Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0268596 (EMA)
 2,520 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A 16-year-old previously asymptomatic boy presented with complaints of fatigue, weight loss, and back pain for several months. Imaging studies revealed a large superior mediastinal mass, numerous bilateral pulmonary nodules, and multiple lytic bone lesions. A needle biopsy from a sternal lesion showed a poorly differentiated carcinoma, immunoreactive for cytokeratins and EMA and immunonegative for various organ/tissue-specific markers.His past medical history was significant for excision of aparotid gland tumor 5 years earlier. Histologic review of the salivary gland tumor revealed a pleomorphic adenoma containing a microscopic focus of invasive carcinoma(carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma). By immunohistochemistry, both the salivary gland tumor and the disseminated carcinoma expressed PLAG1 with a strong nuclear pattern.Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), using dual-color, break-apart probes for PLAG1, showed rearrangement of the gene in both the salivary gland and the disseminated tumors.FISH demonstrated additional cytogenetic aberrations in the carcinoma, including polysomy for chromosome 8 (in both the primary salivary gland and the metastatic tumors) and PLAG1 amplification (in the metastatic tumor). We conclude that in the proper clinicopathologic setting, application of PLAG1 immunohistochemistry and FISH for PLAG1 gene rearrangement may be valuable in establishing the diagnosis of carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma as the source of a cancer of unknown primary site.
 ...
PMID:Disseminated carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma in an adolescent confirmed by application of PLAG1 immunohistochemistry and FISH for PLAG1 rearrangement. 2229 81

Myoepithelial tumors in skin and soft tissue are uncommon but have been increasingly characterized over the past decade. Men and women are equally affected across all age groups and lesions arise most frequently on the extremities and limb girdles. Approximately 20 % of cases occur in pediatric patients, in whom they are frequently malignant. Similar to their salivary gland counterparts, myoepithelial tumors of soft tissue demonstrate heterogeneous morphologic and immunophenotypic features. Tumors are classified as mixed tumor/chondroid syringoma, myoepithelioma, and myoepithelial carcinoma; in soft tissue, tumors having at least moderate cytologic atypia are classified as malignant. Mixed tumor and myoepithelioma show a benign clinical course, with recurrence in up to 20 % (typically secondary to incomplete excision), and do not metastasize. In contrast, myoepithelial carcinoma shows more aggressive behavior with recurrence and metastasis in up to 40-50 % of cases. The majority of myoepithelial neoplasms typically coexpress epithelial antigens (cytokeratin and/or EMA) and S-100 protein; GFAP and p63 are frequently positive and a subset of malignant neoplasms lose INI1 expression. Up to 45 % of myoepitheliomas and myoepithelial carcinomas harbor EWSR1 gene rearrangements, unlike mixed tumor/chondroid syringoma which is characterized by PLAG1 gene rearrangement. While mixed tumor/chondroid syringoma are likely related to primary salivary myoepithelial tumors, soft tissue myoepithelioma and myoepithelial carcinoma appear to be pathologically distinct neoplasms.
 ...
PMID:Myoepithelial neoplasms of soft tissue: an updated review of the clinicopathologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic features. 2580 78

Myoepithelial tumors (MET) represent a clinicopathologically heterogeneous group of tumors, ranging from benign to highly aggressive lesions. Although MET arising in soft tissue, bone, or viscera share morphologic and immunophenotypic overlap with their salivary gland and cutaneous counterparts, there is still controversy regarding their genetic relationship. Half of MET of soft tissue and bone harbor EWSR1 or FUS related fusions, while MET arising in the salivary gland and skin often show PLAG1 and HMGA2 gene rearrangements. Regardless of the site of origin, the gold standard in diagnosing a MET relies on demonstrating its "myoepithelial immunophenotype" of positivity for EMA/CK and S100 protein or GFAP. However, the morphologic spectrum of MET in soft tissue and bone is quite broad and the above immunoprofile is nonspecific, being shared by other pathogenetically unrelated neoplasms. Moreover, rare MET lack a diagnostic immunoprofile but shows instead the characteristic gene fusions. In this study, we analyzed a large cohort of 66 MET with EWSR1 and FUS gene rearrangements spanning various clinical presentations, to better define their morphologic spectrum and establish relevant pathologic-molecular correlations. Genetic analysis was carried out by FISH for EWSR1/FUS rearrangements and potential partners, and/or by targeted RNA sequencing. Then, 82% showed EWSR1 rearrangement, while 18% had FUS abnormalities. EWSR1-POU5F1 occurred with predilection in malignant MET in children and young adults and these tumors had nested epithelioid morphology and clear cytoplasm. In contrast, EWSR1/FUS-PBX1/3 fusions were associated with benign and sclerotic spindle cell morphology. Tumors with EWSR1-KLF17 showed chordoma-like morphology. Our results demonstrate striking morphologic-molecular correlations in MET of bone, soft tissue and viscera, which might have implications in their clinical behavior.
 ...
PMID:A morphologic and molecular reappraisal of myoepithelial tumors of soft tissue, bone, and viscera with EWSR1 and FUS gene rearrangements. 3199 43