Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0268596 (EMA)
 2,520 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A comparative study of the reactivity of two monoclonal antibodies (MAb), NEO 723 (anti-CEA) and Leu M1 (CD15) was performed by immunocytochemistry on sixty five reactive effusions and sixty two neoplastic effusions, fifty eight due to metastases from carcinomas, two due to disseminations of sarcoma and two due to malignant mesotheliomas. The study of the expected reactivity of NEO 723 and the cross-reactivity of Leu M1 on exfoliated neoplastic cells in effusion fluids showed that the sensitivity of NEO 723 was superior to that of Leu M1 for the detection of carcinomatous metastases, as 78% reacted with NEO 723 versus 38% with Leu M1. Among the positive cases, the mean number of reactive cells was twice as high with NEO 723, while only three of the carcinomas no expressing CEA reacted with Leu M1. The study of the reactivity of benign and malignant mesothelial cells with these two antibodies also confirmed the absence of labelling of these cells. Thus, despite a good specificity for carcinoma, the combination of these two antibodies provides only a minor gain in diagnostic sensitivity (+5%) compared with the use of an anti-CEA antibody alone and a loss of sensitivity (-5%) compared with the combination of an anti-CEA and an anti-EMA antibodies. These results appear to justify the suppression of Leu M1 from the first panel of antibodies screening for carcinomatous cells in favour of a combination of anti-CEA and an anti-EMA antibodies. However, Leu M1 may be useful as a second-line test in order to define the primary tumour responsible for the effusion.
 ...
PMID:[Comparative study of the expression of CEA and a myelomonocytic antigen (CD15) in serous effusions using two monoclonal antibodies NEO 723 and Leu M1]. 129 46

An operable case of pedunculated localized mesothelioma of the pleura, a 62-year-old male, came to our clinic with chief complaint of chest X-ray abnormal shadow. On suspicion of pleural tumor, resection was performed. The operative findings revealed that the tumor was arising from visceral pleura of S1 + 2 a segment of left upper lobe, and didn't invade into peripheral tissue. The microscopic findings revealed that the tumor was consist of spindle tumor cells and capillary-like lesions, and had high cellularity and many mitosis. The tumor was diagnosed as localized malignant mesothelioma. Immunohistochemical stainings were performed using six monoclonal antibodies, vimentin, CEA, EMA, keratin (AE1, AE3), Leu-M1. Only vimentin reacted with tumor cells.
 ...
PMID:[An operated case of malignant localized mesothelioma of the pleura]. 140 76

Gliosarcomas are mixed tumors with malignant glial and mesenchymal elements. The number of GFAP-positive tumor cells decreases with the increase of sarcomatous components, until whole areas may be GFAP negative. These distinct differentiations may, however, lead to false interpretations in small tissue samples. In this connection, it is of interest that, according to other reports, glial tumors may be positive for different anti-keratin antibodies and this prompted us to undertake a systematic investigation of the immunoreactivity of gliosarcomas using a panel of well-characterized monoclonal antibodies against cytokeratins (KL1, AE 1/3, Lu-5, CK-19, CK MNF 116 and Ma-903). These cases were further studied with the anti-epithelial non-cytokeratin antibodies EMA, HEA 125, Ber-EP4, CEA as well as the melanoma-antibody HMB-45, Leu-M1, GFAP and vimentin. As screening study we examined 20 cerebral metastatic carcinomas, 21 malignant gliomas (including 6 gliosarcomas) and 3 metastatic melanomas with the monoclonal antibodies KL1 and HMB-45. All cerebral metastatic carcinomas and 4/6 gliosarcomas were positive for KL1, whereas all melanomas, 2 metastatic carcinomas and 3 gliosarcomas showed an immunostaining with HMB-45. All gliosarcomas were positive with at least one of the tested anti-cytokeratin antibodies. The gliosarcomas did not show an immunoreaction in any of the cases when CEA, HEA 125, Ber-EP4, EMA or Leu M1 were applied. In our opinion, the monoclonal antibodies HEA 125 and Ber-EP4 could obviously be helpful in differentiating gliosarcomas from metastatic carcinomas.
 ...
PMID:Epithelial and melanoma antigens in gliosarcoma. An immunohistochemical study. 159 90

Most compensations for asbestos-related deaths secondary to cancer center around mesothelioma and bronchogenic carcinoma. The differential diagnosis between mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma is a common and troublesome one, necessitating the correlation between clinical history, radiographic findings, and pathologic examination of tissues and cells. We describe a multimodal approach based on the use of routine and special stains, immunocytochemistry, and electron microscopy for distinguishing between mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma. Once a malignant diagnosis is arrived at by careful pathological examination, the tumor is classified as mesothelioma if mesothelial cells are identified as the constituent cells of the neoplasm. Mesothelial cells are recognized by (1) their main ultrastructural features: slender and elongated microvilli, abundant intermediate filaments, and lacking secretory granules; and (2) their characteristic immunocytochemical reactivity: positivity for cytokeratin, EMA, and vimentin, and negativity for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), B72-3, Leu-M1, and other gland-cell markers. A variety of methods have been attempted in an effort to distinguish between reactive and malignant mesothelial cells. In practice, however, such distinction depends more on experience and expertise than in any fool-proof ancillary tests. A number of these tests are discussed along with the illustration of classical and unusual examples of mesothelioma and other pleural tumors.
 ...
PMID:Differential diagnosis between mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma: a multimodal approach based on ultrastructure and immunocytochemistry. 160 55

An immunohistochemical study of 63 cases of Hodgkin's disease was undertaken using formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue sections. The antibodies used were against L26, LN-1, LN-2, EMA (epithelial membrane antigen), Leu-M1, Vimentin, UCHL-1, S-100, and lysozyme. Hodgkin's disease could be divided into three groups: the first group was LN-1+/L26+/vimentin-, the second LN-1-/L26+/vimentin+, and the third LN-1-/L26-/vimentin+). Sixteen cases of follicular lymphomas were also examined and were all positive for LN-1 and L26 and negative for vimentin. Thus the vimentin negativity of the first group, including 7 nodular lymphocyte-predominant cases, gives further evidence of their germinal center B-cell origin. Since vimentin is expressed mainly in the immature stage of B-lymphocytes, the second group of Hodgkin's disease may represent immature B-cell Hodgkin's disease. In the third group, vimentin was present in Reed-Sternberg's (RS) and Hodgkin's (H) cells in 45 of the 48 cases (92.5%). In none of 48 cases were these cells positive for S-100 or lysozyme, but strong vimentin-positivity still suggested monocytic or histiocytic origin. The results of our study suggest, at least, divergent origin of RS's and H's cells.
 ...
PMID:Reciprocal/dichotomic expression of vimentin and B cell differentiation antigens in Reed-Sternberg's cells. 168 87

One of the great challenges in the cytodiagnosis of effusions is the distinction between reactive mesothelium/histiocytes and cancer cells. This is notably true in patients having undergone radiation and/or chemotherapy. To establish whether monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) could be used as reliable diagnostic adjuvants, the authors retrospectively and blindly studied 60 cases diagnosed by standard cytologic criteria (malignant, benign, and equivocal), with a panel of seven readily available MoAbs (cytokeratins, vimentin, EMA, B72.3, alpha-CEA, HMFG-2, and Leu-M1) and the lectin Ulex europaeus I. All 18 (100%) malignant cases showed reactivity with EMA and HMFG, whereas 17 (95%) and 11 (61%) reacted with B72.3 and alpha-CEA, respectively. Combinations of (1) EMA + B72.3, (2) EMA + alpha-CEA, and (3) EMA + alpha-CEA + B72.3 displayed positivity in 17 (95%), 11 (61%), and 10 (56%) malignant cases, respectively. Of the 18 benign cases, 7 reacted with HMFG and 2 each with EMA and B72.3. Only one case (5.5%) reacted with both EMA and B72.3. Based on these results, the 24 equivocal cases were regrouped into 14 malignant and 10 benign cases. Follow-up effusions obtained within the ensuing three months in all these patients allowed the authors to unequivocally confirm the diagnosis in all but five. The combination of EMA and B72.3 MoAbs detected malignant cells in 95% of the cases, with a 3.5% incidence of false positive cases in this study. A panel of EMA, B72.3, and alpha-CEA MoAbs should prove the most useful and simple approach to the correct diagnosis in most questionable effusions. Some of the potential pitfalls are discussed.
 ...
PMID:Immunocytochemical profile of benign and carcinomatous effusions. A practical approach to difficult diagnosis. 170 Aug 77

The cytologic diagnosis of malignancy in serous effusions can be challenging. An immunocytochemical (ICC) panel using commercially available antibodies (to carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA], epithelial membrane antigen [EMA], B72.3, Leu-M1, cytokeratin [CK], leukocyte common antigen [LCA], S-100 protein, and vimentin) was applied to cell blocks fixed in methyl Carnoy's solution that were from 55 consecutive pleural, peritoneal, and pericardial fluid specimens. The results were correlated with data from clinical records and routine cytologic studies. Final cytologic diagnoses included 26 of adenocarcinoma and 1 of mesothelioma. The remaining 28 cases were considered to be benign (reactive) proliferations. EMA, CEA, B72.3, and Leu-M1 were present in 96%, 77%, 58%, and 42% of adenocarcinomas, respectively. These determinants were absent in the mesothelioma and the reactive effusions, although anti-CEA yielded strong background staining of inflammatory cells. The CK markers identified malignant cells in 93% of cases, but consistently stained mesothelial cells as well. Antivimentin strongly labeled mesothelial cells in all cases, with weak to absent staining of malignant cells. In 3 of 26 carcinoma cases (12%), the ICC panel identified malignant cells that were not recognized initially on routine cytologic examination. In 1 of 26 cases (4%), the panel was falsely negative. Use of this approach can improve the diagnostic accuracy of cytologic examination of serous fluids. The ICC panel is especially helpful when atypical mesothelial proliferation is present, or in cases that are clinically suspect for malignancy, but cytologically negative because there are only a few malignant cells, or those that are cytologically bland.
 ...
PMID:Immunocytochemical panel for the identification of malignant cells in serous effusions. 171 Apr 19

A primary carcinoid tumor of testis was studied. The tumor cells showed a strong positive reaction to argyrophil or argentaffin stainings, and neuroendocrine granules were identified by electron microscopy. Immunohistochemically, tumor cells expressed various markers such as those for NSE, synaptophysin, CG, Leu-7, 5-HT, HCG, cytokeratin, EMA, CEA and PACP, which indicated the special multiple directions of differentiation of cells possessing neuroendocrinal, epithelial or carcinoembryonic behavior.
 ...
PMID:[Immunohistochemical demonstration of neurohormonal polypeptides in primary carcinoid tumor of testis]. 171 56

This study reports six non-Hodgkin's lymphoma cases that we called histiocyte-rich B-cell lymphoma (BCL) because of the prominent reactive histiocytic infiltrate obscuring the malignant B-cell population. The involved lymph nodes are characterized by a mixed nodular and diffuse infiltrate and occasionally feature prominent sinuses. The infiltrate is composed of reactive lymphocytes and numerous histiocytes obscuring a tumor population composed of variably sized scattered cells with irregular or multilobar vesicular nuclei. Immunostaining of paraffin sections for the B-cell marker recognized by L26 helps in the identification of these neoplastic cells. The clonal nature and further evidence of the B-cell lineage of this condition is shown by immunoglobulin gene rearrangements detected in three cases. The six cases of histiocyte-rich BCL are remarkably similar clinically: all presented with stage IVB disease with splenomegaly and follow an aggressive clinical course. Except for these features, our series show striking similarities to paragranuloma lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin's disease, including male preponderance (all patients are male), age distribution (mean age, 41 years), propensity to progress to a diffuse, large B-cell lymphoma (two cases), as well as morphology of the neoplastic B-cell population and expression of Hodgkin's cell markers (Leu-M1 positivity after neuraminidase digestion in three cases, Leu-M1 positivity without neuraminidase digestion in one case, and additional epithelial membrane antigen [EMA] positivity in two cases). Both morphologically and clinically, the present series can be differentiated from other types of infiltrate-rich BCL, such as T-cell-rich BCL. Although additional cases will have to be recognized, histiocyte-rich B-cell lymphoma most likely represents a distinct clinicopathological entity. We speculate that it develops from a subset of B cells that also gives rise to the lymphocytic-histiocytic (L/H) cell, the Hodgkin's cell variant of lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin's disease, paragranuloma subtype.
 ...
PMID:Histiocyte-rich B-cell lymphoma. A distinct clinicopathologic entity possibly related to lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin's disease, paragranuloma subtype. 172 95

The purpose of this report is to assess whether phenotyping by three monoclonal antibodies routinely used in paraffin sections (Ber-H2-Leu-M1-EMA) and shown to be the most useful for diagnosis may be a predictive factor for recurrences. Among 563 patients diagnosed as having Hodgkin's disease (24% of whom had recurrence), we selected 153 patients with and without recurrence, with matching clinical stage. For all of these cases, histologic material was tested by immunostainings with satisfactory control samples. No phenotype was specific for Hodgkin's disease, although the phenotype Ber-H2-Leu-M1-EMA was predominant. No phenotype was found to be a predictive factor for recurrences, and none was unchanged during the clinical course, except when recurrence occurred as non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
 ...
PMID:Prognostic value of phenotyping by Ber-H2, Leu-M1, EMA in Hodgkin's disease. 197 65


1 2 3 4 5 Next >>