Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0268596 (EMA)
2,520 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

64 diffuse pleural mesotheliomas diagnosed between 1964 and January 1985 at the Institute of Pathology of the University of Freiburg were analyzed. Since 1980 an increase from one case to 10 cases per year has been observed. The tumor was 3 to 4 times more frequent in men than in women. The age distribution showed a peak between the age of 50 and 60. In 26 cases evidence of exposure to asbestos was detected. In one patient radiotherapy of Hodgkin's disease may have been of etiological significance. The median survival time was 13 months. The five-year survival rate was only 4%. Histologic reevaluation was only possible in cases diagnosed after 1975. Of 43 cases thus evaluated 26 were pure mesothelial, 15 biphasic and 2 of the spindle-cell subtype. A median survival time of 23 months for pure mesothelial mesothelioma in comparison to 13 months for the biphasic mesothelioma indicated a better prognosis for pure mesothelial mesothelioma. Although no other primary tumors were detected, in 10 cases the differential diagnosis of adenocarcinoma had to be considered, and in 3 cases tumors of non-epithelial origin had to be excluded. 35 of 43 mesothelioma were CEA-negative, 38 out of 43 cytokeratin-positive, and 33 out of 43 were EMA-positive. Factor-VIII-related antigen was not demonstrated. 12 of 43 mesotheliomas showed PAS-positive staining, 29 of 43 were stained with Alcian blue. 7 of these 29 showed a positive digestion with hyaluronidase. Although CEA may not be negative in every mesothelioma, this marker seems to be a valid tool for the differential diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. In order to safeguard against a mistaken diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma, the exclusion of other tumors is always indispensable.
...
PMID:Malignant pleural mesothelioma: some aspects of epidemiology, differential diagnosis and prognosis. Histological and immunohistochemical evaluation and follow-up of mesotheliomas diagnosed from 1964 to January 1985. 169 Apr 13

Apocrine and eccrine sweat glands are distinct in function, although they are closely related to each other developmentally and morphologically. In certain sweat gland tumors, it is difficult to differentiate between eccrine or apocrine sweat glands. Therefore, this paper reviews histochemical and immunohistochemical markers to differentiate apocrine and eccrine sweat glands with the aim of better understanding the structural and functional characteristics of these sweat glands. Specific markers for apocrine sweat glands are as follows: neuraminidase sensitive anionic sites detected by cationic colloidal gold at pH 2.0, and mitochondrion-like secretory granules that have epidermal growth factor-like antigenicity. The following antibodies react with apocrine sweat glands but not with eccrine sweat glands; the antibodies raised against 70 kDa glycoprotein purified from human milk fat globule membranes, and HMFG-1 (1.10.F3) monoclonal antibody produced by immunizing mice with defatted human milk fat globule membranes. Markers for eccrine sweat glands are as follows: dark cell granules that have chondroitinase ABC sensitive anionic sites detected by cationic gold at pH 2.0 after pretreatment with EGTA, and intercellular canaliculi with high activity of alkaline phosphatase. CEA and GCDFP-15 are expressed in both eccrine and apocrine sweat glands. Anti-EMA monoclonal antibody (E29) stains both eccrine and apocrine sweat glands.
...
PMID:Histochemical and immunohistochemical markers for human eccrine and apocrine sweat glands: an aid for histopathologic differentiation of sweat gland tumors. 1176 85

Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma is a rare but distinct entity with special clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, cytogenetical and outcome features. This tumor developed from soft tissues. A few cases have been reported in the head and neck in the literature. We report two new cases of extraskeletal myxoid chrondrosarcoma presenting in such an unusual site: one involved the left nasal cavity of a 67-year-old man and the second the sphenoidal sinus of a 71-year-old woman. The microscopic examination revealed nests of round small cells dispersed in a myxoid stroma. The myxoid material was stained with Alcian Blue with and without hyaluronidase application whereas no PAS staining was observed. The immunohistochemical staining showed reactivity with S-100 protein and vimentin in two cases and with EMA in one case. These results allowed us to exclude other differential diagnoses: soft tissue tumors with a myxoid stroma (myxoma, myxoid liposarcoma and myxofibrosarcoma). No staining with anti-KL1 allowed us to exclude chordoma. Curative surgery was not possible. Both patients were given radiotherapy and the tumor regressed in one.
...
PMID:[Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma of the nasopharynx]. 1290 30