Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0262471 (ENT)
 5,307 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

1. Vomiting and restlessness following ENT and eye surgery are undesirable, and may be related to the emetic and analgesic effects of any analgesic given to augment anaesthesia during surgery. 2. To rationalise the choice of analgesic for routine ENT surgery we examined the intraoperative, recovery and postoperative effects following the administration of either buprenorphine (3.0 to 4.5 micrograms kg-1), diclofenac (1 mg kg-1), fentanyl (1.5 to 2.0 micrograms kg-1), morphine (0.1 to 0.15 mg kg-1), nalbuphine (0.1 to 0.15 mg kg-1), pethidine (1.0 to 1.5 mg kg-1) or saline (as control) given with the induction of anaesthesia in 374 patients. A standardised anaesthetic technique with controlled ventilation using 0.6-0.8% isoflurane in nitrous oxide and oxygen was employed. The study population constituted 7 similar groups of patients. 3. Intraoperatively, their effects on heart rate and blood pressure, airway pressure and intraocular pressure, were similar. This implies, most surprisingly, that neither their analgesic nor their histamine releasing effects were clinically evident during surgery. By prolonging the time to extubation at the end of anaesthesia, only buprenorphine, fentanyl, morphine and pethidine provided evidence of intraoperative respiratory depression. 4. Postoperatively, buprenorphine was associated with severe respiratory depression, prolonged somnolence, profound analgesia and the highest emesis rate. Diclofenac exhibited no sedative, analgesic, analgesic sparing, emetic or antipyretic effects. Fentanyl provided no sedative or analgesic effects, but was mildly emetic. Morphine provided poor sedation and analgesia, delayed the requirement for re-medication and was highly emetic. Nalbuphine and pethidine produced sedation with analgesia during recovery, a prolonged time to re-medication and a mild emetic effect. None provided evidence, from analysis of postoperative re-medication times and analgesic consumption, of any pre-emptive analgesic effect. 5. We conclude that nalbuphine (mean dose 0.13 mg kg-1) and pethidine (mean dose 1.35 mg kg-1), given individually as a single i.v. bolus during induction of anaesthesia, are the most efficacious analgesics for routine in-patient ENT surgery.
 ...
PMID:Analgesics and ENT surgery. A clinical comparison of the intraoperative, recovery and postoperative effects of buprenorphine, diclofenac, fentanyl, morphine, nalbuphine, pethidine and placebo given intravenously with induction of anaesthesia. 788 92

Since venous cannulation in children has become easier and extensive experience has been gained with total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) in adults, the interest in TIVA for children has recently increased. An intensified sensitivity of the operating room atmosphere to contamination with volatile anaesthetic agents is another important reason to choose intravenous techniques for paediatric anaesthesia. One of the most interesting agents for TIVA in paediatric anaesthesia is propofol. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data for modern intravenous drugs is poor. Because the interpatient variability is relatively large, pharmacokinetic data can only provide guidelines for the dosage of propofol. Propofol has a rapid and smooth onset of action and is as easy to titrate in children as in adults. Propofol can be excellently controlled. Severe haemodynamic side-effects are missing in healthy children and plasma is cleared rapidly of propofol by redistribution and metabolism. There is no evidence of significant accumulation, not even after prolonged infusion times. Because propofol has no analgetic properties it must be combined with analgetics or a regional block for all painful procedures. The combination with the ultra-short acting remifentanil is a major advantage, but requires effective analgetic concepts for painful procedures. In comparison the combination of propofol with long acting opioids abolishes some of the favourable properties of propofol. Further studies of the kinetics and dynamics of propofol and other intravenous agents are needed in paediatrics which should focus on age, maturity and severity of illness. The whole importance of the propofol-infusion syndrome has to be cleared up urgently. TIVA has an important significance in paediatric anaesthesia for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, especially where these have to be repeated. In day-case anaesthesia TIVA has advantages for all short procedures and for ENT and ophthalmic surgery: even after prolonged infusion children have an short recovery time. There is no evidence of agitation or other behavioural disorders after TIVA with propofol in paediatric anaesthesia. Propofol has anti-emetic properties. TIVA with propofol can be combined with regional anaesthesia advantageously to provide long-lasting analgesia after surgery. TIVA with propofol has been used successfully for sedation of spontaneously breathing children for MRI and CT and other procedures with open airways like bronchoscopy or endoscopy. Propofol facilitates endotracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxants. Of course, in malignant hyperthermia TIVA will continue to be the technique of choice. Nothing is known about awareness under TIVA in paediatric patients. TIVA must be considered by comparison with the volatile agents. The use of ultra-short acting agents may cause problems such as awareness, vagal response, involuntary movements and in some cases slow recovery after prolonged infusion of propofol. But it is not known exactly how often this happens during paediatric anaesthesia. With TIVA an effective postoperative analgesia must be provided. Newer administration techniques such as the target-controlled infusions or closed-loop control systems are under development and will help to minimise the potential risk of overdosage with TIVA in paediatrics. At the present TIVA is an interesting and practicable alternative to volatile anaesthesia for pre-school and school children. TIVA with propofol in infants younger than 1 year old requires extensive experience with TIVA in older children and with the handling of this special age group and should be undertaken with maximum precautionary measures.
 ...
PMID:[Total intravenous anesthesia. On the way to standard practice in pediatrics]. 1450 2

The distressing phenomenon of visual height intolerance (vHI) occurs when a visual stimulus causes apprehension of losing control of balance and falling from some height. Epidemiological data of this condition in the general population are lacking. Assignment of prevalence, determinants, and compensation of vHI was performed in a cross-sectional epidemiological study of 3,517 individuals representing the German population. Life-time prevalence of vHI is 28 % (females 32 %). A higher prevalence is associated independently with a family history of vHI, anxiety disorders, migraine, or motion sickness susceptibility. Women aged 50-59 have a higher prevalence than younger women or men of all ages. Initial attacks occur most often (30 %) in the second decade; however, attacks can manifest throughout life. The main symptoms are fearfulness, inner agitation, a queasy-stomach feeling, subjective postural instability with to-and-fro vertigo, and weakness in the knees. Climbing a tower is the first most common precipitating stimulus; the spectrum of such stimuli widens with time in more than 50 % of afflicted individuals. The most frequent reaction to vHI is to avoid the triggering stimuli (>50 %); 11 % of susceptible individuals consult a doctor, most often a general practitioner, neurologist, ENT doctor, or psychiatrist. In brief, visual height intolerance affects one-third of the general population, considerably restricting the majority of these individuals in their daily activities. The data show that the two terms do not indicate a categorical distinction but rather a continuum from slight forms of visual height intolerance to the specific phobia of fear of heights.
 ...
PMID:Down on heights? One in three has visual height intolerance. 2307 Apr 63