Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0243026 (sepsis)
 52,417 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Sequential chemotherapy with methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (MTX/5-FU) for advanced gastric cancer was given 29 patients. The procedure consisted of weekly MTX 100 mg/m2 (i.v.) followed three hours later by 5-FU 600 mg/m2 (i.v.) with leucovorin rescue on each of the following two days. Nine of 28 patients (32.1%) showed partial response to this treatment. Response rates were 28.6% in the 21 cases with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and 42.9% in the 7 cases with well- or moderately-differentiated adenocarcinoma. This procedure was especially effective for primary lesions (PR 9/20: 45%) and lymphnode metastases (CR 4 + PR 4, 8/17: 47.1%). Side effects were mild leukopenia and G-I symptoms such as nausea, diarrhea and loss of appetite, except in 1 patient who died of severe myelosuppression with sepsis. We concluded that sequential MTX/5-FU therapy is fairly effective and the adjuvant chemotherapy of choice for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer with not only poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma but also well- or moderately-differentiated adenocarcinoma.
 ...
PMID:[Sequential chemotherapy with methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil for advanced gastric cancer]. 953 Mar 60

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is an effective enhancer of radiation therapy (RT) in head and neck cancers. Due to rapid, predominantly hepatic metabolism by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and suggested clinical benefit from prolonged drug exposure, 5-FU is commonly given by continuous infusion. Eniluracil is a novel DPD-inactivator designed to prolong the half-life of 5-FU and provide sustained plasma concentrations of 5-FU with oral dosing. We conducted a Phase I study of the safety and efficacy of eniluracil given with oral 5-FU in patients receiving concurrent RT for recurrent or advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Thirteen patients with recurrent, metastatic, or high-risk (defined as an expected 2-year survival rate of <10%) head and neck cancer were enrolled and treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy on an every-other-week schedule. Eniluracil at a fixed dose [20 mg twice a day (BID)] was given for 7 consecutive days (days 1-7). 5-FU and RT were given on 5 consecutive days (days 2-6). One patient was treated with once-daily RT (2.0 Gy fractions). The remaining patients received hyperfractionated RT (1.5-Gy fractions BID). The initial dose of 5-FU was 2.5 mg/m2 given BID. Dose escalation in patient cohorts was scheduled at 2.5-mg/m2 increments, with intrapatient dose escalation permitted. Lymphocyte DPD activity and serum 5-FU and uracil concentrations were monitored during two cycles. DPD activity was completely or nearly completely inactivated in all patients. Sustained, presumed therapeutic concentrations of 5-FU were observed at a dose of 5.0 mg/m2 given BID. Cumulative dose-limiting myelosuppression (both neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) was observed during the fourth and fifth cycles following administration of 5.0 mg/m2 5-FU BID. One patient died of neutropenic sepsis during cycle 4. Other late cycle toxicities included diarrhea, fatigue, and mucositis. Grade 3 mucositis was observed in 4 patients, but no grade 4 mucositis or grade 3 or 4 dermatitis was observed. A second patient death occurred during cycle 1 of treatment. No specific cause of death was identified. The study was subsequently discontinued. Cumulative myelosupression was the significant dose-limiting toxicity of oral 5-FU given with the DPD-inactivator eniluracil on an every-other-week schedule. Clinical radiation sensitization was not observed, based on the absence of dose-limiting mucositis and dermatitis. Alternative dosing schedules need to be examined to determine the most appropriate use of eniluracil and 5-FU as radiation enhancers.
 ...
PMID:Phase I study of eniluracil, a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inactivator, and oral 5-fluorouracil with radiation therapy in patients with recurrent or advanced head and neck cancer. 1003 77

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NAC) therapy protocols were developed to improve survival in patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Our experience with two consecutive NAC therapy trials is reviewed. Both studies included patients with localized squamous cell cancer and adenocarcinoma. Patients were treated with cisplatinum 26 mg/m2/day (days 1-5 and 26-30), 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) 300 mg/m2/day (days 1-30), concurrent radiotherapy (4400 cGy) followed by esophagectomy. In the second trial, adjuvant taxol was added. The first protocol had 50 patients. Two patients died, both before surgery, one from sepsis. There was no residual viable tumor (CR) in 19 (40%) patients. The median survival time was 31 months. The 5-year survival rate of 36% compared favorably with concurrent 5-year survival of 18% for surgery alone. Forty-one patients were enrolled in the second trial. All underwent surgery. There were no treatment or operative deaths. Survival data for this group is maturing. Combined results from both protocols are: treatment mortality of 2.2%, complete response rate of 37%, and a median and 3-year disease-specific survival of 42 months and 54%, respectively. We conclude that NAC followed by surgery improves survival over surgery alone and that CR is predictive of improved survival.
 ...
PMID:Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery for resectable esophageal cancer. 1069 42

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) alone for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma is often associated with early disease relapse and limited survival. Because of these discouraging results, most programs have abandoned OLT for cholangiocarcinoma. However, a small percentage of patients have achieved prolonged survival after OLT, suggesting that adjuvant approaches could perhaps improve the survival outcome. Based on these concepts, a protocol was developed at the Mayo Clinic using preoperative irradiation and chemotherapy for patients with cholangiocarcinoma. We report our initial results with this pilot experience. Patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma above the cystic duct without intrahepatic or extrahepatic metastases were eligible. Patients initially received external-beam irradiation plus bolus fluorouracil (5-FU), followed by brachytherapy with iridium and concomitant protracted venous infusion of 5-FU. 5-FU was then administered continuously through an ambulatory infusion pump until OLT. After irradiation, patients underwent an exploratory laparotomy to exclude metastatic disease. To date, 19 patients have been enrolled onto the study and have been treated with irradiation. Eight patients did not go on to OLT because of the presence of metastasis at the time of exploratory laparotomy (n = 6), subsequent development of malignant ascites (n = 1), or death from intrahepatic biliary sepsis (n = 1). Eleven patients completed the protocol with successful OLT. Except for 1 patient, all had early-stage disease (stages I and II) in the explanted liver. All patients who underwent OLT are alive, 3 patients are at risk at 12 months or less, and the remaining 8 patients have a median follow-up of 44 months (range, 17 to 83 months; 7 of 9 patients > 36 months). Only 1 patient developed tumor relapse. OLT in combination with preoperative irradiation and chemotherapy is associated with prolonged disease-free and overall survival in highly selected patients with early-stage cholangiocarcinoma.
 ...
PMID:Prolonged disease-free survival after orthotopic liver transplantation plus adjuvant chemoirradiation for cholangiocarcinoma. 1082 32

Extra-arterial dislocation of a catheter is one of the complications with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. The authors report a case of sepsis related to catheter tip dislocation to the duodenal bulb. A 69-year-old man underwent sigmoidectomy for sigmoid colon cancer and partial hepatectomy for synchronous metastasis to the liver. We performed hepatic arterial catheterization via the femoral artery, and the patient underwent prophylactic hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with 5-FU. Thirty months later, computed tomography during arteriography (CTA) using a port system revealed the dislocation of catheter tip to the duodenal bulb. He showed no symptoms, so we kept him under observation. Sepsis occurred because of the dislocated catheter 39 months later. After removal of the catheter, the symptoms of sepsis disappeared.
 ...
PMID:[A complication with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy--a case of sepsis related to catheter tip dislocation to the duodenal bulb]. 1108 61

The oral, tumour-selective fluoropyrimidine capecitabine represents a major new strategy for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Pooled results from two large, multicentre, open-label, phase III studies comparing oral capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks) with the Mayo Clinic regimen (5-fluorouracil [5-FU] 425 mg/m2 plus leucovorin 20 mg/m2 days 1-5, every 4 weeks) provide information on over 1200 patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Analysis of all randomised patients demonstrated a significantly superior overall response rate as assessed by the investigator for capecitabine compared with 5-FU/leucovorin (25.7% versus 16.7%, P<0.0002), reinforcing the individual trial results. Median time to disease progression, overall survival and duration of response were equivalent in the two treatment groups. Furthermore, capecitabine showed a superior safety profile compared with 5-FU/leucovorin, with a significantly lower incidence (P<0.001) of diarrhoea, stomatitis, nausea and alopecia, together with a reduced treatment-related hospitalisation rate. In addition, the incidence of neutropenic fever/sepsis was significantly lower in patients receiving capecitabine.
 ...
PMID:Capecitabine as first-line treatment in colorectal cancer. Pooled data from two large, phase III trials. 1184 31

5-fluorouracil (5FU) and cisplatin are commonly used in the treatment of gastric cancer. Continuous 5FU appears to be more effective and less toxic than bolus administration, while increasing the dose intensity of cisplatin may be advantageous. We conducted a phase I study to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of cisplatin, which could be combined with a hybrid bolus/continuous 5-FU regimen (LV5FU2), given every 2 weeks. Thirty-six patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal carcinomas entered the study. Starting cisplatin dose was 40 mg/m2 and it was increased by 10 mg/m2 in cohorts of 3-6 patients. The pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil in 14 patients were compared with those of 6 patients receiving LV5FU2 alone. All patients received prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor at cisplatin doses > or =50 mg/m2. MTD was reached at 100 mg/m2 of cisplatin and, therefore, the 90 mg/m2 dose is recommended for phase II studies. Bone marrow toxicity was the most frequent dose-limiting toxicity with 1 patient dying of neutropenic sepsis. Grade III/IV neutropenia was observed in 10 patients (27.7%). Nonhematological toxicity was infrequent and mild. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the addition of 90 mg/m2 or 100 mg/m2 of cisplatin to LV5FU2 significantly reduced the 5FU area under the curve. Objective response rate in 23 evaluable patients was 39.2%. The combination of LV5FU2 with bimonthly 90 mg/m2 cisplatin is feasible and active and should be further evaluated in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
 ...
PMID:Intensified bimonthly cisplatin with bolus 5-fluorouracil, continuous 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin (LV5FU2) in Patients with advanced gastrointestinal carcinomas: a phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study. 1559 12

The purpose of this phase II trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of the XELOX (capecitabine/oxaliplatin) regimen as first-line therapy in the elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). A total of 50 patients with MCRC aged > or = 70 years received oxaliplatin 130 mg m(-2) on day 1 followed by oral capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) twice daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks. Patients with creatinine clearance 30-50 ml min(-1) received a reduced dose of capecitabine (750 mg m(-2) twice daily). By intent-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate was 36% (95% CI, 28-49%), with three (6%) complete and 15 (30%) partial responses. In total, 18 patients (36%) had stable disease and 14 (28%) progressed. The median times to disease progression and overall survival were 5.8 months (95% CI, 3.9-7.8 months) and 13.2 months (95% CI, 7.6-16.9 months), respectively. Capecitabine was well tolerated: grade 3/4 adverse events were observed in 14 (28%) patients: 11 (22%) diarrhoea, eight (16%) asthenia, seven (14%) nausea/vomiting, three (6%) neutropenia, three (6%) thrombocytopenia, and two (4%) hand-foot syndrome. There was one treatment-related death from diarrhoea and sepsis. In conclusion, XELOX is well tolerated in elderly patients, with respectable efficacy and a meaningful clinical benefit response. Given its ease of administration compared with combinations of oxaliplatin with 5-FU/LV, it represents a good therapeutic option in the elderly.
 ...
PMID:XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) as first-line treatment for elderly patients over 70 years of age with advanced colorectal cancer. 1655 38

From February, 2001 to September, 2002, the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) accrued 65 patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma to a phase II trial of weekly 5-FU, leucovorin, and the orally-administered uridine analog PN401. Of these 65 patients, 57 were assessable for survival and toxicity, which were the endpoints for the study. Treatment consisted of the administration of 1200 mg/m(2) of 5-FU, 500 mg/m(2) of leucovorin, and 6 grams of PN401 every 8 h, beginning 8 h after the completion of the 5-FU infusion, and continuing for a total of 8 doses (48 grams) during each weekly chemotherapy session. Therapy was delivered for six weeks out of every 8-week treatment cycle. The gastrointestinal toxicity of this regimen was mild with 2 patients experiencing grade 3 stomatitis, and 6 patients having grade 3 diarrhea; and the hematologic toxicity was acceptable with 6 of 57 patients found to have had grade 3 or 4 leukopenia, and 14 of 57 patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. There were two deaths judged possibly related to treatment; one in a patient who experienced a variety of Grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicities and died at home with an unknown cause of death; and a second patient who also died at home, and for whom treatment-related sepsis could not be ruled out. The overall median survival was 7.2 months. The ability to safely deliver twice the usual dose of 5-FU with leucovorin on a weekly schedule suggests that oral uridine analog supplementation with PN401 may enhance the therapeutic index of the fluoropyrimidines.
 ...
PMID:Phase II trial of PN401, 5-FU, and leucovorin in unresectable or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a Southwest Oncology Group study. 1683 2

Colorectal cancer is the most common malignant complication in patients who have IBD. The disease is difficult to diagnose because there is an overlap in symptoms in patients who have colon cancer and those who have IBD. Much has been learned about the incidence of colorectal cancer in patients who have IBD and its correlation with disease activity, duration, and anatomic location; however, almost no data are available regarding specific therapeutic considerations during adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy for these patients with respect to their underlying disease. Patients who have IBD who develop colorectal cancer are at higher risk for developing severe diarrhea during chemotherapy that may be due to the toxic effects of cytotoxic drugs or a flare of the IBD. Continuous infusional 5-FU alone, in combination with leucovorin, or in combination with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) seems to be tolerated best. Bolus infusions of 5-FU (Roswell Park or Mayo regimens) and combination therapy of irinotecan with 5-FU should be avoided because of severe diarrhea and the possibility of sepsis. When diarrhea develops or worsens, empiric aminosalicylates may be given. Although it is theoretically possible that anti-EGFR therapies could affect IBD activity adversely, clinical experience with cetuximab in patients who have colorectal cancer has not shown any significant gastrointestinal side effects. Therefore, it seems reasonable to use it in patients who have colorectal cancer and IBD. The administration of bevacizumab has been associated with rare episodes of intestinal perforation; it should be used with great care in patients who have IBD. More studies and an integrative, multidisciplinary approach from oncologists and gastroenterologists are needed to provide optimal care for patients who have IBD during chemotherapy for colorectal cancer
 ...
PMID:Systemic treatment of patients who have colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease. 1695 47


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 Next >>