Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0243026 (sepsis)
 52,417 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Meropenem is a new beta-lactam carbapenem antibiotic that appears to be promising in the treatment of hospitalized infants and children with serious infections. It has broad-spectrum activity against microorganisms, including most of the major aerobic (gram-negative and gram-positive) and anaerobic pathogens that cause serious bacterial infections in neonates and children. In addition, its pharmacokinetic profile makes possible parenteral administration every 8 hours. Several studies have demonstrated that meropenem is an effective and safe treatment for infants and children with serious pediatric infections (e.g., urinary tract infections, pneumonia, sepsis, intraabdominal infections, and skin and soft-tissue infections), bacterial meningitis, and cystic fibrosis. The results of further studies of the use of meropenem in the treatment of high-risk seriously ill infants and children are awaited with interest.
 ...
PMID:Use of meropenem in the treatment of serious infections in children: review of the current literature. 912 95

Carbapenems are active beta-lactam antibiotics versus most of the gram positive and gram negative microorganisms and anaerobes although their activity is lacking in the case of Staphylococcus sp. resistant to methicillin, Enterococcus faecium and Streptococcus pneumoniae with high resistance to penicillin and some gram negative bacilli which naturally produce an methaloenzyme able to hydrolyze them such as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Imipenem, the first synthetized carbapenem requires administration with cilastatin to avoid inactivation by renal dehydropeptidase 1. Meropenem does not require being taken with the renal enzyme inhibitor, with its activity being similar to that of imipenem. In abdominal infection the carbapenems have shown to be the authentic monotherapy in this type of infections being as effective as the different schedules of antibiotic associations normally used. Treatment with carbapenems in bacterial meningitis should be currently limited to the cases produced by gram negative bacilli producers of wide spectrum beta-lactamases (WSBL), cases of meningitis by Pseudomonas aeruginosa or gram negative bacilli producers of inducible cephalosporinase. Meropenem is the carbapenem of choice probably in these cases because the carbapenems are often the only active antibiotics and meropenem, specifically, does not have the risk of convulsions observed with imipenem-cilastatin. The carbapenems have shown to be useful in skin and soft tissue infections as well as in obstetric and gynecologic infections as monotherapy similar to the schedules of the currently used antibiotic associations. In the case of nosocomial pneumonias, all the studies have evaluated the carbapenems in monotherapy as useful and effective, specially in the case of pneumonia by gram negative bacilli. Finally, in non filiated nosocomial sepsis and specially in the case of neutropenic patients, the use of carbapenems is particularly attractive in gram negative sepsis in intensive care units. The appearance in the last few years of strains of gram negative bacilli, producers of wide spectrum beta-lactamase or stable repressed hyperproducers of class I chromosomic cephalosporinase, as well as other multiresistant gram negative bacilli, such as Acinetobacter baumanii make the carbapenems, in many cases, the only effective antibiotic in this type of infections.
 ...
PMID:[The role of carbapenems in the treatment of nosocomial infection]. 941 75

Meropenem was used in the treatment of 14 infectious complications in 11 patients including 8 with acute myeloid leukemia due to the cytostatic therapy, 1 with chronic myeloid leukemia, 1 with aplastic anemia and 1 with acute intermittent porphyria. At the moment of the meropenem use critical neutropenia (less than 500 granulocytes per 1 ml) in 11 cases (79 per cent) was stated. The drug was administered as intravenous infusions in a dose of 1 g every 8 hours for 4 to 41 days (the median of 11 days). 9 out of the 14 infectious complications were cured (the body temperature normalized and all the inflammation foci were eliminated), among them 6 out of 8 pyocyanic sepsis. Eradication of gram-negative bacteria was observed in 8 out of 10 cultures of the biological materials. No toxic complications or electrolytic disorders due to the drug use were recorded. The drug tolerance was good.
 ...
PMID:[Use of meropenem in patients with neutropenia]. 953 29

Meropenem was used in the treatment of 15 newborns (8 preterm) with sepsis, pneumonia or meningitis by intravenous infusion of 15-20 mg/kg daily divided to 3 equal doses. Clinical improvement was achieved in all the cases. No side effects were recorded.
 ...
PMID:[Use of meropenem in the treatment of severe infections in newborns]. 953 30

Infections remain the major cause of morbidity and mortality among neutropenic cancer patients. The current study addresses the question whether monotherapy with the new broad-spectrum carbapenem meropenem exhibits efficacy comparable to that of the standard combination therapy with ceftazidime and amikacin for empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients. Seventy-one patients with hematological malignancies (55%) or solid tumors (45%), neutropenia < 500/microliter, and fever > 38.5 degrees C were randomly assigned to either meropenem (1 g every 8 h) or ceftazidime (2 g every 8 h) and amikacin (15 mg/kg/day) intravenously. Meropenem (n = 34) and ceftazidime/amikacin (n = 37) were equivalent with respect to the clinical response at 72 h (62% versus 68%) (p > 0.05) and at the end of unmodified therapy (59% versus 62%). Gram-positive bacteremia responded poorly in the meropenem and ceftazidime/amikacin group (29% versus 25%), whereas all gram-negative bacteremias responded except for one in the meropenem group caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All patients survived to 72 h. One patient in each group died of gram-positive sepsis resistant to study medication. No significant side effects occurred in any regimen. This study suggests that meropenem monotherapy might be as effective as combination therapy with ceftazidime and amikacin for the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients.
 ...
PMID:Meropenem monotherapy versus combination therapy with ceftazidime and amikacin for empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients. 954 Jul 61

Meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin, currently the only available carbapenem agents in Europe and the United States, are characterised by a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity and stability to beta-lactamase-mediated resistance mechanisms. A guide to the use of carbapenems in clinical practice is presented; the role of carbapenems in the treatment of several types of serious bacterial infection and an up-to-date account of their clinical efficacy and safety profiles are discussed. The good clinical efficacy and favourable safety profiles of the carbapenems make them valuable as initial empirical therapy in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia, sepsis of unknown origin, post-operative peritonitis, paediatric meningitis, and febrile neutropenia. However, to maintain superior efficacy, the carbapenems should be used appropriately for definitive therapy.
 ...
PMID:Carbapenems in clinical practice: a guide to their use in serious infection. 1022 11

With the increasing use of broad-spectrum antibacterial agents, the increase in various drug-resistant bacterial strains has become a concern in recent years. Especially, the development of drug-resistance by Enterobacteriaceae which significantly affects therapy and prognosis in sepsis and lower gastrointestinal post-operative infection. The extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae strains isolated in the Surveillance Program of Bacterial Resistance in Kinki region of Japan (SBRK) were supplied between November 2000 and March 2003. The susceptibilities of them to 16 kinds of antimicrobial agents were investigated. The number of them was 48 strains consisting of 36 Escherichia coli strains (75%) and 12 Klebsiella pneumoniae strains (25%). Our focus was on carbapenem and the new quinolone antibacterial agents. Among the 16 major antibacterial agents examined, carbapenem had low MIC50/90 values. Meropenem had a MIC50/90 of 0.03/0.06microg/ml, followed by biapenem (0.12/0.5), imipenem (0.25/0.5) and panipenem (0.25/0.5). Among cephem, ceftazidime had the lowest MIC50 at 4 microg/ml. All four of the cephem agents had a MIC90 of greater than 128microg/ml. Among beta-lactamase inhibitors, tazobactam/piperacillin had the lowest MIC50 at 4 microg/ml, and sulbactam/cefoperazone had a MIC50 of 32 microg/ml. Among the new quinolones, prulifloxacin had the lowest MIC50 at 1 microg/ml, and the other drugs had a MIC50 of 2 microg/ml. The resistance rate of ciprofloxacin was 61.1% in E. coli and 16.6% in K. pneumoniae. Comparison of drug-sensitivity to cephem by ESBL-gene type revealed that cefpirome, cefepime and cefozopran had higher MIC50/90 values against the CTX-M group with a MIC50 of greater than 128microg/ml. Ceftazidime and aztreonam had higher MIC50/90 values against the TEM/SHV group than those against the CTX-M group. In the CTX-M group, the MIC50 was 4 and 16microg/ml, respectively.
 ...
PMID:[Susceptibility of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae to various antibacterial agents]. 1584 20

Adequacy and effectiveness of empirical antibacterial therapy of severe nosocomial infections with meropenem vs. combined regimens of antibacterial therapy were investigated and the ratio of the cost and effectiveness of the compared regimens was evaluated. A prospective, randomized, open, comparative study of two initiative regimens of empirical antibacterial therapy of severe nosocomial infections was performed: meropenem in a daily dose of 1.5-3 g and the standard regimen with the use of betalactams and fluoroquinolones in combination with aminoglycosides and/or metronidazole. Patients with recorded diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia (including the ventilator-associated one) or abdominal infection with the signs of severe sepsis and severity of APACHE II > 14 were enrolled. The patients were stratified into 2 groups subject to the disease severity, i.e. APACHE II 15-20 and APACHE II 21-25. One hundred thirty five out of 166 patients with recorded nosocomial infection were included into the final estimate of the therapy adequacy and effectiveness (Protocol Analysis): 62 patients were treated with meropenem and in the treatment of 73 patients the standard antibacterial therapy was used. In the group of the patients treated with meropenem there were stated significantly higher clinical effectiveness (recovery in 80.6% of the patients vs. the control of 46.6%, p < 0.01) and pathogen eradication (89.6 and 48.1% respectively, p < 0.01). The difference in the clinical and bacteriological effectiveness of meropenem and the standard therapy was more evident in the subgroups of more severe patients (APACHE > 20). With the use of meropenem the probability of recovery from nosocomial infection was significantly higher (RR 1.73-1.94, p < 0.001) vs. the control. Meropenem provided significantly higher eradication of the pathogens: P. aeruginosa (88 and 40% respectively, p = 0.007), E. coli (100 and 46.7%, p = 0.003), Acinetobacter spp. (90.9 and 40%, p = 0.02). The antibacterial therapy with the use of meropenem was assessed as adequate in 51 out of 56 patients (91.1%), that was 3 times as frequent as with the use of the standard antibacterial therapy (33.9%). The cost-effectiveness coefficient with the use of meropenem was 2.2 times lower vs. the control. Therefore, the empirical therapy of severe nosocomial infections with meropenem proved to be more adequate and from the economic viewpoint more advantageous vs. the standard combined regimens of antibacterial therapy, that was evident from significantly higher clinical and bacteriological efficacy of the treatment and decrease of the terms of the patients hospitalization in intensive care units (on the average by 5 days).
 ...
PMID:[Multicentre study of comparative efficacy of meropenem and combined regimens for empirical antibacterial therapy of severe nosocomial infections: results of clinical and pharmacoeconomic analysis]. 1803 30

A retrospective study of infection in burn patients admitted to the Clinic for Burns and Reconstructive Surgery Kosice-Saca in the period 2003 to 2006 confirms the increased trend of Acinetobacter (Acb) strains, as a multi-drug-resistant potential pathogen. Over 270 patients are admitted every year to our burn clinic with serious burn injuries, and 75 (on average) to the ICU. Since 1992 the bacterial strain A. baumannii has been sporadically isolated from the wound swabs of the patients admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICU); in 1999 there was a rapid increase in the number of isolates of A. baumannii with increasing resistance to the usual antimicrobials, without clinical manifestation. In 2003, 11% of all hospitalized patients were colonized with A. baumannii, but in 2004 the figure for patients in ICU was 10%. In 2006, 3 patients developed sepsis, 5 patients had uroinfection, 2 patients had pneumonia, and 7 patients had serious wound infections. Wound colonization was confirmed in 17 patients that year. A. baumanii resistance significantly increased after 2003, before the introduction of effective antibiotics against A. baumannii: Ampicilin/Sulbactam (from 16% to 55%), Gentamycin (72%-90%), and Meropenem (from 0% to 4%). The first multi-drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii was recorded in 2006 in 8 patients (11%); two patients died of sepsis. Consequently, intensive surveillance of A. baumannii isolates was initiated. The objectives of this investigation were to define the epidemiology of the outbreak and to determine the risk factors for colonization or infection with A. baumannii.
 ...
PMID:Acinetobacter-- serious danger for burn patients. 1868 83

We aimed to compare infection rates for two 3-day antibiotic prophylaxis regimens for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSgbp) and demonstrate local microbiological trends. In 2008, 558 men and, in 2009, 625 men had TRUSgpb. Regimen 1 (2008) comprised 400 mg Ofloxacin immediately before biopsy and 200 mg 12-hourly for 3 days. Regimen 2 (2009) comprised Ofloxacin 200 mg 12-hourly for 3 days commencing 24 hours before biopsy. 20/558 (3.6%) men had febrile episodes with regimen 1 and 10/625 (1.6%) men with regimen 2 (P = 0.03). E. coli was the most frequently isolated organism. Overall, 7/13 (54%) of positive urine cultures were quinolone resistant and (5/13) 40% were multidrug resistant. Overall, 5/9 (56%) patients with septicaemia were quinolone resistant. All patients were sensitive to Meropenem. There was 1 (0.2%) death with regimen 1. Commencing Ofloxacin 24 hours before TRUSgpb reduced the incidence of febrile episodes significantly. We observed the emergence of quinolone and multidrug-resistant E. coli. Meropenem should be considered for unresolving sepsis.
 ...
PMID:Prospective study of antibiotic prophylaxis for prostate biopsy involving >1100 men. 2264 41


1 2 Next >>