Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0243026 (sepsis)
 52,417 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Neutrophil granulocyte function was determined in three patients with systemic staphylococcal infection, clinical manifestations of generalized allergic disease, and hyperimmunoglobulinemia E. Each of the patients had urticarial skin rashes before or at the time of development of staphylococcal suppurative lymphadenitis, pneumonia, or sepsis. Neutrophil chemotaxis, random migration, phagocytosis, and bactericidal capacity were assessed to determine if an abnormality in these functions might have contributed to the development of severe staphylococcal infections. Each of the three patients with generalized urticaria was found to have a marked defect in neutrophil chemotaxis. The mean chemotactic index of the patients was 12 +/- 4, whereas that of 20 controls was 72 +/- 11. Neutrophil random migration, phagocytosis, and bactericidal capacity were normal in each patient. The serum or plasma of the patients did not inhibit chemotaxis of control neutrophils and did not contain an increased concentration of the chemotactic-factor inactivator found in normal serum. Treatment of the neutrophils of these three patients with the competitive histamine H2 receptor blocking agent, burimamide, produced a significant increase in chemotactic responsiveness. These studies suggest the possibility of pharmacologic modification of neutrophil granulocyte function.
 ...
PMID:Severe staphylococcal disease associated with allergic manifestations, hyperimmunoglobulinemia E, and defective neutrophil chemotaxis. 97 42

Penicillin allergy presents a major obstacle to the successful management of some antepartum infections. We studied 15 pregnant women with histories of penicillin allergy confirmed by positive immediate wheal-and-flare skin tests. Thirteen had syphilis, one listeria sepsis, and one Streptococcus viridans endocarditis. Each patient was desensitized over four to six hours by oral administration of increasing doses of penicillin V. At the completion of the procedure, full-dose parenteral therapy with penicillin G or ampicillin was instituted. No extracutaneous reactions were detected. Five of the subjects (33 per cent) experienced pruritus (three) or urticaria (two), but no interruption of desensitization or therapy was necessary. All clinically apparent maternal infections were cured. The pregnancy complicated by listeriosis aborted in the first trimester. The 11 neonates delivered to date are normal. These results indicate that oral desensitization is an acceptably safe approach to therapy in pregnant women who are allergic to penicillin and have infections that require beta-lactam drugs.
 ...
PMID:Penicillin allergy and desensitization in serious infections during pregnancy. 392 35

Clinical efficacy of arbekacin (ABK) was examined on patients with MRSA infection during hospitalization in Nagoya University Hospital. A total of 15 analysed cases of 5 sepsis, 3 pneumonias, 6 wound infections and one abdominal abscess. ABK was administered intravenously by drip infusion of 200 mg per day divided into 2 doses with or without other antibiotics. Overall clinical efficacy rate was 76.9%, and eradication rate for the MRSA was 54.5%. Adverse effects were noted in 3 cases (one each case of urticaria, disorder of liver function, and renal disorder). The renal disorder was found in the case where ABK was used in combination with vancomycin.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical efficacy of arbekacin on MRSA infections]. 807 81

Azathioprine is used in a variety of dermatological conditions. However, because of its side-effect profile, azathioprine is limited for use in patients with severe disease. An unpredictable, rare and potentially fatal side-effect of azathioprine is the development of a hypersensitivity reaction, often consisting of fever, hypotension and oliguria. We describe a 17-year-old patient with leucocytoclastic vasculitis who was placed on azathioprine; within 15 days of start of therapy, she developed a fever. Azathioprine was discontinued and an evaluation for sepsis was undertaken; all cultures were negative and the fever abated. Azathioprine was restarted 5 days later. After a single dose, fever, nausea and vomiting, diarrhoea, hypotension, tachycardia and oliguria developed and the patient was admitted to an intensive care unit. Azathioprine was discontinued and investigations revealed no sign of an infection. All the above signs and symptoms abated within 24 h and the patient was discharged from hospital in 7 days. A review of 28 case reports in the literature of azathioprine-induced hypersensitivity reactions suggest that most commonly a fever and gastrointestinal symptoms occurred on initial presentation. In addition, a maculopapular rash, urticaria, vasculitis, erythema multiforme or erythema nodosum may occur. Hepatotoxicity and nephritis have also been reported. The aetiology of the reaction is unknown but sudden onset of fever and hypotension suggests that this reaction may be due to cytokine or mediator release induced by azathioprine. As azathioprine is metabolized to 6-MP, rechallenges to both should be avoided in patients who experienced an azathioprine hypersensitivity-like reaction.
 ...
PMID:Azathioprine hypersensitivity-like reactions--a case report and a review of the literature. 854

This was a great save. The crew could easily have missed the presentation of anaphylaxis and let the window for treatment with epinephrine slip away. This patient was in anaphylactic shock. There were no signs that supported a traumatic injury, and that, combined with diaphoresis, urticaria and tachycardic central pulse, contributed to the suspicion of anaphylaxis. Anaphylaxis is classified as distributive shock. This type of shock is caused by profound systemic vasodilation, and the heart is unable to increase output enough to maintain blood pressure. Other causes of distributive shock include sepsis and spinal cord injury. It is rare to have both hypotension and wheezing in such cases. In an anaphylactic reaction, an allergen, such as a food protein, medication, insect venom or latex, is introduced into the body. The mast cells of the immune system have a protein on their surface called IgE antibodies (Immunoglobulin E). The mast cells are filled with histamines [table: see text] and leukotrienes, which are chemical mediators. These are released when the allergen reacts with the IgE antibodies. When these mediators are released, they cause smooth-muscle constriction in the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts, resulting in wheezing, stridor, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. They also cause vascular dilation, leading to edema and urticaria. Most patients will present with either profound vascular effect (shock) or wheezing; this is a rather rare presentation of a patient having both. The medication best suited to counteract the effects of these medicators is epinephrine. Epinephrine is an alpha- and beta-agonist, acting to constrict the vasculature and dilate the smooth muscles in the bronchial tree. Antihistamines can alleviate symptoms of anaphylaxis, but should only be used in addition to epinephrine, not as a substitute. In life-threatening reactions, epinephrine must be given quickly and in a form that the body can distribute. Use of the subcutaneous route with a solution mixed at 1:1,000 dilution is appropriate in most patients, but if the patient is in profound shock and not perfusing the skin (pale, cold, clammy skin), then a more diluted concentration must be given i.v. at a slow rate (1 cc every minute of the 1:1,000 dilution) until the patient recovers. If i.v. access is delayed or not available, give the 1:1,000 dilution intramuscularly, in the tongue or down the endotracheal tube. Refer to your local protocols for dosage, but the usual dose of epinephrine is 0.3-0.5 mg, or 0.01 mg/kg in a child. There are more than 40 million people in the U.S. with allergic histories that place them at risk for developing anaphylaxis. Each year over 5,000 deaths are attributed to anaphylaxis. The risk of death from anaphylaxis increases with a more rapid onset of signs and symptoms. Up to 25% of patients will experience a biphasic reaction. This means there is a recurrence of symptoms several hours after the initial reaction, and it is prudent to observe patients for a period of time following their initial treatment.
 ...
PMID:Bugged. 1277 12

A retrospective analysis of the clinical and microbiological efficacy and safety of cefoperazone/sulbactam in the treatment of 39 cardiosurgical patients operated under the conditions of artificial circulation is presented. The age of the adult patients (n = 28) varied from 44 to 58 years and that of the pediatric patients varied from 4 months to 6 years. Antibacterial therapy of 26 patients was needed because of postoperative infectious complications, such as nosocomial pneumonia in 22 patients and sepsis in 4 patients. The antibacterial therapy with cefoperazone/sulbactam in 9 patients was performed during the operation because of active infectious endocarditis. In 4 patients there were observed clinical and laboratory signs of infection without the infection foci. The initial empirical therapy with cefoperazone/sulbactam was applied to 14 patients (group 1) and the target-aimed therapy based on the data of the pathogen susceptibility to cefoperazone/sulbactam was used in 6 patients (group 2). 19 patients (group 3) were treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam because of the fail of the previous antibacterial therapy, including the 4th generation cephalosporins and carbapenems as well. Cefoperazone/sulbactam was used in the monotherapy of 15 cases (38%). Cefoperazone/sulbactam showed high efficacy in the treatment of severe nosocomial infections and infectious endocarditis (in combination with vancomycin or linezolid). It amounted to 93, 100 and 79% in groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively, the total of 94%. The results of the microbiological assay were evident of the cefoperazone/sulbactam high activity against the problem gram nagative isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 12), Acinetobacter baumanii (n = 4), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 4) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 5). Adverse reactions were stated in 2 patients (5%), 1 case of urticaria requiring discontinuation of the drug use. Many of the patients proved to be colonized by MRS before the therapy with cefoperazone/sulbactam. The high probability of staphylococcal superinfection required combination of cefoperazone/sulbactam with antistaphylococcal agents, such as rifampicin, fusidin, vancomycin, linezolid. The best results were provided by the target-aimed therapy based on the microbiological monitoring.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical experience with the treatment of severe nosocomial infections by inhibitor-protected 3rd generation cephalosporin cefoperazone/sulbactam]. 1639 38

Apheresis can remove pathogens and mediators that contribute to pathogenic inflammatory responses in diseases not generally considered to be "Hematologic." Erythrocytapheresis can remove intracellular pathogens such as Babesiosis. Plasmapheresis can remove mediators of the inflammatory response in conditions such as sepsis, chronic autoimmune urticaria and malignant pertussis. Leukapheresis can remove potentially harmful leukocytes in Crohn's Disease and malignant pertussis. While apheresis can remove all of these substances, the clinical efficacy and pathophysiologic changes that occur during apheresis in these conditions are largely unknown. Hence, the clinical utility of apheresis in these conditions is largely unknown and research in these areas has the potential to benefit many patients with a variety of diseases.
 ...
PMID:Role of therapeutic apheresis in infectious and inflammatory diseases: Current knowledge and unanswered questions. 2535 Nov 67