Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0242429 (sore throat)
2,760 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

It was our goal to compare the Proseal-laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) with the classical laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in a german multicenter trial. Handling of the instruments and application criteria were to be tested. 7 anaesthesia departments were able to take part in this study. 280 patients could be investigated after approval of the ethics committee of the medical faculty of the university of Goettingen. 145 patients received the PLMA and 135 the LMA. The surgical interventions were small to moderate procedures with a duration of at least 20 minutes in the sections general surgery, trauma/orthopedic surgery, urology, vascular surgery, gynecology, ENT-surgery and ophthalmology. There was equivalence of the two instruments PLMA and LMA concerning duration and ease of insertion, endoscopic position check, observations on emergence, potential for injury and some postoperative complaints. This equivalence could be confirmed statistically. Laryngospasm was observed in three, Bronchospasm in two patients with the PLMA, in no one with the LMA. In one case of laryngospasm and another of bronchospasm a mechanism of supraglottic laryngeal stenosis has been involved which may occur in rare instances with the PLMA. This mechanism is due to the double cuff of the PLMA with the instruments proximity to the laryngeal inlet. The seal pressure in both groups differs significantly (p = 0.001). The mean value for the seal pressure was 29,3 +/- 0,21 mbar for the PLMA and 20,9 +/- 0,21 mbar for the LMA. In the PLMA the gastric tube could be positioned with the first attempt in 118 patients, with the second attempt in 17 cases. In 10 patients the gastric tube could not be placed. Contrary to the LMA the tip of the PLMA cuff may be bent in some cases with loss of airway safety and positioning of the gastric tube. The symptoms sore throat and painful swallowing on the first postoperative day were more frequent with LMA application. These differences could be confirmed statistically (sore throat p = 0.01, painful swallowing p = 0.04). They may be explained by the more rigid LMA compared to the PLMA and by the fact that the LMA in this study was older than the PLMA, loosing plasticizer. The drainage tube within the PLMA offers safety from aspiration in patients with no primary aspiration risk, additional reassurance for a correct position and a better stability of the airway. Our data may support a wider indication range for the PLMA compared with the LMA. The PLMA may be applied in laparoscopies and lower abdominal surgical interventions. Careful clinical observation will show, if the minimal invasiveness of the PLMA offers an advantage for these patients. The PLMA should not be applied in patients with increased aspiration risk.
...
PMID:[A comparison of the Proseal laryngeal mask to the standard laryngeal mask on anesthesized, non-relaxed patients]. 1246 85

Sixty adult patients undergoing minor peripheral surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive either the laryngeal mask airway (laryngeal mask airway; size 4 for females and size 5 for males) or the PAXpress (adult size), inserted by a single operator with experience of > 50 insertions of each device. The laryngeal mask airway was correctly placed on the first attempt in 27 patients (90%) compared with 20 patients (67%) when using the PAXpress (p < 0.01). No patient required more than two attempts at insertion and there were no failures with the laryngeal mask airway, compared with four (13%) who needed three attempts and two failures (7%) with the PAXpress (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). Mean (SD) total placement time was shorter with the laryngeal mask airway [24.6 (3.1) s] than with the PAXpress[35.4 (2.5) s; p < 0.01]. The most common complication was sore throat, which occurred less frequently with the laryngeal mask airway (8 patients; 26%) than with the PAXpress (15 patients; 53.5%; p < 0.001).
Anaesthesia 2003 Jan
PMID:A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway and PA(Xpress) for short surgical procedures. 1249 68

In this multicenter, randomized study, we compared ease of insertion, postinsertion hemodynamic repercussion, quality of ventilation, and the capacity to achieve a "hands-free" anesthesia delivery between two new devices: the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) and the Laryngeal Tube (LT). The incidence of postoperative laryngopharyngeal discomfort was examined after short surgical interventions in spontaneously breathing patients. After induction with fentanyl and propofol, the respective airways were inserted into 70 adult ASA physical status I and II patients (35 patients in each group). First-attempt insertion success rates were more frequent for the PLMA (77% versus 51%; P < 0.05), but success rates were similar (100% versus 97%) after 3 attempts. The anesthesiologists considered that insertion of the PLMA was easier (P < 0.001). Expired tidal volume was larger with the PLMA (404.9 versus 328.4 mL; P < 0.005) and the ability to achieve hands-free ventilation was more frequent with the PLMA (32 versus 21 cases; P < 0.004). Positional maneuvers with the LT to correct ventilation deficiencies were not always completely effective (5 of 13). There were no differences in the incidence of intolerance, sore throat, dysphagia, and/or dysphonia between the two devices. We conclude that the PLMA showed greater ease of insertion and reliability than the LT for use in nonparalyzed anesthetized patients.
...
PMID:A comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask and the laryngeal tube in spontaneously breathing anesthetized patients. 1450 Jan 91

To assess the curative effects of different reduction techniques on the dislocation of cricoarytenoid joint caused by intubation, indirect laryngoscope (IL) and direct laryngoscope (DL) were utilized for the closed reduction of the displaced arytenoid under local anesthesia. 23 patients who underwent the reduction for dislocated arytenoid under IL or DL from January 1991 to June 2001 were reviewed. The data were collected on the duration of the laryngeal injury, times of receiving reduction, side-effects after the treatment and the period for voice to return to normal. The relationship between the duration of the laryngeal lesion and the period of the voice rehabilitation was examined. 13 patients received the reduction under IL and 10 patients under DL. Except the times of the reduction, which showed significant difference, no differences were found between IL group and DL group in the course and the period of voice rehabilitation, as well as sore throat after the manipulation. The patients' voice recovery was positively related to their course of disease in both IL and DL group. It is concluded that the recovery of normal voice is obviously affected by the duration of arytenoid dislocation. The reduction under IL is as effective as under DL in the treatment of arytenoid dislocation. Reduction by DL is better suit the patients with long time course of disease.
...
PMID:A comparative study on the close reduction of arytenoid dislocation under indirect and direct laryngoscope. 1267 85

We evaluated the modified Airway Management Device (AMDTM) in 60 spontaneously breathing anaesthetised patients. The insertion and removal of the device was very easy and atraumatic. The airway was secured on the first attempt in 41 patients (70%; 95% CI 57-80%). The most important problem was loss of airway, which occurred in 11 patients (19%; 11-30%) during maintenance of anaesthesia. The AMD was dislodged during maintenance in one patient. There was a loss of the airway in 12 patients (20%; 12-31%); in 10, it was maintained with simple airway manoeuvres or a laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation was required in two patients. Ten of these patients were male and two were female; the failure rate was 33% (12-31%) among the male patients and 6% (2-22%) among the female patients. The cuff volumes ranged from 4 ml to 80 ml and cuff pressures from 6 cm H2O to 92 cm H2O. Blood was seen on removal in three patients (6%; 2-16%) and nine patients (18%; 10-30%) experienced sore throat after removal of the device.
Anaesthesia 2003 Jun
PMID:An evaluation of the modified Airway Management Device. 1284 21

Dysphagia of greater than 48 h duration is an indication for indirect laryngoscopy and when odynophagia and otalgia occur simultaneously, the possibility of subluxation of the arytenoids demands an urgent ENT assessment. The potential seriousness of laryngeal lesions following intubation obliges us to use the smallest compatible endotracheal tube. The occurrence of pain cervical surgical emphysema and fever suggests a pharyngeal lesion necessitating the suspension of oral feeding and the initiation of antibiotic therapy with anaerobic activity, while awaiting possible surgical intervention. There is no argument to use a tooth-guard for each intubation, but tooth fragility must be researched. The incidence of nasal fossa trauma is reduced with the use of nasal packs impregnated with local anaesthetic containing a vasoconstrictor. This allows the introduction of a small flexible lubricated tube. Laryngeal mask-induced sore throat is more common than the more serious injuries. The classical technique of introducing a laryngeal mask of appropriate size (4 for women, 5 for men) in which the cuff is inflated to a leak pressure of 20 cm H(2)O reduces this frequency. The facial mask may cause injuries especially with prolonged use. The incidence of pulmonary aspiration, linked to the action of drugs, raised intra-abdominal pressure; an emergent situation or difficult intubation is decreased with the performance of the Sellick maneuver at intubation, rapid induction and the neutralization of gastric acidity. A meticulous technique of insertion of the, individualized anaesthesia, particular vigilance at the time of decurarisation and position changes and a calm awakening assure its optimal use, unless the Proseal laryngeal mask modifies this point of view.
...
PMID:[Lesions to lips, oral and nasal cavities, pharynx, larynx, trachea and esophagus due to endotracheal intubation and its alternatives]. 1294 64

A number of laryngeal masks are available, including both re-usable and single-use masks. Single-use laryngeal masks may decrease the risk of transmitting prion infections. We performed a single-blind randomized trial in 200 spontaneously breathing female patients under general anaesthesia with nitrous oxide, to compare a new single-use laryngeal mask, the SoftSeal (Portex Ltd, U.K.), with a re-usable laryngeal mask, the LMA Classic (Laryngeal Mask Company Ltd., Cyprus). The primary outcome was successful insertion at the first attempt. Size 4 single-use (n = 99) or re-usable (n = 100) laryngeal masks, inserted by experienced anaesthetists, were equivalent for successful placement at the first attempt (90% versus 91% respectively). The single-use mask was less easy to insert (47% difficult versus 9%, P < 0.001). Clinical and anatomical tests of position and function were similar. The cuff pressure of the re-usable mask increased significantly compared with the single-use mask (median +10 cm versus -2 cm H2O, P < 0.001). Forty per cent of patients allocated the single-use mask and 20% of those allocated the re-usable mask experienced sore throat at 24 hours postoperatively (P < 0.05). An estimation of cost per patient use was greater for the re-usable mask. We conclude that the SoftSeal single-use laryngeal mask and the LMA Classic re-usable laryngeal mask airway are of similar clinical utility in terms of successful insertion and airway maintenance. The re-usable laryngeal mask was easier to insert and associated with less postoperative sore throat, but costs were higher.
...
PMID:Randomized evaluation of the single-use SoftSeal and the re-useable LMA Classic laryngeal mask. 1567 27

In a randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled study, we compared the efficacy of capsicum plaster (PAS) applied at the Korean hand acupuncture point for the prevention of postoperative sore throat in 150 patients scheduled to undergo abdominal hysterectomy. The K group had PAS applied at the K-A20 of both hands and placebo tape at both non-acupoints. The PAS was applied prior to induction of anaesthesia and removed 8 h postoperatively. The sore throat scores of Group K were significantly lower than those of other groups at 24 h following surgery (p = 0.00027). The prevalence of moderate to severe sore throat at 24 h was lower for Group K (0%) than for sham and placebo controls (16%[p = 0.038] and 19%[p = 0.032], respectively). There were no differences in the recovery room of the sore throat scores for all groups. We found that the PAS applied at the K-A20 was an alternative method for reducing postoperative sore throat.
Anaesthesia 2004 Jul
PMID:Prevention of postoperative sore throat using capsicum plaster applied at the Korean hand acupuncture point. 1520 May 38

Tracheal intubation with the intubating laryngeal mask airway or the Bonfils intubation fibrescope was performed in 80 patients with predicted difficult airways. Mallampati score, thyromental distance, mouth opening and mobility of the atlanto-occipital joint were used to predict difficult airways. The overall success rate, time to the first adequate lung ventilation and time taken for the successful placement of the tracheal tube were recorded, as well as a subjective assessment of the handling of the device and the incidence of postoperative sore throat and hoarseness. The median [range] time to the first adequate ventilation was significantly shorter with the intubating laryngeal mask airway than with the Bonfils intubation fibrescope (28 [6-85] s vs. 40 [23-77] s, p < 0.005). Tracheal intubation was significantly slower with the intubating laryngeal mask airway than with the Bonfils intubation fibrescope (76 [45-155] s vs. 40 [23-77] s, p < 0.0001. Patients in the Bonfils group suffered less sore throat and hoarseness than those in the other group.
Anaesthesia 2004 Jul
PMID:A comparison of the intubating laryngeal mask airway and the Bonfils intubation fibrescope in patients with predicted difficult airways. 1564 24

We experienced a case of a subcutaneous emphysema after tonsillectomy. The patient, a 24-year-old man, complained of a recurrent sore throat and was diagnosed as having chronic tonsillitis. Pre-operative general examinations revealed no abnormalities. The operation was carried out under general anesthesia. The adhesions between the tonsils and the surrounding tissues were moderate. The bi-lateral tonsils were easily removed. The recovery period was uneventful. On the next morning, marked swelling of the left cheek and submandibular area was noted. On palpation, there was a characteristic crepitation and softness in these areas. The X-ray examination revealed subcutaneous emphysema. There was no finding of airway obstruction. We diagnosed him as having a subcutaneous emphysema and administered antibiotics for 5 days. From clinical findings, the subcutaneous emphysema was thought to be caused by surgical rather than anesthetic factors. The subcutaneous emphysema gradually disappeared. One year after the tonsillectomy, the patient is under observation as an outpatient and is free from any abnormal symptoms. To avoid this kind of complication, we should pay attention to carefully separate the tonsil from its fossa and to make appropriate selection of surgical equipments.
...
PMID:Subcutaneous emphysema after tonsillectomy: a case report. 1526 85


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10