Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0242379 (lung cancer)
 71,905 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

An early phase II cooperative study of Gemcitabine Hydrochloride (abbreviated to "gemcitabine" herewith) was conducted in patients with a variety of solid tumors (i.e., lung cancer, gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, colon/rectum cancer, cervical cancer, ovarian cancer and breast cancer) at 56 institutions. The aim of the first step (Step I) was to investigate the feasibility of gemcitabine in a variety of different solid tumors, including lung cancer regarding efficacy and safety. The aim of the second step (Step II) was as a result of step I (Responses were observed) to continue to investigate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine in chemonaive patients with non-small cell lung cancer. As a Step I study, gemcitabine was administered once weekly at a dose of 800 mg/m2 for a consecutive 3-week period followed by a week of rest, in multiple courses. Among the 29 eligible patients with lung cancer, partial response (PR) was achieved in 3 patients (25.0%, 95% confidence interval: 5.5-57.2%) out of 12 chemonaive patients. Adverse reactions (grade 3 or higher) seen in 29 patients with lung cancer were neutropenia (27.6%), leukopenia (13.8%), decreased hemoglobin (13.8%), thrombocytopenia (10.3%), malaise (6.9%), anorexia (3.4%), nausea/vomiting (3.4%), diarrhea (3.4%), dyspnea (3.4%) and interstitial pneumonia (3.4%). In other types of solid tumors, PR was achieved in 2 (8.7%) out of 23 eligible patients with cervical cancer and in 1 (5.3%) of 19 eligible patients with ovarian cancer, while the use of analgesics became unnecessary in 1 patient with pancreatic cancer. Incidence as well as severity of main adverse reactions in these patients were comparable to those seen in patients with lung cancer. A Step II study, in which gemcitabine was administered once weekly at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 to chemonaive patients with non-small cell lung cancer, was conducted, referring to the results of Step I and clinical studies conducted overseas. The results of the Step II study demonstrated PR in 5 (14.3%, 95% confidence interval: 4.8 - 30.3%) out of 35 eligible patients with non-small cell lung cancer and that the main adverse reactions were comparable to those seen in the Step I study, posing no tolerability problems in particular.
 ...
PMID:[An early phase II study of gemcitabine hydrochloride (LY 188011). Gemcitabine Cooperative Study Group for Early Phase II]. 893 92

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, and dosage and administration of gemcitabine are reviewed. Gemcitabine is a deoxycytidine-analogue antimetabolite with activity against some solid tumors. Gemcitabine is phosphorylated intracellularly to difluorodeoxycytidine triphosphate, which terminates DNA-chain elongation and competitively inhibits DNA polymerase and ribonucleotide reductase. After i.v. administration, gemcitabine is rapidly distributed into total body water. The drug is deaminated in the plasma to inactive difluorodeoxyuridine; both gemcitabine and difluorodeoxyuridine are primarily renally eliminated. In clinical studies, gemcitabine reduced pain and improved function in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine has shown some activity against non-small-cell lung cancer, particularly when combined with cisplatin or ifosfamide. The agent has also shown modest activity against advanced ovarian and breast cancer. Adverse effects include dose-limiting myelosuppression, flu-like symptoms, nausea, vomiting, and rash. Gemcitabine has FDA-approved labeling for use in the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. The recommended dosage for this indication is 1000 mg/m2 (as the hydrochloride salt) i.v. given over 30 minutes weekly for seven weeks, followed after one week of rest by 1000 mg/ m2 i.v. given over 30 minutes weekly for three weeks every four weeks. Gemcitabine palliates symptoms in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. More study is needed to determine gemcitabine's role in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer, and breast cancer.
 ...
PMID:Gemcitabine: a cytidine analogue active against solid tumors. 911 4

Statistics Canada (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) is in the process of developing the Population Health Model to simulate the health and common illnesses of Canadians. The Population Health Model incorporates a lung cancer module that is based on contemporary Canadian practice. This microsimulation model can be used to estimate the total direct care costs of treating all lung cancer cases diagnosed in Canada and to evaluate the cost and cost-effectiveness of new therapeutic interventions as they are introduced into practice. Gemcitabine, a new nucleoside analogue with a broad spectrum of antitumor activity, is about to be introduced on the Canadian market. The Population Health Model has been used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of gemcitabine in the management of lung cancer over a range of drug doses per treatment cycle starting at 1,000 mg/m2 weekly x 3, as well as potential survival benefits. The survival of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated on an international trial of gemcitabine (EO-18) was used to estimate the potential survival gain relative to the survival of stage IV NSCLC patients managed with best supportive care on a randomized trial conducted by the National Cancer Institute of Canada (BR 5). Sensitivity analyses were performed assuming that the survival gain was 25% or 50% less than that reported in the EO-18 trial. The perspective of the economic analysis is that of the government as payer in a universal health care system, and all costs are expressed in 1993 Canadian dollars. Based on the apparent survival advantage of the EO-18 trial in comparison to best supportive care, the cost per life-year gained ranged from $632 to $9,285, depending on the dose per treatment cycle. At the highest dose per cycle (2,000 mg/m2) and with survival reduced by 50% as compared with the EO-18 result, the cost per life-year gained was estimated to be $17,390. From these estimates of direct care costs in the Canadian health care system, gemcitabine appears to be a cost-effective intervention for advanced NSCLC.
 ...
PMID:Cost-effectiveness of gemcitabine in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer: an estimate using the Population Health Model lung cancer module. 919 82

Gemcitabine has shown activity in different solid tumors. In the present study we have evaluated its efficacy in 32 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in a phase II trial. Gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2) was given intravenously as a 30-minute infusion on days 1, 8 and 15. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for response and all patients for toxicity. Partial remissions and stable disease were seen in 4 (14%) and 13 (45%) patients, respectively. Improvement of symptoms occurred in 54% of the patients. Side effects were mild and included predominantly leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. In conclusion, gemcitabine is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
 ...
PMID:Phase II trial of gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. 933 58

Gemcitabine (GEMZAR) is a novel nucleoside analogue with activity in a range of preclinical models both in vitro and in vivo. It is highly schedule dependent, with weekly x3 every 4 weeks being the recommended schedule for phase II/III studies. Early phase II trials identified activity against non-small-cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancers, tumour types for which gemcitabine has a licence for treatment in many countries. However, the preclinical models indicated that gemcitabine may be active against many other human solid tumours. In phase II studies, activity has been identified against breast cancer, both as a single agent and in combination. In bladder cancer, impressive single-agent activity of gemcitabine has also been seen, as well as in combination with cisplatin, initially in MVAC and platinum failures but more recently as first-line therapy both as a single agent and combined with cisplatin. Anti-tumour activity has also been seen in patients with ovarian cancer, head and neck cancer, small-cell lung cancer and cervical cancer, with minimal activity in renal carcinoma, prostate and colon cancer. In view of the excellent side-effect profile and the potential for gemcitabine to inhibit DNA repair after exposure to DNA-damaging agents, further developments of gemcitabine will include its use in combination chemotherapy and combined modality schedules.
 ...
PMID:The role of gemcitabine in the treatment of other tumours. 971 87

The efficacy and toxicity profile of gemcitabine was evaluated in this phase II study of chemonaive patients with locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eighty patients (62 males, 18 females) were entered into this study. The disease stage was IIIA in ten patients, IIIB in 32, and IV in 38 patients. The median age was 61 (range 41 - 78). Karnofsky performance status was > or = 80 in 88% of patients. All patients were chemonaive, but five patients had received prior radiotherapy and 34 patients had undergone prior surgery. Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 was given as a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients received up to nine cycles (median three cycles). Of 872 doses 815 (93%) were administered without dose delay or modification. Of the 80 patients enrolled, 76 were evaluable for efficacy analysis, and 16 patients had a partial response for an overall response rate of 21.1% (95% CI, 11.9-30.3%). A further 47 patients (61.8%) had stable disease. Partial responses were seen in eight of 41 stage III patients (19.5%) and in eight of 35 stage IV patients (22.9%). The median time to progressive disease was 4.6 months. Median survival for all 80 patients was 7.1 months. Haematological toxicity was mild with grade 3 4 neutropenia in 6.3% of patients, grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 3.8% of patients, and grade 3 anaemia in 2.5% of patients. Grade 3 non-laboratory toxicity was: somnolence (1.3% of patients), infection (1.3%), nausea and vomiting (6.4%) and dyspnoea (5.1%). This study confirms that single-agent gemcitabine is active in advanced NSCLC and its well-tolerated safety profile makes it particularly suited to outpatient use.
Lung Cancer 1998 Dec
PMID:Gemcitabine in locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: the Central European phase II study. 1004 77

Because both vindesine and gemcitabine are active drugs in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with different modes of action and only partly overlapping toxicity, a phase II study was performed. Gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) was given on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks, while vindesine 3 mg m(-2) was administered weekly for 7 weeks, then every 2 weeks. A total of 42 patients with nonresectable NSCLC were included. The median age of patients was 56 years; 57% were men, 52% had adenocarcinoma, 31% squamous cell carcinoma and 17% had large-cell carcinoma. The performance status ranged from 0 to 2 with 83% in performance status 1. The majority (55%) had stage IV disease, while 40% had stage III B and 5% stage III A disease. WHO grade 3-4 leucopenia occurred in five patients (12%) and 9% had grade 4 neutropenia. Thrombocytopenia grade 3-4 was observed in six patients (15%). There were no septic death or bleeding episodes. One patient had a transient WHO grade 4 increase in bilirubin, and four patients had a decrease in glomerular filtration rate below the normal limit; one of these patients developed a non-reversible renal insufficiency. Ten patients (24%) complained of dyspnoea of uncertain mechanism, possibly involving bronchoconstriction. There were one complete and seven partial responses among 40 assessable patients (20%, 95% confidence limits 9-36%). Median response duration was 31 weeks (range 11-83 weeks) and median survival time 31 weeks (range 2-171 weeks). The current combination of gemcitabine and vindesine does not appear to be promising for further examination because of the toxicity and somewhat disappointing activity.
 ...
PMID:Phase II study of gemcitabine and vindesine in patients with previously untreated non-resectable non-small-cell lung cancer. 1007 Aug 84

The authors report that 4 out of a series of 56 patients (7.1%) treated with gemcitabine developed an unexplained non-cardiogenic pulmonary distress syndrome most likely related to gemcitabine. One further patient developed ventricular arrhythmia immediately after gemcitabine exposure, leading to cardiac arrest. Between 1995 and 1998 56 patients with locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma were treated with gemcitabine. The patients suffered from breast cancer (n = 17), pancreatic cancer (n = 17), lung cancer (n = 12), cancer of unknown primary (n = 5), ovarian cancer (n = 2), oral cavity cancer (n = 2) and cancer of the bladder (n = 1). Their median age was 55 years, and there were 33 female and 23 male patients. Fifteen patients had been pretreated with radiation therapy: 2 had received radiation therapy involving the mediastinum as treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer and cancer of unknown origin respectively, 11 patients had had prior neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation therapy of the chest wall for breast cancer and 2 patients had received radiation therapy for head/neck cancer. All patients received gemcitabine on days 1, 8 and 15 and this was repeated on day 29 at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) as a 30-min infusion in 250 ml isotonic NaCl. In 4 patients gemcitabine treatment was combined with cisplatinum, in 7 patients with a somatostatin analogue and in 1 patient with epirubicin. All other patients received gemcitabine as a single agent. We assume that the pulmonary or cardiac toxicity of 5 patients was related to gemcitabine. In 3 patients re-exposure resulted in repeated toxicity. One patient did not receive gemcitabine again because of the life-threatening nature of the primary response. Two patients had received prior radiation to the mediastinum with 62 Gy and 50 Gy respectively, 3 years and 1 year before gemcitabine application. In our experience pulmonary toxicity after gemcitabine treatment is more common than initially anticipated. Gemcitabine should be used with caution in patients who have received prior radiation to the mediastinum.
 ...
PMID:Severe non-haematological toxicity after treatment with gemcitabine. 1054 71

This randomized study was designed to determine the response rates, survival and toxicities of single-agent gemcitabine (GEMZAR) and a combination of cisplatin/etoposide in chemonaive patients with non-resectable, locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 was given as a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, 15 of a 28-day cycle, cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 (following cisplatin), 2 and 3. Major eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer, measurable disease, Zubrod performance status 0-2, no prior chemotherapy, no prior radiation of the measured lesion, and no CNS metastases. One hundred and forty-seven patients were enrolled, 72 in the gemcitabine and 75 in the cisplatin/etoposide arm. Patient characteristics were well-matched across both arms. Sixty-seven gemcitabine and 72 cisplatin/etoposide patients were qualified for efficacy analysis. There were no complete responses, but 12 partial responses in the gemcitabine arm and 11 in the cisplatin/etoposide arm, for protocol-qualified response but 12 partial responses in the gemcitabine arm and 11 in the cisplatin/etoposide arm, for protocol-qualified response rates of 17.9% (95%, CI: 9.6-29.2%,) and 15.3% (95% CI: 7.9-25.7%,), respectively. Median survival times were 6.6 months (95% CI: 4.9-7.3 months) for gemcitabine and 7.6 months (95% CI: 5.4-9.3 months) for cisplatin/etoposide. The 1-year survival probability estimate was 26% for gemcitabine and 24% for cisplatin/etoposide. There were no statistically significant between-group differences in time-to-event measures, but patients in the gemcitabine arm had a greater probability of achieving a tumour response after 2 months (probability estimate: 8 vs. 0%,) and of the response lasting at least 6 months (73 vs. 45%,). Clinical and haematologic toxicity was more pronounced in the cisplatin/etoposide arm. Quality-of-life measures indicated a significant worsening of symptomatology in the cisplatin/etoposide arm for hair loss, nausea and vomiting, and appetite loss. This randomized study provides further evidence that single-agent gemcitabine is an active and effective therapy for patients with non-resectable. locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and good performance status, and that it is better tolerated than the combination cisplatin/ etoposide.
Lung Cancer 1999 Nov
PMID:Single-agent gemcitabine: an active and better tolerated alternative to standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. 1056 79

The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been a subject of debate for many years. Only recently, cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy has been demonstrated to yield a small but definite survival benefit and to improve symptoms, performance status and quality of life in a substantial proportion of advanced NSCLC patients. The cisplatin-etoposide (PE) regimen was developed in the early 1980s and has been one of the standard chemotherapy programs most extensively used in the clinical practice until a few years ago. More recently, several randomized trials have compared the efficacy of new cisplatin-containing combination chemotherapies including Paclitaxel or Gemcitabine with that of PE or PE-like regimens. Preliminary results are encouraging, indicating a small benefit in favor of the last generation of regimens which might therefore replace PE as 'gold standards' in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. However, the costs of these last generation regimens is higher and the entity of the benefit small. Therefore, PE chemotherapy can still be an option in selected situations.
 ...
PMID:The combination of etoposide and cisplatin in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 1058 33


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>