Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0242379 (lung cancer)
 71,905 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Treatment of inoperable, regionally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer has been problematic, given the poor long-term results and toxicity of current treatment measures and the extensive comorbid disease commonly found in these predominantly elderly patients. The generally acknowledged standard of care has been administration of radiotherapy to the involved sites and nodal drainage sites. This may improve survival in patients with good prognostic factors. No modality, however, has demonstrated a clear benefit over the others in this setting. Of 13 randomized trials comparing radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy, 5 using non-cisplatin-containing regimens showed no benefit. However, 4 of 6 trials with cisplatin-containing regimens have shown modest benefit. Cisplatin given concurrently with radiotherapy on a daily basis was significantly better than radiotherapy alone and was associated with improved locoregional control, suggesting that the radiation sensitization properties of the drug and consequent local control may be important for enhanced survival. Determining relapse patterns of patients according to these and other treatment approaches may help guide future development of therapeutic options. Improvements in both local and systemic control will be required before a curative approach to treatment can be considered. In this regard, hyperfractionated radiotherapy or radiation sensitizers to enhance locoregional control may complement enhancement of systemic control with chemotherapy, especially if a balance can be struck between the efficacy and toxicity of these modalities.
 ...
PMID:Chemotherapy and radiotherapy for regionally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. 838 71

We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the antitumor activity and safety of concurrent continuous infusion of cisplatin and etoposide in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cisplatin (30 mg/m2 daily) and etoposide (80 mg/m2 daily) were given as a 24-h continuous infusion for 72 h to 48 patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC. Of the 46 evaluable patients, 9 achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 20% (95% confidence interval, 9.4%-33.9%). The median duration of response was 23 weeks. The median duration of survival for all patients was 34.4 weeks. The major toxicity was hematologic. Leukopenia (WHO grade > or = 3) was observed in 22 patients (48%) and thrombocytopenia (WHO grade > or = 3), in 13 patients (28%). In all, 20 patients (43%) experienced severe anemia (WHO grade > or = 3). Nonhematologic toxicity mainly consisted of moderate to severe alopecia in 33 patients (72%) and moderate to severe nausea and vomiting in 25 patients (54%). No significant nephrotoxicity was seen. We conclude that a 72-h concurrent continuous infusion of cisplatin and etoposide does not appear to be active against advanced NSCLC.
 ...
PMID:Phase II study of a 72-h concurrent continuous infusion of cisplatin and etoposide in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. 838 99

Cisplatin (CDDP)-containing chemotherapy has become the mainstay of clinical trials in unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the role of chemotherapy in the routine management of NSCLC remains controversial. We conducted a phase I study with the combination carboplatin (CBDCA), CDDP, and etoposide (Etop) in unresectable NSCLC. CBDCA, at a starting dose of 80 mg/m2, on day 1, was combined with a fixed dose of CDDP (80 mg/m2, day 1) and Etop (80 mg/m2, days 1-3). Escalation was performed after four patients entered at each dose level. If no World Health Organization (WHO) grade 4 toxicity developed after the first cycle in more than half of the patients or WHO grade 3/4 toxicity in more than two thirds, the dose was escalated. The maximum tolerated dose was established at 300 mg/m2 for CBDCA. Thrombocytopenia and leukopenia were the dose-limiting toxicities. No grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were seen. The recommended dose of CBDCA to be combined with CDDP (80 mg/m2, day 1) and Etop (80 mg/m2, days 1-3) is 280 mg/m2. This trial suggests that our combination chemotherapy may be effective in patients with advanced NSCLC. A multicenter phase II study based on these findings is now under way.
 ...
PMID:Phase I study of a carboplatin-cisplatin-etoposide combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. 863 34

A phase I trial was performed to investigate the tolerability and efficacy of the novel nucleoside analogue gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Both cisplatin and gemcitabine were administered as 30 min infusions weekly x 3 with a week of rest. There was one dose escalation of cisplatin from 25 mg/m2 (dose level 1) to 30 mg/m2 (in subsequent dose levels 2-5), such that the mean dose intensity for the weekly x 3 q 4 week cycle was 22.5 mg/m2/week which is close to that achieved with 100 mg/m2 bolus monthly. Gemcitabine was initiated at 1000 mg/m2 (dose levels 1 and 2) then escalated by 250 mg/m2/week to 1750 mg/m2 (dose level 5). Of 32 chemotherapy-naive patients entered (22 males, 10 females; median age 61 years, range 29-74 years), 11 had localized tumours (2 stage IIIa, 9 IIIb) and 21 had stage IV tumours with haematogenous metastases and a poor prognosis. Twenty-one patients had adenocarcinoma, 4 squamous cell carcinoma, 6 large cell undifferentiated tumors, and one had mixed squamous and adenocarcinoma. Dose-limiting toxicity was not seen in more than one patient in cycle 1 at any dose level. Grade 4 granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred more frequently with repeated dosing, necessitating dose reductions except at the lowest dose level (cisplatin 25 mg/m2, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2). Non-haematological toxicity was mild and rapidly reversible. Cisplatin administration led to a higher frequency of nausea and vomiting than that seen with gemcitabine alone, but this was easily controlled with antiemetics. In the 28 patients evaluable, to date responses have been seen at most dose levels, with an overall response rate 35.7%. This phase I trial is ongoing and further dose escalation is intended to determine the MTD of gemcitabine.
Lung Cancer 1996 Feb
PMID:Phase I trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a preliminary report. 869 17

The effect of calmodulin antagonist trifluoperazine (TFP) on in vitro drug sensitivity of primary cultured lung cancer cells was studied in 28 cases with MTT assay. TFP was found to enhance significantly the anticancer activities of VCR, ADR and VP16 (P < 0.01 or < 0.05). But TFP could not sensitize tumor cells to DDP. TFP may therefore be useful as an adjunct in chemotherapy of lung cancer.
 ...
PMID:[Effect of calmodulin antagonist on chemosensitivity of primary cultured lung cancer cells]. 869 72

The authors studied the influence on survival of 21 clinical, anatomical, haematological and biochemical factors evaluated, at diagnosis, of 411 patients (pts) with advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) followed in our department between 1984 and 1990. Most of the patients were male (347--84.4%) and only 64 (15.6%) were females. Median age was 62 years, but was slightly higher in females. Only 34 patients were aged under 45 years. Squamous cell carcinoma (215 pts--52%) and adenocarcinoma (152 pts--37%) were the most frequent histologic types. Performance status was poor--only 103 (25%) continued active; 120 (29%) spent at least half of the time in bed; 188 (46%) were severely limited. After staging, 179 (44%) presented locally advanced disease (stage IIIB) and 232 (56%) metastatic dissemination (stage IV). Therapy was defined by the oncologic group according to individual characteristics and based on clinical grounds. Anti-neoplastic therapy was performed in 225 (55%), chemotherapy alone in 121 (30%), radiation therapy alone in 67 (16%), and sequential combined treatment (chemotherapy and thoracic radiation) in 37 (9%). Until 1987, the main chemotherapy regimen was MACC (Metrotrexate + Adriamycine + Cyclophosphamide + Lomustin), afterwards VP(M) (Cisplatin + Vimblastin + Mitomycine). Radiation therapy was performed using Co60, 2 Gy/day, 5 days a week, for 4 weeks (approximately 45 Gy total). The response rate was poor--four complete responses (2%), 42 (19%) partial responses. The overall median survival was 4.3 months and only 5% of patients were alive after 18 months of follow up. Prognostic importance of each characteristic studied was initially done by unifactorial analysis, followed by multifactorial analysis according to two methods: Cox proportional hazards model and recursive partitioning amalgamation--RECPAM. Regardless of the method used, the main determinants of survival were found to be performance status (Zubrod), weight loss and serum albumin. Other factors such as the staging (presence or absence of metastasis), lymphocytes, lactic dehydrogenase, and hoarseness were also significant. It is noteworthy that age and histological type were irrelevant; sex and hoarseness only proved important when integrated within a multifactorial model. The overall prognostic evaluation and therapeutic decision of advanced NSCLC patients could be improved by combining the prognostic value of TNM with that of performance status, weight loss and serum albumin. These prognostic guidelines must be taken into account when designing new clinical trials.
Lung Cancer 1995 Dec
PMID:Survival predictors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. 871 65

A multi-institutional cooperative group trial was undertaken by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of cisplatin and intravenous etoposide for the treatment of metastatic or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The doses used were those previously determined to be the maximally tolerated dose of this drug combination. Forty patients were entered into the trial, 37 of whom were eligible for evaluation. Cisplatin (35 mg/M2/day for 3 days) and etoposide (200 mg/M2/day for 3 days) were administered every 28 days for a planned 6 cycles of therapy. Sixteen of 37 evaluable patients (43%) responded to therapy. Myelosuppression was the dominant toxicity, with 89% of the patients experiencing grade 4 neutropenia, and nearly half grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. Median survival was 8.5 months, with 30% of the patients alive at 1 year and 10% alive at 2 years. Malaise, fatigue, and peripheral neuropathy were the other major toxicities. The combination of etoposide at the dose of 200 mg/M2/day for 3 days and cisplatin at 35 mg/M2/day for 3 days is a highly potent combination against metastatic non-small cell carcinoma.
Lung Cancer 1995 Dec
PMID:Etoposide (VP-16) and cisplatin at maximum tolerated dose in non-small cell lung carcinoma: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. 871 68

The best treatment for inoperable "non small cell" lung cancer remains unknown. While metastatic patients are usually treated palliatively, the therapeutic course for locally advanced disease is less clear cut and more controversial. The common habit was been to treat these patients only when disturbing symptoms are present. But this is now changing, because defined radiotherapy techniques and combinations with chemotherapy and/or radiosensitizers produce better results. Also, in palliative treatments new dose-fractionalised schemes are being sought, with the aim of less discomfort and better efficacy. Two clinical trials are presented. The first is a palliative, 10 Gy single-dose treatment of 17 patients with chest symptoms. Results have been encouraging: 67% symptoms palliated at 1 month from treatment. Palliation was however short: 42% at 2 months, 32% at 3 months. The low incidence and mildness of acute complications in this small number of patients permit us to conclude that the treatment is feasible and tolerable; short-lived palliation could be used in patients with a short life expectancy. In the second study, was a multimodality treatment-polychemotherapy (Cisplatin 100 mg/mq days 1, 22 and Vinblastine 5 mg/mq days 1, 8, 15, 22) followed by radiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fractions/42 days) with Cisplatin (5 mg/mq/d) as a radiosensitizer. 15 patients have been recruited, but only 7 could be evaluated. 5/7 objective responses were observed (3 complete). Whole acute toxicity is acceptable. The lack of data concerning late toxicity does not allow conclusions about the feasibility of this therapeutic.
 ...
PMID:[Locally advanced non-small cell lung tumors: curative or palliative radiotherapy]. 896 97

A phase I study was performed to establish the optimum dose for combination therapy with infusional cisplatin and irinotecan (CPT-11) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The subjects were 20 patients with a performance score of 0-2 with untreated advanced NSCLC. Cisplatin was administered by 5-day continuous intravenous infusion at 20-25 mg/m2 per day. CPT-11 was administered by bolus infusion at a starting dose of 20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 or 60 mg/m2 per day on day 1 alone, followed by serial increments of 20 mg/m2. Since grade 4 granulocytopenia was observed in two of the five patients receiving 20 mg/m2 per day cisplatin (days 1-5) and 100 mg/m2 CPT-11 (day 1), and since one of them developed severe pneumonia and sepsis associated with the granulocytopenia, the regimen was considered to be intolerable. In the same patient, grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 diarrhea were observed. Therefore, the optimum dose appeared to be 20 mg/m2 per day (days 1-5) for cisplatin and 80 mg/m2 (day 1) for CPT-11. The side effects were grade 2 diarrhea in one of three patients, and grade 2 vomiting in three patients, but grade > or = 2 hemotoxicity was not observed. This combined regimen resulted in a partial response in 9 out of 19 assessable patients. The dose-limiting factor in this combination therapy was granulocytopenia, and a high efficacy rate was obtained.
 ...
PMID:A phase I study of irinotecan and infusional cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. 902 73

The management of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still evolving. Newer third-generation chemotherapy (paclitaxel [Taxol]-based; vinorelbine [Navelbine]/ cisplatin [Platinol]) is more effective than second-generation cisplatin-based chemotherapy for patients with stage IIIB and IV disease. The combined use of cisplatin-based chemotherapy with sequential or concurrent radiation therapy has improved the survival of patients with unresectable stage IIIA disease. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy has improved the survival of patients with resectable stage IIIA disease compared to surgery alone. Combined-modality therapy is a fertile area of innovative clinical investigations for the majority of stage III resectable and potentially curable NSCLC patients, as well as those with locally advanced unresectable stage III disease. We expect therapy to substantially improve over the next few years. Cooperative groups should move quickly to incorporate third-generation chemotherapy into large randomized trials in order to redefine the standard of therapy for patients with this disease.
 ...
PMID:Multidisciplinary approach to potentially curable non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. 911 51


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>