Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0242379 (lung cancer)
 71,905 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Prostate cancer is the most common noncutaneous malignancy diagnosed in American men, and in 1994 it will pass lung cancer as the most common cancer diagnosed in the United States, with an estimated 200,000 new cases. The molecular biology of prostate carcinogenesis is rapidly advancing, and it is clear that, to a degree, prostate cancer is a heritable disease. The use of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a screening tool has been widely accepted by the medical community, although the evidence to support the efficacy of screening is not yet available. The curative approaches to organ-confined, clinically localized prostate cancer include radiation therapy, radical prostatectomy, and close observation in selected patients. The absence of well-designed clinical trials contributes to the confusion surrounding which curative treatment is the best option in individual patients. The standard approach to patients with evidence of extracapsular spread without distant metastases has been external-beam radiotherapy, although the results with radiation therapy alone in these patients has left considerable room for improvement. Innovative combined-modality approaches are currently being investigated at a number of institutions for these poor-prognosis patients. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy is currently being investigated at multiple institutions and offers some hope for improved results. The treatment of metastatic disease remains hormonal manipulation, although the exact nature of optimal androgen deprivation is currently a matter of considerable debate. In patients with hormone-refractory disease newer regimens using novel chemotherapy regimens offer some promise.
 ...
PMID:Prostate cancer. 753 41

According to 1992 Cancer Statistics, prostate carcinoma is once again predicted to be the most common cancer in men, exceeding the incidence of lung cancer. In American men, this cancer is estimated to be the second most frequent cause of cancer deaths by site. Although metastases have been reported in practically every organ in the body, prostatic cancer most often metastasizes to bones, regional lymph nodes, and viscera. Although secondary involvement of the larynx by malignant neoplasms arising in contiguous structures is well known, metastatic cancer to the larynx from a prostate carcinoma is rare. This report discusses a unique case that presented with hoarseness resulting from vocal cord paralysis. The diagnosis of the tumor was confirmed by immunoperoxidase stains for prostate-specific antigen.
 ...
PMID:Vocal cord paralysis from prostatic carcinoma metastasizing to the larynx. 840 19

Attainment of cell type-specific cytotoxicity with minimal side effects is the ultimate goal of cancer therapy. By employing the prostate-specific antigen promoter (PSAP), we investigated (1) whether PSAP-driven antisense genetic constructs targeting DNA polymerase-alpha and topoisomerase II alpha (Top II alpha), designated PSAP-antipol and PSAP-antitop respectively, could induce death of prostate cancer cells, and (2) whether the cytotoxicity is restricted to cells of prostate origin. A PSAP-driven beta-galactosidase gene, PSAP-LacZ, was also used to estimate the expression of the PSAP-driven transcripts. Lipofection-mediated gene transfers were performed with these 3 constructs and a control plasmid, pCDNA3, in 3 human prostate cancer cell lines (LNCaP, DU-145, PC-3) and 5 other cell lines (Cos-1 [monkey kidney], HL-60 [human myeloid leukemia], Hep G2 [human hepatoma], NCI H460 [human lung cancer] and SW 480 [human colon cancer]). On transfection with PSAP-LacZ, LNCaP, DU-145, and PC-3 showed a 10.8, 1.8, and 1.6 fold increase in beta-galactosidase activity, respectively. The remaining 5 cell lines showed no changes after transfection. Corresponding to the levels of the induced beta-galactosidase activity, LNCaP showed the strongest growth inhibition by the antisense constructs: 36% by PSAP-antipol, 39% by PSAP-antitop and 80% by PSAP-antipol+PSAP-antitop. DU-145 and PC-3 had minimal growth inhibition with PSAP-antipol alone or PSAP-antitop alone. However, when cotransfected with PSAP-antipol and PSAP-antitop, DU-145 and PC-3 displayed 42% and 55% growth inhibition, respectively. In contrast, no cytotoxicity was observed in the remaining 5 cell lines when transfected with PSAP-antipol, PSAP-antitop or both. Therefore, PSAP-driven antisense gene therapy targeting DNA polymerase-alpha and Top II alpha inhibits the growth of human prostate cancer cells and the cytotoxic effect is restricted in cells of prostate origin.
 ...
PMID:Prostate-specific antigen promoter driven gene therapy targeting DNA polymerase-alpha and topoisomerase II alpha in prostate cancer. 871 4

The current debate regarding early detection and aggressive treatment of prostate cancer is fueled by the absence of controlled studies defining the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening, and by the lack of adequately powered trials demonstrating the benefit of curative treatment for early-stage prostate cancer. Pending the results of clinical trials in 10 to 15 years, advocates of early detection of prostate cancer with digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen have compared prostate cancer screening with the effective strategy of breast cancer screening, implying that prostate cancer screening should similarly reduce cancer mortality. They have also cited the high burden of disease, the acceptable operating characteristics of digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen, a stage shift among cases detected by screening, and the theoretical curability of early-stage disease as sufficient reasons to proceed with screening. These arguments, however, are reminiscent of earlier arguments in favor of lung cancer screening with chest x-ray examination and sputum cytology, a practice ultimately proven ineffective in clinical trials. We reviewed published articles on lung and prostate cancer screening and identified many parallels. While prostate cancer screening may one day prove effective, analogies between the current prostate cancer screening controversy and the older lung cancer screening debate should inject some caution regarding widespread dissemination of prostate cancer screening without experimental evidence that such screening does more good than harm.
 ...
PMID:Controversies in prostate cancer screening. Analogies to the early lung cancer screening debate. 908 63

Prostate cancer is second only to lung cancer among killers of men in the United States. Researchers continue to develop tests that are more sensitive for diagnosing prostate cancer. At present, primary care assessment and evaluation of the disease are determined by physical evidence that may not be apparent and by laboratory values that may not be truly reflective of the underlying disease process. Men over the age of 40 need an annual evaluation for increased prostate-specific antigen (PSA) along with a digital rectal examination. Some data suggest that the digital rectal exam and PSA levels may be insensitive indicators of prostate cancer in men with low total or free testosterone levels. The synergistic effect of testosterone on PSA could mask indicators for evaluation of prostate cancer.
 ...
PMID:Primary care screening for prostate cancer. 1045 74

The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial is enrolling 148,000 men and women ages 55-74 at ten screening centers nationwide with balanced randomization to intervention and control arms. For prostate cancer, men receive a digital rectal examination and a blood test for prostate-specific antigen. For lung cancer, men and women receive a posteroanterior view chest X-ray. For colorectal cancer, men and women undergo a 60-cm flexible sigmoidoscopy. For ovarian cancer, women receive a blood test for the CA125 tumor marker and transvaginal ultrasound. Members of the control arm continue with their usual care. Follow-up in both groups will continue for at least 13 years from randomization to assess health status and cause of death. The primary endpoint is mortality from the four PLCO cancers, which accounts for about 53% of all cancer deaths in men and 41% of cancer deaths in women in the United States each year. Blood specimens are collected from screened participants, buccal cell DNA from controls, and histology slides from cases; these are maintained in a biorepository. Participants complete a baseline questionnaire (covering health status and risk factors) and a dietary questionnaire. More than 12,000 participants were enrolled in the pilot phase (concluded in September 1994). Changes in the eligibility criteria followed. As of April 2000, enrollment exceeded 144,500. Data are scanned into designated on-site computers for uploading by participant identification number to the coordinating center for quality checks, archival storage, and preparation of analysis datasets for use by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Scientific direction is provided by NCI scientists, trial investigators, external consultants, and an independent data safety and monitoring board. Performance and data quality are monitored via data edits, site visits, random record audits, and teleconferences. The PLCO trial is formally endorsed by the American Cancer Society and has been ranked by the American Urological Association as one of the most important prostate cancer studies being conducted. Special efforts to enroll black participants are cosponsored by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
 ...
PMID:The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial of the National Cancer Institute: history, organization, and status. 1118 83

The objectives of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial are to determine in screenees ages 55-74 at entry whether screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy (60-cm sigmoidoscope) can reduce mortality from colorectal cancer, whether screening with chest X-ray can reduce mortality from lung cancer, whether screening men with digital rectal examination (DRE) plus serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) can reduce mortality from prostate cancer, and whether screening women with CA125 and transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) can reduce mortality from ovarian cancer. Secondary objectives are to assess screening variables other than mortality for each of the interventions including sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value; to assess incidence, stage, and survival of cancer cases; and to investigate biologic and/or prognostic characterizations of tumor tissue and biochemical products as intermediate endpoints. The design is a multicenter, two-armed, randomized trial with 37,000 females and 37,000 males in each of the two arms. In the intervention arm, the PSA and CA125 tests are performed at entry, then annually for 5 years. The DRE, TVU, and chest X-ray exams are performed at entry and then annually for 3 years. Sigmoidoscopy is performed at entry and then at the 5-year point. Participants in the control arm follow their usual medical care practices. Participants will be followed for at least 13 years from randomization to ascertain all cancers of the prostate, lung, colorectum, and ovary, as well as deaths from all causes. A pilot phase was undertaken to assess the randomization, screening, and data collection procedures of the trial and to estimate design parameters such as compliance and contamination levels. This paper describes eligibility, consent, and other design features of the trial, randomization and screening procedures, and an outline of the follow-up procedures. Sample-size calculations are reported, and a data analysis plan is presented.
 ...
PMID:Design of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. 1118 84

Numerous medical organizations have developed cancer screening guidelines. Faced with the broad, and sometimes conflicting, range of recommendations for cancer screening, family physicians must determine the most reasonable and up-to-date method of screening. Major medical organizations have generally achieved consensus on screening guidelines for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer. For breast cancer screening in women ages 50 to 70, clinical breast examination and mammography are generally recommended every one or two years, depending on the medical organization. For cervical cancer screening, most organizations recommend a Papanicolaou test and pelvic examination at least every three years in patients between 20 and 65 years of age. Annual fecal occult blood testing along with flexible sigmoidoscopy at five-year to 10-year intervals is the standard recommendation for colorectal cancer screening in patients older than 50 years. Screening for prostate cancer remains a matter of debate. Some organizations recommend digital rectal examination and a serum prostate-specific antigen test for men older than 50 years, while others do not. In the absence of compelling evidence to indicate a high risk of endometrial cancer, lung cancer, oral cancer and ovarian cancer, almost no medical organizations have developed cancer screening guidelines for these types of cancer.
 ...
PMID:Cancer screening guidelines. 1127 40

Exisulind (Aptosyn, Cell Pathways, Inc.) is the first of a new class of targeted, pro-apoptotic drugs that show promise in the treatment of cancer. These agents induce apoptosis (i.e., programmed cell death) in a broad range of pre-cancerous and cancerous tissues without affecting normal cells. The antineoplastic effect of exisulind appears to be the result of activation of protein kinase G (PKG) which leads to multiple downstream effects culminating in apoptosis. Exisulind has demonstrated antineoplastic activity in solid tumour and haematological cancer cell lines and is an inhibitor of tumour growth in rodent models of colon, prostate, bladder, mammary and lung cancer. Preclinical data evaluating selective apoptotic antineoplastic drugs (SAANDs) in combination with various chemotherapy drugs indicates additive or synergistic antineoplastic effects. In clinical studies, exisulind prevented colorectal polyp formation in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) over 24 months. In a randomised, placebo-controlled study of prostate cancer patients, exisulind inhibited the rise of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in men with PSA progression after radical prostatectomy. Exisulind has been well-tolerated by most patients in clinical trials. In conclusion, preclinical evidence and early clinical results suggest that exisulind and other drugs in this class may have wide applications in treating cancer both as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy and other targeted agents.
 ...
PMID:Exisulind, a selective apoptotic antineoplastic drug. 1177 93

Anti-tubulin couplets have activity in hormone-resistant prostate cancer. This study was designed to define the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended phase II dose (RPTD) of the unique triplet combination of paclitaxel, estramustine phosphate (EMP) and vinorelbine (Pacl-E-Vin). Patients with advanced malignancies who had failed standard therapy, ECOG performance status (PS 0-2) and adequate organ function were included. Dose of EMP was fixed at 300 mg/m2/dose p.o. t.i.d. on days 1-3 and 8-10. Vinorelbine dose was 20 mg/m2/day i.v. on days 3 and 10. Paclitaxel was dose escalated from 40 to 50 mg/m /day i.v. on days 3 and 10. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Twelve adults (median age 72) were entered on this study. Primary tumors included prostate (n=7), cervix (n=2), melanoma (n=1), colon (1) and lung with synchronous prostate cancer (n=1). Nine patients had received no prior chemotherapy, one had received a prior regimen and two had received two or more prior regimens. Of four evaluable patients at dose level 1, one patient had grade 3 neutropenia leading to the day 10 dose being withheld. Of five evaluable patients at dose level 2, there was one DLT (febrile neutropenia) and two grade 3 neutropenias leading to the day 10 dose being withheld. One patient had a lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. Other side effects were mild and reversible. Nine patients were evaluable for efficacy: three with prostate cancer had a greater than 50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and a patient with synchronous prostate and lung cancer had a greater than 50% PSA response. We conclude that the DLT of Pacl-E-Vin is neutropenia. RPTD is vinorelbine 20 mg/m2, paclitaxel 40 mg/m2, both administered on days 3 and 10, and EMP 900 mg/m2/day on days 1-3 and 8-10, q3w. Dose omission at day 10 followed by 20% dose reduction of paclitaxel and vinorelbine is recommended in the event of grade 3 neutropenia. Activity in hormone-refractory prostate cancer is promising and warrants phase II evaluation.
 ...
PMID:A phase I study of paclitaxel, estramustine phosphate and vinorelbine (Pacl-E-Vin) in advanced malignancies: triple tubulin targeting. 1254 60


1 2 3 4 Next >>