Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0242379 (lung cancer)
 71,905 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In 103 patients with small-cell lung cancer, we compared four courses of standard doses of Adriamycin (A) (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio), vincristine (V), and cyclophosphamide (C) with a regimen of increased doses of cyclophosphamide and to a lesser extent, Adriamycin. We found no significant difference in rate (22% v 21%) or median duration (seven v nine months) of complete remission. Patients not in complete remission after the four cycles of AVC received two courses of VP-16 (etoposide) and cisplatin: the complete remission rate increased to 49% and 48% respectively. Patients on the high-dose arm received co-trimoxazole prophylaxis; those on the standard arm did not. Patients on the high-dose arm had a higher incidence of neutropenia (nadir less than 500 cells/microL) but a lower incidence of infection for similar degrees of neutropenia. However, they also suffered more severe side effects of a different kind. Cotrimoxazole thus allowed for the administration of higher doses of chemotherapy to outpatients by protecting them from infection. However, the higher doses of cyclophosphamide and Adriamycin, did not improve treatment results, produced more severe side effects, and is not recommended.
 ...
PMID:Co-trimoxazole prophylaxis during high-dose chemotherapy of small-cell lung cancer. 298 Dec 92

Seventy-eight patients with evaluable small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were treated with etoposide (VP-16) and cisplatin after their disease failed to respond to, or relapsed after, induction combination chemotherapy, consisting primarily of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and vincristine (CAV). Twenty-four patients had limited disease (LD) and 54 had extensive disease (ED). In six (8%) patients, a complete response (CR) was achieved and in 37 (47%), there was a partial response (PR). The median duration of response for responding patients was 22 weeks (range, 4 to 50 weeks) for patients with LD and 18 weeks (range, 4 to 49 weeks) for those with ED. Twelve percent of patients demonstrated stable disease, and 33% of patients had progressive disease on treatment. The median survival times of LD patients achieving a CR or PR were 59 and 34 weeks, respectively, whereas the comparable figures for ED patients were 45 and 23 weeks, respectively. Gastrointestinal toxicity was mild, but myelosuppression, predominantly leukopenia and thrombocytopenia, was common. Mild to moderate nephrotoxicity occurred in 11 patients, but was reversible in all cases. Two febrile episodes occurred during periods of drug-induced neutropenia, but no other significant toxicities were identified. These results provide further evidence that VP-16 and cisplatin is an effective and tolerable combination chemotherapy regimen for SCLC resistant to CAV.
 ...
PMID:Etoposide (VP-16) and cisplatin: an effective treatment for relapse in small-cell lung cancer. 298 Dec 93

From July 1980, 104 consecutive patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) received vincristine 1.4 mg/m2, doxorubicin (Adriamycin) 40 mg/m2, and Etoposide (VePesid) 300 mg/m2 intravenously (as a single infusion) every 3 weeks. The overall response rate (complete response plus partial response) was 58%. In 47 patients with limited disease the response rate was 66% with 21/47 (45%) complete responders. Treatment was delivered on an outpatient basis. Toxicity was mild, and in 455 rapid infusions of etoposide, there have been no adverse reactions.
 ...
PMID:Single-dose etoposide in combination with vincristine and doxorubicin in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). 298 35

Thirty-one patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were treated with VP-16 and cisplatin as first-line therapy. In the majority of cases an Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio) containing regimen was contraindicated because of severe cardiac or hepatic disease. Eight patients who presented with cerebral metastases were also included in the series. Eleven patients had limited disease (LD), and 20 had extensive disease (ED). Of the 28 evaluable patients, 12 (43%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 12 (43%) had a partial response (PR). Four patients (14%) either had no response or progressed on treatment. The median duration of response for patients with LD was 39 weeks and for those with ED, 26 weeks. The median survival time (MST) for the whole group of responding (CR and PR) LD patients was 70 weeks (range, 28 to 181 + weeks), and for responding ED patients, it was 43 weeks (range, 17 to 68 weeks). Gastrointestinal toxicity was mild, but leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were common. There were four febrile episodes during periods of drug-induced neutropenia and this led to one treatment-related death. Nephrotoxicity occurred in 15 patients and required discontinuation of cisplatin in two. These results compare favorably with reports of standard induction chemotherapy regimens and provide further evidence of the activity of the VP-16 and cisplatin regimen in patients with SCLC.
 ...
PMID:VP-16 and cisplatin as first-line therapy for small-cell lung cancer. 299 6

The Lung Cancer Study Group randomized 141 patients with resected stage II and III adenocarcinoma and large-cell undifferentiated carcinoma to receive postoperative Cytoxan (Bristol-Meyers, Syracuse, NY), Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio), and cisplatin (CAP) chemotherapy or bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) and levamisole immunotherapy. Careful intraoperative staging was performed on all patients. Before randomization, patients were stratified by stage, weight loss, cardiac arrhythmia, and institution. Prognostic variables such as stage, age, weight loss, and nodal involvement were equally distributed between the two groups. Disease-free survival was significantly prolonged in the group receiving chemotherapy. There was no evidence of a deleterious effect of the immunotherapy. This study indicates that postoperative CAP chemotherapy is effective in prolonging disease-free survival in these patients.
 ...
PMID:Surgical adjuvant therapy for stage II and stage III adenocarcinoma and large-cell undifferentiated carcinoma. 300 26

In an attempt to circumvent innate or acquired tumor-cell resistance to chemotherapy, patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were treated with induction therapy that incorporated two active and potentially non-cross-resistant chemotherapy regimens on two National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCI-C) trials. Patients with limited disease (LD) SCLC were treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin (Adriamycin [Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio]) and vincristine (CAV) and VP-16 plus cisplatin in two different sequences. One arm was randomized to receive CAV alternating with VP-16 plus cisplatin for a total of six treatment cycles, and the other arm received three courses of CAV followed by three courses of VP-16 plus cisplatin. Both treatment strategies produced similar response rates and survival curves, and each treatment group has a projected 2-year survival of 20%. Patients with extensive disease (ED) were treated with either six cycles of CAV (standard regimen) or CAV alternating with VP-16 plus cisplatin for a total of six treatment cycles. In this study, the alternating regimen produced a higher complete response (CR) rate (40% v 27%) and overall response rate (61% v 39%; P less than .01). The progression-free survival was also superior for the alternating arm (P = .001), as was overall survival (P less than .05). The frequency of thrombocytopenia and severe gastrointestinal toxicity was slightly greater in the alternating arm, but the frequency of neutropenia and infection was less. The alternation of CAV and VP-16 plus cisplatin during induction therapy is an effective treatment strategy in the management of SCLC and superior to CAV alone in extensive SCLC.
 ...
PMID:The use of VP-16 plus cisplatin during induction chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer. 302 Jun 92

VP-16 and cisplatin were used as first-line therapy in 31 patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in whom chemotherapy regimens that contained doxorubicin (Adriamycin [Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio]) were contraindicated because of severe cardiac or hepatic disease. Eight patients who had cerebral metastases at presentation were also included in the study. There were 11 patients with limited disease (LD) and 20 with extensive disease (ED). Of the 28 evaluable patients, 12 (43%) had a complete response (CR) and 12 (43%) had a partial response (PR). Four patients (14%) failed to respond. The median duration of response (MDR) for LD patients was 39 weeks and for ED patients was 26 weeks. Patients with LD who responded (CR and PR) had a median survival time (MST) of 70 weeks (range, 28 to 232+ weeks), whereas ED patients who responded had an MST of 43 weeks (range, 17 to 68 weeks). Gastrointestinal toxicity was mild, but leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were common. Mild degrees of reversible nephrotoxicity occurred in 15 patients, but required discontinuation of cisplatin in only two. The results of this study are compared with several other recently published reports of VP-16 and cisplatin used as first-line therapy in SCLC.
 ...
PMID:First-line therapy with VP-16 and cisplatin for small-cell lung cancer. 302 Jun 94

Seventy patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were given six courses of chemotherapy alternating two drug combinations: a combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin (Adriamycin [Adria Laboratories, Columbus OH]) and vincristine (CAV) was alternated with cisplatin and etoposide at 3-week intervals. Thoracic radiotherapy was administered concurrently with the first cisplatin-etoposide chemotherapy. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was administered after the completion of all chemotherapy. No maintenance treatment was used. Seventy-six percent of patients achieved a complete clinical response. The median survival was 78 weeks and the 2-year survival rate was 32% with an average follow-up of 3 1/2 years. Seventeen percent are currently alive and disease free. Cisplatin and etoposide can be administered concurrently with thoracic irradiation with acceptable toxicity. Our results justify further clinical research using alternating chemotherapy and concurrent thoracic irradiation and cisplatin-etoposide chemotherapy.
 ...
PMID:Alternating chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin-etoposide for limited-stage small-cell carcinoma of the lung. 302 Jun 95

Etoposide is one of the most active drugs used in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Recently, studies were completed that evaluated the substitution of etoposide for doxorubicin (Adriamycin) used in combination with cyclophosphamide and vincristine. This study has shown that equivalent antitumor activity, as measured by objective response, can be obtained with the combination of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and vincristine (CEV) as compared with the CAV combination. A longer response duration and median survival are seen in extensive-disease patients treated with the CEV combination. As expected, no cardiotoxicity is associated with CEV therapy, and interestingly, there is no potentiating neurotoxicity with CEV. A study recently completed has shown that CEV can be effectively combined with intensive radiation therapy to the chest administered simultaneously. CEV appears to be an effective alternative to CAV, and it can be readily combined with aggressive radiation therapy.
 ...
PMID:Clinical trials of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and vincristine in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer. 302 Jun 99

Cisplatin plus VP-16 has become a widely used salvage regimen for CAV (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin [Adriamycin], and vincristine) failures. However, the major value of this two-drug combination will probably be as an integral part of the initial therapeutic strategy. Cisplatin plus VP-16 has been used as induction therapy in four separate published studies involving 238 patients. The response rates ranged from 71% to 94% and complete remission (CR) rates varied from 30% to 53%. Cisplatin plus VP-16 has also been alternated with CAV in several phase II studies with encouraging results. A Southeastern Cancer Study Group (SECSG) protocol in extensive disease is currently testing this hypothesis in a random prospective study. A recently completed SECSG protocol in limited small-cell lung cancer tested the concept of late intensification with two courses of cisplatin plus VP-16 following six courses of CAV, v six courses of CAV alone. Presently, there is a statistically significant survival advantage for cisplatin plus VP-16.
 ...
PMID:Initial therapy with cisplatin plus VP-16 in small-cell lung cancer. 302 Jul 1


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>