Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0242379 (lung cancer)
 71,905 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The treatment of advanced ovarian cancer with taxol is hindered by the development of drug resistance. The cellular target for taxol is the microtubule that is stabilized by the drug. Taxol preferentially binds to the beta subunit of tubulin of which there are six distinct isotypes in mammalian cells. We have used highly specific oligonucleotides and polymerase chain reaction to analyze expression of all six beta-tubulin genes. Human lung cancer cells (A549) were selected in 12 and 24 nM taxol resulting in cell lines that were 9- and 17-fold resistant, respectively. These cells displayed an altered ratio of classes I, II, III, and IVa beta-tubulin isotypes. Ovarian tumors, seven untreated primary and four taxol- resistant tumor-bearing ascites, displayed significant increases (P < 0.005) in classes I (3.6-fold), III (4.4-fold), and IVa (7.6-fold) isotypes in the taxol-resistant samples as compared with untreated primary ovarian tumors. The increased expression appears to be related to the resistance phenotype, as the basal levels of the class III and IVa isotypes in the untreated tumors were extremely low. This is the first report of altered expression of specific beta-tubulin genes in taxol-resistant ovarian tumors and we propose that the latter may play a role in clinical resistance to taxol.
 ...
PMID:Taxol-resistant epithelial ovarian tumors are associated with altered expression of specific beta-tubulin isotypes. 927 47

Studies conducted by the Spanish Lung Cancer Group indicate that cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy can yield a 25% response rate, 9-month median survival time, and 30% 1-year survival rate in patients with stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer. Phase II trials of single-agent paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) have an almost 30% response rate in non-small cell lung cancer. Based on these results, we decided to examine whether the sequence-dependent effects of paclitaxel/etoposide influence treatment outcome (antitumor response) and toxicity. In vitro data show a paradoxical antagonist rather than additive effect. In the first part of our study (part A), paclitaxel and etoposide were administered at the same time. In the second part (part B), etoposide preceded paclitaxel. In both parts, patients with previously untreated stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer with good performance status were eligible. In part A, etoposide (fixed dose, 100 mg/m2) on days 1, 2, and 3 was administered by 30-minute infusion; paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) was given by a 3-hour infusion on day 1. In part B, the etoposide dose and schedule were the same, but paclitaxel (same dose) was administered on day 4. Treatment in both parts was repeated every 21 days for a maximum of 10 cycles. In part A, 18 patients were entered and no objective responses were observed. In part B, 21 patients were accrued, 17 of whom had sufficient follow-up for response assessment. Seven objective responses were achieved (two complete and five partial responses, for an objective response rate of 41%). Seven patients had no change and three had progressive disease. Frequency and severity of side effects were not significantly different in either part of the study. However, grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 10 (59%) patients and one (5%) patient in parts A and B of the trial, respectively. Nonhematologic toxicity was slight. In conclusion, paclitaxel cytotoxicity is abrogated when it is given concurrently with etoposide. When etoposide precedes paclitaxel, a more effective paclitaxel/etoposide schedule is attained.
 ...
PMID:A sequence-dependent paclitaxel/etoposide phase II trial in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. 933 Nov 23

The primary objective of this study was to define the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity profile of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ), given as a 24-hour infusion, in conjunction with ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide (ICE) chemotherapy in patients with advanced lung cancer. Paclitaxel was escalated from 75 to 225 mg/m2 in 25-mg/m2 increments. All patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 5 microg/kg/d from day 4 until the neutrophil count was > or = 10,000/microL. The study population consisted of 41 patients with a median age of 60 years and a median follow-up of 20.7 months. Stage distribution included 5% stage IIIA, 46% stage IIIB, and 49% stage IV. Histology consisted of 61% adenocarcinoma, 12% squamous cell carcinoma, 10% large cell carcinoma, 15% small cell carcinoma, and 2% mixed. The predominant toxicity was hematologic; 63% of patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia and 49% developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Fever and neutropenia occurred in 34% of patients. Hematologic toxicity was, in all cases, short-term and reversible and was not dose related. With few exceptions, nonhematologic toxicity was not clinically important. Among 39 patients evaluable for response, 36% achieved a remission (8% complete, 28% partial, 41% had stable disease, and 23% experienced disease progression). Among 33 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, the response rate was 27% (one complete response, eight partial responses, 15 had stable disease, and nine had progressive disease). Among six patients with small cell carcinoma, the response rate was 83% (two complete responses, three partial responses, and one had stable disease). The median survival of all 41 patients was 13.6 months. Survival was almost identical between stage IIIA and stage IV subsets. We conclude that it is possible to safely administer full-dose single-agent paclitaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in conjunction with full-dose ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy. While response rates observed were not particularly notable, median survival is considerably longer than that usually achieved with combination chemotherapy in advanced lung cancer.
 ...
PMID:Ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide/paclitaxel in advanced lung cancer: update and preliminary survival analysis. 933 Nov 27

Small cell lung cancer accounts for 20% to 25% of all lung cancer cases and is initially responsive to combination chemotherapy. However, the majority of patients relapse, and at that point their disease is highly resistant to chemotherapy. The combination of etoposide with either cisplatin or carboplatin is regarded as the standard of care for these patients. Previous studies have documented the activity of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) at doses of 135 to 250 mg/m2 administered over 1, 3, or 24 hours as either a single agent or in combination with etoposide and a platinum compound. Studies adding paclitaxel to etoposide/carboplatin (EP) have demonstrated complete responses in both limited and extensive disease, but all have been in single-arm phase II studies. Preliminary data also suggest the possibility of a dose-response curve for the combination. We recently began a randomized phase II/III comparison of the standard EP to EP plus paclitaxel for newly diagnosed patients with limited or extensive small cell lung cancer. Carboplatin in this study is dosed according to area under the concentration-time curve as calculated by the Calvert formula. The study compares EP (carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 6 intravenously [IV] over 30 to 60 minutes on day 1, with etoposide 120 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 3) versus EP plus paclitaxel (paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV 1-hour infusion on day 1, carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 6 IV over 30 to 60 minutes on day 1, and etoposide 50/100 mg orally on alternating days 1 to 10). The design, inclusion criteria, and staging of patients in this study will be presented with initial accrual and patient characteristics. Randomized studies of this type are essential if the true role of this new combination is to be fully evaluated.
 ...
PMID:A randomized study of etoposide and carboplatin with or without paclitaxel in the treatment of small cell lung cancer. 933 Nov 38

Topotecan (Hycamtin) is a promising new topoisomerase I-targeting anticancer agent that first entered clinical trials in 1989 under National Cancer Institute sponsorship in collaboration with SmithKline Beecham. In 1996, it was approved for use by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for previously treated patients with advanced ovarian cancer. For these patients, topotecan provides another therapeutic option upon disease progression after initial platinum-based chemotherapy. Topotecan also has activity in other tumor types, including small-cell lung cancer, hematologic malignancies and pediatric neuroblastoma and rhabdomyosarcoma. Topotecan combination regimens with paclitaxel (Taxol), etoposide (VePesid), cisplatin (Platinol), and cytarabine and with other treatment modalities, such as radiation therapy, are in development. Studies evaluating topotecan combinations as initial treatment in such diseases as ovarian and small-cell lung carcinoma are also underway. It is hoped that earlier use of topotecan, with its novel mechanism of action, will prolong survival and increase cure rates in patients with these chemoresponsive tumors. Whether or not such hopes are realized, these important studies will help define the role of topotecan in cancer chemotherapy.
 ...
PMID:Clinical status and optimal use of topotecan. 939 64

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) is a taxane with a wide spectrum of antitumor activity. Combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus cisplatin has been shown to be more active than older drug combinations in the treatment of ovarian cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. Paclitaxel also appears to be as active as other therapies for the first-line treatment of breast cancer, and an established salvage treatment after platinum therapy for ovarian cancer and after anthracycline therapy for breast cancer. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating the role of paclitaxel in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer and in early stage lung cancer. Cost analysis of combination paclitaxel/cisplatin treatment for ovarian cancer indicated drug costs represented a low proportion of inpatient costs, making it cost effective per life-year gained in both the inpatient and outpatient settings. In extensive cost analyses of lung cancer therapies in Canada, best supportive care for stage IV lung cancer was shown to cost more than Can$28,000. In this setting, with an expected increase in survival, the cost of treating stage IV lung cancer with paclitaxel appears to be cost effective. Furthermore, in a large randomized study of paclitaxel versus cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil/prednisone in breast cancer, preliminary results suggested that paclitaxel may be associated with equivalent cancer control, quality of life, and less side effects. Thus, future research will consider the cost-benefit of improved quality of life with paclitaxel therapy and evaluate the comparative cost-benefit when taxanes are used to treat earlier-stage disease.
 ...
PMID:The pharmacoeconomics of cancer therapies. 942 79

The purpose of the study was to delineate the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel (Taxol, Bristol Myers Squibb) in the treatment of drug resistant small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients with SCLC relapsing within 3 months of cytotoxic therapy received paclitaxel 175 mg m(-2) intravenously over 3 h every 3 weeks. The dose of paclitaxel was adjusted to the toxicity encountered in the previous cycle. Of 24 patients entered into the study, 24 and 21 were assessable for response and toxicity respectively. There were two early deaths and two toxic deaths. No complete and seven partial responses (29%) (95%CI 12-51%) were observed and five patients had disease stabilization. The median survival (n = 21) was 100 days. Life-threatening toxicity occurred in four patients; in others (non)-haematological toxicity was manageable. Paclitaxel is active in drug-resistant SCLC. Further investigation in combination with other active agents in this poor prognosis group is appropriate.
 ...
PMID:A phase II study of paclitaxel in heavily pretreated patients with small-cell lung cancer. 946 Oct 9

We evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of combination paclitaxel (Taxol) (via 1-hour infusion), carboplatin (Paraplatin), and oral etoposide (VePesid) in the first-line treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer. Between June 1993 and July 1996, 117 patients with small-cell lung cancer. were treated in two sequential phase II studies. The first 38 patients received a lower-dose regimen: paclitaxel 135 mg/m2, via 1-hour infusion; carboplatin dosed to an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5.0, and oral etoposide 50 mg alternating with 100 mg on days 1 through 10. Based on a very favorable toxicity profile, the paclitaxel and carboplatin doses were increased in the subsequent cohort of 79 patients (paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 by 1-hour infusion; carboplatin target AUC increased to 6.0). Thoracic radiation therapy (1.8 Gy/day; total dose, 45 Gy) was administered concurrently with courses 3 and 4 of chemotherapy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. The combination of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2, carboplatin to an AUC of 6.0, and extended-schedule oral etoposide 50 or 100 mg alternating days 1 through 10 is highly active and well tolerated in patients with small-cell lung cancer. The regimen can be administered concurrently with radiation therapy with no unusual side effects, although a minority of patients develop esophagitis. Median survival rates in patients with both extensive- and limited-stage disease compare favorably with other reported regimens.
 ...
PMID:Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended-schedule oral etoposide for small-cell lung cancer. 951 9

Despite advances in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer during the 1970s, with the use of combination chemotherapy, and in the 1980s, with the combination of etoposide and cisplatin plus concurrent radiation therapy, treatment success seems to have reached a plateau in the current decade. Research should now be directed into three areas: (1) strategies to prevent the development of second cancers, one of the major causes of death in people "cured" of their first primary cancer; (2) introduction of new agents such as paclitaxel (Taxol) and other newer chemotherapeutic drugs into clinical trials, particularly in conjunction with radiation therapy in limited disease; and (3) development of new therapeutic approaches, such as the modulation of drug resistance, molecular biology interventions, and monoclonal antibody therapy, strategies that are based on increased understanding of small-cell lung cancer biology. Although it is doubtful that any single strategy will be curative, selective approaches that exploit new research findings in conjunction with moderately effective, more conventional treatments might allow us to raise remission and survival rates significantly.
 ...
PMID:Small-cell lung cancer: a perspective on the past and a preview of the future. 951 11

Management of disseminated non-small-cell lung cancer has changed over the past 10 years. Newer agents, such as vinorelbine (Navelbine) and paclitaxel (Taxol), have been shown to modestly improve survival in patients with advanced disease when administered in conjunction with cisplatin (Platinol). Compared with older regimens consisting of cisplatin and a Vinca alkaloid or a podophyllotoxin, the newer regimens yield a 10- to 15-week improvement in median survival and an additional 10% to 15% in 1-year survival. Based on these results derived from randomized trials, it appears that metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer patients with good performance status should be treated with regimens containing either vinorelbine or paclitaxel in conjunction with cisplatin.
 ...
PMID:Recent advances with chemotherapy for NSCLC: the ECOG experience. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. 951 15


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>