Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0242379 (lung cancer)
 71,905 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A total of 55 patients with measurable colorectal metastatic carcinoma were studied to evaluate the impact on toxicity, response, and survival of protracted venous infusion (PVI) 5-FU 200 mg/m2 per day with Cis-DDP 80 mg/m2 or carboplatin 300 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, 1-hour infusion. Patients received continuous uninterrupted therapy until there were signs or symptoms of toxicity. Both 5-FU and cisplatin were withheld when patients experienced grade II stomatitis and diarrhea, severe nausea or vomiting not controlled by standard antiemetic therapy, and clinically significant hand-foot syndrome. The toxicity was neurological (20% grade 2 and 3) hematological (13% grade 2) and dermatological (11% grade 2). The overall response (CR+PR) was 24% with a median survival of 13 months. The results of our study show that there is no improvement in response rate, response duration or survival compared with historical trials. However, this study does confirm the valuable palliative role of the protracted 5-FU infusion treatment. Colorectal carcinoma is one of the most common neoplasms in Western societies, being second only to lung cancer as a cause of death from malignancy. The management of nonmetastatic primary disease in surgical, with adjuvant chemotherapy for those at high risk of relapse. However, for those with metastatic disease at diagnosis or recurrent disease after resection, cytotoxic chemotherapy is the treatment of choice and fluorouracil (5-FU) is the most active cytotoxic agent in this disease, with a response rate of approximately 20%. Efforts to improve the response rate have focused on the use of agents to modulate 5 FU. The Southwestern Oncology Group (SWOG) study reported by Leichman et al. (1) and a study from the United Kingdom by Hill et al. (2) compared conventional FU to modulated FU and found no improvement in response rate or survival. In the SWOG study, two different schedules of bolus FU and LV were compared with bolus FU alone and to continuous infusion FU administered alone or modulated by LV or PALA. In this study, the results obtained with bolus FU were superior to most of the studies in the literature: The response rate was 26%, and the median survival was 14 months. The high- and low-dose LV and FU groups showed response rates and survival similar to bolus FU alone. However, in 12 previously reported randomized studies comparing FU and LV or FU alone, nine reported that the combination of FU and LV produced significant increases in response rates and two reported significant increase in survival (3, 4). Many of these trials used the dose schedules reported in the SWOG trial. Protracted venous infusion (PVI) 5-FU has been shown to have superior efficacy with less toxicity in colorectal cancer when compared to bolus 5-FU and synergy between cisplatin and 5-FU has been demonstrated in vitro. Consequently, we have investigated the efficacy of the combination of bolus cis or carboplatin and PVI 5 FU in 55 patients with advanced colorectal cancer using survival, response rate, symptomatic response, and toxicity as study endpoints.
 ...
PMID:First-line protracted venous infusion fluorouracil with CisDDP or carboplatin in advanced colorectal cancer. 922 28

To assess the efficacy and toxicity of an outpatient combination chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), we treated 70 consecutive patients with epirubicin 80 mg m(-2) i.v. on day 1 and etoposide 200 mg o.d. p.o. on days 1-4 (EE) at 3-weekly intervals. The median age of patients was 64 years (range 39-84). The male-female ratio was 42:28 and 35 (50%) had metastatic disease. Fifty-seven patients were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 64.4%, including 14 (23.7%) complete responses and 24 (40.7%) partial responses. Median time to progression was 7 months in responders and 8 months in patients with limited disease. The median survival in patients with limited disease was 10.5 months (range 0.5-70 +) and 7 months (range 0.5-24) in those with extensive disease. Improvement of symptoms occurred in 79% of patients with shortness of breath, 80% with cough, 81% with haemoptysis and 68% with pain. In 19 patients an increase in body weight was noted. Major (WHO grade 3/4) toxicities were neutropenia in 13 (18.5%) patients, alopecia in 33 (47.1%) patients, mucositis in 15 (21.4%) patients, anorexia in eight patients (11.4%), nausea and vomiting in six patients (8.5%) and diarrhoea in 4 (5.7%) patients. In conclusion, EE is an active and well-tolerated outpatient regimen in the treatment of SCLC. The survival data in this unselected group of patients were disappointing and the possible explanations for this are discussed.
 ...
PMID:Outpatient treatment with epirubicin and oral etoposide in patients with small-cell lung cancer. 930 64

We conducted a phase I study of irinotecan (CPT-11) and etoposide (VP-16) given sequentially to untreated patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Arm A: CPT-11 was given over 90 min on days 1-3 and VP-16 was given over 60 min on days 4-6. Arm B: VP-16 was given on days 1-3 and CPT-11 on days 4-6. G-CSF was given to all patients daily on days 7-17. Twenty-seven patients were entered randomly at the two arms. The major dose-limiting toxicities in arms A and B were granulocytopenia and diarrhoea. Transient elevations of transaminases and bilirubin were observed in both arms. The degree of the toxicities did not differ between the two arms. The maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) were 60 mg m-2 CPT-11 and 60 mg m-2 VP-16 in both arms. Of the 13 patients who received more than two cycles, two out of five achieved partial response (PR) at the first level of arm A and one out of four achieved PR at the second level of arm B. We conclude that these schedules of sequential CPT-11 and VP-16 administration were inappropriate because of severe toxicities.
 ...
PMID:Phase I study of sequentially administered topoisomerase I inhibitor (irinotecan) and topoisomerase II inhibitor (etoposide) for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. 940 Sep 32

Combined use of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin has proven to have synergistic effects in many experimental systems and clinical studies. UFT, an oral preparation of uracil and tegafur in a 4:1 molar ratio, was reported to have enhanced activity as compared with 5-FU or tegafur alone against various human tumors. Based on those results, we conducted a pilot study to confirm the feasibility and antitumor effect of UFT in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). UFT was orally administered at a dose of 400 mg/m2 according to a protocol for step-wise prolongation of the administration period, such as days 1-14 in step I, days 1-21 in step II, days 1-28 in step III. During to course, cisplatin was administered at a fixed dose of 20 mg/m2/day on days 8 through 12. The course was repeated every 4 weeks. Numbers of patients enrolled in steps I, II, III were six, ten and six (a total of 22), respectively. There were three females and 19 males, PS scored 0/1/2 = 7/14/1, stage IIIA/IIIB/IV = 3/8/11. Adenocarcinoma/squamous cell carcinoma/large cell carcinoma = 11/7/4, and median age 68 (range 52-79). All 22 patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 21 for efficacy. Compliance of UFT declined as the administration period of UFT was prolonged. In step I, one patient had grade 3 toxicity of each neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea/vomiting and diarrhea. In step II, grade 3, 4 neutropenia was seen in four patients, grade 3 thrombocytopenia and anorexia in one patient, and grade 3 nausea/vomiting in four patients. In step III, there was grade 3 neutropenia in two patients and grade 3 anorexia in one patient. All other toxicities were mild. The overall response rate was 38% (one CR and 7 PR, 95% C.I.: 21-59%). Combination therapy with oral UFT and 5-day infusion of cisplatin is feasible with substantial antitumor effect against advanced NSCLC. Since UFT compliance decreased in step III (no patient in step III received > 2 courses of treatment), we considered the step II schedule to be worth for further evaluation in a combination phase II study.
Lung Cancer 1997 Nov
PMID:Pilot study of UFT combined with 5 consecutive days cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer. 944 49

JM216 [bis-acetato-ammine-dichloro-cyclohexylamine-platinum(IV)] is an oral platinum complex that is currently in phase II trials in ovarian cancer and lung cancer on a daily-times-5 schedule. This trial examined an alternative schedule of two doses given 12 h apart, which may be better tolerated by patients. A total of 19 patients were given 50 cycles of treatment at doses ranging from 150 to 350 mg/m2 b.i.d. The study was stopped before the MTD was reached due to non-linear pharmacokinetics. Toxicity was similar to that encountered in previous phase I studies, with nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea being seen at all dose levels, although this was generally mild and short-lived, and grade 3 and 4 myelosuppression being seen at dose levels ranging from 250 to 350 mg/m2. There was no nephro-, oto-, or neurotoxicity, but one patient had an allergic reaction at 300 mg/m2 on the fifth and sixth cycles. No response was seen, but two patients with mesothelioma had stable disease and received six cycles. There was considerable interpatient variability in plasma pharmacokinetics at all dose levels. There was no relationship between dose and AUC (dose 1 and dose 2) or Cmax after dose 1. In a limited number of patients the first dose was given in the morning rather than in the evening, apparently resulting in lower AUC, Cmax and Tmax values at the 250-mg/m2 dose level, but this was not seen in one patient at 300 mg/m2. This study confirms that the pharmacokinetics of JM216 is non-linear and highly variable due to saturable absorption and that the daily times 5 schedule is the optimal schedule for further phase II trials.
 ...
PMID:Phase I study of oral JM216 given twice daily. 965 14

A phase I trial of the combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) with cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) showed a very promising response rate of 54% in previously untreated NSCLC patients. This study was conducted to confirm the activity and toxicities of CPT-11 and cisplatin combination for previously untreated NSCLC in a multi-institutional phase II study. Seventy patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC received CPT-11 60 mg m(-2) intravenously (i.v.) on days 1, 8 and 15, and cisplatin 80 mg m(-2) (i.v.) on day 1 every 4 weeks. Assessments were made of response, survival and toxicities. Sixty-nine were eligible, and evaluable for toxicities and survival, and 64 patients evaluable for response. Thirty-three patients (52%; 95% confidence interval 39-64%) achieved an objective response, with one complete response (2%) and 32 partial responses (50%). The median duration of response was 19 weeks and the overall median survival time was 44 weeks. The 1-year survival rate was 33%. The major toxic effects were leucopenia and diarrhoea. Grade 3 or 4 leucopenia, neutropenia, and diarrhoea occurred in 32 patients (46%), 53 patients (80%), and 13 patients (19%) respectively. A combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin is very effective against non-small-cell lung cancer with acceptable toxicities.
 ...
PMID:A phase II trial of combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. CPT-11 Lung Cancer Study Group. 968 87

Irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) shows marked anti-tumour activity alone and in combination with cisplatin in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is necessary to investigate combined-modality therapy including novel effective anti-cancer agents to improve long-term survival of patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. A phase I/II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with CPT-11 and cisplatin was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and efficacy in this group of patients. Thirteen previously untreated patients with unresectable stage IIIA/B NSCLC were enrolled and efficacy and toxicity was evaluated in 12 of them; one patient was ineligible. Chemotherapy was repeated every 4 weeks for three courses. Radiation therapy was started on day 2 of the first course of chemotherapy and 60 Gy in 30 fractions was given over 6 weeks. Four of six patients enrolled at level 1 completed the scheduled treatment. Another two received only one and two courses of chemotherapy as a result of persistent leucopenia and neutropenic fever respectively. Three of six patients given level 2 therapy completed the scheduled treatment. Another three received only one and two courses of chemotherapy, two refused treatment because of diarrhoea and one died of pneumonia. Radiation therapy was inadequate in these three patients. As the CPT-11 dose intensity in this trial was low, because of the necessity of omitting CPT-11 administration on days 8 and/or 15 as a result of leucopenia or diarrhoea, and the low radiation therapy completion rate, the trial was discontinued at level 2. Five patients at level 1 and three at level 2 showed partial responses, an overall response rate of 67%. Although neither MTD nor dose-limiting toxicity could be identified, chemotherapy with CPT-11 and cisplatin plus concurrent radiation therapy was deemed unacceptable. We are now conducting a phase I/II study of chemotherapy using CPT-11 as a single agent in combination with radiation therapy.
 ...
PMID:Dose-finding study of irinotecan and cisplatin plus concurrent radiotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer [seecomments]. 968 87

Vinorelbine, docetaxel and cisplatin have documented single-agent activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); a multicenter phase II trial was initiated in order to evaluate the tolerance and efficacy of their combination. A total of 24 chemotherapy-naive patients with measurable stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and performance status (PS; WHO) 0-2 entered the study. Vinorelbine (20 mg/m2 i.v.) was given on days 1 and 15, cisplatin (60 mg/m2) on day 1, and docetaxel (100 mg/m2) on day 16, in cycles of 28 days. Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (150 microg/m2 s.c.) was administered prophylactically from day 17 to day 27. One pathological complete (4%) and six partial responses (25%) were documented (overall response 29%; 95% CI 11.6-49.2%). A total of five patients (21%) had stable and 12 (50%) progressive disease. The median duration of response was 28 weeks and the median time to tumor progression 36 weeks; the median survival was 20 weeks. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 16 patients (67%) while 13 of them (54%) developed febrile neutropenia. Grade 4 mucositis occurred in two patients (8%) and one of them also presented grade 4 diarrhea. There were four treatment-related deaths: two from sepsis, one from massive hemoptysis due to a pulmonary abscess and one from acute myocardial ischemia 7 days post-chemotherapy. In conclusion, the high incidence of neutropenic episodes and treatment-related deaths led to an early discontinuation of patient enrollment. This combination, in the schedule and the doses used, could not be recommended for off protocol treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC.
Lung Cancer 1998 Sep
PMID:Combination chemotherapy with docetaxel, vinorelbine and cisplatin as first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase II study of the Greek Cooperative Group for Lung Cancer. 985 99

A combination chemotherapy of irinotecan (CPT-11) and cisplatin (CDDP) has been reported to be active for lung cancer. In the previous trial, however, diarrhoea and leucopenia became the major obstacle for sufficient dose escalation of CPT-11 to improve the treatment outcome. We conducted a phase I study to investigate whether the fractionated administration of CDDP and CPT-11 at escalated dose was feasible and could improve the treatment outcome. Twenty-four previously untreated patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or extensive disease of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were eligible. Both CDDP and CPT-11 were given on days 1 and 8, and repeated every 4 weeks. The dose of CDDP was fixed at 60 mg m(-2) and given by 1-h infusion before CPT-11 administration. The starting dose of CPT-11 was 40 mg m(-2), and the dose was escalated by an increase of 10 mg m(-2). The maximally tolerated dose of CPT-11 was determined as 60 mg m(-2) because grade 4 haematological or grade 3 or 4 non-haematological toxicities developed in six patients out of 11 patients evaluated. Diarrhoea became a dose-limiting toxicity. The objective response rates were 76% for NSCLC and 100% for SCLC. The recommended dose of CPT-11 and CDDP in a phase II study will be 50 mg m(-2) and 60 mg m(-2) respectively.
 ...
PMID:Fractionated administration of irinotecan and cisplatin for treatment of lung cancer: a phase I study. 1007 Sep 1

In our phase II study an acceptable and effective agent like cisplatin was used in combination with vinorelbine and gemcitabine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These two new cytostatic drugs have demonstrated, when used as a single-agent treatment, effective response rates (vinorelbine) and minimum toxicity (gemcitabine). The following schedule was used: (i) vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; (ii) gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; and (iii) cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 8. The schedule was repeated every 21 days, with a maximum of six cycles per patient. A total of 31 patients with a mean Karnofsky performance status of 90% were evaluated and 29 of them were finally eligible. Of the patients, five (16.1%) were at stage IIIb and the remainder (83.9%) were at stage IV. The overall response rate was 65% (20 patients); six patients (19.4%) had complete response (CR) and 14 (45.2%) had partial response (PR). Two patients (6.5%) had stable disease and seven (22.6%) had progressive disease. The most notable toxicity was hematologic. Leukoneutropenia was mainly revealed after the third or fourth cycle and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was administered in 24 patients (77.4%). Mild anemia was found in almost all patients after the third or fourth cycle (Hb 10-11 g/dl) and eight patients (25.8%) required erythropoietin (EPO). Thrombocytopenia was more often observed compared with other known chemotherapeutic regimens; six patients (19.4%) had grade I thrombocytopenia and therapy was delayed in another four patients (12.9%) due to this complication. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild and well tolerated and consisted of alopecia (54.8%), nausea and vomiting (12.9%), constipation (12.9%), peripheral neuropathy (9.6%), diarrhea (6.5%), stomatitis (3.2%) and local phlebitis (3.2%). The examined combination provides us with one of the best overall responses rates reported, however at the cost of remarkable hematologic toxicity. Therefore, it would be better applied in patients with good performance status. The high response rates give us hope of using this combination as a neoadjuvant regimen.
Lung Cancer 1999 Jan
PMID:A phase II study with vinorelbine, gemcitabine and cisplatin in the treatment of patients with stage IIIb-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 1010 Jan 44


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>