Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0242379 (lung cancer)
 71,905 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In our phase II study an acceptable and effective agent like cisplatin was used in combination with vinorelbine and gemcitabine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These two new cytostatic drugs have demonstrated, when used as a single-agent treatment, effective response rates (vinorelbine) and minimum toxicity (gemcitabine). The following schedule was used: (i) vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; (ii) gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; and (iii) cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 8. The schedule was repeated every 21 days, with a maximum of six cycles per patient. A total of 31 patients with a mean Karnofsky performance status of 90% were evaluated and 29 of them were finally eligible. Of the patients, five (16.1%) were at stage IIIb and the remainder (83.9%) were at stage IV. The overall response rate was 65% (20 patients); six patients (19.4%) had complete response (CR) and 14 (45.2%) had partial response (PR). Two patients (6.5%) had stable disease and seven (22.6%) had progressive disease. The most notable toxicity was hematologic. Leukoneutropenia was mainly revealed after the third or fourth cycle and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was administered in 24 patients (77.4%). Mild anemia was found in almost all patients after the third or fourth cycle (Hb 10-11 g/dl) and eight patients (25.8%) required erythropoietin (EPO). Thrombocytopenia was more often observed compared with other known chemotherapeutic regimens; six patients (19.4%) had grade I thrombocytopenia and therapy was delayed in another four patients (12.9%) due to this complication. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild and well tolerated and consisted of alopecia (54.8%), nausea and vomiting (12.9%), constipation (12.9%), peripheral neuropathy (9.6%), diarrhea (6.5%), stomatitis (3.2%) and local phlebitis (3.2%). The examined combination provides us with one of the best overall responses rates reported, however at the cost of remarkable hematologic toxicity. Therefore, it would be better applied in patients with good performance status. The high response rates give us hope of using this combination as a neoadjuvant regimen.
Lung Cancer 1999 Jan
PMID:A phase II study with vinorelbine, gemcitabine and cisplatin in the treatment of patients with stage IIIb-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 1010 Jan 44

We conducted a randomized phase II trial of two different schedules of topotecan in patients with advanced-stage non small lung cancer (NSCLC) without prior cytotoxic chemotherapy. All patients had histologic or cytologic confirmation of stage IV (M1) or III-B NSCLC. Patients were stratified by performance status, stage and weight loss. Patients were randomized to receive topotecan at intravenous doses of 1.5 mg/m(2)/day over 30 min for 5 days every 3 weeks (Arm A) or 1.3 mg/m(2)grade 3 in both arms included leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, malaise, constipation, diarrhea, lethargy, pulmonary, vomiting, infection and myalgia. Severe (> or = grade 3) thrombocytopenia occurred in 15.8% of Arm A patients and 37.8% of Arm B patients and this difference was statistically significant (P=0.03). The median times to progression are 101 and 63 days (P=0. 75) and the median survival times are 257 and 179 days (P=0.83) for Arms A and B, respectively. These differences in time to progression and overall survival are not statistically significant. Topotecan has limited, single agent activity in advanced NSCLC when given as 1. 5 mg/m(2)/day over 30 min for 5 days every 3 weeks. We do not intend to pursue further investigations with topotecan in patients with NSCLC.
Lung Cancer 2000 May
PMID:A randomized phase II trial of two schedules of topotecan for the treatment of advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer. 1071 33

In a phase III trial, 191 patients aged over 70 with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer were randomized to receive best supportive care (BSC) alone or BSC plus vinorelbine on days 1 and 8, q 21 days for up to six cycles. Increasing difficulties in recruitment meant that the investigators, blinded to the results, stopped the trial early. Data from 161 patients have been analyzed. The vinorelbine regimen was well tolerated. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 10% of patients and grade 2/3 anemia in 16%. The principle nonhematological toxicities were constipation and fatigue. An objective response rate was recorded in 19.7% of the 76 patients treated with vinorelbine. The survival experience of these patients was significantly superior to that among control patients. The median duration of survival was longer (28 versus 21 weeks) and patients receiving vinorelbine were significantly more likely to survive to one year (32% versus 14%). The relative risk of death in the vinorelbine group was 0.65 (95% confidence interval: 0.45-0.93). Quality of life was extensively investigated using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer scales. While aspects of quality-of-life issues that were directly related to drug toxicity (such as nausea and constipation) were lower in the vinorelbine group, patients who received vinorelbine fared better than controls on measures related to lung cancer symptoms and pain and on social, cognitive, and physical functioning.
 ...
PMID:The ELVIS trial: a phase III study of single-agent vinorelbine as first-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study. 1118 97

Platinum-based chemotherapy is considered standard treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, toxicity of most platinum-based regimens is substantial and requires close monitoring and supportive care. Over the past decade, paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, irinotecan, and topotecan have been introduced into the clinic. These newer agents have shown promising activity against NSCLC with a favorable toxicity profile as single agents. For patients with metastatic NSCLC, palliation is the main goal of therapy. Therefore, treatment should be easy to administer on an outpatient basis. We explored a novel combination therapy avoiding platinum. Patients with recurrent or metastatic NSCLC were treated with intravenous (i.v.) topotecan (0.5-1.0 mg/m(2)/day x 5) and i.v. vinorelbine (20-30 mg/m(2)/day on day 1 and day 5) in 21-day cycles. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined separately with or without the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. Twenty-nine patients have been enrolled to date. At i.v. topotecan doses of 0.75-1.0 mg/m(2)/day and i.v. vinorelbine of 25 mg/m(2)/day, neutropenia was frequent but of short duration (<7 days). The DLT of i.v. topotecan (0.85 mg/m(2)) in the absence of G-CSF support was based on myelosuppression with neutropenic fever. With the addition of G-CSF, a DLT has not been reached. Nonhematologic toxicities included mild to moderate fatigue and constipation. An overall clinical response rate of 42% was achieved, with responses noted at all dose levels. At a short median follow-up of 15 months, the median survival for all patients is 13 months. In conclusion, the combination regimen of topotecan and vinorelbine is feasible for outpatient administration and is well tolerated with less toxicity than platinum-based regimens. Preliminary response data demonstrate good tumor activity, suggesting that this regimen could make an excellent palliative treatment for advanced NSCLC.
 ...
PMID:Is cisplatin required for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer? Experience and preliminary results of a phase I/II trial with topotecan and vinorelbine. 1159 13

This paper reports on data from the Regional Study of Care for the Dying, conducted in 1990, and compares symptoms, care and service utilization for patients with chronic lung diseases (CLD) and lung cancer (LC) in the final 12 months of life. Post-bereavement structured interviews were conducted with informal carers of 449 LC patients and 87 CLD patients. The LC patients were significantly younger than those with CLD (P = 0.001) and these respondents were more likely to have been a spouse (P = 0.034). No differences were found in the mean number of symptoms reported by the two groups in the final year or week of life, although the CLD patients were more likely to have experienced these symptoms for longer. Significantly more patients with CLD than LC experienced breathlessness in the final year (94% CLD vs 78% LC, P < 0.001) and final week (91% CLD vs 69% LC, P < 0.001) of life. Significantly more LC patients were reported to have experienced anorexia (76% LC vs 67% CLD, P = 0.06) and constipation (59% LC vs 44% CLD, p = 0.01) in the final year of life. There were no differences in general practitioner use, but LC patients were reported to have received more help from district nurses (52% LC vs 39% CLD, P = 0.025) and from a palliative care nurse (29% LC vs 0% CLD, P < 0.001). More CLD patients were reported to have received help from social services (29% CLD vs 18% LC, P = 0.037). LC patients were reported to be more likely to have known they might die (76% LC vs 62% CLD, P = 0.003) and to have been told this by a hospital doctor (30% LC vs 8% CLD, P = 0.001). Among those that knew, LC patients were told earlier prior to death than CLD patients. This study suggests that patients with CLD at the end of life have physical and psychosocial needs at least as severe as patients with lung cancer.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of the palliative care needs of patients dying from chronic respiratory diseases and lung cancer. 1205 46

A phase II trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the novel combination of vinorelbine and paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with stages IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer. From January 1997 to September 1999, 34 patients (9 stage IIIB and 25 stage IV) received a regimen consisting of the following: vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 20 minutes intravenous (i.v.) infusion, days 1 and 8; and paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 3-hour i.v. (starting 1 hour after vinorelbine) on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 28 days until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity development. The median age was 57 years (range 41-70 years); median performance status was 1. Histology was as follows: squamous cell in 24 (71%), large cell in 1 (3%), and adenocarcinoma in 9 (26%). All patients are evaluable for toxicity, whereas 30 are evaluable for response (4 patients refused treatment). Objective response was recorded in 4 of 30 patients (13%, 95% CI 1-25%). No complete response was observed. Partial response was recorded in 4 patients (13%), no change in 10 patients (34%), and progressive disease in 16 patients (53%). The median time to treatment failure was 4 months and median survival was 9 months. The limiting toxicity was myelosuppression: leukopenia in 23 patients (68%), whereas neutropenia was observed in 25 patients (78%). Peripheral neurotoxicity developed in 14 patients (41%) (without G3 or G4 episodes), and constipation (G1-G2: 10 patients), myalgia (G1-G2: 11 patients), diarrhea (G1-G2: 7 patients), and stomatitis were observed in 7 patients. Vinorelbine-paclitaxel combination showed only modest activity against locoregionally advanced or metastatic NSCLC.
 ...
PMID:Vinorelbine and paclitaxel for locoregional advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. 1215 70

Vinorelbine is a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid that is effective as monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the large comparative Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study (ELVIS), patients receiving vinorelbine monotherapy achieved an objective response rate of 19.7%. The median survival time and the 1-year survival rate were significantly higher in recipients of vinorelbine plus best supportive care than in recipients of best supportive care alone. Vinorelbine recipients generally scored better than recipients of best supportive care on quality-of-life (QOL) functioning scales and experienced significantly fewer lung cancer-related symptoms; however, QOL scores were worse with vinorelbine for parameters relating to drug tolerability. Comparative phase III trials investigating the efficacy of combination therapy with vinorelbine and other agents specifically in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC have been conducted only for the combination of vinorelbine and gemcitabine [the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG) trial and the Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES)]. Objective response rates for vinorelbine/gemcitabine combination therapy in these phase III trials were 22 and 20%, respectively. The SICOG trial was closed early when an interim analysis demonstrated a significant survival advantage for combination therapy with vinorelbine plus gemcitabine over vinorelbine monotherapy. However, a survival advantage for combination therapy versus vinorelbine monotherapy was not demonstrated in the larger MILES trial. The main adverse effect of vinorelbine monotherapy in the elderly is myelosuppression. Adverse events associated with most antineoplastic agents, such as mild alopecia, nausea, vomiting and mucositis, were reported in clinical trials; however, these events were rarely severe. Mild-to-moderate neurotoxicity, including constipation (presumably from autonomic neuropathy), was also reported. The addition of gemcitabine to vinorelbine increased the incidence of both haematological and nonhaematological adverse events. However, there was no significant increase in the incidence of life-threatening toxicity. Vinorelbine as a single agent is effective in elderly patients with NSCLC and is associated with improved survival and at least a trend towards improved QOL parameters compared with best supportive care alone. Vinorelbine was associated with a generally manageable tolerability profile. The benefit of adding gemcitabine to vinorelbine for the treatment of NSCLC in the elderly is equivocal; improved survival was reported in one comparative trial, but not in another larger one. Vinorelbine is an effective and well tolerated palliative treatment option for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.
 ...
PMID:Vinorelbine: a review of its use in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. 1238 Dec 38

A prospective study was conducted to measure quality of life in newly diagnosed lung cancer patients attending a chest clinic in a large teaching and district general hospital in a geographically defined area (northern sector of Glasgow, Scotland). Quality of life was assessed at two points in time, pre-diagnosis (baseline) and 3 months after diagnosis (follow-up) using three standard measures; the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP); the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), and its lung cancer supplement (QLQ-LC13). Out of 133 lung cancer patients diagnosed during the study period, 129 patients (97%) were interviewed pre-diagnosis. Of these, only 63% of the patients had an active treatment. Ninety-six patients were alive at follow-up, of whom 82 patients were re-interviewed. Thus, only 82 patients who had complete data were used in the analysis. Comparing patients' pre-diagnosis and follow-up scores on the NHP, only sleep difficulties improved slightly. Patients reported increased perceived health problems of all other characteristics studied (energy, p = 0.0004; physical mobility, p = 0.0008). Similar results were observed on the EORTC questionnaires indicating that patients' functioning and global quality of life had decreased. The only significant improvement after 3 months was seen in patients' cough (p = 0.006). There were marked increases in hair loss (p < 0.0001), constipation (p = 0.007), and sore mouth (p = 0.0004). The findings suggest that patient-centred variables should receive sufficient consideration in the treatment of lung cancer. The study results clearly indicate that information on quality of life contributes to our understanding of patients' experiences of their cancer treatment.
 ...
PMID:How quality of life data contribute to our understanding of cancer patients' experiences? A study of patients with lung cancer. 1263 62

Cough is an important defensive reflex of the airway and a common symptom of respiratory disease. After an upper respiratory tract virus infection, cough is transient, but is more persistent with conditions such as asthma, rhinosinusitis, gastroesophageal reflux, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer. Treatment directed at these conditions may improve cough, but there remains a need to control cough directly. The most effective antitussives are opioids, such as morphine, codeine or pholcodeine, but they produce side effects including drowsiness, nausea, constipation and physical dependence. Opioids such as k- and d-opioid receptor agonists, non-opioids such as nociceptin, neurokinin and bradykinin receptor antagonists, vanilloid receptor VR(1) antagonists, blockers of sodium-dependent channels, and maxi-K calcium-dependent channel activators of afferent nerves may all represent novel antitussives and this needs to be confirmed in clinical trials.
 ...
PMID:Current and future prospects for drugs to suppress cough. 1291 74

AE-941 (Neovastat), an antiangiogenic component extracted from cartilage, selectively competes for the binding of vascular endothelial growth factor to its receptor, inhibits matrix metalloproteinases, stimulates tissue plasminogen activator enzymatic activities, and induces apoptotic activities in endothelial cells. A phase I/II study was conducted to obtain information on its safety and efficacy in patients with advanced cancer refractory to treatment or for which no standard treatments were available. Eighty patients with histologically confirmed lung cancer were enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation study of AE-941 (30, 60, 120, or 240 mL/day) administered orally b.i.d. as monotherapy. No dose-limiting toxicity was reported. The most frequent adverse events were nausea (9%), pruritus (5%), anorexia (4%), and vomiting (4%). All adverse events were grade 1/2 except grade 3 constipation (n = 1). A survival analysis was conducted in the 48 patients with unresectable stage IIIA, IIIB, or IV non-small-cell lung cancer. A significant survival advantage was observed for patients receiving doses > 2.6 mL/kg/day (which correspond to approximately 180 mL/day in a 70-kg patient) compared to patients receiving lower doses (median, 6.1 months vs. 4.6 months; P = 0.026). No tumor responses were observed. On the other hand, 26% of the patients in the high-dose group had stable disease compared to 14% in the low-dose group. AE-941 is well tolerated in patients with advanced lung cancer. The higher dose of AE-941 explored in this phase I/II trial may confer a survival benefit.
Clin Lung Cancer 2003 Jan
PMID:Phase I/II trial of the safety and efficacy of AE-941 (Neovastat) in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. 1462 12


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>