Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0242379 (lung cancer)
 71,905 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

This review summarizes the results reported in preclinical and clinical trials of three novel anticancer drugs developed and tested in Japan. In phase II trials, Irinotecan, a semisynthetic analog of camptothecin, has yielded response rates exceeding 20% in non-small-cell lung cancer, small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, uterine cervical cancer, and non-Hodgkini's lymphoma. It was modestly active on pancreatic cancer and was not active on acute leukemias. Dose-limiting toxicities were leukopenia and diarrhea, and other major toxicities were nausea, vomiting, and alopecia. Amrubicin, a totally synthetic anthracycline, exhibited both higher efficacy on human tumor xenografts and cardiotoxicity milder than that of doxorubicin in preclinical studies. The dose-limiting toxicity in phase I trials was leukopenia. In phase II trials, amrubicin has shown activity equivalent to that of doxorubicin on non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, response rates exceeding 20% on non-small-cell lung cancer, and a response rate of 78.8% on untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. S-1 is an oral formulation consisting of ftorafur (an analog of 5-fluorouracil), 5-chloro-2, 4-dehydropyrimidine, which inhibits degradation of 5-fluorouracil, and potassium oxonate, which reduces gastrointestinal toxicity, at a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1. In phase I trials, dose-limiting toxicities (myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicities) were judged to be milder than those induced by UFT (ftorafur plus uracil). The response rates obtained in phase II trials were 40-49% on advanced gastric cancer, 35.5% on colorectal cancer, 37.5% on head and neck cancer, and 40.7% on breast cancer.
 ...
PMID:Novel anticancer drugs in Japan. 1023 66

Over several decades, in vitro experimental studies have demonstrated that retinoids effect the process of carcinogenesis and tend towards the alteration of cells back to more normal differentiation. This hypothesis has formed the basis of several chemopreventive studies in breast cancer, cervical cancer, head and neck cancer and lung cancer. Experimental evidence exists to suggest that chemoprevention with retinoids may well have a beneficial effect in patients at high risk of acquiring prostate cancer. None of the studies, however, in any of the cancers have yet been definitive, but opportunities exist with newer retinoids that appear to be able to be given on a long-term basis with minimal toxic side effects, to explore this exciting potential treatment pathway.
 ...
PMID:Retinoids in chemoprevention. 1032

Oral cancer is often preceded by precancerous lesions, the most common of which is leukoplakia. Several treatment modalities are available: elimination of the possible cause, cold knife, laser, or cryosurgery, and topical application of bleomycin and 5-fluorouracil. In research, oral leukoplakia is used as a model to study the value of chemoprevention as a strategy to prevent cancer, because its effect is directly visible and material for analysis is easily obtainable from the mouth. In several studies and chemoprevention trials the efficacy of retinoids, retinol and/or beta-carotene on oral leukoplakia has been demonstrated. Second primary tumors occur in 10-30% of head and neck cancer patients and 10% of lung cancer patients. Chemoprevention offers an attractive approach to combat this threat to such patients, which is bound to cast a shadow over their lives. In the last 10-15 years several chemoprevention studies with vitamin A, retinoids or agents working through other mechanisms (antioxidants) have been launched. The largest chemoprevention study in curatively treated early-stage oral cancer, laryngeal cancer and lung cancer (N = 2595) is EUROSCAN, an EORTC study initiated in 1988. End-points are second tumors, local/regional recurrence and distant metastases, and long-term survival rates. Preminary results will be available in 1998.
 ...
PMID:Chemoprevention of head and neck and lung (pre)cancer. 1033 16

Recent interest has focused on the use of amifostine (Ethyol; Alza Pharmaceuticals, Palo Alto, CA/US Bioscience, West Conshohocken, PA) as a possible multiorgan combined-modality protector. Amifostine has been shown to selectively protect normal tissues from the cytotoxic and mutagenic effects of alkylating and platinum-based chemotherapy and ionizing radiation. There are a number of approaches to ameliorating therapy-related toxicities, including the use of individual agents that target specific toxicities. However, amifostine is unique in that it possesses a broad range of tissue-protective effects. Amifostine has been studied in clinical trials comprising patients with lung cancer, head and neck cancer, and cancer of the cervix. Results of these trials show that amifostine can be safely administered to patients receiving chemotherapy and radiation therapy. These trials also demonstrate that amifostine has the potential to be a broad-spectrum cytoprotectant of normal tissues from the toxicities of radiation, as well as certain forms of chemotherapy. The selective cytoprotective effects of amifostine allow for the use of higher doses of cytotoxic therapy. Theoretically, this could improve therapeutic outcome in patients with cancer.
 ...
PMID:Amifostine and combined-modality therapeutic approaches. 1034 67

On returning from a medical meeting, we learned that sadly a patient, "Mr. B.," had passed away. His death was a completely unexpected surprise. He had been doing well nine months after a course of intensive radiotherapy for a locally advanced head and neck cancer; in his most recent follow-up notes, he was described as a "complete remission." Nonetheless, he apparently died peacefully in his sleep from a cardiac arrest one night and was found the next day by a concerned neighbor. In our absence, after Mr. B. expired, his death certificate was filled out by a physician who didn't know him in detail, but did know why he recently was treated in our department. The cause of death was listed as head and neck cancer. It wasn't long after his death before we began to receive those notorious "requests for additional information," letters from the statistical office of a well-known cooperative group. Mr. B., as it turns out, was on a clinical trial, and it was "vital" to know further details of the circumstances of his passing. Perhaps this very large cancer had been controlled and Mr. B. succumbed to old age (helped along by the tobacco industry). On the other hand, maybe the residual "fibrosis" in his neck was actually packed with active tumor and his left carotid artery was finally 100% pinched off, or maybe he suffered a massive pulmonary embolism from cancer-related hypercoagulability. The forms and requests were completed with a succinct "cause of death uncertain," adding, "please have the Study Chairs call to discuss this difficult case." Often clinical reports of outcomes utilize and emphasize the endpoint "disease specific survival" (DSS). Like overall survival (OS), the DSS can be calculated by actuarial methods, with patients who have incomplete follow-up "censored" at the time of last follow-up pending further information. In the DSS, however, deaths unrelated to the index cancer of interest are censored at the time of death; thus, a death from intercurrent disease is considered a "success" (to the investigator, that is; obviously, not to the patient and his or her family). The DSS rate will always be superior to the OS rate. Obviously, for any OS curve, if one waits long enough it will ultimately come to zero. There is thus a very logical rationale for reporting the DSS separately, particularly in diseases where death from intercurrent disease is expected to be common. Analyzing the DSS allows researchers to better compare the biologic efficacy of two or more cancer treatments, since it does not necessarily come to zero. Unlike some other endpoints, including local-regional control or freedom from progression, it takes into account the possibility of salvage therapy. DSS also focuses on an endpoint of interest to the public-death from cancer. In a recent popular media survey in which people were asked how they would choose to die if they could, 0% selected cancer. However, there are two serious potential problems with heavy dependence on the DSS. First, since patients who die from intercurrent disease are considered "cured," it seriously inflates the apparent effectiveness of a cancer treatment. Given the same biologic disease and the same treatment, the DSS as calculated in an old, sick population at high risk of intercurrent death will be better than the DSS in a younger, healthier population whose major risk is from their cancer. This problem has been discussed with respect to early stage prostate cancer, in which the conservative approach of observation has been criticized. The studies at issue rely heavily on the DSS, suggesting a comparable DSS (90% at 10 years) with "watchful waiting" to other researchers' results with aggressive therapy. The problem is that these series of conservative management focus on a patient population (as opposed to individuals) with a high risk of competing causes of mortality, which is very different from the population of patients generally treated with aggressive therapy (in which some have shown overall survivals superior to age-matched controls). It is fallacious and illogical to compare nonrandomized series of observation to those of aggressive therapy. In addition to the above problem, the use of DSS introduces another potential issue which we will call the bias of cause-of-death-interpretation. All statistical endpoints (e.g., response rates, local-regional control, freedom from brain metastases), except OS, are known to depend heavily on the methods used to define the endpoint and are often subject to significant interobserver variability. There is no reason to believe that this problem does not occasionally occur with respect to defining a death as due to the index cancer or to intercurrent disease, even though this issue has been poorly studied. In many oncologic situations-for example, metastatic lung cancer-this form of bias does not exist. In some situations, such as head and neck cancer, this could be an intermediate problem (Was that lethal chest tumor a second primary or a metastasis?.Would the fatal aspiration pneumonia have occurred if he still had a tongue?.And what about Mr. B. described above?). In some situations, particularly relatively "good prognosis" neoplasms, this could be a substantial problem, particularly if the adjudication of whether or not a death is cancer-related is performed solely by researchers who have an "interest" in demonstrating a good DSS. What we are most concerned about with this form of bias relates to recent series on observation, such as in early prostate cancer. It is interesting to note that although only 10% of the "observed" patients die from prostate cancer, many develop distant metastases by 10 years (approximately 40% among patients with intermediate grade tumors). Thus, it is implied that many prostate cancer metastases are usually not of themselves lethal, which is a misconception to anyone experienced in taking care of prostate cancer patients. This is inconsistent with U.S. studies of metastatic prostate cancer in which the median survival is two to three years. It is possible that many deaths attributed to intercurrent disease in "watchful waiting" series were in fact prostate cancer-related, perhaps related to failure to thrive, urosepsis, or pulmonary emboli. We will not know without an independent review of the medical records of individual patients; in some cases, even the most detailed review, sometimes even an autopsy, will not be conclusive. There are only a few data available describing the problems created by cause-of-death-interpretation bias. One small study, presented only in abstract form, assessed the cause of death in 50 randomly selected prostate cancer patients who died. Five experts in prostate cancer were asked to assign the cause of death as due to or not due to prostate cancer. The DSS varied from 21% to 35% among the five reviewers, a relative difference of 66%. Studies of autopsies, which are now rarely done in the U.S., have shown that fatal malignant tumors were occasionally missed by clinicians and-even more sobering-an occasional patient thought to have died from metastatic cancer is found to have no tumor but to have died from a "benign" cause such as TB. One study suggested an error rate of approximately 8%. Clearly the use of DSS is here to stay and is a useful adjunct to OS in analyzing randomized trials. There needs to be more research on the validity and interobserver reproducibility of the DSS. In the meantime, researchers should not report DSS without reporting OS and the reasons for intercurrent deaths should be described-peer reviewers should enforce this. As with so many other problems with statistics in the medical literature, it is the job of the reader to remain skeptical. The rate of intercurrent deaths in a study should reflect the age and demographics of the study population. If the DSS is far superior to the OS, the population being studied may be unusually sick (and thus unrealistic), or there may be a bias in classifying the causes of death. Similarly, if the DSS and OS are identical (unless a highly virulent malignancy is being studied), it may suggest the researchers have only included an unusually healthy (and thus unrealistic) patient population. Finally, we would also be a bit suspicious of a sizeable series that did not have any deaths that were considered of "uncertain" cause, unless the researchers specifically included them as being due to the cancer. We honestly think that everybody has a few patients like Mr. B.
 ...
PMID:"Just Another Statistic" 1038 5

A novel derivative of camptothecin, 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC), is currently under Phase II evaluation in various cancers. Exceptionally mild toxicities were observed in patients with brain tumors who were treated with anticonvulsants. To investigate a pharmacokinetic interaction between 9-AC and anticonvulsants, and to evaluate the pharmacodynamics of 9-AC, we investigated the clinical pharmacology of 9-AC, administered by a 72-h infusion, in three Phase II studies. Plasma concentrations of total 9-AC (lactone plus carboxylate) at a steady state were measured in 56, 10, and 14 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, malignant glioma, and head and neck cancer, respectively. For lung cancer or glioma patients, 9-AC was infused at 45 (51 patients) or 59 (15 patients) microg/m2/h, and 9-AC was infused at 35.4 microg/m2/h in head and neck cancer patients. All glioma patients had been treated with phenytoin or carbamazepine. 9-AC clearance did not differ among the dosage rates, but differed according to the diseases (P = 0.002). Glioma patients had a higher clearance (1.0-18.0; median, 2.0 liters/h/m2) than lung cancer patients (0.3-5.1; median, 0.9 liters/h/m2). A logistic regression model described the relationship between the 9-AC concentration and the probability of grade 4 neutropenia, which was the main toxicity. Observed incidences of grade 4 neutropenia for patients with model-predicted probability of 0-20%, 20-40%, and 40-100% were 10%, 32%, and 67%, respectively, and corresponded to 9-AC concentration of <54, 54-86, and >86 ng/ml, respectively. Anticonvulsants seem to induce the clearance of 9-AC, and the concentration of 9-AC predicts the probability of grade 4 neutropenia.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of 9-aminocamptothecin infused over 72 hours in phase II studies. 1038 15

Hemizygosity and homozygosity mapping studies show that many common sporadic cancers including lung, breast, kidney, cervical, ovarian, and head and neck cancer display deletions on the short arm of chromosome 3. For ovarian cancer, monochromosomal transfer suppression studies have identified three candidate regions for chromosome 3p ovarian cancer tumor suppressor genes (OCTSGs). To accurately map OCTSG candidate regions, we analyzed 70 ovarian tumors for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at 20 loci on chromosome 3p that were selected to target those regions proposed to contain tumor suppressor genes for common sporadic cancers. All samples were informative for at least five markers. In 33 (52%) tumors without microsatellite instability, LOH was observed for at least one 3p marker. Analysis of 27 ovarian tumors demonstrating both loss and retention of 3p markers enabled us to define four nonoverlapping minimal deletion regions (OCLOHRs): (a) OCLOHR-1 mapped distal to D3S3591 at 3p25-26; (b) OCLOHR-2 mapped between D3S1317 and D3S1259 at 3p24-25; (c) OCLOHR-3 mapped between D3S1300 and D3S1284, an area that includes the FHIT locus at 3p14.2; and (d) OCLOHR-4 mapped between D3S1284 and D3S1274 at 3p12-13, a region known to contain overlapping homozygous deletions in lung and breast tumor cell lines. However, microsatellite markers from the chromosome 3p21.3 interval homozygously deleted in lung cancer cell lines did not identify a distinct OCLOHR. The frequency and extent of 3p LOH correlated with tumor stage such that LOH at two or more OCLOHRs was present in 53% (16 of 30) of stage III tumors but only 26% (5 of 19) of stage I/II tumors (P = 0.08). To determine the relationship between the OCLOHRs and the three candidate ovarian cancer suppression regions (OCSRs) identified previously by monochromosome transfer studies, we performed detailed genetic and physical mapping studies to define the extent of the three candidate OCSRs and to establish YAC contigs covering each region. OCSR-A at 3p25-26 and OCSR-B at 3p24 were shown to overlap with OCLOHR-1 and OCLOHR-2, respectively, providing further evidence for OCTSGs in these regions. We also show that OCSR-C overlaps with a locus at 3p21.3 previously implicated in lung and breast cancer.
 ...
PMID:Detailed genetic and physical mapping of tumor suppressor loci on chromosome 3p in ovarian cancer. 1049 22

MECHANISM OF BONE DESTRUCTION IN MALIGNANT OSTEOLYSIS: Many mechanisms have been described to explain the excessive osteoclastic activity: local stimulation factors (cytokines, lymphokines) are mainly found in breast cancer of myeloma; a general stimulation factor (PTH rP) is found predominantly in lung cancer, head and neck cancer and in cancer of the kidney or ovary. CONTRIBUTION OF BISPHOSPHONATES: The use of bisphosphonates is warranted to counteract the overactivity of the osteoclasts in humans, especially since these drugs could have a direct effect on cancer cells and also have their own therapeutic effect. There are four objectives for using bisphosphonates in cancer patients: lowering serum calcium levels, pain relief, treatment and prevention of bone metastasis. Four bisphosphonates have marketing approval in France for this indication. PROVEN AND TO BE PROVEN EFFECTS: The serum calcium lowering effect and the curative effect for the treatment of bone metastasis are well documented for all four formulations which all meet the clinical requirements for marketing approval. The preventive effect on the development of secondary bone localizations of primary cancers remains to be demonstrated and will require extensive testing in humans. There is however room for hope of substantial progress in cancerology.
 ...
PMID:[Action of bisphosphonates on malignant osteolysis]. 1052 64

Gene therapy has the potential to provide cancer treatments based on novel mechanisms of action with potentially low toxicities. This therapy may provide more effective control of locoregional recurrence in diseases like non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as well as systemic control of micrometastases. Despite current limitations, retroviral and adenoviral vectors can, in certain circumstances, provide an effective means of delivering therapeutic genes to tumor cells. Although multiple genes are involved in carcinogenesis, mutations of the p53 gene are the most frequent abnormality identified in human tumors. Preclinical studies both in vitro and in vivo have shown that restoring p53 function can induce apoptosis in cancer cells. High levels of p53 expression and DNA-damaging agents like cisplatin (Platinol) and ionizing radiation work synergistically to induce apoptosis in cancer cells. Phase I clinical trials now show that p53 gene replacement therapy using both retroviral and adenoviral vectors is feasible and safe. In addition, p53 gene replacement therapy induces tumor regression in patients with advanced NSCLC and in those with recurrent head and neck cancer. This article describes various gene therapy strategies under investigation, reviews preclinical data that provide a rationale for the gene replacement approach, and discusses the clinical trial data available to date.
 ...
PMID:p53 tumor suppressor gene therapy for cancer. 1055 Aug 40

In this review, we aim to synthesize the emerging picture of retinoids in lung cancer through a summary of ongoing investigations in biology, chemoprevention and therapy settings, in an attempt to clarify the possible role of these agents in such a disease. Early work in head and neck cancer has evidenced the capability of retinoids to interrupt field carcinogenesis by reversing premalignant lesions and decreasing the incidence of second primary tumors (SPTs). At this time, the completed randomized trials in lung cancer have failed to demonstrate an evident chemopreventive effect of the tested agents on different study end points, although both a marginally significant benefit of retinol palmitate in time-to-development rates for smoke-related SPTs and a potential preventive effect of retinol supplementation against mesothelioma in selected populations of asbestos-exposed workers have been recently reported. Concerning the role of retinoids in lung cancer treatment, a moderate activity of 13-cis-retinoic acid (13cRA) or all-transretinoic acid (ATRA) as single agents has been reported in small series of advanced, mostly pretreated lung cancer patients. More encouraging findings derive from combination studies, in which retinoids, especially ATRA, are added to either alpha-interferon or chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Major recent advances have been made towards the understanding of retinoids mechanisms of action; at this regard, the role of RAR-beta basal or treatment-induced levels seems to be of particular interest as intermediate end point and/or independent prognostic factor, besides their known importance in lung carcinogenesis. Future research for chemopreventive and therapeutic programs with retinoids in lung cancer should be focused on the investigation of new generation compounds with a specificity for individual retinoid nuclear receptors. Such selective molecules may have a greater activity against lung cancer, with a more favourable toxicity profile, as recently suggested by our preliminary data on Ro 41-5253.
 ...
PMID:Retinoids in lung cancer chemoprevention and treatment. 1058 49


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>