Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0242339 (dyslipidemia)
 13,927 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Coronary angiographic trials have demonstrated that the lowering of cholesterol slows the progression of atherosclerosis, enhances atherosclerotic regression, limits the formation of new lesions, and reduces the incidence of coronary events. Atherosclerotic progression has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of cardiac death, cardiac death plus nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and all coronary events. Most of the atherosclerotic regression trials were too small and of too short duration to demonstrate a significant difference in hard coronary events between patients receiving cholesterol-lowering intervention and controls. However, when data from these studies were pooled, total mortality was found to be reduced by 26% and the rate of nonfatal MI by 39% in actively treated patients. The first events trial to demonstrate clearly a reduction in overall mortality was the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S), in which lowering of serum cholesterol in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and hypercholesterolemia also reduced coronary mortality, fatal and nonfatal MI, sudden cardiac death, and the need for revascularization. Reductions in major coronary events were seen consistently in all subgroups of patients studied and regardless of concomitant therapy with aspirin, beta blockers, or calcium antagonists. Further evidence of the benefit of cholesterol-lowering therapy was provided by the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study (WOSCOPS), which evaluated men with hypercholesterolemia but no history of CAD. Those receiving active treatment had less overall mortality, lower risk of definite nonfatal MI or death from definite or suspected CAD, and less need for revascularization. The Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) Study recently showed that lipid-lowering therapy is also beneficial in CAD patients with less severe dyslipidemia.
 ...
PMID:Review of cholesterol-lowering therapy: coronary angiographic and events trials. 890 Mar 35

In accordance with the principles of protein biochemistry, apolipoprotein is the only protein which: 1) forms a protein-lipid complex (PLC) mainly from one class of lipids; 2) determines its functional role; 3) causes dyslipidemia in the genetic destruction of apoproteins or their quantitative ratio. Blood flow lipid transport is based on the functional specificity of their apoproteins; each apoprotein forms a functionally independent PLC; each PLC is formed from one class of lipids; each PLC has one protein-vector; each protein-vector interacts only with receptor. The basis of a united cycle functioning in lipid transport is the difference of primary apoprotein structure. Cholesterol performs an auxiliary function in triglyceride transport by providing circulation in the functional cycle. Lipid transport in blood flow is based, first, on the principles of protein biochemistry and, second, on those of lipidology.
 ...
PMID:[Blood flow lipid transport from viewpoint of protein biochemistry]. 898 7

To further elucidate the incidence and potential mechanism of asparaginase-associated lipid abnormalities in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), we serially obtained fasting lipid and lipoprotein studies on 38 of the 43 consecutively diagnosed children with ALL before, during, and after asparaginase therapy. We also evaluated a second population of 30 long-term survivors of childhood ALL; a fasting lipid and lipoprotein profile was obtained once at study entry. The mean peak triglyceride level during asparaginase of 465 mg/dL (standard deviation [SD] 492) was significantly higher (P = .003) than the level of 108 mg/dL (SD 46) before the initiation of asparaginase therapy. Sixty-seven percent of the newly diagnosed patients had fasting triglyceride levels greater than 200 mg/dL during asparaginase therapy; 15 patients (42%) had levels greater than 400 mg/ dL, 7 with levels greater than 1,000 mg/dL. The incidence of hypertriglyceridemia did not vary by type of asparaginase or risk status of ALL (defined by white blood cell count and age). None of the 7 patients with triglyceride levels greater than 1,000 mg/dL developed pancreatitis. In contrast, 4 of the 13 patients without triglyceride elevation developed pancreatitis; 3 of the 4 patients had fasting studies at the height of their abdominal pain. Nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of lipid subclasses showed a significant increase in the smaller, denser forms of very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) and negligible chylomicron fraction in a subset of patients with marked triglyceride elevation. Lipoprotein lipase activity was consistently above normative values for all levels of triglyceride and could not be explained by obesity or hyperglycemia. Apolipoprotein B(100) levels increased during asparaginase therapy, although the mechanism of this remains unclear. LDL reciprocally decreased with increased VLDL during asparaginase therapy. After asparaginase therapy, triglyceride levels (mean, 73 mg/dL [SD 33]) were significantly lower than levels obtained during asparaginase therapy. Triglyceride levels for survivors did not differ from the normal range or postasparaginase levels in the newly diagnosed patients. These data show a striking temporal association between asparaginase therapy and hypertriglyceridemia. Changes in cholesterol, in contrast, were not temporally related to asparaginase treatment. Cholesterol levels were elevated (>200 mg/dL) in 20% of the patients after asparaginase, which may be due to continued treatment with corticosteroids. The mean cholesterol level of long-term survivors of 177 mg/dL was significantly higher than the norm (P = .045). High-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels were significantly lower than normal at all time periods and for both populations; 25% of survivors had HDL levels less than 35 mg/dL. We conclude that modifications in asparaginase therapy are not necessary. In cases of triglyceride elevation greater than 2,000 mg/dL when the risk of pancreatitis is increased, close clinical monitoring is imperative. Larger studies are needed to determine the incidence of dyslipidemia in long-term survivors of ALL as well as the relationship between lipid abnormalities and other late effects of treatment, notably obesity and cardiomyopathies.
 ...
PMID:Asparaginase-associated lipid abnormalities in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. 905 8

Noncompliance with therapeutic diets remains a major obstacle to achieving improvements in cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. This study compared dietary compliance and CVD risk factor response to two dietary interventions designed to treat hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus. In a multicenter trial, 560 adults were randomly assigned to either a self-selected, mixed-food plan (n = 277), or a nutrient-fortified prepared meal plan (n = 283); each was designed to provide 15-20% of energy from fat, 55-60% from carbohydrate, and 15-20% from protein. Nutrient intake was estimated from 3-d food records collected biweekly throughout the 10-wk intervention. Compliance was determined by evaluating the participants' ability to meet specific criteria for energy intake [+/-420 kJ (100 kcal) from the midpoint of the prescribed energy range], fat intake (< 20%, < 25%, or < 30% of energy from total fat), and the National Cholesterol Education Program/American Heart Association Step 1 and 2 diet recommendations. Compliance with energy, fat, and Step 1 and 2 criteria was better in participants who followed the prepared meal plan than in those who followed the self-selected diet (P < 0.0001). Compliant participants in both groups achieved greater reductions in body weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and total and low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol than noncompliant participants (P < 0.05). In general, better endpoint responses were observed with lower fat intakes regardless of group assignment. The prepared meal plan is a simple and effective strategy for meeting the many nutrient recommendations for CVD risk reduction and improving dietary compliance and CVD endpoints.
 ...
PMID:Dietary compliance and cardiovascular risk reduction with a prepared meal plan compared with a self-selected diet. 925 Jan 24

There are millions of people with coronary heart disease and tens of millions more who are at risk. Research reveals that aggressive cholesterol management, especially in patients with known coronary heart disease, reduces the incidence of clinical cardiac events and improves survival rates. A review of the literature reveals disturbing evidence that patients with dyslipidemia are not being treated according to the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. The need for lipid nurse specialists is real and growing; the challenge of managing care for patients with dyslipidemia is tremendous. Because the role of the lipid nurse specialist is relatively new, it is described in detail in this article. Nurses who desire to fight heart disease aggressively will find this area of nursing practice interesting, challenging, and rewarding. Nurses who facilitate the implementation of the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines to the large numbers of patients with dyslipidemia offer a valuable public health service.
 ...
PMID:Aggressive cholesterol management: role of the lipid nurse specialist. 931 61

The importance of treating dyslipidemias based on cardiovascular risk factors is highlighted by the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. The first step in evaluation is to exclude secondary causes of hyperlipidemia. Assessment of the patient's risk for coronary heart disease helps determine which treatment should be initiated and how often lipid analysis should be performed. For primary prevention of coronary heart disease, the treatment goal is to achieve a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level of less than 160 mg per dL (4.15 mmol per L) in patients with only one risk factor. The target LDL level in patients with two or more risk factors is 130 mg per dL (3.35 mmol per L) or less. For patients with documented coronary heart disease, the LDL cholesterol level should be reduced to less than 100 mg per dL (2.60 mmol per L). A step II diet, in which the total fat content is less than 30 percent of total calories and saturated fat is 8 to 10 percent of total calories, may help reduce LDL cholesterol levels to the target range in some patients. A high-fiber diet is also therapeutic. The most commonly used options for pharmacologic treatment of dyslipidemia include bile acid-binding resins, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, nicotinic acid and fibric acid derivatives. Other possibilities in selected cases are estrogen replacement therapy, plasmapheresis and even surgery in severe, refractory cases.
 ...
PMID:Management of dyslipidemia in adults. 960 9

The primary dyslipidemias are associated with an increased incidence of atherosclerotic vascular disease in coronary, cerebral, and peripheral vessels. If nonpharmacologic therapy, such as dietary changes and aerobic exercise, fails to achieve the therapeutic goal levels for serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides suggested by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel, pharmacologic intervention is indicated. The choice of the class of lipid-lowering drug(s) for initial therapy and subsequent therapy depends on the nature of the dyslipidemia, e.g., hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, suppressed HDL cholesterol levels, or combinations of these disturbances in lipid metabolism. Appropriate therapy with the highly efficacious agents currently available significantly reduces the associated morbidity and mortality related to atherosclerosis. The clinical applications of these classes of agents are discussed here.
 ...
PMID:Control of lipid disorders in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease. 967 55

Little doubt remains about the value of lipid-lowering therapy since publication of the results of large, randomized, controlled trials that show decreased total, as well as coronary, mortality with the use of statins for primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. All of the available statins are effective and safe, but they vary greatly in terms of cost-effectiveness. Fluvastatin has been determined to be a cost-effective therapeutic agent in the large proportion of the population with mild-to-moderate dyslipidemia who fit treatment guidelines of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP). Atorvastatin and simvastatin are cost-effective for the relatively smaller number of patients who require greater reductions in cholesterol.
 ...
PMID:Economic implications of lipid-lowering trials: current considerations in selecting a statin. 976 45

Usual risk factors for coronary artery disease account for only 25-50% of increased atherosclerotic risk in diabetes mellitus. Other obvious risk factors are hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia. However, hyperglycemia is a very late stage in the sequence of events from insulin resistance to frank diabetes, whereas lipoprotein abnormalities are manifested during the largely asymptomatic diabetic prodrome and contribute substantially to the increased risk of macrovascular disease. The insulin-resistant diabetes course affects virtually all lipids and lipoproteins. Chylomicron and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) remnants accumulate, and triglycerides enrich high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL), leading to high levels of potentially atherogenic particles and low levels of HDL cholesterol. Hyperglycemia eventually impairs removal of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, the accumulation of which accentuates hypertriglyceridemia. As triglycerides increase-still within the so-called normal range-abnormalities in HDL and LDL became more apparent. Thus, when triglycerides are >200 mg/dL, LDL particles are small and dense (when they are <90 mg/dL, the particles are of the large, buoyant variety). The atherogenicity of small, dense LDL particles is attributed to their increased susceptibility to oxidation, but in many patients they may be a marker for insulin resistance or the presence of atherogenic VLDL. Hypertriglyceridemia is associated with atherosclerosis because (1) it is a marker for insulin resistance and atherogenic metabolic abnormalities; and (2) the small size of triglyceride-enriched lipoproteins enables them to infiltrate the blood vessel wall where they are oxidized, bind to receptors on macrophages, and ingested, leading to the development of the atherosclerotic lesion. Various studies (primary prevention with gemfibrozil: Helsinki Heart Study; secondary prevention with simvastatin and pravastatin: Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study [4S] and Cholesterol and Recurrent Events [CARE], respectively) have demonstrated that lipid-lowering therapy in type 2 diabetes is effective in decreasing the number of cardiac events. Risk reduction was 22% to 50% (statins) and approximately 65% (fibrate) relative to placebo. It was also noted (in 4S and CARE) that the risk of major coronary events in untreated diabetic patients was 1.5-1.7-fold greater than in untreated nondiabetic patients. Although gemfibrozil (fibric acid derivative) is more effective in decreasing triglycerides and increasing HDL cholesterol in diabetic patients than the statins, it does not change and may even increase LDL-cholesterol levels (fenofibrate may be an exception, decreasing LDL cholesterol by 20-25% in some studies). However, gemfibrozil does increase LDL particle size. Nevertheless, the statins are the current lipid-lowering drugs of choice because the change in LDL-cholesterol-to-HDL-cholesterol ratio is better than with gemfibrozil. Moreover, the diabetic patient may be more likely to benefit from statin therapy than the nondiabetic patient. It should be noted that, in theory, nicotinic acid can correct or improve all lipid or lipoprotein abnormalities in patients with type 2 diabetes. Unfortunately, it is relatively contraindicated because it causes insulin resistance and may precipitate or aggravate hyperglycemia (in addition to its other well-known side effects such as flushing, gastric irritation, development of hepatotoxicity, and hyperuricemia). It is unknown at present whether newer formulations such as once-daily Niaspan may be better tolerated in diabetes. In any case, most patients with type 2 diabetes have risk factors for coronary artery disease and qualify for aggressive LDL cholesterol-lowering therapy. At the same time, it is presently unknown whether improved glycemic control decreases coronary artery disease risk in such patients.
 ...
PMID:Diabetic dyslipidemia. 991 65

The proposal that antioxidants may retard the progression of atherosclerosis is not new. Published studies examining the effect of antioxidants on experimental antioxidants extend back to 1940. The results have all been inconsistent. However, the data regarding the beneficial effects of retarding atherosclerotic progression are strong enough to warrant continued research on the lipoprotein oxidation theory or atherosclerosis. However, caution is needed to avoid embracing a concept without proof. It should be noted that the National Cholesterol Education Program does not recommend the use of antioxidant vitamin supplements to reduce CAD. Atherogenesis is produced by multiple factors. To believe that all such factors are mediated by uncontrolled oxidative events is, to say the least, naive. Finally, should antioxidants prove to be effective in retarding coronary atherosclerosis, their place on the therapeutic ladder of CAD prevention would be low. The overwhelmingly proven evidence favors the following factors that have been proven to lower morbidity and mortality due to atherosclerosis: (a) treatment of hypertension, (b) cessation of tobacco use, (c) treatment of dyslipidemia, (d) achieving a normal weight, (e) regular exercise, (f) treatment of homocystinuria, especially in cases with renal disease, and (g) antioxidants.
 ...
PMID:The use of antioxidants in retarding atherosclerosis: fact or fiction? 1007 4


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>