Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0242339 (dyslipidemia)
 13,927 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Dyslipidemia of chronic renal failure is of multifactorial origin. Decreased activity of lipoprotein lipase and hepatic triglyceride lipase, peripheral insulin resistance, hyperparathyroidism and L-carnitine deficiency are the contributing factors. This results in a disturbed catabolism of chylomicron, accumulation of very-low-density (VLDL) and intermediate-density (IDL) lipoproteins as well as incompletely cleared remnant particles, whereas low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels are diminished. There is current debate as to whether cardiovascular disease is accelerated and whether hyperlipidemia should specifically be treated. In addition, there have been few means of influencing these metabolic alterations. Drug incompatibility and consequently side effects render treatment difficult. The drugs that have been most tested for lipid lowering in chronic renal failure are the fibric acids. By their mode of action, they are the logical choice. Dose reduction overcomes major side effects such as myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. The second generation of fibric acid derivatives (gemfibrozil and beclobrate) show several advantages over formerly used derivatives. Treatment with lovastatin and simvastatin appears to be safe and is recommended in a minority of patients with predominantly elevations of LDL. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors also lower remnant particles effectively in hemodialysis (HD) patients. L-Carnitine and low-molecular-weight heparin have been shown to influence VLDL rich in triglycerides in a subset of patients on HD. In posttransplant hyperlipidemia, diet remains the first course of action in all patients. When this approach fails, the new lipid-lowering agents, especially fibric acids, appear to be safe in short-term studies in azathioprine- and ciclosporin-treated patients. Lovastatin has been shown to be safe in stable renal transplant patients. Its toxicity seems to depend mainly on high ciclosporin whole blood through or plasma levels.
 ...
PMID:Hyperlipoproteinemia in chronic renal failure: pathophysiological and therapeutic aspects. 186 98

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors have been proven effective in decreasing the plasma cholesterol levels in patients affected with various forms of hypercholesterolemia, familial dysbetalipoproteinemia, familial combined hyperlipidemia and in nephrotic and diabetic dyslipidemia. The purpose of this study was to monitor and evaluate the efficiency and safety of the therapy with simvastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, in a group of patients treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) with severe hypercholesterolemia. Monitoring of the changes occurring in the various lipids and apolipoproteins in these patients included the measurements of the plasma lipids and apolipoproteins A-I, A-II, B, C-II, A-IV and Lp(a). Lipoproteins were separated by gel filtration, on a Superose 6HR column, before and after 24 weeks of treatment. The patterns were compared to those observed in a group of primary hyperlipidemic patients treated with Lovastatin, a compound of the same class. The drug was well tolerated by the CAPD patients and no adverse reaction was observed. In addition to the decrease of the total and LDL cholesterol, similar to that reported in other groups of patients, we further observed a decrease of the apo E concentration in both the CAPD and the hyperlipidemic patients. This decrease was especially pronounced in the HDLE fraction and could involve an upregulation of the apo B-E and/or apo E receptor. These results should provide information about the mechanism of action of this drug in patients with end-stage renal disease.
 ...
PMID:Effect of simvastatin treatment on the dyslipoproteinemia in CAPD patients. 187 12

A common pattern of dyslipidemia is elevated levels of plasma triglyceride, borderline high total cholesterol, reduced high-density lipoprotein, and increased apolipoprotein B. This pattern of dyslipidemia frequently is associated with premature coronary heart disease. Nicotinic acid is the drug of first choice for this pattern. In this study, gemfibrozil and lovastatin were compared for their effects on the overall lipoprotein profile in 13 men with this type of dyslipidemia. Both drugs significantly reduced very-low-density lipoprotein and intermediate-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and both modestly raised high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Gemfibrozil therapy, however, failed to reduce total cholesterol or total apolipoprotein B levels, whereas lovastatin therapy lowered levels of total cholesterol by 28%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 33%, and total apolipoprotein B by 32%. Moreover, lovastatin therapy caused greater declines in lipoprotein cholesterol ratios than gemfibrozil therapy. Lovastatin thus seems to have certain advantages over gemfibrozil for treatment of elevated plasma triglyceride levels accompanied by borderline high total cholesterol and raised apolipoprotein B levels; therefore, lovastatin therapy should be considered as one approach for management of this condition.
 ...
PMID:Primary hypertriglyceridemia with borderline high cholesterol and elevated apolipoprotein B concentrations. Comparison of gemfibrozil vs lovastatin therapy. 223 67

Hyperlipidemia associated with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and insulin resistance is characterized by high triglyceride levels; raised levels of total low-density lipoprotein (LDL), which is made up of small, dense, cholesterol-rich particles; low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL); and glycosylation of apolipoproteins. Optimal drug therapy for this lipid profile is controversial. To test whether a fibrinic acid derivative (gemfibrozil) or a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor (lovastatin) would produce better results in these patients, a crossover study was performed. Gemfibrozil 600 mg twice daily and, after a washout period, lovastatin 20 to 40 mg twice daily were administered to nine patients with NIDDM. Gemfibrozil significantly decreased triglyceride, very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), and intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) levels, the total cholesterol:HDL ratio, and the IDL plus VLDL;HDL ratio, and significantly increased levels of HDL, HDL2, and HDL3. Lovastatin significantly decreased levels of total cholesterol, calculated LDL, directly measured LDL, IDL, total triglycerides, VLDL, and the ratios of LDL:HDL, total cholesterol:HDL, and directly measured LDL:HDL and significantly increased total HDL and HDL3 levels. Gemfibrozil was significantly more effective than lovastatin in raising total HDL and HDL3 levels and in lowering the IDL plus VLDL:HDL ratio. Lovastatin was significantly more effective than gemfibrozil in lowering total cholesterol, LDL, directly measured LDL, and the LDL:HDL and directly measured LDL:HDL ratios. In the absence of malignant hypertriglyceridemia, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, rather than a fibrinic acid derivative, is indicated for the treatment of patients with dyslipidemia associated with NIDDM and insulin resistance.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of lovastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, with gemfibrozil, a fibrinic acid derivative, in the treatment of patients with diabetic dyslipidemia. 859 42

Insulin resistance is characterized principally by impaired insulin-mediated glucose uptake which provokes a compensatory increase in pancreatic beta-cell secretory activity. For a time this may produce well-controlled plasma glucose levels but as the insulin resistance worsens the augmented insulin production becomes inadequate to keep plasma glucose at euglycemia leading to the development of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), accompanied by hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia. A number of metabolic defects are associated with NIDDM including obesity, hypercoagulability, cardiovascular disease risk factors such as hypertension and dyslipidemia and these constitute the insulin resistance syndrome. The identity of the biochemical factor that might link all these defects is not yet known. We have hypothesized that platelet-activating factor (1-O-alkyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, PAF) may be such a link. In this study, we measured plasma acetylhydrolase (EC.1.1.48), which degrades PAF to the inactive metabolise lyso-PAF, as a surrogate for PAF activity in three groups of hypercholesterolemic subjects: lean controls (n = 9), non-diabetic obese (n = 6) and NIDDM subjects (n = 6). The ages and body mass indices of the subjects were 46 +/- 3.1 and 24.2 +/- 2.2 for the lean controls, 52 +/- 2.5 and 28.7 +/- 0.9 for the NIDDM subjects and 60 +/- 2 and 27.6 +/- 2.1 for the obese, non-diabetic subjects (mean +/- S.E.M.). The measurements were made before and after therapy with the cholesterol-lowering drug lovastatin, a 3-hydroxy 3 methylglutaryl (HMG) coenzyme. A reductase inhibitor (40 mg/day) for 3 months. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels were 91 +/- 11, 96 +/- 3 and 146 +/- 11 mg/dl, for the lean, obese and NIDDM subjects, respectively, before therapy began. Lovastatin did not affect FPG in any of the three subject groups. Before treatment, the fasting plasma insulin (FPI) levels were 6.1 +/- 0.92, 10.83 +/- 2.03 and 14.68 +/- 3.64 mU/l for the lean, non-diabetic obese and NIDDM subjects, respectively. After lovastatin therapy only the obese group exhibited a significant change in FPI (15.35 +/- 2.47 mU/l) (P < 0.05). Total cholesterol levels were similar in all three groups both before and after lovastatin therapy but within each group lovastatin therapy significantly reduced the total cholesterol by 32, 29 and 34% in the lean, obese and NIDDM subject groups respectively (P < 0.0001). Lovastatin therapy reduced LDL-cholesterol levels by 40, 32 and 46% in the lean, obese and NIDDM subjects, respectively, but produced no significant effect on HDL or triglyceride levels. Before therapy, the plasma acetylyhydrolase activities were 104 +/- 7, 164 +/- 7 and 179 +/- 7 nmol/ml per min in the lean, obese and NIDDM subjects, respectively. Lovastatin therapy reduced plasma acetylhydrolase levels to 70 +/- 7, 87 +/- 6 and 86 +/- 7 nmol/ml per min in the lean, obese and NIDDM subjects, respectively. Plasma acetylhydrolase activity was predominantly (> 80%) associated with LDL cholesterol both before and after lovastatin treatment. Also, plasma acetylhydrolase activity significantly correlated with fasting plasma insulin levels before lovastatin therapy but not after. Taken together, this study clearly implicates PAF metabolism in three defects associated with the insulin resistance syndrome: hypercholesterolemia, obesity and NIDDM. Additionally, we conclude that chronic hyperinsulinemia may play a significant role in the production of plasma acetylhydrolase.
 ...
PMID:Plasma PAF acetylhydrolase in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus and obesity: effect of hyperinsulinemia and lovastatin treatment. 945 36

Advicor (lovastatin and extended-release niacin) is the first cholesterol-lowering combination product to become available for the management of hyperlipidemia. Lovastatin significantly lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, whereas niacin significantly lowers triglycerides and lipoprotein (a) and markedly increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. These effects are ideal for managing a variety of lipid disorders, including metabolic syndrome. Lovastatin and niacin reduce coronary heart disease mortality in primary and secondary prevention patients, respectively. The extended-release niacin component uses a unique technology to minimize adverse effects (e.g., flushing and hepatotoxicity) while retaining the same lipid-altering effects as immediate-release niacin. The combination product appears to be well tolerated, with discontinuation due to adverse effects other than flushing occurring in a similar percent of patients as for lovastatin in clinical trials. Approximately 9% of patients discontinued the combination product due to flush. No confined cases of myopathy or hepatotoxicity have been reported with this product. Once-daily dosing provides ease of administration that should improve compliance and result in a greater proportion of patients meeting their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals. The nomenclature surrounding niacin products used to treat dyslipidemias is confusing. While only two types of niacin formulations exist (immediate-release formulations and formulations which dissolve more slowly than immediate-release formulations), government regulations allow for slowly dissolved niacin formulations to be divided into two types of niacin products; those that are available over-the-counter (OTC) and those that are available by prescription only. Over-the-counter slowly dissolved niacin preparations are not classified as OTC per se, but are considered "nutritional supplements". For this reason, they fall under the jurisdiction of the Federal Trade Commission and do not fall under the umbrella of the FDA branch that controls dyslipidemic products (Endocrine and Metabolic Division of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research). The slowly dissolved niacin nutritional supplements have not been reviewed by the FDA for safety nor efficacy in the treatment of dyslipidemia nor are they required to meet generic drug rules (even though various brands are available). These brands are described on their labels as "sustained-release", "timed-release", and "slow-release" for example. Only two slowly absorbed niacin products have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of dyslipidemia; they are Niaspan (Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Miami, FL) and Advicor (Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Miami, FL). The term "extended-release" has been given to these two products to simplify the terminology and differentiate the products from immediate-release niacin. In this review, we will use "extended-release" to refer to the FDA approved slowly dissolving niacin preparation and "sustained-release" to refer to the nutritional supplements (not FDA approved).
 ...
PMID:Lovastatin and extended-release niacin combination product: the first drug combination for the management of hyperlipidemia. 1197 44

In this pilot, randomized, double-blind study, we compared the effects of policosanol and lovastatin on lipid profile and lipid peroxidation in patients with dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus. After 4 weeks on a cholesterol-lowering diet, 36 patients were randomized to policosanol (10 mg/day) or lovastatin (20 mg/day) tablets o.i.d. for 8 weeks. Policosanol significantly (p < 0.001) lowered serum low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) (29.9%), total cholesterol (21.1%), triglycerides (13.6%) and the LDL-C/high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) (36.7%) and total cholesterol/HDL-C (28.9%) ratios and significantly (p < 0.01) increased HDL-C (12.5%). Lovastatin significantly (p < 0.001) lowered LDL-C (25%), total cholesterol (18%), triglycerides (10.9%) and the LDL-C/HDL-C (30.4%) and total cholesterol/HDL-C ratios (23.9%) and significantly (p < 0.01) raised HDL-C (8.3%). Policosanol was more effective (p < 0.05) than lovastatin in reducing both ratios and in increasing (p < 0.05) HDL-C. Policosanol, but not lovastatin, significantly raised the lag time (20.9%) of Cu+2-induced LDL peroxidation and total plasma antioxidant activity (24.2%) (p < 0.05). Both policosanol and lovastatin significantly decreased the propagation rate (41.9% and 41.6% respectively, p < 0.001), maximal diene production (8.3% and 5.7%) and plasma levels of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (9.7% and 11.5%, p < 0.001). Both treatments were well tolerated. Only one patient in the lovastatin group withdrew from the trial due to adverse events. In conclusion, policosanol and lovastatin administered short term to patients with dyslipidemia secondary to type 2 diabetes were effective in lowering cholesterol and in inhibiting the extent of lipid peroxidation. Policosanol (10 mg/day) was slightly more effective than lovastatin (20 mg/day) in reducing the LDL-C/HDL-C and total cholesterol/HDL-C ratios, in increasing HDL-C levels and in preventing LDL oxidation. Nevertheless, since this was a pilot study, further clinical studies performed in larger sample sizes of diabetic patients are needed for definitive conclusions.
 ...
PMID:Effects of policosanol and lovastatin on lipid profile and lipid peroxidation in patients with dyslipidemia associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus. 1283 46

The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of lovastatin correction of dyslipidemia and impaired intravascular platelet activity (IPA) in patients with arterial hypertension (AH) concurrent with metabolic syndrome (MS). Eighteen patients were given lovastatin for a month. The time course of changes in anthropometric parameters, blood lipid spectrum, plasma and lipid peroxidation, antioxidative protectiveness of the liquid blood part and platelets, and IPA were assessed. The results were processed by Student's test and correlation analysis. Lovastin was ascertained to correct dyslipoproteinemia and peroxidation syndrome and to optimize the intrathrombocytic mechanisms responsible for their function regulation in patients with AH + MS. Lovastatin inhibits in vivo increased platelet activity. These effects may be stabilized during its use. Body weight loss and diminished insulin resistance in patients with AH concurrent MS require long use of lovastatin along with low-calorie diet and exercises.
 ...
PMID:[Thrombocytic hemostasis in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome and its correction with lovastatin]. 1558 98

In comparison to the general population, individuals with chronic kidney failure experience an increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease attributed predominantly to pronounced abnormalities in lipid metabolism. The emerging consensus is that patients with chronic kidney failure should be treated aggressively for dyslipidemia. Statins reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in a range of at-risk patients; this class of lipid-lowering drugs should be considered first-line treatment of dyslipidemia observed in renal disease patients. Although the statins share a common lipid-lowering effect, there are differences within this class of drugs. The statins differ in their pharmacokinetic effects, drug interaction profiles, and risk of myotoxicity. This article characterizes the dyslipidemia observed in the renal failure setting and reviews the therapeutic considerations involved in selecting among the statins. Lovastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin, atorvastatin, and rosuvastatin are the available statins in the United States.
 ...
PMID:Considerations in the treatment of dyslipidemia associated with chronic kidney failure and renal transplantation. 1623 Aug 79

Lovastatin and extended-release (ER) niacin in a fixed dose combination (Advicor) is approved for the treatment of dyslipidemia. Since both drugs are extensively metabolized, this study investigated the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of their co-administration following single-dose administration. In a 4-way crossover study 40 subjects received: two 1000/20 Advicor tablets (ADV), two 1000 mg niacin ER tablets (NSP), two 20mg lovastatin tablets (Mevacor; MEV), and two niacin ER 1000 mg tablets with two lovastatin 20mg tablets (NSP+MEV). Plasma was assayed for niacin, nicotinuric acid (NUA), lovastatin, lovastatin acid and HMGCoA reductase inhibition. Urine was assayed for niacin and its metabolites, NUA, N-methylnicotinamide and N-methyl-2pyridone-5-carboxamide. Least square mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals for C(max) and AUC((0-t)) were determined for NSP+MEV versus MEV or NSP, ADV versus MEV or NSP, and ADV versus NSP+MEV. Co-administration of niacin and lovastatin did not significantly influence C(max) and AUC((0-t)) of lovastatin, niacin, NUA and total urinary recovery of niacin and metabolites. A 22 to 25% decrease in lovastatin acid C(max) was observed while lovastatin acid AUC((0-t)) was not affected. The HMGCoA reductase inhibition C(max) and AUC((0-t)) were not affected indicating that the difference in lovastatin acid C(max) was not clinically relevant.
 ...
PMID:The comparative bioavailability of an extended-release niacin and lovastatin fixed dose combination tablet versus extended-release niacin tablet, lovastatin tablet and a combination of extended-release niacin tablet and lovastatin tablet. 1757 Dec 83


1 2 Next >>