Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0240066 (iron deficiency)
 7,156 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Parenteral iron, in the form of intramuscular injection or intravenous infusion of iron dextran, is commonly used to treat iron deficiency. Constitutional symptoms, anaphylaxis, and rarely death are risks associated with the use of iron dextran for this purpose. However, iron supplementation of TPN solutions to meet daily requirements can be accomplished safely. We propose that iron dextran added to TPN is well tolerated by patients because the amounts employed are small and the infusion times are long. To illustrate, we present a case where rapid administration of parenteral iron was associated with allergic type symptoms. Inclusion of daily requirements of iron in the TPN solution prior to and subsequent to this reaction did not elicit symptoms.
 ...
PMID:Safety of iron dextran in total parenteral nutrition: a case report. 312 81

Use of recombinant human erythropoietin in patients with end-stage renal disease has highlighted iron deficiency as the major cause of resistant anemia. The current mainstay of intravenous (i.v.) iron replacement therapy, iron dextran, has been shown in prior studies to have a risk of serious life-threatening anaphylaxis of just under 1 per 100 patients exposed. The current study assessed the safety profile of an alternative i.v. iron, sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose (Ferrlecit), as compared with iron dextrans. Sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose, a unique chemical preparation, has been in use since 1959, principally in Europe, at a rate of approximately 2.7 million i.v. doses per year (1992 to 1996) in Germany and Italy alone. For iron dextran, usage in the United States was comparable--principally renal hemodialysis--and estimated from market sources at 3.0 million doses per year (1995). From 1976 to 1996, there were 74 allergic adverse events reported for sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose to the World Health Organization (WHO), German Health Bureau, and the manufacturer (all combined). For the years 1992 to 1996, sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose had an allergy event reporting rate of 3.3 allergy episodes per million doses per year compared with a similar rate of 8.7 reported allergy events per million doses per year for iron dextran in the United States in 1995. Case fatalities for sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose and iron dextran within these reports were then compared. For sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose, there were no reports of deaths over the entire period (1976 to 1996). However, for iron dextrans, there were 31 fatalities among 196 allergy/anaphylaxis cases reported in the United States between 1976 and 1996, yielding a case-fatality rate of 15.8%. These data show that sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose, when compared with iron dextrans in comparably sized patient usage populations with similar total rates of reporting of allergic events, has a significantly lower reported mortality rate (P < 0.001). Thus, the data justify usage of sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose as the safer iron replacement therapeutic agent.
 ...
PMID:Sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose: safer intravenous iron therapy than iron dextrans. 1007 Sep 26

Iron supplementation has become an integral part of the management of patients receiving epoetin therapy, and clinicians have found it necessary to learn how and when to use it to the best advantage. Three routes of administration for iron are available: oral, intramuscular, and intravenous. Oral iron has the advantage of being simple and cheap, but it is limited by side-effects, poor compliance, poor absorption, and low efficacy. Intravenous iron is the best means of guaranteeing delivery of readily available iron to the bone marrow, but it requires greater clinical supervision. The i.v. iron preparations vary widely in their degradation kinetics, bioavailability, side-effect profiles, and maximum dose for single administration. Iron dextran is hampered by a small but significant risk of anaphylaxis, whereas all i.v. iron preparations can induce "free iron" reactions if the circulating plasma transferrin is overloaded. Intravenous iron may be given in advance of epoetin therapy, as concomitant treatment to prevent the development of iron deficiency, as treatment of absolute or functional iron deficiency, or as adjuvant therapy to enhance the response to epoetin in iron-replete patients. Markers of iron status that may indicate a need for i.v. iron include a serum ferritin of less than 100 microg/liter, a transferrin saturation of less than 20%, and a percentage of hypochromic red cells more than 10%. Various regimens are available for giving i.v. iron: low-dose administration of 20 to 60 mg every dialysis session in hemodialysis patients, medium-dose administration of 100 to 400 mg, and high-dose administration of 500 to 1000 mg. Iron sodium gluconate can only be given as a low-dose regimen because of toxicity, whereas the only preparation suitable for high-dose administration is iron dextran. Although concerns have been raised regarding iron overload and long-term toxicity with i.v. iron therapy in terms of increased risk of infections, cardiovascular disease, and malignancy, there is little evidence to substantiate this in patients receiving epoetin. Care should be taken, however, to prevent the serum ferritin rising above 800 to 1000 microg/liter and the transferrin saturation above 50%. Provided this is done, the benefits of i.v. iron almost certainly outweigh the risks in terms of optimizing the response to epoetin therapy.
 ...
PMID:Strategies for iron supplementation: oral versus intravenous. 1008 88

Absolute or functional iron deficiency is a common problem in chronic disease which may lead to iron-deficient erythropoesis. Moreover, lack of available iron is the most common reason for unresponsiveness to epoetin in patients on chronic dialysis. Measurements of serum ferritin, transferrin saturation and percentage of hypochromic red blood cells allow the assessment of iron status. Lack of iron resorption and dose-dependent side-effects limit oral supplementation in a number of patients. Several iron preparations are available for intravenous substitution, especially the newly registered iron-saccharose offers safe and reliable iron supplementation and reduces the risk of anaphylaxis and iron toxicity. This review discusses new guidelines concerning diagnosis of iron status, indication for therapy and application of intravenous iron preparation.
 ...
PMID:[Indications and practical management of parenteral iron therapy]. 1287 35

Parenteral iron therapy is occasionally necessary for patients intolerant or unresponsive to oral iron therapy, for receiving recombinant erythropoietin therapy, or for use in treating functional iron deficiency. There are now three parenteral iron products available: iron dextran, ferric gluconate, and iron sucrose. We summarize the advantages and disadvantages of each product, including risk of anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity, dosage regimens, and costs. The increased availability of multiple parenteral iron preparations should decrease the need to use red cell transfusions in patients with iron-deficiency anemia.
 ...
PMID:Parenteral iron therapy options. 1511 2

Many patients require parenteral iron therapy for optimal correction of anemia, including cancer patients who require erythropoietic drugs. Available parenteral iron therapy options include iron dextran, iron gluconate, and iron sucrose. The purpose of this study is to summarize our institution's experience with parenteral iron therapy over a 5-year period, with a focus on comparative safety profiles. All patients receiving parenteral iron therapy over this period were included in the analysis. Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare the adverse event rates of each product. A total of 121 patients received 444 infusions of parenteral iron over this period. Iron dextran was the most commonly used product (85 patients) and iron sucrose was the least used (2 patients). Iron gluconate was used by 34 patients. Overall adverse event rates per patient with iron dextran and iron gluconate were 16.5% and 5.8%, respectively (P = .024). Premedication with diphenhydramine and acetaminophen before infusions of iron dextran reduced adverse event rates per infusion from 12.3% to 4.4% (P = .054). Test doses of iron dextran were used 88% of the time for initial infusions of iron dextran. All adverse events for all parenteral iron products were mild or moderate. There were no serious adverse events and no anaphylaxis was observed. Our results suggest that, if test doses and premedications are used, iron dextran is an acceptable product to treat iron deficiency.
 ...
PMID:Parenteral iron therapy: a single institution's experience over a 5-year period. 1631 14

Iron deficiency is a frequent complication in chronically ill patients and in pregnant women. Iron status can now be characterised precisely and relatively easily by determining serum ferritin, transferritin saturation and if necessary hypochromic erythrocytes and the haemoglobin content of erythrocytes (CHr). Oral iron replacement is usually restricted by limited absorption and low tolerability. Intravenous iron therapy is possible in such cases and can be combined with rHuEPO (e.g. EPREX/Epoetin alfa) in severe cases. Iron saccharate Switzerland and this permits high dose iron replacement without any danger of anaphylaxis or acute iron toxicity.
 ...
PMID:[The iron letter--an update on the treatment of iron deficiency anemia]. 1655 Jul 9

Iron deficiency is a frequent complication in chronically ill patients and in pregnant women. Iron status can now be characterised precisely and relatively easily by determining serum ferritin, transferritin saturation and if necessary hypochromic erythrocytes and the haemoglobin content of erythrocytes (CHr). Oral iron replacement is usually restricted by limited absorption and low tolerability. Intravenous iron therapy is possible in such cases and can be combined with rHuEPO (e.g. EPREX/ epoetin alfa) in severe cases. Iron saccharate (VENOFER) is commercially available in Switzerland and this permits high dose iron replacement without any danger of anaphylaxis or acute iron toxicity.
 ...
PMID:[Current recommendations for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia]. 1751 29

Iron deficiency anemia is a common occurrence in patients with chronic kidney disease and many patients do not respond well to supplementation with oral iron. There are now five intravenous iron preparations available for use in the chronic kidney disease patient, with ferumoxytol being the most recently approved agent. As opposed to previously available intravenous irons, ferumoxytol has the advantage of not needing a test dose, allowing a large dose of iron (510 mg) to be given in a short period of time by bolus injection, and no reported cases of anaphylaxis. Ferumoxytol has advantages for use in the outpatient setting to treat iron deficiency, in patients with chronic kidney disease not yet on dialysis and in patients on peritoneal dialysis. The use of ferumoxytol in the hemodialysis population where thrice weekly intravenous access is the norm is less clear. Cost-effectiveness studies and post-approval studies on ferumoxytol as well as changes in the cost structure of dialysis reimbursement will likely have a large impact on the use of this new agent.
 ...
PMID:Ferumoxytol for the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease. 2012 70

Anemia in chronic kidney disease is common and iron deficiency is an important cause. To repair iron-deficiency anemia, replacement of iron is needed. Iron can be replaced either by the oral route or by the intravenous route. In a meta-analysis, 5 of the 6 trials were short-term, 1 to 3 months, and compared to oral iron, the mean increase in hemoglobin with intravenous iron was only 0.31 g/dL. However, one of the studies included in this meta-analysis was 6 months long and had a mean decline in hemoglobin of 0.52 g/dL associated with intravenous iron administration. Given the short duration of most of the clinical trials comparing oral with intravenous administration of iron the long-term safety of these modes of administration of supplemental iron could not be assessed. Replacement of iron by the oral route is associated with mostly minor complications such as black stools, constipation, and abdominal discomfort. In contrast, intravenous administration of iron may lead to severe adverse events such as anaphylaxis and, as a more recent randomized trial has suggested, delayed complications such as infections and cardiovascular disease. Delayed complications of repeated intravenous iron use are difficult to recognize at an individual level therefore inpatients who have had recent cardiovascular events or are infected, intravenous iron should probably be avoided. Balancing safety and efficacy would require clinical judgment because 1 size may not fit all till we have better data to support the liberal use of parenteral iron.
 ...
PMID:Iron deficiency anemia in chronic kidney disease: Uncertainties and cautions. 2840 61


1 2 Next >>