Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0234233 (Tenderness)
375 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Tenderness and pain thresholds in pericranial muscles were studied in a random sample of 735 adults aged 25-64 years. This study was a part of a multifaceted, epidemiological study of different headache disorders. Manual palpation and pressure pain threshold were performed by observers blinded to the persons' history of headache. The aim of the study was to evaluate the possible role of pericranial myofascial nociception in headache pathogenesis. Tenderness in migraineurs did not differ from non-migraineurs. Subjects with episodic tension-type headache and females with chronic tension-type headache were more tender than the rest of the population, and males without any experience of headache were less tender than the rest of the male population. A strong positive correlation between tenderness and frequency of tension-type headache was found (males: P < 10(-4); females: P < 10(-5)), while no relation between tenderness and migraine frequency was seen (P = 0.43). In subjects having actual headache at the day of examination tenderness was 32% increased compared to a matched group with identical usual frequency of headache, but without headache during the examination. A significant relation of tenderness to the recency of last episode of headache was detected in both sexes after control for usual frequency and actual headache (males: P < 10(-3); females: P < 10(-4)). Pressure pain thresholds were largely normal indicating normal pain processing and contradicting the idea that tension-type headache mainly is due to generally increased pain sensitivity. This study supports the pathogenetic importance of muscular factors in tension-type headache, while muscular factors are of no primary importance in migraine.
...
PMID:Muscle tenderness and pressure pain thresholds in headache. A population study. 845 67

Skin roll tests were performed on 15 patients with cervicogenic headache, 15 with tension headache ("tension-type headache"; 6 with the acute ("episodic") and 9 with the chronic form), and 43 migraine without aura patients (15 without and 28 with sideshift). Three positions (trapezius, mandibular, supraorbital) were used. The results were compared with those obtained in a control series (no. = 95). Fourteen cervicogenic (93.3%), 8 tension headache (53.3%), and 8 migraine (18.6%) patients reported tenderness in the trapezius position during the procedure. Tenderness asymmetry of > or = 10 mm on the visual analogue scale (with the highest value on the symptomatic side; trapezius position) was found in 10 (67%) cervicogenic headache patients, vs 3 (20%) tension headache patients and no migraine patients. A clear tenderness asymmetry in this area may suggest a cervicogenic headache rather than a migraine without aura diagnosis. Thickness values were less helpful in distinguishing cervicogenic headache from other headaches. In the cervicogenic headache group, both tenderness and skinfold thickness showed significantly higher values on the symptomatic than on the non symptomatic side in the trapezius position, but not in the other positions. The differences between cervicogenic headache on the one hand and tension headache/migraine on the other were generally rather small, indeed, there was a considerable overlap between the groups. In single cases, therefore, the skin roll test will contribute little to the differential diagnosis of cervicogenic headache.
...
PMID:The "skin roll" test: a diagnostic test for cervicogenic headache? 962 97

Migraine pathophysiology is associated with a dural inflammation. Recent evidence suggests that the primary inflammation occurs in a maxillary nerve segment, accessible intraorally. Local tenderness, related to symptom laterality, has been palpated consistently in asymptomatic migraine patients, and significant migraine relief has been obtained from chilling confined to this area. Thirty-five symptomatic episodic migraine patients were enrolled in this study, comparing 40 minutes of bilateral intraoral chilling, 50 mg of oral sumatriptan, and 40 minutes of sham (tongue) chilling. Hollow metal tubes chilled by circulating ice water were held in the maxillary molar periapical areas by the patient. Pain and nausea were recorded at baseline and 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours after start of treatment, using a numeric symptom-relief scale. Significant mean headache relief was obtained by maxillary chilling and sumatriptan at all four time intervals, with poor relief obtained by placebo. Maxillary chilling was more effective than sumatriptan at all four time intervals. Significant nausea relief was obtained by maxillary chilling and sumatriptan at posttreatment and 2 and 4 hours later. At 24 hours, some headache and nausea recurrence was noted with sumatriptan. The repeated-measures analysis of variance indicated that both treatments, drug (P = 0.024) and maxillary chilling (P = 0.001), reduced the headache, as compared with the control group. Tenderness suggests local inflammation associated with vasodilatation and edema. Because chilling can resolve local edema, these findings raise the possibility that an intraoral inflammation may be a factor in migraine etiology.
...
PMID:Intraoral chilling versus oral sumatriptan for acute migraine. 1197 19

To assess in patients with migraine and tension type headache, both episodic and chronic, the extent to which muscle tenderness may relate to anxiety and depression, 459 patients with Episodic Migraine (EM, 125), Chronic Migraine (CM, 97), Episodic Tension Type Headache (ETTH, 82), Chronic Tension Type Headache (CTTH, 83), and EM+ETTH (72) were enrolled. For each patient, a psychological assessment on the Axis 1 of the DSM-IV and muscle palpation of pericranial and cervical muscles were carried out. A Pericranial Muscle Tenderness Score (PTS) and a Cervical Muscle Tenderness Score (CTS) were calculated (range 0-3). Logistic and linear regression analyses were employed to assess relations between muscle tenderness, the demographic variables and psychiatric disorders in the different patient groups. Odds ratio for 'male gender' was higher in groups with tension type headache. Only EM patients showed a positive association with increasing age. Anxiety and depression were significantly associated to CM. A significant negative correlation of PTS and CTS was observed in EM patients. In relation to male gender, the PTS was significantly lower in EM, ETTH and CTTH; CTS was significantly lower in EM, CM, and CTTH. Anxiety and, even more, anxiety and depression combined were positively associated to higher PTS and CTS in EM patients. Anxiety and depression were also positively associated to higher CTS in patients with EM+ETTH. In CTTH patients, PTS only was positively associated to anxiety and depression. We conclude that in patients with EM, the presence of anxiety or anxiety and depression combined considerably increases the level of muscle tenderness in the head and, even more, in the neck, and might facilitate the evolution into CM.
...
PMID:Muscle tenderness in different headache types and its relation to anxiety and depression. 1549 85

This study was aimed at comparing the personality profile, the psychiatric comorbidity (depression and anxiety) and the tenderness of the pericranial and cervical muscles in women with chronic migraine (CM) and chronic tension-type headache (CTTH). Forty-one CM and 34 CTTH women were enrolled. A clinical evaluation (according to SCID-I) and a psychometric assessment (MMPI-2, STAI-1 and STAI-2) were performed. After palpation, a Pericranial muscle Tenderness Score (PTS) and a Cervical Muscle Tenderness Score (CTS) were calculated. No significant difference was detected in MMPI-2, STAI-1, STAI-2, PTS and CTS scores between the two groups. Anxiety and depression were present in 80% of CM and in 63% of CTTH women. We did not find any significant difference either in the personality profile or in the muscle tenderness between CM and CTTH patients. This similarity points to a role of these factors, in association with psychiatric comorbidity, in the chronicisation of headache.
...
PMID:A comparative analysis of personality profile and muscle tenderness between chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache. 1619 46

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a chronic pain condition of unknown aetiology characterized by diffuse pain and tenderness at tender points. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence and clinical features of FMS in the different forms of primary headaches, in a tertiary headache centre. Primary headache patients (n = 217) were selected and submitted to the Total Tenderness Score, anxiety and depression scales, Migraine Disability Assessment, allodynia questionnaire, Short Form 36 Health Survey and the Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale. In patients with FMS, the Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue, the Pain Visual Analog Scale, the Manual Tender Point Survey and the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire were employed. FMS was present in 36.4% of patients and prevailed significantly in tension-type headache and in patients with higher headache frequency. Headache frequency, pericranial muscle tenderness, anxiety and sleep inadequacy were especially associated with FMS comorbidity. In the FMS patients, fatigue and pain at tender points were significantly correlated with headache frequency. FMS seems increasingly prevalent with increased headache frequency, for the facilitation of central sensitization phenomena favoured by anxiety and sleep disturbances.
...
PMID:Fibromyalgia comorbidity in primary headaches. 1917 Jun 92

Background: Migraine is the most common cause of primary headache in children leading to a decrease in the quality of life. During the last decade, pain catastrophizing construct became a major focus of interest in the study and treatment of pain. Aim of the study: To evaluate pain catastrophizing in episodic and chronic migraine children and adolescents selected in a tertiary headache Center.To test whether the children's pain catastrophizing might be associated (a) with the frequency of attacks and disability (b) with psychopathological aspects (c) with allodynia and total tenderness score as symptom of central sensitization.To test the best discriminating clinical variables and scores between episodic and chronic migraine, including pain catastrophizing. Methods: We conducted a cross sectional observational study on consecutive pediatric patients affected by migraine. We selected 190 headache patients who met the diagnostic criteria for Migraine without aura, Migraine with aura and Chronic migraine. We submitted all children to the Child version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-C), and to the disability scale for migraine (PedMIDAS), general quality of life estimated by children (PedsQL) and parents (PedsQL-P), anxiety and depression (SAFA-A; SAFA-D) scales. We also evaluated headache frequency and the presence and severity of allodynia and pericranial tenderness. Results: No difference was detected in Total Pain Catastrophizing score (PCS-C) between chronic and episodic migraine groups (ANOVA F = 0.59, p = 0.70); the PedMIDAS, the PedsQL-P for physical functioning and the Total Tenderness Score were discriminant variables between episodic and chronic migraine. The PCS-C was not correlated with migraine related disability as expressed by Ped MIDAS, but it was significantly correlated with general low quality of life, allodynia, pericranial tenderness, anxiety, and depression. Conclusion: Pain catastrophizing seems a mental characteristic of a clinical phenotype with psychopathological traits and enhanced expression of central sensitization symptoms. This clinical profile causes general decline in quality of life in the child judgment, with a probable parents' underestimation. In childhood age, it would not be a feature of chronic migraine, but the possibility that it could predict this evolution is consistent and worthy of further prospective evaluation.
...
PMID:Pain Catastrophizing in Childhood Migraine: An Observational Study in a Tertiary Headache Center. 3082 15