Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0220723 (PCA)
 4,687 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Critically ill cancer patients may present special problems. Often these patients are terminally ill and mortality in a critical care unit devoted to cancer patients is higher than in other units. Sedation becomes paramount in the treatment of these patients. Some techniques may be inappropriate, such as epidural narcotics in a patient who is thrombocytopenic from chemotherapy. Drug pharmacokinetics are ill defined in these patients who often have liver and renal failure either resulting from tumor or chemotherapy. As the number of available drugs increases, interactions among these drugs become more important. Very little investigations has been done with the drugs we used everyday in the ICU. One should carefully titrate medication to effect--not rely on standard dosage regimens that have been primarily determined in relatively healthy patients. Combinations of techniques are being used, such as PCA with epidural narcotic administration with short acting, lipid soluble narcotics. Nerve blocks, primarily intercostal for chest trauma, were used in the past, but the requirement for frequent reinjection has made them less desirable. Recently thoracic paravertebral block has been used successfully for 9 to 10 hour pain relief with chest trauma. With this armamentarium of techniques and drugs, the critical care physicians should be able to go a long way to relieve pain and suffering of patients in the ICU.
 ...
PMID:Sedation and pain management for the critically ill. 246 65

The postoperative analgesia afforded after colonic surgery by IV opioid, clonidine and lignocaine given intra- and postoperatively was evaluated. In a double-blind randomised trial, 80 male patients scheduled for colonic resection under general anaesthesia received fentanyl 5 micrograms.kg-1 at induction and another 4 micrograms.kg-1 before skin incision (group A) or fentanyl (same dose) plus clonidine 4 micrograms.kg-1 in 20 min + 2 micrograms.kg-1.h-1 (group B, C) or fentanyl plus clonidine (same dosage) plus lignocaine 2 mg.kg-1 before skin incision, repeated before peritoneal incision and retractor placement (group D). In the four groups, intraoperative boluses of fentanyl 2 micrograms.kg-1 were given in response to the painful stimulation of the procedure. Postoperative pain was managed with PCA delivering 2 mg morphine per request in group A, 1.5 mg morphine in group B, 1.5 mg morphine + 15 micrograms clonidine in group C and 1.2 mg morphine + 15 micrograms clonidine + 23 mg lignocaine in group D. Postoperative analgesia was assessed by recording the analgesic demands (met and unmet) and the dose of morphine delivered at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 hours. Side-effects, pain and sedation analogue scores were also recorded. Analgesic demands and delivered morphine dose were reduced, at any time interval considered, in groups B, C, D, compared with A (P < 0.001). No differences were noted between the group B, C, D. Pain analogue scores were better in groups B, C, D compared with group A (P < 0.001). Sedation and side-effects were not increased in groups B, C, D.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Intraoperative and postoperative analgesia using intravenous opioid, clonidine and lignocaine. 816 Sep 43

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ondansetron plus droperidol with each drug alone or placebo in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). One hundred females, aged 18-65 yr, ASA physical status I-II, undergoing general anesthesia for elective abdominal surgery were included in a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. A standardized anesthetic technique and postoperative analgesia (ketorolac plus patient-controlled analgesia [PCA] with morphine) were used in all patients. Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (Group 1, n = 25), droperidol 2.5 mg with induction of anesthesia and 1.25 mg 12 h later (Group 2, n = 25), ondansetron 4 mg with induction (Group 3, n = 25), and ondansetron plus droperidol at the same doses as Groups 3 and 2, respectively (Group 4, n = 25). A complete response, defined as no PONV in 48 h, occurred in 28% of patients in Group 1, 60% in Group 2 (P < 0.05 vs Group 1), 56% in Group 3 (P < 0.05 vs Group 1), and 92% in Group 4 (P < 0.01 vs Groups 1, 2, and 3). Sedation was significantly greater with droperidol (Groups 2 and 4) for 12 h postoperatively. In conclusion, the combination of ondansetron plus droperidol was more effective than each antiemetic alone or placebo in the prevention of PONV in women undergoing elective abdominal surgery.
 ...
PMID:Combination of ondansetron and droperidol in the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting. 865 20