Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0220723 (PCA)
 4,687 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Antigenicity study of 6-amidino-2-naphthyl 4(-)[(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)amino] benzoate dimethanesulfonate (FUT-187), a new protease inhibitor, was investigated in guinea pigs and mice and the following results were obtained. 1. In guinea pigs immunized with FUT-187 plus adjuvant by intramuscular/subcutaneous routes, ASA, ACA and PCA reactions challenged intravenously or intradermally were positive. 2. In guinea pigs immunized with FUT-187 plus adjuvant by intramuscular/subcutaneous routes, ASA and PCA reactions challenged orally were negative. 3. In guinea pigs immunized with FUT-187 by the oral route, ASA, ACA and PCA reactions were negative. 4. In guinea pigs immunized with IABA and AN plus adjuvant by intramuscular/subcutaneous routes, ASA and PCA reactions were negative. 5. 48-hr PCA reactions were elicited with sera obtained from BALB/c and C3H/He mice immunized with FUT-187 plus adjuvant by the intraperitoneal route, responses were negative. 6. From the results of hapten inhibition tests using anti-FUT-187 guinea pig serum, it is suggested that the antigenicity of FUT-187 is attributable to the its benzoic acid.
 ...
PMID:[Antigenicity study of 6-amidino-2-naphthyl 4(-)[(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)amino] benzoate dimethanesulfonate (FUT-187) in guinea pigs and mice. 129 27

This double blind study aimed to assess the effects of a continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion of morphine added to an intermittent bolus patient controlled analgesia on morphine demand and related side-effects. Patients scheduled for abdominal and thoracic surgery (ASA 2 or 3) were randomly allocated postoperatively to three groups (n = 10 each): group 1 were given i.v. boluses of 2 mg of morphine (lockout interval = 15 min); the other two groups were given the same boluses as well as a continuous i.v. infusion of either 1 mg.kg-1 of morphine (group 2) or 2 mg.kg-1 (group 3). Pain was assessed with a visual analog scale before starting analgesia, and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 16, 24 and 36 h. Total and bolus morphine doses were recorded at the same time. Breathing rate and the level of sedation were measured every hour and blood gases every time 40 mg of morphine had been consumed. Morphine administration was stopped if breathing rate decreased to less than 10 c.min-1, the patient became too sedated, or PaCO2 rose to more than 45 mmHg. Pain scores were similar in the three groups. Total amounts of morphine were higher in groups 2 (56.8 +/- 23.8 mg) and 3 (116.2 +/- 41.8 mg) compared with group 1 (38.2 +/- 17.8 mg) (p < 0.05). Morphine administration was stopped in 5 patients in group 3 and in 1 in group 2 because PaCO2 had risen to more than 45 mmHg. Therefore, a continuous i.v. infusion is not required in patients receiving PCA, all the more so as this has deleterious respiratory effects.
 ...
PMID:[Patient-controlled analgesia: effect of adding continuous infusion of morphine]. 147 77

We compared the postoperative epidural analgesia provided by the continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine supplemented with patient-controlled injection (PCA) of epidural fentanyl with that provided by a continuous infusion of bupivacaine supplemented with a continuous epidural infusion of fentanyl. Our patient population comprised 16 ASA physical status I or II patients undergoing laparotomy with a midline incision under general anesthesia combined with bupivacaine epidural analgesia. Post-operatively, a continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine (0.1 mg.kg-1.h-1) was combined with epidural fentanyl given by either (a) PCA (15-micrograms bolus with a lockout interval of 12 min, n = 8) or (b) continuous infusion (1 microgram.kg-1.h-1, n = 8). In the case of inadequate pain relief in the latter group, the fentanyl infusion rate was increased by 10 micrograms/h. Analgesia evaluated by a visual analogue pain score and by a verbal pain score was similarly effective in both groups. The sedation score was also similar in both groups. The total dose of epidural fentanyl administered during the first 24 h was significantly lower in the PCA group than in the continuous infusion group (405 +/- 110 micrograms vs 1600 +/- 245 micrograms, P less than 0.001). The dose of fentanyl given during each 4-h interval ranged between 40 and 160 micrograms in the PCA group and 251 and 292 micrograms in the continuous infusion group. Clinically detectable respiratory depression was not observed in either group. In conclusion, epidural administration of 0.1 mg.kg-1.h-1 bupivacaine combined with fentanyl provides effective postoperative analgesia with a total dose of fentanyl required that is lower when fentanyl is administered by epidural PCA rather than by continuous epidural infusion.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of continuous epidural bupivacaine infusion plus either continuous epidural infusion or patient-controlled epidural injection of fentanyl for postoperative analgesia. 185 27

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA, intravenous self-application of narcotics) was studied during the early postoperative period. Subjects were 40 ASA I-III patients recovering from elective major and minor surgery (20 each having undergone abdominal or orthopedic operations). Whenever the patients required pain relief, piritramid demand doses of 2.0 mg were given via the hand-button of a microprocessor-controlled injection pump (On-Demand Analgesia Computer, ODAC). Hourly maximum dose was set to 15 mg with a pump refractory time of 1 minute between valid demands. A continuous low-dose piritramid infusion (0.24 mg/h) was additionally administered in order to prevent catheter obstruction. Duration of the PCA period was 19.7 +/- 6.5 hours (mean +/- SD). During this time, 17.1 +/- 13.8 demands per patient were recorded resulting in mean individual piritramid consumptions of 30.4 +/- 28.1 micrograms/kg/h. Self-administration was characterized by considerable intra- and interindividual variability. Following abdominal surgery, slightly more piritramid was needed compared with orthopedic patients, although less pain relief was achieved in the former group. The same proved to be true for a comparison between the sexes, males requiring significantly more piritramide for less pain relief than females (p = 0.05). Over-all efficacy and patient acceptance proved to be excellent. Effectiveness of PCA was judged superior by about 73% of patients when compared with previously experienced conventional postoperative analgesia. Side effects (sweating, nausea, emesis) occurred in about 20% but were usually of minor intensity. No serious circulatory or respiratory problems were observed during the PCA period. Patient-controlled analgesia is discussed as a promising concept for the treatment of acute pain and for clinical pain research.
 ...
PMID:Patient-controlled analgesia with piritramid for the treatment of postoperative pain. 288 42

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA, intravenous self-application of narcotics) has been studied during the early postoperative period in 40 ASA I-III patients recovering from elective major and minor surgery (20 abdominal and 20 orthopaedic operations). Doses of 3.7 mg of the new agonist-antagonist opioid analgesic nalbuphine were available on demand, whenever the patients felt that pain relief was necessary, delivered by a microprocessor-controlled injection pump (On-Demand Analgesia Computer, ODAC) in response to use of a patient-controlled manual switch. The maximum dose/h was set at 28.2 mg, with a refractory time of 1 minute between successful demands. A continuous nalbuphine infusion (0.44 mg X h-1) was administered in addition in order to prevent obstruction of the catheter. The duration of the PCA period was 17.9 (0.4-28.0) h (median, range). During that time, 13.3 (1-45) demands per patient were recorded, resulting in median individual nalbuphine consumptions of 51.3 (8.1-1050.5) micrograms X kg-1 X h-1. Self-administration was characterized by considerable intra- and inter-individual variability. Following abdominal surgery significantly more nalbuphine was needed compared to orthopaedic patients, but it resulted in poorer pain relief. There were no statistically significant differences in drug requirements or pain scores between the sexes. Overall efficacy and patient acceptance proved to be good. When compared with previous conventional postoperative analgesia, the effectiveness of PCA was judged superior by about 57% of patients. Side effects (nausea, sweating) occurred in about 10% of patients but were usually of minor intensity. No serious circulatory or respiratory problems were observed during the period of PCA. Patient-controlled analgesia is a promising technique for the treatment of acute pain and for clinical pain research.
 ...
PMID:Patient-controlled analgesia with nalbuphine, a new narcotic agonist-antagonist, for the treatment of postoperative pain. 379 24

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA, intravenous self-application of narcotics) was studied during the early postoperative period. Subjects were 40 ASA I-III patients recovering from elective major and minor surgery (each 20 having undergone abdominal or orthopaedic operations). Morphine boluses each of 1.92 mg were available via a hand-button whenever the patients felt pain relief necessary, and delivered by a microprocessor-controlled injection pump (On-Demand Analgesia Computer, ODAC). Hourly maximum dose was set to 15 mg with a pump refractory time of 1 min between valid demands. A continuous low-dose morphine infusion (0.23 mg/h was additionally administered in order to prevent catheter obstruction. Duration of the PCA period was 20.3 +/- 4.3 h (mean, standard deviation). During this time, 18.3 +/- 10.6 demands per patient were recorded resulting in individual morphine consumption of 29.6 +/- 16.6 micrograms/kg/h. Self-administration was characterized by considerable intra- and inter-individual variability. Following abdominal surgery, significantly more morphine was needed compared with orthopaedic patients, although pain relief was found less in the former group. There were no statistically significant differences in drug requirements or pain scores between the sexes. With respect to different anaesthetic techniques, patients recovering from spinal anaesthesia needed lower morphine doses only during the first few (1-4) h in comparison with neuroleptanalgesia. Over-all efficacy and patient acceptance proved to be excellent. Effectiveness of PCA was judged superior by about 84% of patients when compared with previously experienced conventional postoperative analgesia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Postoperative on-demand analgesia with morphine]. 407 43

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA, intravenous self-application of narcotics) was studied during the early postoperative period. Subjects were 40 ASA I-III patients recovering from elective major and minor surgery (each 20 having undergone abdominal or orthopaedic operations). Pentazocine bolusses of each 8 mg were available via a hand-button whenever the patients felt pain relief necessary, and delivered by a microprocessor-controlled injection pump (On-Demand Analgesia Computer, ODAC). Hourly maximum dose was set to 60 mg with a pump refractory time of 1 min between valid demands. A continuous low-dose pentazocine infusion (1 mg/h) was additionally administered in order to prevent catheter obstruction. Duration of the PCA period was 20.3 +/- 5.9 h (mean, standard deviation). During this time, 20.0 +/- 12.7 demands per patient were recorded resulting in mean pentazocine consumption of 135.6 +/- 81.4 micrograms/kg/h. Self-administration was characterized by considerable intra- and interindividual variability. There were no statistically significant differences with regard of pentazocine consumption or pain relief between abdominal and orthopaedic patients, nor could any be demonstrated between the sexes. Similarly, no clear differences were found after various anaesthetic techniques (neuroleptanalgesia, halothane or spinal anaesthesia). Over-all efficacy and patient acceptance proved to be excellent. Effectiveness of PCA was judged superior by about 68% of patients when compared with previously experienced conventional postoperative analgesia. Side effects (nausea, emesis, sweating) occurred in about 10-18% but were usually of minor intensity. Circulatory or respiratory problems were not observed during the PCA period. Patient-controlled analgesia is discussed as a promising concept for the treatment of acute pain and clinical pain research.
 ...
PMID:[Postoperative on-demand analgesia with pentazocine (Fortral)]. 409 11

Studies on antigenicity of suloctidil were performed on ASA, Schultz-Dale reaction, PCA and PHA in guinea pigs. Two sensitizing procedures were enforced. One was performed by means of treatment of suloctidil (p. o. and i. p.) and the other was done by means of injection of suloctidil, suloctidil-BSA-mixture and suloctidil-BSA-conjugate emulsified with FCA. Guinea pigs treated with suloctidil by oral or intraperitoneal administration showed no ASA, Schultz-Dale reaction, PCA and PHA by the challenge of suloctidil. The animals treated with suloctidil-BSA-conjugate only evoked severe anaphylactic reaction to challenge of suloctidil-OVA-conjugate. Guinea pigs treated with suloctidil and suloctidil-BSA-mixture showed no anaphylactic reaction to challenge of suloctidil, suloctidil-OVA-mixture and suloctidil-OVA-conjugate. The animals sensitized with suloctidil-BSA-conjugate showed no anaphylactic reaction to challenge of suloctidil and suloctidil-OVA-mixture. Therefore, it is concluded that suloctidil does not have any antigenicity.
 ...
PMID:[Antigenicity of suloctidil]. 631 26

Twenty-one ASA I or II patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery were studied for 24 hours after operation. They were entered into a prospective, randomised study of patient-controlled intravenous morphine compared with continuous thoracic epidural fentanyl combined with 0.2% bupivacaine. Pain relief was superior in the bupivacaine series (P < 0.05) throughout the 24 hour study period and this was associated with significantly greater pulmonary ventilation compared with the PCA series. Forced expiratory parameters were reduced in both series after the operation but significantly less so in the epidural group. There was a reduced incidence of emetic symptoms in the epidural group (P < 0.05) but the incidence of other minor side effects did not differ significantly. Thoracic epidural fentanyl/bupivacaine results in significantly better analgesia than patient-controlled intravenous morphine.
 ...
PMID:Thoracic epidural analgesia compared with patient controlled intravenous morphine after upper abdominal surgery. 788 2

Postoperative pain relief can be achieved by several methods, including the use of systemic opioids and regional anaesthesia with intrathecal or epidural opioids or local anaesthetics. On-demand analgesia using a PCA (patient-controlled analgesia) system is regarded as the ideal option for systemic opioid analgesia. While PCA devices are not yet commonly used in all recovery units, the use of repetitive boluses on demand is still the most frequent form of administration in postoperative pain therapy. The objective of the present study was to show if continuous infusion of the opioid tramadol could produce better analgesia than repetitive administration of boluses. METHOD. In a study under double-blind conditions 135 ASA I and II patients were assigned at random to group I (infusion group) or group B (bolus group) when they first requested pain treatment after abdominal surgery. The patients in group I received an initial intravenous loading dose of 100 mg tramadol, followed by an infusion of 12 mg/h tramadol for 24 h; if necessary, repeated boluses of 50 mg tramadol were given. In group B the patients received a placebo infusion instead of the tramadol infusion; otherwise, the procedure was the same. Pain relief was monitored by means of a VAS (visual analogue scale) up to 6 h after surgery. We investigated the retrograde assessment of analgesia by the patients after 6 h, how often repetitive boluses were required, and the amount of analgesics administered in 6 and 24 h. RESULTS. The pain relief was assessed as excellent or good by 76.5% of group I and 65.6% of group B; 19.1% of group I and 26.9% of group B assessed the analgesic effect as satisfactory; 4.4% of group I and 7.5% of group B complained of insufficient analgesia. In group I 69.2% requested only one or no repetitive bolus, compared with 40.3% in group B, while two or more boluses were demanded by 30.8% in group I und 59.7% in group B. The average analgesic consumption after 6 h was 223.5 +/- 53.7 mg tramadol in group I and 176.6 +/- 63.1 mg tramadol in group B, respectively. After 24 h it was 449.5 +/- 66.0 mg tramadol in group I and 201.6 +/- 83.9 mg tramadol in group B. While the consumption during the first 6 h was comparable, from then on the consumption in group I increased significantly. Side effects were reported by 25% in both groups. They were clinically irrelevant and did not necessitate termination of the clinical trial in any case. During the study period pulse and blood pressure remained within the normal range and did not show any significant changes. CONCLUSION. The fact that the patients in group I requested far fewer repetitive boluses than those in group B and the assessment by the patients led to the conclusion that treatment in the infusion group is better than that in the bolus group. Concerns that a significantly higher consumption of analgesics would cause unwanted side-effects have proven unfounded. Six hours after surgery, when analgesia was evaluated by the patients, there was no significant difference between the two groups. Not until the maintenance infusion had been administered for a further 18 h, was the tramadol consumption within the infusion group significantly higher. Thus, we should consider continuing unreduced administration of the maintenance infusion 6 h after operation.
 ...
PMID:[Postoperative analgesia with tramadol. Continuous infusion versus repetitive bolus administration]. 804 60


1 2 3 Next >>