Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0184567 (acute pain)
3,962 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Although it is well known that cannabinoids produce antinociception in acute pain models, there is less information on the ability of cannabinoids to alleviate hyperalgesia. In the present study, we determined whether cannabinoids attenuated the development of hyperalgesia produced by intraplantar injection of capsaicin in rats. In normal, untreated animals, intraplantar injection of 10 microg capsaicin produces nocifensive behavior (elevation of the injected paw) suggestive of pain, an increase in the frequency of withdrawal from punctate mechanical stimuli applied to the paw (mechanical hyperalgesia) and a decrease in the latency of withdrawal from noxious heat (heat hyperalgesia). Separate groups of animals were pretreated intravenously with vehicle, the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 at doses of 1, 10, 100 or 200 microg/kg, or the enantiomer WIN 55,212-3 (100 microg/kg) 5 min before intraplantar injection of capsaicin into one paw. The duration of nocifensive behavior was measured during the first 5 min after capsaicin injection. Withdrawal responses to mechanical and heat stimuli applied to the plantar surface of both hindpaws were measured before and at 5 and 30 min after capsaicin. Pretreatment with WIN 55,212-2 produced a dose-dependent decrease in nocifensive behavior and in hyperalgesia to mechanical and heat stimuli produced by capsaicin, as compared with vehicle pretreatment. Doses of 100 and 200 microg/kg WIN 55,212-2 completely blocked the development of hyperalgesia to mechanical and heat stimuli without altering withdrawal responses on the contralateral control paw. Furthermore, these doses of WIN 55,212-2 had no effect on basal withdrawal responses to heat in animals that did not receive capsaicin. The inactive enantiomer WIN 55,212-3 did not alter the development of capsaicin-evoked pain or hyperalgesia. These data suggest that low doses of cannabinoids, which do not produce analgesia or impair motor function, attenuate chemogenic pain and possess antihyperalgesic properties.
...
PMID:The cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 mesylate blocks the development of hyperalgesia produced by capsaicin in rats. 1035 90

This study was performed to assess the degree of acute pain in children following eye surgery using a Face Pain Rating Scale (FPRS), with a validity and reliability test employing a Numeric/Word Graphic Rating Scale (NWGRS). The degree of pain was obtained at 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours after surgery using the FPRS and NWGRS. The changes in pain intensities were analyzed using a RM-ANOVA, while the relationship between the FPRS and NWGRS was analyzed by a Pearson coefficient in SPSS/WIN. Two third of the children experienced pain equal to, or greater, than moderate to severe, and about one fifth of the subjects expressed the most severe pain at 2 hours after surgery. At 4 hours after surgery, 95.3% of the children still complained of pain, and 8 hours after surgery, 82.8% of the patients experienced 'a little bit' or 'a little more' pain or discomforts. At 1 day after surgery, only 34.4% of children were free of pain. A high correlation between the FPRS and NWGRS was identified over 5 time-points (.887 < r < .735). The gender, type of the surgery and past operation experience had no effects on the degree of pain. Our results suggest that FPRS is a reliable and valid measurement for acute pain assessment in Korean children following eye surgery, and warrants application in the integrated clinical protocol, including non-pharmacological and pharmacological management of acute pediatric pain reduction following surgery.
...
PMID:Measurement of acute pain after eye surgery in children. 1254 48

Current evidence indicates that cannabinoids are antinociceptive and this effect is in part mediated by spinal mechanisms. Anatomical studies have localized cannabinoid CB(1) receptors to pre- and postsynaptic sites within the spinal cord. However, behavioural tests have not clearly indicated the relative importance of each of these sites. In this study, the tail flick test was used as a model of acute pain in the rat to determine the site of action of WIN 55,212-2 ((R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3[(4-morpholinyl)methyl]pyrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazinyl]-(1-naphthalenyl)methanone mesylate), a synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist. WIN 55,212-2 (3 mg/kg, i.p.) increased the latency of tail withdrawal from a noxious radiant heat source, indicating it is antinociceptive in this model. Using the same paradigm, WIN 55,212-2 was then tested against the synaptically-induced nociceptive hypersensitivity in response to noxious thermal stimulation of the tail (hot water tail immersion). WIN 55,212-2 blocked this hypersensitivity, confirming a spinal site of action of the cannabinoid receptor agonist. Further, WIN 55,212-2 blocked the nociceptive hypersensitivity induced by intrathecal administration of substance P. As substance P acts on postsynaptic tachykinin NK1 receptors in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, the data are interpreted to suggest that WIN 55,212-2 expressed its anti-hypersensitivity effects at least partially via a postsynaptic site of action; the data do not rule out a presynaptic site of action. This study suggests that cannabinoids may induce analgesia via a postsynaptic site of action in the spinal cord, as well as the possibility that they may interact with substance P signaling.
...
PMID:Physiological evidence of a postsynaptic inhibition of the tail flick reflex by a cannabinoid receptor agonist. 1902 34

Cannabinoid CB1 receptors have been implicated in the antinociceptive effect of paracetamol. In the current study, we examined whether blockade of CB1 receptors prevent the analgesic activity of dipyrone, in a similar way to paracetamol. Hot-plate and tail-flick tests were used to assess the antinociceptive activity in mice. Dipyrone and WIN 55,212-2, a cannabinoid agonist, exerted significant antinociceptive effects in both hot-plate and tail flick tests. The CB1 receptor antagonist, AM-251 (3 mg/kg), at a dose which had no effect when used alone, did not alter the antinociceptive effect of dipyrone, whereas completely prevented the antinociceptive activity of WIN 55,212-2 in both thermal antinociceptive tests. Our findings suggest that, unlike paracetamol, cannabinoid CB1 receptors do not participate in the antinociceptive action of dipyrone when acute pain tests used.
...
PMID:Involvement of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the antinociceptive effect of dipyrone. 2378 45

Divergent results in pain management account for the growing number of studies aiming at elucidating the pharmacology of the endocannabinoid/endovanilloid anandamide (AEA) within several pain-related brain structures. For instance, the stimulation of both Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) and Cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) receptors led to paradoxical effects on nociception. Here, we attempted to propose a clear and reproducible methodology to achieve the antinociceptive effect of exogenous AEA within the dorsal periaqueductal gray (dPAG) of mice exposed to the tail-flick test. Accordingly, male Swiss mice received intra-dPAG injection of AEA (CB1/TRPV1 agonist), capsaicin (TRPV1 agonist), WIN (CB1 agonist), AM251 (CB1 antagonist), and 6-iodonordihydrocapsaicin (6-IODO) (TRPV1 selective antagonist) and their nociceptive response was assessed with the tail-flick test. In order to assess AEA effects on nociception specifically at vanilloid or cannabinoid (CB) substrates into the dPAG, mice underwent an intrinsically inactive dose of AM251 or 6-IODO followed by local AEA injections and were subjected to the same test. While intra-dPAG AEA did not change acute pain, local injections of capsaicin or WIN induced a marked TRPV1- and CB1-dependent antinociceptive effect, respectively. Regarding the role of AEA specifically at CB/vanilloid substrates, while the blockade of TRPV1 did not change the lack of effects of intra-dPAG AEA on nociception, local pre-treatment of AM251, a CB1 antagonist, led to a clear AEA-induced antinociception. It seems that the exogenous AEA-induced antinociception is unmasked when it selectively binds to vanilloid substrates, which might be useful to address acute pain in basic and perhaps clinical trials.
...
PMID:Blockade of Cannabinoid CB1 Receptors in the Dorsal Periaqueductal Gray Unmasks the Antinociceptive Effect of Local Injections of Anandamide in Mice. 2904 38