Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0184567 (acute pain)
 3,962 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Intravenous indoprofen (400 mg), a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, was compared with intramuscular oxicodone hydrochloride (= oxicone 10 mg), a narcotic analgesic agent, in regard to efficacy and side effects in the treatment of renal colic. Oxicone was combined with papaverine (20 mg). Patients were randomized to either treatment, and the drugs were given in double-dummy fashion, i.e. one injection of active drug plus one placebo injection. Pain intensity before and after treatment was registered by the patient (visual analog scale) and by a nurse, who also registered side effects. Oxicone was given to 46 patients and indoprofen to 48. The groups did not differ in body weight, age, sex distribution, or pretreatment intensity of pain. More patients required additional treatment in the oxicone than in the indoprofen group (19 v. 10). At 2-5 min after injection, pain reduction was greater with indoprofen, and more patients in this group had pain relief after 3-5 hours. Side effects were less frequent with indoprofen than with oxicone (1 v. 20 patients), in particular from the central nervous system. This difference probably was related to indoprofen's slow and poor penetration of the blood-brain barrier. The study affirmed that non-narcotic cyclooxygenase inhibitors can replace narcotic analgesics for acute pain alleviation in renal colic. Indoprofen seems to be a useful alternative, with low risk of central nervous side effects.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of a narcotic (oxicone) and a non-narcotic anti-inflammatory analgesic (indoprofen) in the treatment of renal colic. 389 Apr 35

Rofecoxib (Vioxx, Merck & Co., Inc.) is a new orally-effective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) approved for treatment of acute pain, fever, primary dysmenorrhea and pain and inflammation in osteoarthritis (OA). It is also being evaluated for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and adenomatous polyps of the colon. Rofecoxib is a specific inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), thereby inhibiting prostanoid synthesis in cells that express COX-2, including inflammatory cells. As cells in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract principally express COX-1, a different isoform of cyclooxygenase, it is predicted that rofecoxib will have less GI toxicity than other less selective NSAIDs. In clinical trials, rofecoxib was found to be as effective as other NSAIDs for management of pain and inflammation. In trials that compare rofecoxib with ibuprofen, diclofenac and indomethacin, less GI toxicity has been observed, as assayed by a decrease in lesions visible on endoscopy, by GI blood loss and, in a meta-analysis, by frequency of serious adverse GI events. The presence of COX-2 in cells other than inflammatory cells results in side effects common among NSAIDs, including peripheral oedema and hypertension. These side effects are dose-dependent. Rofecoxib, together with other branded NSAIDs, are relatively expensive, which has led to concern regarding costs versus benefits. There is also concern regarding potential risks associated with the use of rofecoxib by populations that would otherwise not tolerate NSAIDs.
 ...
PMID:Rofecoxib. 1124 95

Non-opioid analgesics such as NSAIDs play a central role for patients with cancer pain as well as for those with acute pain. Pain management using non-opioid analgesics need to avoid potential side effects, and the analgesic action of NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, would synergistically potentiate opioids' effects via the activation of the periaquaductal grey of the midbrain. The analgesic action of opioids would also be potentiated by the activation of alpha 2-adrenoceptors of the spinal cord. Thus the use of non-opioid analgesics for cancer patients taking opioid needs meticulous care. Undertreatment of pain is a persistent clinical problem for patients with cancer. Although changing medical practice is difficult and improving pain management with the rational use of combination of drugs may especially difficult, supplementation of non-opioid analgesics for opioid treatment would provide a better quality of life of cancer patients.
 ...
PMID:[Non-opioid analgesics in cancer pain]. 1155 55

While non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the mainstay of therapy for the management of acute pain and rheumatoid arthritis, toxicity associated with chronic administration limits their benefit-to-risk relationship in many patients. A series of studies is reviewed that assesses the relationship between cytokines released at the site of tissue injury and NSAID analgesia, and the in vivo selectivity of a selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor (celecoxib) in comparison to a dual COX-1/COX-2 inhibitor (ketorolac). Three replicate studies in the oral surgery model of acute pain used submucosal microdialysis sample collection for the measurement of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2; a product of both COX-1 and COX-2) and thromboxane B2 (as a biomarker for COX-1 activity) with parallel assessments of pain. The time course of PGE2 production was consistent with early release due to COX-1 activity followed by increased production 2-3 hours after surgery, consistent with COX-2 expression. Ketorolac 30 mg at pain onset suppressed both pain and peripheral PGE2 levels. Ketorolac 1 mg either at the site of injury or intramuscularly also produced analgesia but without any effect on peripheral PGE2 levels. Celecoxib selectively suppressed PGE2 but not TxB2 at time points consistent with COX-2 activity, while producing analgesia. These studies demonstrate the ability to assess the time course and selective effects of COX-2 inhibitors in vivo and suggest that suppression of COX-2 mediated PGE2 is temporally related to NSAID analgesia.
 ...
PMID:Analgesia and COX-2 inhibition. 1169 55

Racemic ibuprofen, which contains equal quantities of R(-)-ibuprofen and S(+)-ibuprofen, has been used as an anti-inflammatory and analgesic agent for over 30 years. Although the S(+)-enantiomer is capable of inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX) at clinically relevant concentrations, R(-)-ibuprofen is not a COX inhibitor. The two enantiomers of ibuprofen are therefore different in terms of their pharmacological properties and may be regarded as two different 'drugs'. They also differ in terms of their metabolic profiles. For example, R(-)-ibuprofen becomes involved in pathways of lipid metabolism and is incorporated into triglycerides along with endogenous fatty acids. S(+)-Ibuprofen does not appear to become involved in these unusual metabolic reactions, which is why S(+)-ibuprofen is regarded as being metabolically 'cleaner' than racemic ibuprofen. When racemic ibuprofen is given to humans, a substantial fraction of the dose of R(-)-ibuprofen (50%-60%) undergoes 'metabolic inversion' to yield S(+)-ibuprofen. On this basis, it has been argued that to obtain clinical effects that are comparable to those of a given dose of racemic ibuprofen, the dose of S(+)-ibuprofen would need to be about 75% of the dose of the racemate. However, this 'pharmacokinetic' rationale does not take into account the fact that inversion is not instantaneous, that there is variability in the extent of inversion between individuals, and that the kinetics of inversion may differ depending on the dosing situations. For example, the extent of inversion appears to be reduced when the racemate is given to patients experiencing acute pain. Recent studies have demonstrated that the clinical benefits of racemic ibuprofen can be derived from the administration of the single S(+)-enantiomer at a dose that is half that of the racemate. For example, 200 mg of S(+)-ibuprofen has been found to be superior or at least equivalent to 400 mg of the racemate in the relief of dental pain. Possible explanations for this higher than expected efficacy of S(+)-ibuprofen are considered.
 ...
PMID:Comparative pharmacology of S(+)-ibuprofen and (RS)-ibuprofen. 1177 73

Opioid agents are highly effective analgesics after orthopedic surgery but are associated with several adverse effects. Valdecoxib is a new, highly selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-specific inhibitor with a rapid onset of action and significant analgesic properties that is being developed for the management of acute pain. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the opioid-sparing efficacy of valdecoxib as part of a multimodal treatment of pain associated with hip arthroplasty. This multicenter, multiple-dose, double-blind, parallel-group study compared the opioid-sparing effects, analgesic efficacy, and safety of 20- and 40-mg doses of valdecoxib twice daily with placebo in patients receiving morphine by patient-controlled analgesia after hip arthroplasty. Study medication was first administered 1 to 3 hours preoperatively. The total amount of morphine administered, pain intensity, and patient's global evaluation of study medication were assessed over a period of 48 hours. Patients receiving 20 or 40 mg valdecoxib twice daily required on average 40% less morphine than those receiving placebo after hip arthroplasty. Pain intensity levels and patient satisfaction were significantly improved in both valdecoxib groups compared with placebo. Valdecoxib and placebo were equally well tolerated. Pre- and postoperative administration of valdecoxib reduces the amount of morphine required for postoperative pain relief and provides greater analgesic efficacy compared with morphine alone. Thus, valdecoxib has significant clinical utility for acute pain management in orthopedic surgery patients.
 ...
PMID:Valdecoxib, a COX-2-specific inhibitor, is an efficacious, opioid-sparing analgesic in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. 1178 19

Rofecoxib is a selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor that is approved for the treatment of acute pain and osteoarthritis in adults. A sensitive and rapid high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method of determining rofecoxib in human serum is described. Alkalinized plasma samples are extracted into an organic solvent containing an internal standard and evaporated under nitrogen. The dried sample residues are reconstituted with mobile phase and analyzed by HPLC. The method uses 100 microL of the sample and is linear from 20 to 2000 ng/mL of rofecoxib. Precision and accuracy studies are performed. Stability of the drug in serum over four weeks is documented. This new method is simple, sensitive, precise, and accurate. Its use will translate into faster laboratory turnaround time, and the small sample volume required (100 microL) makes this assay suitable for pediatric patients. This assay will expedite pharmacokinetic studies and the therapeutic drug monitoring of rofecoxib and possibly other COX-2 inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:A rapid and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography assay for rofecoxib in human serum. 1186 83

The elucidation of inducible cyclooxygenase (Cox-2) dependent inflammatory pathways led to the development of specific Cox-2 inhibitors, the coxibs. These agents include the currently available celecoxib and rofecoxib and such second-generation agents as parecoxib, valdecoxib, and etoricoxib. The therapeutic advantage of coxibs is founded primarily in their lack of significant gastrointestinal (GI) side effects. Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of coxibs to be completely comparable with traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and pharmacoeconomics suggest favorable cost/benefit ratios with these agents compared with traditional NSAIDs, related to their reduced GI complication profiles and lower indirect costs associated with disability. Although several clinical questions remain (eg, use with low-dose aspirin, risk of thrombosis, myocardial infarction, edema, and hypertension), the emergence and clinical utility of coxibs is likely to continue on the basis of their efficacy and relative GI safety advantage. Although newer, more specific Cox-2 inhibitors may alter the choice, it is likely that this class of anti-inflammatories will become (if they have not already) the drugs of first choice in the treatment of acute pain, chronic pain, and most rheumatic conditions in the 21st century. In addition to the treatment of rheumatic conditions, it is possible that coxibs will also be of clinical utility in protection against malignant transformation and Alzheimer disease.
 ...
PMID:Cox-2 inhibitors: today and tomorrow. 1200 72

Pharmacia (formerly Searle), in collaboration with Pfizer and Yamanouchi, has developed valdecoxib, a second-generation cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor as a follow-up to celecoxib, for the treatment of arthritis. Pharmacia filed an NDA with the FDA in March 2001 for the treatment of acute pain, dysmenorrhea, osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). At this time, Pharmacia anticipated a 12-month review [402883]. In June 2001, launch was anticipated in 2002 [412616], and in November 2001, valdecoxib was granted FDA approval [429715]. The company claims that valdecoxib has improved potency and broader therapeutic range than other COX-2 inhibitors including celecoxib, and has the potential for once-daily dosing [287279], [313957]. By 1999, due to the poor water solubility of valdecoxib, Searle was also developing the prodrug parecoxib [324667]. Valdecoxib has been described by Searle as almost superimposable at the site critical for COX-2 inhibition, a structural side pocket in the enzyme which coincides with the sulfonamide group of the drug [324667]. In April 2000, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter estimated sales would be US $400 million in 2003, rising to US $750 million in 2004 [375906]. In April 2001, Merrill Lynch predicted world sales of US $460 million in 2002, rising to $1,065 million in 2005 [420574]. In September 2000, Merrill Lynch reported that additional pain data were being accumulated for this drug, the possible inclusion of which could push filing back to later in the first half of 2001 [382577]. In May 2001, Merrill Lynch expected launch in 2002 [411811]. In August 2001, Lehman Brothers predicted that launch would take place in thefirst half of 2002 and the product would make peak sales of US $1,500 million [420809]. Credit Suisse predicted in this month that total sales would reach US $330 million in 2002, rising to US $1832 million in 2004 [422318]. In September 2001, Morgan Stanley expected launch in the first half of 2002 [427113]. By October 2001, Credit Suisse had revised its sales predictions to US $180 million in 2002, US $790 million in 2003 and US $1,430 in 2004 [427185].
 ...
PMID:Valdecoxib (Pharmacia). 1202 53

The economic evaluation of health care programs is undertaken to assess health care costs and benefits. Part of the goal of cost-effectiveness analysis is to maximize health benefits given the constraint of limited health care resources. The identification of costs is critical in a cost-effectiveness analysis of clinical interventions. The recent introduction of the cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-selective inhibitors, coxibs, for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and acute pain gives rise to cost-effectiveness issues. These new agents provide similar efficacy with fewer gastrointestinal events compared with nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), but are more expensive on a per-dose basis. However, several modeled cost analyses have suggested that COX-2 inhibitors are cost effective in subsets of patients because they are associated with fewer downstream costs, particularly medical and surgical treatment of gastrointestinal adverse effects. Three cost-effectiveness models of interventions for rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis, including COX-2 inhibitors, are reviewed. Prospective clinical investigation of the potential costs and benefits of these new agents is necessary to further support these findings.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacoeconomics of coxib therapy. 1220 85


1 2 3 4 Next >>