Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0184567 (acute pain)
 3,962 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We audited and analysed the adverse effects and safety of postoperative pain management on 2509 consecutive patients under care of the Acute Pain Service at a tertiary referral teaching hospital over a 32-month period. Our standard respiratory monitoring consisted of continuous pulse oximetry, hourly respiratory rate counting, sedation scoring and intermittent arterial blood gas sampling. This protocol was reliable and detected six episodes of bradypnoea, 13 of hypercapnia and 23 of oxygen desaturation occurring in 39 patients (1.8% of all spontaneously breathing patients). Two patients required naloxone injection and none had long-term sequelae. Hypotension due to epidural bupivacaine 0.0625% and fentanyl 3.3 micrograms.ml-1 infusion occurred in four patients (1.2%), all with a sensory block higher than T5. They readily responded to fluid infusion and ephedrine (two patients). Postoperative nausea or vomiting occurred in 723 (28.8%) and 380 (15.1%) patients, respectively. Odds ratio analysis showed that the risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting were: female gender, gynaecological operations, nongeriatric patients and systemic analgesia. Postoperative nausea and vomiting decreased analgesic efficacy by discouraging the use of patient-controlled analgesia and was regarded as equally distressing as pain. Other side-effects included: pruritus in 182 patients; dizziness in 333 and lower limb weakness in 73 (21.2% of patients receiving epidural local anaesthetics). It is concluded that a standard monitoring and management protocol, an experienced nursing team and reliable Acute Pain Service coverage is mandatory for the safe use of modern analgesic techniques.
Anaesthesia 1997 Nov
PMID:An audit of the safety of an acute pain service. 940 64

Nociception is a protective system of the body which prevents it from injury and tissue damage. Human beings respond to noxious stimuli by moving away. They learn by pain to avoid these situations in future. Shortly after major injury, there is a limited analgesic period allowing the body to flee the area of danger, later on, emerging pain compels the body to rest and supports recuperation. While acute pain has a certain meaning, chronic pain does not. It induces a comprehensive suffering including loss of initiative, appetite and vigilance. It reduces life-quality, often accompanied by depressive moods. Acute pain causes changes in the central nervous system leading to an increased sensitivity of nociception (hyperalgesia). During healing, the central processing of noxious stimuli is normalised taking minutes to weeks. Sometimes, unknown factors initiate chronification of pain. Changes on a molecular level in peripheral tissue as well as in the central nervous system induce "cellular early genes", a synthesis of c-fos, c-jun and other proteins favouring the chronification of pain. All efforts have to be made to depress or interrupt such a development. One of the first steps to pain prophylaxis in a hospital is an optimal surgical technique: incision, extension, limited tissue damage and minimal invasive surgery should guarantee the smallest impairment of the nociceptive system possible. However, nociceptive input is intense and of long duration and leads to central sensibilisation. Postoperative pain has lost its function as surgery anticipates healing. Pain induces a reduction of ventilation, circulation, digestion and increases the risk of other disorders. There is need of aggressive pain treatment for humanitarian reasons and for reasons of late sequelae like permanent pain and increased reduction of function. This is of pivotal importance in patients with amputations or sympathetic reflex dystrophy (SRD). Antinociception is best provided by regional anaesthesia technique with a combination of local anaesthetics and opioids which results in better outcome. Hence, regional anaesthesia techniques are strongly indicated in those patients. Good antinociception may be even more important than it is assumed today. Anand demonstrated a lower morbidity and mortality in 45 newborns undergoing cardiothoracic surgery, when general anaesthesia was performed with high-dose sufentanil versus halothane supplementary doses of morphine. Anaesthesiologists have to reconsider the quality of general anaesthesia: the antinociception of their regimen.
 ...
PMID:[Neurophysiological aspects of pain and its consequences for the anesthetist]. 941 70

Historically, recovery rooms were established in order to reduce complications in the period immediately following surgery and anaesthesia, utilising staffing and equipment resources economically. To minimise the incidence of postoperative complications remains the main task of post anaesthesia care units (PACU). However, especially in hospitals with a high degree of surgical emergencies, the scope of tasks and procedures within the PACU has expanded. Facing restricted capacities in intensive therapy (ITU) and high dependency units (HDU) the PACU serves as a buffer; intensive care functions can be covered here until the patient can be admitted to an intensive care unit. In this context, the PACU also has a switch function; postoperatively, the patient is evaluated here and the level for further treatment determined: ITU, HDU, or normal ward. The PACU period can be utilised to improve the patient's condition (upgrade function) enabling continuation of treatment on a lower level (HDU instead of ITU, normal ward instead of HDU). This combination of buffer, switch and upgrade function is of special importance when ITU and HDU resources are limited. A new task for the PACU arises from efforts to optimise acute pain therapy; initial adjustment of continuous infusion systems according to the patients' needs can be performed here without additional staffing requirements. Finally, the PACU can be used preoperatively for "tune up" procedures in high risk patients. The basis for co-operation between anaesthetist and surgeon is the separation of responsibilities in combination with mutual trust. Accordingly, the anaesthetist is responsible for monitoring and maintenance of vital functions. Consequently, the anesthetist has a professional and organisational responsibility in the PACU. The surgeon can and must rely on notification whenever surgical complications may require his intervention. With increasing comorbidity of patients and complexity of surgical procedures the anaesthetist's responsibility in the immediate perioperative period gains a new quality. The number of surgical procedures requiring intraoperative intensive therapy from the anaesthetist is increasing; the delivery of anaesthesia becomes a background task during these operations. Thus, the anaesthetist becomes responsible for perioperative patient treatment in the operating room area which divides into three phases: preoperative "tune up" in the PACU (e.g.) haemodynamic optimisation, starting continuous regional anaesthesia techniques), anaesthesia and support of vital functions in the OR, and immediately postoperative treatment in the PACU.
 ...
PMID:[The perioperative phase as a part of anesthesia. Tasks of the recovery room]. 943 72

Patients with complex dissociative disorders remain in alternating psychophysiological states which are discrete, discontinuous, and resistant against integrative tendencies. In this contribution, a parallel is drawn between animal defensive and recuperative states that are evoked in the face of severe threat and the characteristic responses of dissociative disorder patients as displayed in major dissociative states. Empirical data and clinical observations seem to be supportive of the idea that there are similarities between freezing, concomitant development of analgesia and anesthesia, and acute pain in threatened animals and severely traumatized human beings.
 ...
PMID:Animal defensive reactions as a model for trauma-induced dissociative reactions. 956 14

The effect of introducing an Acute Pain Service into a District General Hospital was evaluated by conducting an audit of pain, emesis, sleep and satisfaction before and after inception. A total of 1518 questionnaires were collected; in which surgical patients had been asked to assess their experience pre- and postoperatively. The introduction of an Acute Pain Service significantly (p < 0.0001) improved in-patient perception of pain relief upon return of consciousness after anaesthesia and for 2 days postoperatively, when compared with the experience before its inception. The incidence of emetic sequelae did not increase and both patient satisfaction (p < 0.001) and sleep pattern (p < 0.05) in hospital were significantly improved. An estimate of the economic benefit suggests that the development of Acute Pain Services may be cost effective as well as providing an improved quality of service for patients undergoing surgery.
Anaesthesia 1998 Apr
PMID:The acute pain service: effective or expensive care? 1019 33

Pethidine is an effective epidural opioid for the treatment of acute pain. Its use has been well described in Australian and New Zealand practice, particularly in the field of obstetric anaesthesia. Reported methods of delivery have included bolus injection, continuous infusion and patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Areas of application have included treatment of postoperative pain, labour pain and intraoperative pain. Because of its intermediate lipid solubility, pethidine may have advantages over many other epidural opioids. However, potential for accumulation of norpethidine limits its use to relatively short durations of treatment.
 ...
PMID:Epidural pethidine: pharmacology and clinical experience. 961 17

A 17-nation survey was undertaken with the aim of studying the availability of acute pain services (APS) and the use of newer analgesic techniques, such as epidural and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). A questionnaire was mailed to selected anaesthesiologists in 105 European hospitals from 17 countries. Depending on the population, between five and ten representative hospitals from each country were selected by a country coordinator. A total of 101 (96.2%) completed questionnaires were returned. A majority of respondents were dissatisfied with pain management on surgical wards. Pain management was better in post-anaesthesia care units (PACUs); however, 27% of participating hospitals did not have PACUs. There were no organized APS in 64% of hospitals, although anaesthesiologists from chronic pain centres were available for consultation. In the hospitals that had APS, the responsible person for the APS was either: (1) a junior anaesthesiologist (senior anaesthesiologist available for consultation); or (2) a specially trained nurse (supervised by consultant anaesthesiologists). Many anaesthesiologists were unable to introduce techniques such as PCA on wards because of the high equipment costs. Although 40% of hospitals used a visual analogue scale (VAS) or other methods for assessment of pain intensity, routine pain assessment and documenting on a vital sign chart was rarely practised. There was a great variation in routines for opioid prescription and documentation procedures. Nursing regulations regarding injection of drugs into epidural and intrathecal catheters also varied considerably between countries. This survey of 105 hospitals from 17 European countries showed that over 50% of anaesthesiologists were dissatisfied with post-operative pain management on surgical wards. Only 34% of hospitals had an organized APS, and very few hospitals used quality assurance measures such as frequent pain assessment and documentation. There is a need to establish organized APS in most hospitals and also a need for clearer definition of the role of anaesthesiologists in such APS.
 ...
PMID:Acute pain services in Europe: a 17-nation survey of 105 hospitals. The EuroPain Acute Pain Working Party. 964 80

A study involving 2738 patients in 15 hospitals in the United Kingdom was undertaken to evaluate the effect of simple methods of pain assessment and management on postoperative pain. The study consisted of four parts: a survey of current practice in each hospital; a programme of education for staff and patients regarding pain and its management; the introduction of formal assessment and recording of pain and the use of a simple algorithm to allow more flexible, yet safe, provision of intermittent intramuscular opioid analgesia; and a repeat survey of practice. One hospital from each of the former health regions of England and Wales was selected for inclusion in the project. Hospitals included representatives of different size units (university, large and small district general hospitals). As a result of the study, there was an overall reduction in the percentage of patients who experienced moderate to severe pain at rest from 32% to 12%. The incidence of severe pain on movement decreased from 37% to 13% and moderate to severe pain on deep inspiration from 41% to 22%. Similar decreases were seen in the incidence of nausea and vomiting. There was also a slight reduction in the incidence of postoperative complications. This study shows that simple techniques for the management of postoperative pain are effective in reducing the incidence of pain both at rest and during movement and should form part of any acute pain management strategy.
Anaesthesia 1998 May
PMID:The effect of education, assessment and a standardised prescription on postoperative pain management. The value of clinical audit in the establishment of acute pain services. 1021 22

This review highlights the advantages of regional anaesthesia techniques, especially of epidural analgesia, for the management of postoperative and posttraumatic pain: excellent pain relief and a high degree of patient satisfaction, even compared to the gold standard of acute pain therapy, i.v. PCA with opioids. Further advantages of epidural analgesia (EA) are discussed, such as early recovery of gastrointestinal function, reduction of postoperative respiratory complications, lower incidence of myocardial ischema, better mobilisation, reduced risk of thromboembolism, lower incidence of chronic pain problems (such as phantom limb pain) etc. Nevertheless, many studies failed to show significant effects on outcome (e.g. mortality). Weighing the risks, costs and benefits of EA, this technique is indicated in case of significant postoperative pain, especially in case of painful mobilisation, in patients with significant pulmonary risk factors (ASA 3 or IV), in patients where an improved perfusion or gastrointestinal motility is deemed essential, and if chronic pain syndromes are common problems that should be prevented (e.g., amputation). For the praxis of epidural analgesia it is emphasised to place the catheter in an appropriate segment to obtain sufficient analgesia without side effects. Organisational structures (such as an acute pain service) and appropriate monitoring allow to continue EA with local anaesthetics and/or opioids on surgical wards. Recommendations are given for the monitoring of EA on surgical wards. Clear cut agreements should define the role of anaesthesiologists, surgeons and nurses in the management of patients treated with postoperative EA on surgical wards.
 ...
PMID:[Epidural analgesia in postoperative pain therapy. A review]. 967 10

Incident reporting is an effective tool for continuous quality improvement in clinical practice. A prospective study on voluntary incident reporting in pain management was conducted at a major teaching hospital in Hong Kong. Over a 12-month period, 53 incidents were reported in 1275 patients who received pain relief treatments which were supervised by the acute pain service. The majority of the incidents were first detected by the pain team. The most common incidents involved delivery circuits, delivery pump and drug administration. A large proportion (81.4%) of the incidents were thought to be preventable. Human factors were involved in 41.9% of the patients reported, most commonly associated with unfamiliar technique/inexperience, inattention and inadequate communication. Four patients developed major morbidity of which two were attributed to inadequate analgesia, while three others had major physiological changes without morbidity. Strategies have been formulated to prevent further occurrence of these incidents. We propose that incident reporting is a potentially useful tool in identifying and preventing adverse events in postoperative pain management.
Anaesthesia 1998 Aug
PMID:Incident reporting in acute pain management. 979 15


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>