Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0184567 (acute pain)
 3,962 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The authors challenge the general view that the analgesic effect of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can be universally attributed to their inhibitory effects on the synthesis of peripherally formed prostaglandins. Analgesic activity by some of these compounds in the reduction of physiological pain elicited by a single noxious stimulus, or the treatment of acute pain which results from sudden trauma to otherwise healthy tissue, is better described as an antinociceptive effect. Single-dose studies in the dental pain model that have been conducted in double-blind conditions and included a placebo control group have been reviewed; those NSAIDs which are significantly superior to the reference compound aspirin 650mg and those which could represent real alternatives to the use of narcotics in certain situations for the management of acute pain have been identified. Azapropazone, diflunisal, naproxen, oxaprozin and tolmetin are all weak inhibitors of prostaglandin synthesis, yet they have been shown to be more effective than aspirin. In a model of joint pain, azapropazone 600mg has been shown to be as effective as pethidine (meperidine) 100mg despite being the weakest inhibitor of prostaglandin synthesis. Whether the antinociceptive effect of azapropazone acts at a peripheral or a central level, or both, is not clear; evidence for the effects of NSAIDs on the central nervous system (CNS) is discussed. Historically, the antinociceptive character of some NSAIDs is apparent in several studies in both animals and humans. More recently, experimental algesimetry models designed to distinguish the antinociceptive effects of NSAIDs include the use in humans of photoplethysmography and computer-supported infrared thermographic imaging.
 ...
PMID:Dissociation between the antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A survey of their analgesic efficacy. 171 58

To determine the relative analgesic efficacy of ibuprofen 400 mg and acetaminophen 1000 mg, we conducted a single-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial using a standard assay for analgesic agents, the dental pain model. At regular intervals over 6 hours, 184 patients who had undergone dental impaction surgery rated pain intensity and relief on categorical scales and pain half-gone on a dichotomous nominal scale; a categorical overall evaluation was completed at the end of 6 hours. Both active agents were effective compared to placebo. Ibuprofen 400 mg was more effective than acetaminophen 1000 mg for Sum Pain Intensity Difference (SPID), Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR), sum pain half-gone, and overall evaluation (P less than .05 to P less than .001). The time-effect curves demonstrated a greater peak effect and longer duration of action for ibuprofen 400 mg compared to acetaminophen 1000 mg. Side effects were reported in five ibuprofen patients, 11 acetaminophen-treated patients, and seven placebo patients. Based on the results of this clinical study, we conclude that ibuprofen 400 mg is a safe and more effective analgesic than acetaminophen 1000 mg for patients with acute pain.
 ...
PMID:Ibuprofen and acetaminophen in the relief of acute pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. 268 71

In the past decade, advances in quantitative EEG methods, such as the analysis of cortical power spectrum, have proven a useful tool for observing changes in brain activity as a function of physiological and behavioral states. The cortical power spectrum (CPS) is a computer-derived analysis of brain electrical activity using mathematical principles of Fast Fourier Transform function. The total energy output of specific cortical areas can be estimated over time, as a function of EEG spectral frequencies. This report describes the study of CPS in pathophysiological pain patients, using acute dental pain as a model. Seven "walk-in" acute pain patients in an emergency dental clinic were recorded during 10 min of pain, before treatment. Approximately one week later, 10 min recordings during nonpain states were obtained as control. Subjective pain scales and other psychological measures were administered to all subjects before and after recording on each visit. Each 10 min stage of continuous CPS recording consisted of 10 spectra per stage, 6 epochs/spectrum, and 10.24 sec/epoch; each spectrum was stored, averaged, transformed, displayed, printed, and plotted by the Pain Microcomputer System. Results show significant cortical power reduction along all frequency bands (0.5-50 Hz) when pain-states are compared to nonpain states. The magnitude of reduction also appears to correspond to subjective pain report. Analysis for rank order may be inversely related to subjective painfulness, indicating that pain and alpha-desynchronization are closely associated. This study demonstrates that the brain activity of clinical pain patients can be measured. The feasibility of developing a pathophysiological objective pain measuring system is discussed.
 ...
PMID:Cortical power spectral analysis of acute pathophysiological pain. 686 80

Propiram is an orally administered opioid analgesic with partial morphine-like agonist and weak antagonist properties. Analgesic efficacy of propiram, usually 50 or 100mg, appears comparable to that of standard dosages of other oral opioid drugs [i.e. pentazocine, pethidine (meperidine)] in patients with acute pain of moderate to severe intensity arising from various gynaecological and surgical procedures, and may be superior to codeine in gynaecological and postoperative dental pain. Some evidence of a more rapid onset of action for propiram than for these opioid agents, and a longer duration of action for propiram than for codeine, is encouraging but remains to be substantiated in more extensive clinical use. The tolerability profile of propiram resembles those of others in its class, with drowsiness, nausea and vomiting, and dizziness experienced most frequently in controlled trials. The apparently low propensity of propiram for development of physical dependence and psychotomimetic effects requires confirmation with wider clinical experience. Available data thus indicate that propiram is an effective, orally administered opioid analgesic suitable for providing relief of acute moderate to severe pain arising from various surgical or gynaecological procedures, and that the drug is likely to become a useful alternative in such conditions where opioid analgesia is appropriate.
 ...
PMID:Propiram. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and clinical use as an analgesic. 769 33

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, adverse effects, and dosage and administration of tramadol are reviewed. Tramadol is a synthetic analogue of codeine that binds to mu opiate receptors and inhibits norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake. It is rapidly and extensively absorbed after oral doses and is metabolized in the liver. Analgesia begins within one hour and starts to peak in two hours. In patients with moderate postoperative pain, i.v. or i.m. tramadol is roughly equal in efficacy to meperidine or morphine; for severe acute pain, tramadol is less effective than morphine. Oral tramadol can also be effective after certain types of surgery. Tramadol and meperidine are equally effective in postoperative patient-controlled analgesia. In epidural administration for pain after abdominal surgery, tramadol is more effective than bupivacaine but less effective than morphine. In patients with ureteral calculi, both dipyrone and butylscopolamine are more effective than tramadol. For labor pain, i.m. tramadol works as well as meperidine and is less likely to cause neonatal respiratory depression. Oral tramadol is as effective as codeine for acute dental pain. In several types of severe or refractory cancer pain, tramadol is effective, but less so than morphine; for other types of chronic pain, such as low-back pain, oral tramadol works as well as acetaminophen-codeine. Common adverse effects of tramadol include dizziness, nausea, dry mouth, and sedation. The abuse potential seems low. The recommended oral dosage is 50-100 mg every four to six hours. Tramadol is an effective, if expensive, alternative to other analgesics in some clinical situations.
 ...
PMID:Tramadol: a new centrally acting analgesic. 907 93

The efficacy and tolerability of single doses of dexketoprofen trometamol 12.5 mg, 25 mg, and 50 mg and ketoprofen 50 mg were compared in this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of 210 patients with moderate to severe pain after removal of one mandibular impacted third molar tooth. Pain intensity and pain relief were monitored for 6 h after administration of medication using visual analogue and verbal rating scales. All four active treatments were significantly more effective than placebo (P < 0.001). Dexketoprofen 25 mg and 50 mg produced an analgesic effect within 30 min of administration and their effect persisted for 6 h. Ketoprofen 50 mg produced a level of analgesia similar to those of the higher doses of dexketoprofen trometamol, but it had a slower onset. The 12.5-mg dose of dexketoprofen trometamol was significantly superior to placebo but produced a lower level and shorter duration of analgesia compared to the other active treatments. There were no significant differences between 25 and 50 mg of dexketoprofen trometamol in any measure of analgesic efficacy. No serious adverse events were observed and there were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events among treatment groups. These results demonstrate that dexketoprofen trometamol 25 mg is at least as effective as the racemic ketoprofen 50 mg in the treatment of postsurgical dental pain. The more rapid onset of action compared to ketoprofen suggests that dexketoprofen trometamol is more appropriate for treatment of acute pain.
 ...
PMID:Clinical comparison of dexketoprofen trometamol, ketoprofen, and placebo in postoperative dental pain. 988 82

Contrary results have been reported from studies comparing horizontal and vertical orientations of the visual analogue scale (VAS) in non-dental pain states. The vertical orientation of the VAS has been used in our department for several years while the horizontal orientation is the most commonly used in other acute pain models. The present study investigated whether a horizontally oriented VAS is as sensitive as a vertically oriented VAS in the assessment of present pain after oral surgery. Seventy-four patients recorded their pain intensity hourly and half-hourly 15 times during 11 hours after surgery on a horizontal and on a vertical 100 mm VAS. Slightly lower mean and median values were observed at 2/3 of the observation time points for the vertical VAS compared to the horizontal VAS. The results from the two scales were compared with analysis of variance for repeated measures. No significant differences between the horizontal and the vertical VAS-values were found (p = 0.099). Distributions (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) and dispersions of data were also similar with the two orientations of the VAS. This study shows that a vertically oriented VAS is equally sensitive as a horizontally oriented VAS in assessing present pain intensity after oral surgery.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of present pain intensity assessments on horizontally and vertically oriented visual analogue scales. 992 87

Pain is a common complaint, often occurring in conjunction with inflammation. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most commonly used analgesic agents in ambulatory patients. In recent studies, the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor rofecoxib demonstrated analgesic effects similar to those of NSAIDs in the treatment of acute pain and primary dysmenorrhea. The present randomized, single-dose, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active-comparator-controlled, parallel-group study was undertaken to compare the analgesic efficacy of the COX-2 inhibitors rofecoxib 50 mg and celecoxib 200 mg with that of ibuprofen 400 mg and placebo in patients with postoperative dental pain. Two hundred and seventy-two patients experiencing pain after the removal of > or =2 third molars were randomized according to pain severity (moderate vs severe) to receive a single dose of placebo (n = 45), rofecoxib 50 mg (n = 90), celecoxib 200 mg (n = 91), or ibuprofen 400 mg (n = 46). Using a patient diary, patients recorded pain intensity, pain relief, and global evaluations throughout the 24-hour period after dosing. The overall analgesic effect, onset of action, peak effect, and duration of effect were evaluated, with the primary end point being total pain relief over 8 hours (TOPAR8). The safety profile was assessed on the basis of physical findings, laboratory results, and spontaneous reports of adverse experiences. The results showed that compared with celecoxib, rofecoxib had superior analgesic effects on all measures of analgesic efficacy, including overall analgesic effect (TOPAR8, 18.3 vs. 12.5; P<0.001), time to onset of effect (30 vs. 60 minutes; P = 0.003), peak pain relief (score, 2.8 vs 2.3; P<0.05), and duration of effect (>24 vs. 5.1 hours; P<0.001). In addition, rofecoxib's analgesic efficacy was similar to that of ibuprofen (TOPAR8, 18.3 vs. 17.0; P = 0.460), but the duration was longer (P<0.05); with ibuprofen, the time to on set was 24 minutes, peak pain relief score was 2.9, and duration of analgesic effect was 8.9 hours. The safety profile was similar across all treatment groups. Thus rofecoxib provided analgesic efficacy superior to that of celecoxib and comparable to that of ibuprofen in the treatment of patients with acute postoperative dental pain.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of rofecoxib and celecoxib, two cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, in postoperative dental pain: a randomized, placebo- and active-comparator-controlled clinical trial. 1056 62

In designing clinical trials for the treatment of acute pain, enrollment of patients with moderate to severe pain is recommended even when the desired indication is treatment of mild pain. To test this approach, the authors explored the results of two studies that had the same standard placebo-controlled, parallel-group design and that compared the study medication to a single dose of ibuprofen 400 mg. One study had 25 subjects, the other 50 in its ibuprofen arm. Subjects indicating moderate or severe pain (on a scale ranging from 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) following a surgical extraction of two or more third molars were enrolled. There was a difference between the ibuprofen groups in these two studies in average baseline pain intensity (PI) (2.88 +/- 0.33 vs. 2.26 +/- 0.44). In the higher baseline group, PI decreased faster, achieving lower levels of PI that were maintained for the rest of the study period. The results of pain relief measurements paralleled those of PI. The authors conclude that including patients with a higher degree of baseline pain in the postoperative dental pain model has the potential to increase discrimination of analgesic properties of new drugs.
 ...
PMID:Baseline pain and response to analgesic medications in the postsurgery dental pain model. 1066 18

Rofecoxib is a selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor which has little or no effect on the COX-1 isoenzyme at doses up to 1000 mg/day. Rofecoxib has greater selectivity for COX-2 than celecoxib, meloxicam, diclofenac and indomethacin. In well-controlled clinical trials, rofecoxib 12.5 to 500 mg/day has been evaluated for its efficacy in the treatment of osteoarthritis, acute pain and rheumatoid arthritis [lower dosages (5 to 125 mg/day) were generally used in the chronic pain indications]. In the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis, rofecoxib was more effective in providing symptomatic relief than placebo, paracetamol (acetaminophen) and celecoxib and was similar in efficacy to ibuprofen, diclofenac, naproxen and nabumetone. Overall, both the physician's assessment of disease status and the patient's assessment of response to therapy tended to favour rofecoxib. In patients with postsurgical dental pain, pain after spinal fusion or orthopaedic surgery, or primary dysmenorrhoea, rofecoxib provided more rapid and more sustained pain relief and reduced requirements for supplemental morphine use after surgery than placebo. Rofecoxib was more efficacious than celecoxib in patients with acute dental pain and pain after spinal fusion surgery, although celecoxib may have been used at a subtherapeutic dose. In comparison with traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) ibuprofen, diclofenac and naproxen sodium, rofecoxib was similar in efficacy in the treatment of acute pain. Although naproxen sodium provided more rapid pain relief than rofecoxib in patients with primary dysmenorrhoea, the reverse was true after orthopaedic surgery: rofecoxib provided more rapid pain relief and less supplemental morphine was needed. Rofecoxib was as effective as naproxen in providing symptomatic relief for over 8700 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Compared with traditional NSAID therapy, rofecoxib had a significantly lower incidence of endoscopically confirmed gastroduodenal ulceration and, in approximately 13,000 patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, a lower incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events. Rofecoxib was generally well tolerated in all indications with an overall tolerability profile similar to traditional NSAIDs. The most common adverse events in rofecoxib recipients were nausea, dizziness and headache. In conclusion, rofecoxib is at least as effective as traditional NSAID therapy in providing pain relief for both chronic and acute pain conditions. Rofecoxib provides an alternative treatment option to traditional NSAID therapy in the management of symptomatic pain relief in patients with osteoarthritis. Initial data from patients with primary dysmenorrhoea and postoperative pain are promising and further trials may confirm its place in the treatment of these indications. Rofecoxib has also shown promising results in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and is likely to become a valuable addition to current drug therapy for this patient population. Importantly, rofecoxib is associated with a lower incidence of GI adverse events than traditional NSAIDs making it a primary treatment option in patients at risk of developing GI complications or patients with chronic conditions requiring long term treatment.
 ...
PMID:Rofecoxib: a review of its use in the management of osteoarthritis, acute pain and rheumatoid arthritis. 1139 14


1 2 3 4 5 Next >>