Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0184567 (
acute pain
)
3,962
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Neurotrophins (NTFs) are a family of polypeptide growth factors that control the apoptotic death or survival, growth, and differentiation of neurons. NTFs also regulate several other cell populations such as lymphoid, epithelial, oligoglia, and mast cells. Disregulation of the NTFs or their receptors plays a key role (etiological or upstream) in certain human pathologies. Hyperactivity may lead to inflammatory pain, or some forms of
cancer
by autocrine/paracrine growth. Loss of activity may lead to neurodegeneration, neuropathic pain, or some forms of
cancer
by absence of differentiation. Consequently the NTFs and their receptors are important therapeutic targets, and pharmacological modulation may have applications ranging from treatment of chronic or acute neurodegeneration, some forms of
cancer
, and chronic pain (with agonists); and some forms of
cancer
or
acute pain
(with antagonists).
...
PMID:Small molecule peptidomimetic ligands of neurotrophin receptors, identifying binding sites, activation sites and regulatory sites. 1236 63
Chronic pain in children and adolescents is frequently misdiagnosed by caregivers. It is not treated until it results in the loss of routine ability and function. Chronic pain is often associated with underlying diseases commonly seen in childhood, including sickle cell disease,
malignancy
, rheumatologic disorders, inflammatory bowel disease, trauma, and states where there is no identifiable etiology. Chronic pain differs from
acute pain
in that it serves no useful function. Untreated or under-treated chronic pain will result in the unnecessary suffering of the patient, disruption of family routine, and cohesiveness and restriction of the child's daily activities, thereby increasing long-term disability. Accurate and repeated assessment of chronic pain is required for therapy to be effective. Assessment of chronic pain in children is difficult due to their developing cognitive abilities. The assessment of childhood pain varies with the child's age, type of pain, situation, and prior painful experiences. Assessment tools such as the Varni-Thompson Pediatric Pain Questionnaire and the Visual Analog Scale are helpful for both the patient and physician in helping to identify situations that precipitate pain, to rate the level of pain and determine if therapy has been effective. Documentation of pain assessments and the effectiveness of interventions in the medical record should be included as a routine part of all patient records. Most caregivers have extensive experience in the treatment of
acute pain
in children but are often not comfortable with the management of complicated and chronic pain states. The therapy for chronic pain in children is multifactorial. It can include agents from multiple classes of pharmacologic agents (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, tricyclic antidepressants, and antineuroleptics) nonconventional therapies (acupuncture and pressure and aromatherapy), as well as herbal and homeopathic remedies.
...
PMID:The assessment and management of chronic pain in children. 1239 45
Pain is one of the most important considerations in the care of thoracic surgical patients. Failure in pain management is associated with increased mortality and morbidity.
Acute pain
management aspires to stop the painful stimuli before it is transferred to the CNS. The authors recommend (1) a thorough explanation of the operation and the expected outcome to the patient, (2) preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation for those with marginal lung function, (3) choosing the least painful surgical approach with acceptable exposure, (4) minimizing tissue trauma during surgery, (5) preemptive analgesia, and (6) early ambulation as prophylactic measures that should be employed during hospitalization. Good
acute pain
control should reduce the incidence of chronic pain. Mediansternotomy and VATS seem to be less acutely painful approaches than thoracotomy for most thoracic surgery. One should rule out recurrent
malignancy
as the etiology for chronic or recurrent pain. Opioids and NSAIDs are sufficient to produce optimal pain control in patients who undergo VATS and sternotomv. TEA is typically reserved for patients who have a thoracotomy. Opioid PCA can be used instead of-or after the discontinuation of-the epidural catheter. Chronic pain can be treated in many ways, and input from a pain clinic might be beneficial. The single best approach to chronic pain is to prevent it. This can be achieved by selecting the right incisional approach, instituting early physical therapy, and achieving optimal postoperative pain control.
...
PMID:Acute and chronic pain syndromes after thoracic surgery. 1247 33
The management of patients with chronic pain is a common clinical challenge. Indeed, chronic pain is often inadequately controlled in patients with
cancer
and in those with non-
cancer
chronic pain. Because of the complex nature of chronic pain, successful long-term treatment is more difficult than for
acute pain
. Most often
acute pain
is nociceptive, whereas chronic pain can be nociceptive (i.e., in response to noxious stimuli), neuropathic (i.e., initiated by a primary lesion or dysfunction in the nervous system) or mixed in origin. Opioids are the current standard of care for the treatment of moderate or severe nociceptive pain. Opioids mediate their actions by binding and activating receptors both in the peripheral nervous system and those that are found in inhibitory pain circuits that descend from the midbrain to the spinal cord dorsal horn. Opioid agonists exert a number of physiological responses including analgesia, which increases with increasing doses. The use of opioids to manage pain in patients with
cancer
is well accepted. The WHO step-wise algorithm for analgesic therapy based on pain severity reserves the use of opioid therapy for moderate and severe pain. The WHO algorithm has proven to be highly effective for the management of cancer pain. However, the use of opioids to treat patients with chronic non-cancer pain is controversial because of concerns about efficacy and safety, and the possibility of addiction or abuse. The results of clinical surveys and retrospective case series involving patients with non-
cancer
chronic pain have been inconsistent in regard to resolving these controversial issues. The oral route of drug administration is most appropriate for patients receiving opioids; although rectal, transdermal and parenteral routes of administration are used in specific situations. For continuous chronic pain, opioids should be administered around-the-clock and several long-acting formulations are available that require administration only once or twice daily. Opioid doses should be titrated according to agent-specific schedules to maximise pain relief and maintain tolerability. Adverse effects include constipation, nausea and vomiting, sedation, cognitive impairment and respiratory depression. Tolerance to the analgesic and adverse effects as well as physical dependence, which causes withdrawal symptoms upon discontinuance, may occur with opioid use. Estimates of addiction rates among patients with chronic non-cancer pain range from 3.2 to 18.9%. Successful pain treatment and symptom management is an attainable goal for the majority of patients with chronic pain. Further controlled clinical trials are needed to define the role of opioid therapy in chronic non-cancer pain, and to establish criteria for patient selection and specific treatment algorithms.
...
PMID:Responsible prescribing of opioids for the management of chronic pain. 1248 20
Buprenorphine, a powerful opioid, is newly available for delivery in a transdermal formulation. The transdermal system's matrix patch provides rate-controlled administration of the drug. Three double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were conducted to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of the buprenorphine transdermal system (buprenorphine TDS, Transtec). A total of 445 patients were enrolled in the studies. All suffered from moderate to severe and very severe pain, both
cancer
- or non-
cancer
-related. The percentage of responders increased as the rate of buprenorphine delivered by the transdermal system rose, ranging from a 29% (
cancer
) and 36% (non-
cancer
) response rate associated with the lowest dose (35 microg/h), to 40% (
cancer
) and 46% (non-
cancer
) with the highest dose (70 microg/h). Patients receiving buprenorphine TDS slept longer, uninterrupted by pain, than patients from the placebo group. Systemic adverse effects reported in the drug cohorts included nausea, vomiting and dizziness, and were typical of those reported in other studies of opioids; local adverse events, most commonly erythema and pruritus, were transient and mild to moderate. In an open-label, follow-up trial, in which 239 patients from the original clinical studies participated, 90% of patients reported that their analgesia was satisfactory or even better over a mean duration of 4.7 months; nearly 95% of patients found the patch to be user-friendly. The new buprenorphine TDS appears to be an important new modality for administering analgesia in patients with non-
acute pain
.
...
PMID:Buprenorphine TDS: the clinical development rationale and results. 1266 19
Ketoprofen is a NSAIDs of the 2-aryl propionic acid class commonly used in the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic disease,
acute pain
and fever. Clinically, ketoprofen seems to reduce morphine requirements by 33 to 40% with ketoprofen's supposed central mechanism of analgesia. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) ketoprofen as an adjuvant to IV PCA (patient controlled analgesia) with tramadol after major gynecological
cancer
surgery for postoperative analgesia. Fifty patients were enrolled in this double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Patients were allocated randomly to two groups: group I (25 patients) served as a control group, with patients receiving saline; group II (25 patients) received ketoprofen. Patients received an intravenous bolus of saline or 100 mg ketoprofen at the end of surgery. Then, PCA was given as a 20 mg tramadol bolus and 10 min lockout time. Pain relief was regularly assessed using a visual analog scale. Tramadol consumption, side-effects, and patient satisfaction were noted during the 24 hours after the surgery. No significant difference was observed in pain score, side-effects and patient satisfaction between the groups (p > 0.05). The cumulative PCA-tramadol consumption was lower in the ketoprofen-treated patients than placebo-treated patients (p < 0.05). Our results demonstrate that a single dose of 100 mg ketoprofen reduced tramadol consumption for treatment of postoperative pain after major gynecological
cancer
surgery.
...
PMID:Adding ketoprofen to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol after major gynecological cancer surgery: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. 1270 75
The purpose of this study was to validate the changes in
acute pain
measurement scales that are most strongly associated with a patient-determined indicator of clinical importance. Measures of pain intensity and pain relief are commonly used outcomes in therapeutic clinical trials. Recent studies of the properties of
acute pain
measures have provided data defining the cut-off points that are best associated with clinically important differences. Validation of these findings in another clinical trial data set is important. Data were obtained from the titration phase of a recently conducted randomized controlled clinical trial of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC), which compared OTFC to immediate release morphine sulfate (MSIR) for the treatment of
cancer
-related acute breakthrough pain. Changes in pain intensity and pain relief were recorded every 15 minutes for 60 minutes and global medication performance recorded at the end of each study pain episode. At any titration step, if the patient felt that the first dose of the study medication did not provide adequate relief within 30 minutes, an additional rescue medication could be taken. To find the level of each pain scale best associated with this measure of the adequacy of pain relief, the calculated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for different cut-off points of the measured pain scales were compared to whether or not the patient needed rescue medication. The overall ability of the pain measures to discriminate episodes for which a rescue was not needed was calculated using area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Data were analyzed from 134 OTFC-naive patients who collected data on 1307 episodes of breakthrough pain. Using the criteria of a balanced sensitivity and specificity, the best cut-off points were determined to be: 33% for the percent pain intensity difference; > or =2 for the raw pain intensity difference on a 0-10 numeric rating scale; > or =2 (i.e., moderate or better) for pain relief; > or =33% for the percent maximum total pain relief; and > or =2 (good or better) for global medication performance. ROC area under the curve ranged from 0.839 to 0.862 for each of the pain measures listed above, calculated at 60 minutes. These data indicate that the pain scale cut-off points that are best associated with a patient-derived measure of a clinically important difference closely approximate those found in an earlier study. ROC analysis provided evidence that the overall pain measures were strongly associated with not requiring an "additional dose of rescue medication." Thus, the cut-off points determined for these pain scales provide a good surrogate measure of a patient-determined clinically important response. This provides support for the usefulness of these values in future clinical trials of pain therapy.
...
PMID:Clinically important changes in acute pain outcome measures: a validation study. 1272 31
Caring for patients with
cancer
presents unique challenges to anesthetists. Chemotherapeutic regimens can cause cardiac, pulmonary, and other complications that will influence the anesthesia provider's care. New surgical techniques, including vertebroplasty, vertebrectomy, radiofrequency ablation of the liver, and sentinel node biopsy, present issues related to the surgical techniques and drugs administered. Recurring problems, including tumors of the airway and cardiac tamponade, continue to present challenges for anesthesia providers. Many patients with
cancer
who undergo surgery not only have
acute pain
related to the surgical procedure but also have chronic pain that will influence anesthetic and postoperative pain management. This Journal course discusses new therapies and procedures and approaches to recurring problems in
cancer
care.
...
PMID:Cancer: new therapies and new approaches to recurring problems. 1277 52
Radiotherapy is an established treatment for metastatic bone pain. It may be delivered as a localised low dose treatment for localised bone pain or systemically for more widespread symptoms using hemibody external beam radiotherapy or intravenous bone-seeking radioisotopes. Bisphosphonates have been shown to reduce morbidity from bone metastases when given to patients with asymptomatic disease from myeloma and primary breast and prostate cancers. They also reduce metastatic bone pain in these sites. In the absence of randomised data comparing radiotherapy with bisphosphonates in the same clinical setting, comparison of the response rates from individual trials of the two modalities suggests that the overall pain response in all tumour types from radiotherapy is around 80% compared to a similar rate in myeloma with bisphosphonates but only 40% in solid tumours. Optimal use of the two modalities requires further investigation but since they have different dose limiting toxicities their incorporation in a combined modality approach to metastatic bone pain is rational using the concepts of additive effect and spatial co-operation in which bisphosphonates provide background control alongside
acute pain
relief using radiotherapy. They are also an important alternative for bone pain where radiation tolerance has been reached or radiotherapy is not readily available.
Cancer
Treat Rev 2003 Aug
PMID:Bisphosphonates and radiation therapy for palliation of metastatic bone disease. 1292 72
Traditional pain management strategies for cancer pain have relied on the use of opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and other adjuvant analgesics. However, the substantial adverse effects associated with their use has left many patients without dependable options for effective treatment. Recent advances in the understanding of pain and its pathophysiologic mechanisms have led to the development of novel therapeutics. Cyclooxygenase(Cox)-2-specific inhibitors (coxib) have an established efficacy in the treatment of chronic and
acute pain
comparable to that of traditional NSAIDs without the degree of gastrointestinal complication or the platelets inhibitor effect of traditional NSAIDs. Numerous studies have shown that coxibs are efficacious in the management of chronic and
acute pain
in various clinical settings including postoperative pain. The superior safety profile of coxibs in conjunction with a comparable efficacy to nonselective NSAIDs supports the use of coxibs in balanced analgesic regimens and provides the potential to incorporate coxibs into the pain management algorithm used to treat cancer pain.
Bull
Cancer
2004 May
PMID:[Analgesic effects of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors]. 1523 41
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next >>