Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0178874 (tumor progression)
 40,807 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Carcinoid tumors are relatively indolent, but the treatment of advanced disease remains a challenge. Liver-directed therapies are a consideration in patients with liver-dominant disease. Somatostatin analogs (SSTa) are routinely used to control hormone-mediated symptoms (carcinoid syndrome), but the identification of systemic agents with antitumor efficacy has proven difficult. Aside from octreotide for small bowel carcinoid (which is associated with delayed progression), no treatment has proven antitumor activity. Chemotherapy seems to be of limited value. The role of interferon is also controversial; it is typically used after failure of octreotide. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy may have activity in patients with SST receptor-expressing tumors, but randomized controlled trials are lacking. Advances in the understanding of the mechanisms underlying tumor progression have led to the identification of several potential therapeutic targets (including the vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] and mammalian target of rapamycin [mTOR] signaling pathways), but none has been definitively validated in carcinoid. Everolimus is associated with a trend toward improved progression-free survival in patients with progressive carcinoid, but is not approved for this indication. Therefore, a serious unmet need remains for additional therapeutic strategies for patients with advanced disease. Several avenues are under study, including the use of novel SSTa; VEGF and mTOR inhibitors; and agents that interfere with insulin growth factor 1 receptor and AKT signaling. Moving forward, optimizing patient selection based on clinical features or biomarkers holds promise for identifying individuals most likely to benefit from therapy.
 ...
PMID:Systemic therapy for advanced carcinoid tumors: where do we go from here? 2267 20

Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients have a substantial risk of developing secondary solid cancers (SSCs). The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the incidence of SSC in a monocentric cohort of thalassemia major (TM) patients (n=122) who received HCT versus an hematopoietic cell donor monocentric cohort (n=122) and versus a large multicenter cohort of age- and sex-matched TM patients (n=244) who received conventional therapy. With a median follow-up of 24 years, 8 transplanted patients were diagnosed with SSC at a median of 18 years after HCT and at a median age of 33 years. Three patients died of cancer progression and 5 are living after a follow-up ranging from 10 months to 16 years after SSC diagnosis. The 30-year cumulative incidence of developing SSC was 13.24%. The occurrence of solid cancers in the hematopoietic cell donor cohort was limited to only one case for a significantly lower cumulative incidence (3.23%, P=0.02) and to 3 cases in the cohort of nontransplant patients for a significantly lower cumulative incidence (1.32%, P=0.005). This study shows that the magnitude of increased risk of SST is fourfold to sixfold for patients treated with HCT as compared with hematopoietic cell donors and nontransplant patients.
 ...
PMID:Secondary solid cancer following hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with thalassemia major. 2899 Dec 45