Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0162871 (abdominal aortic aneurysm)
 8,664 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In a prospective study 152 consecutive patients presenting with acute abdominal pain were assessed clinically and an ultrasonographic examination was performed immediately. Of these, 16 (11 per cent) patients would normally have had an immediate ultrasonographic scan requested; routine (within 24 h of admission) ultrasonographic examination would have been requested in a further 66 (43 per cent) patients. In 70 (46 per cent) patients an ultrasonographic examination would not have been requested. Ultrasonography altered the diagnosis in one patient from probable appendicitis to cholecystitis. Ultrasonography missed one abdominal aortic aneurysm and one empyema of the gallbladder. Ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 96 per cent, a specificity of 94 per cent, a positive predictive value of 96 per cent, a negative predictive value of 94 per cent and an accuracy of 95 per cent in diagnosing appendicitis. Exactly the same values were found for the clinical diagnosis of appendicitis. The study shows that routine immediate ultrasonographic examination of the acute abdomen is rarely helpful, with the possible exception of appendicitis. Where an urgent ultrasonographic scan is necessary on clinical grounds the expertise of a radiologist is probably required, whereas in specific areas, for example in the diagnosis of right iliac fossa pain, there may be a place for training the surgical trainee.
 ...
PMID:Ultrasonography in the acute abdomen. 195 78

Renal transplant recipients are at increased risk of malignancy and infection. We present the case of a 72-year-old-man with recurrent bladder carcinoma, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and end-stage renal failure due to renovascular disease. He received a cadaveric renal allograft into his left iliac fossa, was given cyclosporin A, azathioprine, and prednisolone triple therapy immunosuppression, and had no rejection episodes. He presented four years post-transplantation with a two-year history of intermittent sweats and fevers. Previous episodes had been investigated with no firm diagnosis made. This time he had right iliac fossa pain of three weeks' duration. Examination revealed a tender mass. Investigations showed unchanged graft function, but elevated inflammatory indices. Ultrasonography and computed tomography detailed an infiltrating mass associated with the sigmoid colon, which colonoscopy failed to visualise. At laparotomy a 6-cm tumor was removed, with adherent sigmoid colon and bladder dome. Macroscopically the mass was an abscess, and microscopy found acute and chronic inflammatory giant cells and fibrillary masses suggestive of actinomycosis, with no malignancy. The patient recovered uneventfully on antibiotics. At six months' follow-up, examination, inflammatory markers, and radiographic imaging showed no evidence of recurrence. Twelve months later the patient died of rupture of his proximal abdominal aorta. There was no evidence of recurrence at postmortem examination. We conclude with a brief review of actinomycosis in transplant recipients.
 ...
PMID:An unusual abdominal mass in a renal transplant recipient. 1253 66