Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0162871 (abdominal aortic aneurysm)
 8,664 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We report two cases in which concurrent abdominal aortic aneurysm and colon carcinoma were treated in the same surgical procedure. In the first case both lesions were detected preoperatively but were uncomplicated. Single-stage treatment was undertaken electively. In the second case the colonic lesion was found during treatment of the aneurysm and both lesions were complicated. The decision to undertake single-stage treatment was made intraoperatively. Recovery was uneventful in both cases. Based on previous case reports and our experience in these two patients, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of single-stage management. The principal risk is prosthetic infection. The advantages include avoidance of complications of the unoperated lesion and the ability to manage both lesions with only one operation. With a two-staged approach, complications following the first procedure and/or progression of the unoperated lesion may prohibit the second procedure. Despite the successful outcome in our patients, we recommend using single-stage management only in selected cases.
 ...
PMID:Single-stage management of abdominal aortic aneurysm and colon carcinoma. 879 1

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay for interferon gamma production has been used to analyze specific T cell responses to a Flu 9-mer peptide, and a 9-mer peptide of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Assays were performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of HLA-A2-positive patients with CEA-expressing carcinomas, both before and after vaccination with CEA-based vaccines, and from HLA-A2-positive healthy blood donors. The ELISPOT assay utilized aliquots of frozen PBMC, and assays were performed after 24 h in culture with peptide to rule out any artifacts due to long-term in vitro stimulation cycles. An internal standard was used for each assay to define reproducibility of the assay, and all samples from a given patient (pre- and post-vaccination, with both the Flu and CEA peptides) were analyzed simultaneously. The results indicated a trend towards healthy blood donors having higher levels of Flu-specific T cell precursors than do colon carcinoma patients, but these results were not statistically significant (P = 0.06). On the other hand, slightly higher CEA-specific T cell responses were observed in cancer patients with CEA-expressing carcinomas than in healthy blood donors. PBMC from two CEA-based vaccine clinical trials were analyzed for T cell responses to the same CEA peptide and to the Flu control peptide. The first trial consisted of three monthly vaccinations of CEA peptide (designated PPP) in adjuvant. The second trial consisted of cohorts receiving three monthly vaccinations of avipox-CEA recombinant (designated AAA) or cohorts receiving a primary vaccination with recombinant vaccinia-CEA followed by two monthly vaccinations with avipox-CEA (designated VAA). Few, if any, CEA-specific T cell responses were seen in the PPP vaccinations, while the majority of patients receiving the poxvirus CEA recombinants demonstrated increases in CEA-specific T cell responses and no increases in Flu-specific responses. CEA-specific IgG responses were also demonstrated in patients following recombinant CEA poxvirus vaccinations. Statistical analyses of the T cell responses to the same CEA peptide demonstrated a P value of 0.028 for the recombinant poxvirus vaccines, as compared with the peptide vaccine. There were no differences seen (P = 0.37) in Flu-specific responses after these two types of CEA vaccination. These results thus provide the first evidence that poxvirus recombinant-based vaccines are more potent in the initiation of tumor-antigen-specific T cell responses than vaccines employing peptide in adjuvant, when assays are conducted in an identical manner, and in defining responses to the same peptide. These results also demonstrate for the first time that an ELISPOT assay, performed over a 24-h period and without in vitro sensitization, can be successfully used to monitor immune responses to a tumor-associated antigen in cancer patients.
 ...
PMID:The use of a rapid ELISPOT assay to analyze peptide-specific immune responses in carcinoma patients to peptide vs. recombinant poxvirus vaccines. 1112 22