Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0153690 (bone metastases)
 6,382 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

CA 15-3, MCA, and CA-549 levels were determined in the serum of 56 patients with metastatic breast cancer, all of whom had visceral and/or bone metastases. CA 15-3 was positive in the serum of 37 patients, MCA in the serum of 38 patients, and CA-549 in the serum of 39 patients. All 3 markers were positive in 36 patients, and all 3 were negative in 16 patients. In the serum of 4 patients only 1 or 2 markers were slightly elevated. Thus, the results were identical in 52 of the 56 patients. It is concluded that CA 15-3, MCA, and CA-549 are sensitive markers for advanced breast cancer, and that no advantage can be expected by combining them.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of CA-549 with CA 15-3 and MCA in patients with metastatic breast cancer. 139 Mar 7

Serum MCA levels were determined in 173 consecutive patients with breast cancer in order to assess the clinical utility of MCA for the detection of bone metastases. Bone pathology was diagnosed by scintigraphy, radiology and clinical follow-up. Metastases were found in 37 patients, benign lesions in 25, and in 111 no bone lesions were found. Eighteen of the 173 bone scans were considered indeterminate for metastases. Based on the receiver-operating characteristic curves (ROC) analysis, the cut-off level for MCA was set at 20 U/ml. Only in 4 of the 37 patients with bone metastases MCA was below 20 U/ml. All 4 patients had completed their chemotherapy course within six months before MCA determination. Only in 6 patients of the 136 without bone metastases MCA levels were above 20 U/ml. Of the 18 patients with indeterminate bone scans, 15 had benign lesions and all of them had MCA levels below 20 U/ml. MCA determination is a sensitive method for the detection of bone metastases in breast carcinoma. We encourage the use of this procedure for the selection of high-risk groups or as a complementary method for the interpretation of bone scintigraphy.
 ...
PMID:MCA serum determination in breast carcinoma patients for the diagnosis of bone metastases. 813 59

The present study was carried out on 152 patients divided into three groups: A) 73 underwent radical surgery for breast carcinoma without signs of metastases; B) 31 patients with radiologic and scintigraphic evidence of bone metastases originating from malignant mammary neoplasia (14 with only one and 17 with two or more localizations); C) 48 affected by simple mammary cysts. No patients had a previous history of primary or secondary bone pathologies or renal, hepatic or endocrine ones. Besides this, no patient took drugs influencing the metabolic turnover of the bony tissue in the three months preceding the study. After surgery all patients underwent standard clinical and laboratory follow-up, the latter including, every 3 months, the evaluation of serum CA 15.3, CA 27.29 MCA, and ostase. The ostase cut-off, obtained by the statistical elaboration of the serum values of the 48 patients with benign mammary cysts and the 73 disease free patients, was 17 microg./L. The mean concentration in the three groups and two subgroups was: 13.76 microg./L (patients without metastases), 31.84 (patients with metastases), 18.4 (limited bony metastases), 40.04 (diffused bony metastases) and 5.36 (mammary cists). The diagnostic sensitivity of ostase proved superior to that of CA 15.3 (84% vs 75%) except when considering the subgroup with limited metastases (71.4% vs 72.7%), while the specificity was similar (around 78%). CA 27.29 and MCA were not useful as markers of metastasis. In a longitudinal-perspective study it was possible periodically to test these markers in 13 patients, at first, disease free and then with signs of bone progression evidence by skeletal scintigraphy. In 11 of these patients ostase and CA 15.3 showed increased values, an average 136 and 131 days respectively, before instrumental evidence of progression. None of the 13 patients, at the time of bone progression diagnosis, showed clinical, laboratory or instrumental signs of disease in other organs. The precocity of the serum increase of ostase could have a triple role: 1) accomplishment of a closer follow-up in patients at "high risk" of bone disease; 2) aid in the interpretation "in a neoplastic sense" of an "uncertain image of hypercaptation"; 3) accomplishment of a supporting or specific oncology treatment at an earlier stage which may be of some advantage as regards quality of life.
 ...
PMID:Serum ostase in the follow-up of breast cancer patients. 857 28

Numerous tumor markers such as CEA, MCA, CA 15-3 have been assayed in breast cancer patients to detect relapse at a preclinical stage and most of all to monitor the treatment of the advanced disease. Since they are not site-specific, pyridinium crosslink dosage has recently been reported as a specific bone resorption marker in several non neoplastic diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the urinary pyridinium crosslink levels in breast cancer with or without osseous involvement, and to correlate it with serial doses of CA 15-3. 285 breast cancer patients (226 free of disease and 59 with bone metastases) were measured for both pyridinoline and CA 15-3. In the metastatic patients the mean values of the two markers were significantly higher than in non evident disease patients (P = < 0.01 and p = < 0.001 respectively). Abnormal values over the normal were found in 22% for pyridinoline and 11% for CA 15-3 in patients free of disease while the normal values observed in patients with bone metastases were 22% for pyridinoline and 39% for CA 15-3. Tandem dosage of CA 15-3, was highly sensitive but site-aspecific, and pyridinoline, which is bone specific, may be useful chiefly in the monitoring of breast cancer treatment, since many physiological conditions such as age, menopausal status and variation over 24 hours, and cost effectiveness will influence the use of pyridinoline during follow-up.
 ...
PMID:Usefulness of pyridinium crosslinks and CA 15-3 as markers in metastatic bone breast carcinoma. 869 47

The objective of this review is to determine clinical practical guidelines for the use of serum tumor markers in the care of breast cancer patients outside of clinical trials. Mucin antigens (CA 15-3, MCA, CA 549) and CEA are established markers in breast cancer. Owing to their low sensitivity, none of these markers can be recommended for screening, diagnosis or staging. During follow-up, increasing marker levels may indicate recurrence 3-6 months earlier than clinical and radiological examinations in about 40-50% of patients. However, the clinical benefit of this lead-time is not established. Tumor markers are able to monitor response to treatment in 70-80% of patients with metastatic breast cancer. However, paradoxical changes of the markers especially in the beginning of treatment, the insufficient concordance with tumor activity in 20-30% of the women, and the lack of curative therapy regimens limit the prospective clinical use of the markers in the individual patient. Therefore, marker changes require confirmation by radiological methods in most cases. The present data are insufficient to recommend routine use of tumor markers alone for monitoring breast cancer patients after primary treatment or during palliative therapy. However, in the absence of readily measurable disease (e. g. bone metastases) continuously increasing marker levels may be used to indicate treatment failure. If high-dose chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer renders to be effective, the clinical impact of tumor markers will increase considerably. Until that time, the analytical performance and the sensitivity of the established marker assays should be improved, and the clinical role of newer marker tests (TPS, CA 27.29) should be evaluated.
 ...
PMID:[Considerations in rational use of tumor markers in breast carcinoma]. 962 26