Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0153690 (bone metastases)
 6,382 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer requires histologic proof of diagnosis, careful staging, and assessment of each patient's performance status and comorbidities. For patients with stage IIIB (pleural effusion) and stage IV disease who have a Cancer and Leukemia Group B performance status (PS) of 0 to 1, appropriate management consists of combination chemotherapy with a platinum (either cisplatin or carboplatin) combined with paclitaxel, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, docetaxel, or CPT-11. Dosages and schedules previously established by large phase II or phase III studies should be followed. Variations in the toxicity patterns, schedules of administration, and economic considerations should guide the selection of the specific regimen. For patients who maintain a good performance status after first-line chemotherapy, second-line treatment may be considered. Current evidence supports the use of docetaxel as second-line treatment if the patient has not previously received this drug. Gemcitabine and paclitaxel may also have activity in this setting. Vinorelbine, ifosfamide, and CPT-11 appear to be inactive as second-line therapy for patients who have previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. For patients with a PS of 2, single-agent chemotherapy with vinorelbine, gemcitabine, or a combination of the two should be considered. Patients with poor performance status should be treated with supportive measures designed to relieve pain and acute complications because any tumor-directed therapy has limited benefit. Special situations exist in which curative therapy for metastatic disease is a possibility. Patients who present with solitary sites of metastatic disease, particularly after a long disease-free interval and in the CNS may undergo definitive surgery or radiotherapy with curative intent. Some have also reported favorable outcomes for patients with solitary adrenal or bone metastases as well. Surgical treatment or definitive radiotherapy should not be employed unless a thorough restaging evaluation is performed that includes computed tomography scan of the chest and abdomen through adrenals, brain magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography scan. A plethora of new agents targeting angiogenesis, tumor invasiveness, the hypoxic environment of tumors, and the cell cycle are currently in development.
 ...
PMID:Advanced non-small cell lung cancer. 1205 40

Bone disease in multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by lytic bone lesions, which can cause severe bone pain, pathologic fractures and hypercalcemia. However, the lytic bone disease in MM differs from that in other cancer patients who have lytic bone metastases. Although increased osteoclastic bone destruction is involved in MM and other tumors involving bone, in contrast to other tumors, once the MM tumor burden exceeds 50% in a local area, osteoblast activity is either suppressed or absent. The basis for this severe imbalance between increased osteoclastic bone resorption and decreased bone formation has been a topic of intensive investigation over the last several years and will be reviewed in this article.
Leukemia 2009 Mar
PMID:Pathogenesis of myeloma bone disease. 1903 21

Several solid tumors like breast cancer tend to spread to the bone, where the microenvironment is especially receptive to the tumor by special interactions between bone cells and tumor cells. Bone metastases often lead to skeletal-related events with significant morbidity and mortality. The therapy of bone metastases and osteoporosis with bisphosphonates (BPs) has been established many years ago as a standard treatment. In the adjuvant setting, cancer treatment-induced bone loss is a frequent cause of morbidity, and prevention and treatment of this condition with BPs and the monoclonal antibody denosumab are also well established. Besides postmenopausal patients, several studies including 2 larger studies by the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) and the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) have shown an increase in bone mineral density in premenopausal women. BPs as anticancer treatment are, however, still controversial because several studies yielded conflicting results, with beneficial effects only in subgroups of patients. The publication of the latest Oxford overview of prospective trials is being awaited; at the presentation of the results, a 34% relative reduction of bone metastasis and a 17% improvement in overall survival was demonstrated in the subgroup of postmenopausal patients. These results will likely lead to an incorporation of the use of BPs into routine adjuvant breast cancer treatment.
...
PMID:Adjuvant bisphosphonates in breast cancer treatment. 2575 11