Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0152169 (renal colic)
 811 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The historical background to extracorporeal lithotripsy using shock waves is described and indications for use of this treatment discussed in relation to other types of therapy for reno-ureteral lithiasis: percutaneous or trans-ureteral endoscopy. The reduction in invasive surgical procedures is emphasized. The first human use of extracorporeal lithotripsy by shock waves dates back to 1980. Since then, more than 30,000 calculi have been treated in this way, either exclusively or in combination with other therapy. For simple small calculi (less than 1 cm in diameter and situated in the pelvis or a calyx) the incidence of complications is minimal: renal colic (15%), fever (13%), need for complementary therapy (7%). With extension of use of extracorporeal lithotripsy to complex calculi (multiple calculi, staghorn calculi) these figures increased to 30, 5 and 12% respectively. Patients with obstructive and infected lithiasis were treated by percutaneous drainage nephrostomy with intensive antibiotic therapy prior to extracorporeal treatment. Extending indications also provided data on contraindications: coagulation disorders, major vascular problems, abnormal size or weight of patient, pregnancy and finally difficulty in localizing calculi. Of interest is the almost total lack of efficacy of shock waves for treating staghorn calculi. Treatment in these cases should be by an initial percutaneous approach to reduce size of calculus followed by extracorporeal lithotripsy under nephrostomy cover. Surgery for lithiasis should therefore be reserved for complex lithiasis cases with large caliceal calculi proximal to a long narrow infundibulum and to calculi proximal to a stenosis of pyelo-ureteral junction. Whenever possible, lumbar ureter calculi should be raised towards the pelvis by endoscopic manipulation before extracorporeal lithotripsy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Extracorporeal lithotripsy in the treatment of renal lithiasis. 5 years' experience]. 379 77

In a prospective study of 150 consecutive patients presenting over a 1-year period with acute renal colic, we compared the accuracy of intravenous urogram (i.v.u.) and ultrasound (US) in identifying and localizing ureteric calculi and hydronephrosis. i.v.u. was far superior to US. It identified 141 ureteric calculi vs. only one by US (P < 0.00001) and 109 hydronephroses vs. 66 (P < 0.0001). It is concluded that i.v.u. remains the gold standard for imaging in acute renal colic. US +/- plain supine abdominal film should be reserved for contrast medium risk patients and those in whom radiation is relatively contraindicated.
 ...
PMID:Imaging in acute renal colic: the intravenous urogram remains the gold standard. 1038 17

The aim of our study was to compare non-contrast spiral CT, US and intravenous urography (IVU) in the evaluation of patients with renal colic for the diagnosis of ureteral calculi. During a period of 17 months, 112 patients with renal colic were examined with spiral CT, US and IVU. Fifteen patients were lost to follow-up and excluded. The remaining 97 patients were defined to be either true positive or negative for ureterolithiasis based on the follow-up data. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and accuracy of spiral CT, US and IVU were determined, and secondary signs of ureteral stones and other pathologies causing renal colic detected with these modalities were noted. Of 97 patients, 64 were confirmed to have ureteral calculi based on stone recovery or urological interventions. Thirty-three patients were proved not to have ureteral calculi based on failure to recover a stone and diagnoses unrelated to ureterolithiasis. Spiral CT was found to be the best modality for depicting ureteral stones with a sensitivity of 94 % and a specificity of 97 %. For US and IVU, these figures were 19, 97, 52, and 94 %, respectively. Spiral CT is superior to US and IVU in the demonstration of ureteral calculi in patients with renal colic, but because of its high cost, higher radiation dose and high workload, it should be reserved for cases where US and IVU do not show the cause of symptoms.
 ...
PMID:Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi. 947 67

Urolithiasis is a very common affliction of mankind. In western countries incidence is increasing steadily. An increasing proportion of patients are presenting with ureteral stones, of which renal colic most often is the first complaint and the most common reason for an emergency visit to a urologist. Proper imaging strategy is of paramount importance in the diagnosis of acute flank pain and in the subsequent therapy planning once a ureteral stone is diagnosed. Renal colic during pregnancy poses specific problems, both in imaging and therapy. Apart from the adequate treatment of renal colic, modern therapy of those ureteral calculi that will not pass spontaneously will consist of a judicious combination of ESWL (extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy), endourology, and laparoscopy. Open surgery should only be reserved for limited and very specific indications. Although beyond the scope of this article, metaphylaxis should take an important role in the follow-up of stone patients in general.
 ...
PMID:Modern approach to ureteral stones. 1453 25

Imaging has an essential role in the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of patients with stone disease. A variety of imaging modalities are available to the practicing urologist, including conventional radiography (KUB), intravenous urography (IVU), ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance urography, and computed tomography (CT) scans, each with its advantages and limitations. Traditionally, IVU was considered the gold standard for diagnosing renal calculi, but this modality has largely been replaced by unenhanced spiral CT scans at most centers. Renal US is recommended as the initial imaging modality for suspected renal colic in pregnant women and children, but recent literature suggests that a low-dose CT scan may be safe in pregnancy. Intraoperative imaging by fluoroscopy or US plays a large part in assisting the urologist with the surgical intervention chosen for the individual stone patient. Posttreatment imaging of stone patients is recommended to ensure complete fragmentation and stone clearance. Plain radiography is suggested for the follow-up of radiopaque stones, with ultrasound and limited IVU reserved for the follow-up of radiolucent stones to minimize cumulative radiation exposure from repeated CT scans. Patients with asymptomatic calyceal stones who prefer an observational approach should have a yearly KUB to monitor progression of stone burden. Current research has been aimed toward the development of a micro-CT scan and coherent-scatter analysis to determine stone composition in vivo. This may have a significant impact on the future clinical management of renal calculi by facilitating selection of the most appropriate surgical intervention based on stone composition at the time of presentation.
 ...
PMID:Imaging in diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of stone patients. 1909 4

Acute abdominal pain constitutes a diagnostic challenge for the physician. The list of diseases that can cause abdominal pain is very extensive. Some of these conditions may be serious and life-threatening. The medical history is fundamental for the judicious choice of the most suitable diagnostic tests. Plain abdominal x-ray has little diagnostic efficiency although it comprises the initial diagnostic test when perforation of a hollow viscus, intestinal obstruction or ingestion of a foreign body is suspected. Abdominal ultrasound is the test of choice in suspected biliary tract pathology, complicated renal colic and gynaecological disease. Abdominal computed axial tomography (CT) may be the most sensitive and specific imaging test for diagnosing most causes of abdominal pain but should be reserved for selected cases.
 ...
PMID:[Imaging tests in acute abdominal pain]. 1910 Jan 35

This study was conducted to assess the diagnostic yield of B-Mode Ultrasonography compared to unenhanced helical CT scan in detecting urinary stones in patients with acute renal colic. This retrospective study comprised of 156 patients who underwent unenhanced urinary tract CT scan and ultrasonography for suspicion of urolithiasis. Both techniques were used to determine the presence or absence, site, size, and number of urinary stones, as well as presence of any other intra-abdominal pathology. For statistical analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography were measured considering unenhanced CT scan as a gold standard. Unpaired two-tailed student's t-test was used for comparison between mean size of true positive, false positive, and false negative stones. There were 68 patients having 115 urinary stones. Ultrasound identified 54 stones, missed 43, and falsely diagnosed 18 stones. The mean size of true positive, false positive, and false negative stones were 4.8 +/- 3.3 mm, 6 +/- 1.8 mm and 4.18 +/- 3 mm, respectively. There were 23 patients with other intra-abdominal pathologies, equally detected by both techniques. Ultrasound helped in identifying the cause of acute flank pain in 62% of cases. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of renal stone disease were 58%, 91%, 79%, 78%, and 78%, respectively. Our study suggests that, despite its limited value in detecting urinary stones, ultrasonography should be performed as an initial assessment in patients with acute flank pain. Unenhanced helical CT should be reserved for patients in whom ultrasonography is inconclusive.
 ...
PMID:The role of B-mode ultrasonography in the detection of urolithiasis in patients with acute renal colic. 2042 74