Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0152030 (skin irritation)
 2,146 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Povidone-iodine (PVP-I), an antibacterial medicine, was infiltrated in sepiolite (SPL). The available iodine content in this new pharmaceutical product, a sepiolite preparation containing povidone-iodine (PVP-I-SPL), was retained at 98.9 and 98.3% during storage at 40 degrees C for 3 and 6 months, respectively. The effective removal of various gasses, including ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, ethylmercaptan and acetaldehyde, was achieved by use of PVP-I-SPL. Especially, the concentration of ammonia gas was reduced more than half after 30 min of exposure, suggesting that PVP-I-SPL has excellent ability to adsorb ammonia gas. The satisfactory antibacterial effect of PVP-I-SPL was also obtained by testing its minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). No irritation reactions to the rabbit auricle or ophthalmic mucosa or to human skin were observed by the skin irritation test. The PVP-I-SPL preparation has bactericidal activity and gas-adsorbing ability; therefore, this pharmaceutical product should be useful for the prevention of infections and deodorization in hospital rooms and houses, as well as in nursing homes for elderly people.
 ...
PMID:Preparation and characteristics of antibacterial sepiolite containing povidone-iodine as a useful pharmaceutical product for patient care. 998 60

Ethanol is widely used in all kinds of products with direct exposure to the human skin (e.g. medicinal products like hand disinfectants in occupational settings, cosmetics like hairsprays or mouthwashes, pharmaceutical preparations, and many household products). Contradictory evidence about the safety of such topical applications of the alcohol can be found in the scientific literature, yet an up-to-date risk assessment of ethanol application on the skin and inside the oral cavity is currently lacking.The first and foremost concerns of topical ethanol applications for public health are its carcinogenic effects, as there is unambiguous evidence for the carcinogenicity of ethanol orally consumed in the form of alcoholic beverages. So far there is a lack of evidence to associate topical ethanol use with an increased risk of skin cancer. Limited and conflicting epidemiological evidence is available on the link between the use of ethanol in the oral cavity in the form of mouthwashes or mouthrinses and oral cancer. Some studies pointed to an increased risk of oral cancer due to locally produced acetaldehyde, operating via a similar mechanism to that found after alcoholic beverage ingestion.In addition, topically applied ethanol acts as a skin penetration enhancer and may facilitate the transdermal absorption of xenobiotics (e.g. carcinogenic contaminants in cosmetic formulations). Ethanol use is associated with skin irritation or contact dermatitis, especially in humans with an aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) deficiency.After regular application of ethanol on the skin (e.g. in the form of hand disinfectants) relatively low but measurable blood concentrations of ethanol and its metabolite acetaldehyde may occur, which are, however, below acute toxic levels. Only in children, especially through lacerated skin, can percutaneous toxicity occur.As there might be industry bias in many studies about the safety of topical ethanol applications, as well as a general lack of scientific research on the long-term effects, there is a requirement for independent studies on this topic. The research focus should be set on the chronic toxic effects of ethanol and acetaldehyde at the point of impact, with special regard to children and individuals with genetic deficiencies in ethanol metabolism.
 ...
PMID:Safety evaluation of topical applications of ethanol on the skin and inside the oral cavity. 1901 31

An in vitro cell culture approach was evaluated for its ability to provide data pertinent to the assessment of skin irritation potential. The hypothesis of this approach is that a direct toxic insult to the epidermal keratinocyte in vivo may lead to release of inflammatory mediators, which are responsible for initiation of a local primary skin irritant reaction. This paper presents data on the cytotoxic potential of a number of structurally unrelated chemicals (chloroform, 2-methoxyethanol, 2-butoxyethylacetate, toluene, 1-butanol, acetaldehyde, n-hexane, sodium dodecyl sulfate, benzalkonium chloride, silver nitrate, dibutyltin dichloride and tributyltin chloride). Cytotoxicity (neutral red uptake and intracellular acid phosphatase activity) of a number of structurally unrelated chemicals, representative of a wide range of skin irritation potential, was evaluated in cultures of rat and human epidermal keratinocytes. The sensitivity of human and rat keratinocytes to the test chemicals was very similar, irrespective of the endpoint of cytotoxicity. The neutral red uptake assay appeared more generally applicable to the diverse range of chemical structures represented in this study, since not all test chemicals elicited an early increase in intracellular acid phosphatase activity. The results were very encouraging, as a good correlation was evident between cytotoxicity in rat keratinocytes and the degree of erythema and oedema associated with an in vivo skin irritant response in rabbits. Keratinocyte cytotoxicity data may provide an indication of the potential of a chemical to induce a severe skin irritant reaction, or if a chemical is more likely to be a marginal or non-irritant. However, the data illustrate that such assays appear unable to discriminate correctly between more subtle classes of irritancy, such as non-irritant, mild, moderate or severe. Available human in vivo skin irritation data were insufficient to conclude which cell type is preferable for evaluation of human skin irritation potential.
 ...
PMID:Use of human and rat keratinocyte cultures to assess skin irritation potential. 2065 Feb 13