Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0152030 (skin irritation)
 2,146 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Long-term antihypertensive treatment by once-weekly application of transdermal clonidine patches, in doses equivalent to 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 mg of clonidine daily, was evaluated in an open trial of 41 patients with baseline seated diastolic blood pressures of 90 to 103 mmHg. In all the patients, seated diastolic blood pressure was reduced to less than 90 mmHg with transdermal clonidine alone at the end of a dose titration phase of two to six weeks. Thirty-two patients successfully completed at least 22 months of therapy; three patients withdrew because of lack of efficacy and six because of adverse events. In the second treatment year 14 patients required a concomitant diuretic. Mean reductions in seated diastolic blood pressure from baseline values were statistically significant (P less than 0.0001) at all study intervals. The incidence of patient withdrawals resulting from the development of contact dermatitis at the patch application site was 5%; skin irritation not requiring withdrawal occurred in 13 patients during the first year of treatment and in two during the second. The incidence of dry mouth (in 7%) and drowsiness (in 10%) was lower than has been reported during oral clonidine therapy (40% and 35%). The results suggest that transdermal clonidine may be beneficial for the maintenance therapy of many patients with mild hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Long-term treatment with transdermal clonidine in mild hypertension. 274 74

This study assessed the antihypertensive efficacy and side effects of clonidine administered transdermally. Twenty-five patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (seated diastolic blood pressure 95-120 mm Hg with diuretic therapy alone) controlled with oral diuretic plus oral clonidine were enrolled. Transdermal clonidine was substituted for oral clonidine and titrated until adequate blood pressure control (seated diastolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg) was attained. At the end of titration, seated morning blood pressure averaged 129/90 +/- 15/5 mm Hg (mean +/- standard deviation) compared to 136/96 +/- 13/7 mm Hg (p less than 0.01/0.001) during oral clonidine administration. Standing morning blood pressure was also lower during transdermal than oral therapy (131/94 +/- 16/5 vs 136/99 +/- 14/7, p less than 0.05/0.001). Afternoon blood pressures (at peak effect of oral dose) were virtually identical during oral and transdermal therapy in both seated and standing positions. Typical side effects of oral clonidine, including dry mouth, drowsiness, and sexual dysfunction, were reduced during transdermal therapy. There was less morning-to-afternoon variability of blood pressure control and plasma clonidine concentrations during transdermal than during oral therapy. One patient left the study because of drowsiness and two because of skin reactions to the transdermal skin patch. Mild transient local skin irritation occurred frequently. Transdermal clonidine plus a diuretic is an effective treatment for mild to moderate essential hypertension, improves compliance and reduces side effects of therapy.
 ...
PMID:Transdermal administration of clonidine: a new approach to antihypertensive therapy. 395 4

Predictive factors and compliance level were evaluated in a group of patients with sleep apnea syndrome under CPAP treatment, assessing side effects and equipment condition: silicone interface (SI), mask-conectors (M-C), air tube (AT) and head strap (HS). Patients with >3mo treatment were included, clock counter reading was registered at the beginning, 2 and 4 mo. Patients were considered compliant (C+) when usage was >4h/day and >5day/week. Of 46 patients (male 34; age 62 +/- 9years; BMI 33 +/- 7kg/m2; AHI 38 +/- 18/h; time of therapy 2.1 +/- 1.7years; CPAP 9 +/- 1.4 cmH2O), 34 had a clock counter and 24 (71%) were C+. Initial symptoms included: somnolence (65%), snoring (39%), bed-partner witnessed apneas (28%). Comparing C+ and C- we didn't find significant difference in age, BMI, CPAP pressure, length of therapy, AHI and pre-treatment Epworth classification. Referred vs. measured time of use in C+ and C- were 6.6 +/- 1 vs. 6.1 +/- 1 h/d (p=0.02) and 5.6 +/- 1 vs. 2.4 +/- 1 h/d (p<0.005). Compliant patients reported more resolution of somnolence (p<0.005) and nocturia (p<0.05), lower post CPAP Epworth (p<0.05), more frequent somnolence as initial symptom (p<0.05) and a higher education level (p=0.01). Side effects (SE) (n=45): dry mouth 36%, nasal congestion 27%, sleep disruption 11%, CPAP noisy 9%, dry nose, rhinorrhea and skin irritation 7%. Twenty seven percent of patients reduced the CPAP use because of the SE. Correction strategies included: humidifier, nasal steroid, surgery or infiltration of turbinates. Comparing the condition of SI, M-C, AT and HS between < or =1 vs. >1year of use, we observed a lower percentage of fine elements (87 to 44%, 74 to 44%, 83 to 44%, 91 to 78%, respectively). Most common defects included stiffness of SI, cracks in SI, M-C and AT, loose conexions. The study confirms the importance of objective monitoring in patients with CPAP. Side effects and equipment condition require special attention because this could affect an effective treatment.
 ...
PMID:[Compliance with continuous positive airway pressure therapy in patients with sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome]. 1556 May 39

Throughout this decade, there has been significant research into pharmacotherapies for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This article considers the efficacy and safety of five of the more novel long-acting pharmacological treatments recently approved by the FDA for marketing in the US for paediatric ADHD, along with an alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist in preparation. Reviewed treatments include the non-stimulant atomoxetine, three novel extended-release (XR) stimulant preparations: dexmethylphenidate, lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and the methylphenidate transdermal system (TDS), and the recently approved XR alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist, guanfacine. Dexmethylphenidate XR is a stimulant treatment in a single isomer form, and has an efficacy and tolerability similar to two doses of immediate-release (IR) dexmethylphenidate when taken 4 hours apart, but is dosed at half of the usual d,l-methylphenidate dose. Dexmethylphenidate XR utilizes a beaded bimodal release, with 50% initially released and another 50% released 4 hours later to provide benefit lasting up to 10-12 hours. Lisdexamfetamine was the first stimulant treatment approved as a prodrug, whereby the single isomer d-amfetamine remains pharmacologically inactive until activated by cleaving the lysine. Its efficacy and tolerability are generally consistent with that of XR mixed amfetamine salts, with this activation method and more consistent absorption generally resulting in up to an 11- to 13-hour benefit. The methylphenidate TDS patch utilizes skin absorption to provide predictable and uniform delivery of methylphenidate when worn for 9 hours/day. The efficacy and tolerability of the methylphenidate TDS patch is generally consistent with that of osmotic-controlled release oral system (OROS) methylphenidate, providing benefit for about 11-12 hours. Because of their formulation, lisdexamfetamine and methylphenidate each have an onset of effect at about 2 hours after administration. An adjustable wear time for the methylphenidate TDS patch accommodates related adverse effects, but its disadvantages are frequent skin irritation and the need to remember to take the patch off. Atomoxetine is the first non-stimulant treatment approved by the FDA and employs weight-based dosing up to 1.4 mg/kg/day. Benefit is generally observed within 2-8 weeks of initiation and is considered to have a lesser therapeutic effect than that of stimulants. A recent parallel-group controlled study found that atomoxetine (up to 1.8 mg/kg/day) and OROS methylphenidate both improved ADHD symptoms, although subjects receiving OROS methylphenidate had a significantly better response. Interestingly, treatment-naive children had a similar beneficial response to atomoxetine as those receiving OROS methylphenidate. Subsequent crossover treatment revealed a subgroup of youths who did not respond well to OROS methylphenidate but did respond to atomoxetine. Also identified was a larger than expected subgroup who did not respond well to either active treatment, confirming the need to continue the pursuit of novel treatments. As of September of 2009, guanfacine in XR form is the first alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist to gain approval to treat ADHD, approved for the treatment of 6- to 17-year olds. A second alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist, clonidine, is in development as a potential XR treatment for paediatric ADHD. IR clonidine has a fast onset and short half-life, with its use historically limited by somnolence. Although early formulations did not improve inattention well, recent evidence suggests that clonidine XR may have potential use as monotherapy or in extending benefit when taken with a stimulant. Guanfacine has a more specific neuronal action and a longer action than that of clonidine. The approved dosing of guanfacine XR 1 to 4 mg daily generally provides symptom benefit lasting 8-14 hours, and up to 24 hours in some children and adolescents receiving a higher dose. Such recent developments and ongoing study of additional potential pharmacological interventions may lead to additional future treatment options for children with ADHD.
 ...
PMID:Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: recent advances in paediatric pharmacotherapy. 2003 Apr 23

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a chronic disease treated effectively with the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Patient adherence to prescribed CPAP is variable, however, leaving the undertreated OSA patient at risk of development or worsening of comorbid medical conditions, including hypertension and cardiovascular disease. The severity of disease and the presence of daytime sleepiness appear to have some predictive quality for subsequent adherence, though a search for consistent predictive factors related to CPAP adherence has proven elusive. Other influences, such as sex, age, socioeconomic status, and personality traits are less robust predictors. The use of sophisticated therapy modalities such as auto-titration or bi-level PAP units has been shown to improve adherence in certain subsets of OSA patients. Adverse effects such as nasal congestion, dry mouth, or skin irritation occur in approximately 50% of CPAP users, and addressing these adverse effects may improve adherence in some patients. More encouraging, studies on the use of intensive patient education and behavioral interventions have shown more positive effects on adherence, leading to the conclusion that improvement in patient adherence to CPAP therapy requires a multi-layered approach, using combined technological, behavioral, and adverse-effect interventions.
 ...
PMID:Encouraging CPAP adherence: it is everyone's job. 2080 3