Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0151825 (bone pain)
 3,118 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

To evaluate the schedule dependency of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (filgrastim) for stem cell mobilization, we conducted a randomized comparison in 50 healthy donors, with one subcutaneous daily injection of 10 microg/kg G-CSF (n = 25) compared with twice injections daily of 5 microg/kg G-CSF (n = 25). The two groups were well balanced for age, body weight and sex. G-CSF application was performed on an out-patient basis and leukapheresis was started in all donors on day 5. The most frequent side-effects of G-CSF were mild to moderate bone pain (88%), mild headache (72%), mild fatigue (48-60%) and nausea (8%) without differences between the two groups. The CD34(+) cell count in the first apheresis was 5.4 x 10(6)/kg donor weight (range 2.8-13.3) in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group compared with 4.0 x 10(6)/kg (range 0.4-8.8) in the 1 x 10 microg/kg group (P = 0.007). The target of collecting > 3.0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg donor weight with one apheresis procedure was achieved in 24/25 (96%) donors in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group and in 17/25 (68%) donors in the 1 x 10 microg/kg group. The target of collecting > 5.0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in the first apheresis was achieved in 64% in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group, but in only 36% in the 1 x 10 microg/kg group. The progenitor cell assay for granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM) and erythroid burst-forming units (BFU-E) was higher in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group than in the 1 x 10 microg/kg group (7.0 vs. 3.5 x 10(5)/kg, P = 0.01; 6.6 vs. 5.0 x 10(5)/kg; P = 0.1). Administering G-CSF (filgrastim) at a dosage of 5 microg/kg twice daily rather than 10 microg/kg once daily is recommended; this leads to a higher CD34(+) cell yield and requires fewer apheresis procedures without increasing toxicity or cost.
 ...
PMID:A randomized comparison of once versus twice daily recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) for stem cell mobilization in healthy donors for allogeneic transplantation. 1112 35

The Severe Chronic Neutropenia International Registry (SCNIR) was established in 1994 following four phase I/II and one phase III clinical trial on the use of filgrastim (recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [r-metHuG-CSF]) as a treatment for severe chronic neutropenia (SCN). A primary purpose of the SCNIR is to monitor SCN patients treated with filgrastim for adverse events that might occur over time. As of December 31, 2000, 832 patients with SCN (384 congenital, 160 cyclic, 288 idiopathic) were enrolled. Clinical trial and Registry data show that filgrastim is an effective treatment for SCN; more than 90% of patients treated respond with normalization of blood neutrophil counts. The SCNIR has collected data on bone pain, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, thrombocytopenia, osteopenia/osteoporosis, vasculitis, glomerulonephritis, growth and development, pregnancy and fertility, leukemic transformation, and mortality. Analysis of data from patients who received filgrastim for up to 11 years did not identify any adverse events associated with increased duration of treatment.
 ...
PMID:Risk and benefit of treatment of severe chronic neutropenia with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. 1195 97

We compared two doses of recombinant human granulocyte-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for stem cell mobilisation in 90 healthy donors for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in a retrospective analysis. Group I (n = 46) received 10 microg/kg G-CSF (filgrastim) given as 5 microg/kg twice daily, and group II (n = 44) received 16 microg/kg, given as 8 microg/kg twice daily with a 12-h interval. The groups were well-balanced for age and body-weight. G-CSF application was performed on an out-patient basis, and leukapheresis was started in all donors on day 5. The most frequent side-effects of G-CSF were grade I/II, bone pain, headache and fatigue in both groups, whereas grade III of bone pain, headache and fatigue occurred in the 2 x 8 microg/kg group only. One serious non-fatal event with non-traumatic spleen rupture occurred in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group. The CD34(+)cell count in the first apheresis of all donors was 5.1 x 10(6)/kg donor weight (range, 1.5-19.3). The CD34(+) cell harvest was higher in the 2 x 8 microg/kg group than in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group (7.1 x 10(6)/kg vs 4.9 x 10(6)/kg; P = 0.09). The target of collecting >5.0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg donor weight with one apheresis procedure was achieved in 45% of group I and in 61% of group II, respectively. Administering G-CSF at a dosage of 8 microg/kg twice daily leads to a higher CD34(+) cell yield than a dosage of 2 x 5 microg/kg, but is associated with increased toxicity and higher cost.
 ...
PMID:Stem cell mobilisation with 16 microg/kg vs 10 microg/kg of G-CSF for allogeneic transplantation in healthy donors. 1204 Apr 68

We investigated the effects of low-dose granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on the mobilization of stem cells in 6 healthy subjects. When G-CSF was administered by continuous subcutaneous infusion at a rate of 72 microg/day for 5 days, the numbers of white blood cells and granulocytes rapidly increased to maximal levels. CD34+ cells were mobilized to the peripheral blood in 3 days, and the maximal level was reached 4 or 5 days after the start of treatment. We attempted to determine whether the levels of mobilized stem cells that we could obtain using this method would be sufficient for peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Two of the 6 subjects complained of mild bone pain 4 or 5 days after the start of treatment, but the pain did not affect their daily activities. Only 1 abnormal result (for serum alkaline phosphatase) was found in the laboratory data. The present preliminary results have provided us with a framework for a prospective study comparing low-dose continuous infusion with conventional mobilization procedures.
 ...
PMID:Effect of continuous subcutaneous administration of a low dose of G-CSF on stem cell mobilization in healthy donors: a feasibility study. 1209 48

Treatment of healthy donors with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) allows the mobilization and peripheralization into circulating blood of an adequate number of CD34+ cells that can then be collected by leukapheresis (PBSC). This procedure avoids the invasiveness of bone marrow harvest and the risks related to general anesthesia. The main adverse effects of rhG-CSF are: bone pain, 84%, headache, 54%, fatigue, 31%, and nausea, 13%, which are usually scored by the donors as moderate to severe, resolving within 2-3 days after discontinuation of the cytokine. Analgesics, mainly acetaminophen, are sufficient to control the pain. Less than 5% of the donors experience non-cardiac chest pain, a local reaction at the injection site, insomnia, dizziness or a low-grade fever. Discontinuation of the PBSC procedure because of adverse effects of rhG-CSF or leukapheresis is rarely necessary (0.5%) but this good tolerability can be hampered by the need, in 5-20% of cases, for an adequate venous access that requires insertion of a central or venous catheter. There are no absolute contraindications to the stimulation of healthy donors with rhG-CSF but the description of cases of non-traumatic splenic rupture, iritis, cardiac ischemia, and gouty arthritis suggests that further precautionary restrictions are advisable when deciding eligibility for PBSC collection. The main advantages for patients receiving an allogeneic PBSC transplant are the faster hematologic and immunologic recovery and the potential for a greater efficacy in advanced disease by lowering the transplant-related mortality. One of the major concerns regarding the use of rhG-CSF in unrelated healthy donors is the uncertainty about its possible role in triggering malignancy, in particular myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia. There are no studies with an adequate sample size and follow-up that can answer this question but two recent retrospective studies reported that in the medium term rhG-CSF is not associated with an excess of lymphoproliferative disorders. Currently, caution on the long-term safety of the use of rhG-CSF in healthy donor is still warranted but the data so far accumulated on allogeneic PBSC transplants are encouraging both as far as concerns the good short-medium tolerability profile of G-CSF-stimulation of the donor and the potential major efficacy in leukemia patients.
 ...
PMID:The use of cytokine-stimulated healthy donors in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. 1241 88

Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) from healthy individuals are a rapidly emerging alternative source to bone marrow for allogeneic transplantation. Although widely applied in the meantime, only limited information on feasibility and safety of mobilization and collection of PBPCs is currently available from prospective multicenter studies specifically designed to investigate this donation modality. This ongoing multicenter study on the performance as well as the short- and long-term safety profile of rhG-CSF-induced mobilization and collection of PBPCs was initiated in October 1999. The study is designed to recruit a total of 300 healthy family donors who will be followed regularly for a period of 5 years after donation. The first interim report presented here summarizes results obtained after enrollment of 150 donors from nine German institutions. The study protocol allowed the individual choice between two dose regimens of rh-CSF (10 micro g/kg per day vs 2x8 micro g/kg per day of donor body weight). The primary endpoint was defined as a yield of > or =5x10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg of recipient body weight in a single leukapheresis product. This endpoint was attained by 50% of donors receiving the lower rhG-CSF dose regimen and by 75% of donors with the higher dose regimen ( p<0.0009). A total of 478 acute adverse events attributable to the mobilization procedure were recorded and manifested predominantly as transient bone pain and headaches (80%). No persistent hematologic or nonhematologic adverse events have occurred in this study so far. Thus, the current experience in a prospective multicenter study supports previous single-center and retrospective registry reports in that the collection of PBPCs after rhG-CSF mobilization is feasible and associated with frequent, but generally mild and acceptable side effects.
 ...
PMID:Filgrastim mobilization and collection of allogeneic blood progenitor cells from adult family donors: first interim report of a prospective German multicenter study. 1248 66

Bone pain is a common side effect of treatment with filgrastim. Pegfilgrastim is a pegylated long-acting analogue of filgrastim that is administered once per chemotherapy cycle. The profile of prospectively defined, patient-reported bone pain judged by the investigators as related to study drug was analyzed retrospectively for each drug using data from two comparable phase III trials. These multicenter, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trials compared once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim (6 mg, study 1 or 100 microg/kg, study 2) to daily filgrastim 5 microg/kg in patients with stage II-IV breast cancer undergoing multiple cycles of myelosuppressive chemotherapy (doxorubicin/docetaxel). Subcutaneous once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim 6-mg and 100-microg/kg doses were administered to 76 and 150 patients, respectively; subcutaneous daily filgrastim 5 microg/kg was administered to a total of 227 patients. Because bone pain in study 1 was higher (P = 0.044) in every cycle compared with study 2, all analyses were performed separately for each study. No statistically significant differences in incidence, severity, or duration were observed between patients receiving either once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim or daily filgrastim in either study. Bone pain incidence and severity were significantly greater (P < 0.001) in cycle 1 of both studies compared with later cycles. Among patients with bone pain, a trend towards earlier onset with pegfilgrastim was observed but was not associated with increased bone pain severity or duration. In patients who received a fixed 6-mg dose of pegfilgrastim, the overall bone pain incidence was similar when analyzed by body weight (< 60 kg, 60-100 kg, > 100 kg). No patients were withdrawn from either study for bone pain.
 ...
PMID:Bone pain associated with once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim is similar to daily filgrastim in patients with breast cancer. 1263 78

A randomised trial in breast cancer patients was designed to compare the number of peripheral blood progenitor cells collected after mobilisation with a single dose of 10 microg/kg/day granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (n=14) or a split dose of 5 microg/kg twice daily (n=14). Both groups were well balanced. No significant differences were observed between groups regarding aphereses parameters. The total number of CD34+ cells collected was higher in the split-dose group (mean of 7.1 and median of 7.4 x 10(6)/kg) than in the single-dose group (5.6 and 5.8 x 10(6)/kg, respectively) (P=0.26). The mean of CD34+ cells collected after the first apheresis procedure was 3.9 x 10(6)/kg for the split dose group and 3.1 x 10(6)/kg for the single-dose group (P=0.24). Circulating CD34+ cells before the first apheresis were higher for the split-dose group (mean 79.7 vs 59.2 x 10(6)/l) (P=0.14). All bone pain scores applied were significantly higher for the split-dose group. Our primary end point of improving the mean of total CD34+ cells collected to 2.5 x 10(6)/kg was not achieved with twice-daily G-CSF administration. Further studies evaluating different mobilisation schedules with G-CSF are needed to determine the optimal regimen.
 ...
PMID:A randomised study of 10 microg/kg/day (single dose) vs 2 x 5 microg/kg/day (split dose) G-CSF as stem cell mobilisation regimen in high-risk breast cancer patients. 1295 27

We investigated whether anti-inflammatory effects of treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, filgrastim) are mediated via prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) induction. In a double-blind crossover study, 10 healthy volunteers received 300 microg of filgrastim or saline 1 week apart. This was repeated after oral administration of 50 mg of flurbiprofen 1 h before injection. The increase in neutrophilic granulocytes initiated by G-CSF was augmented significantly by flurbiprofen. Lipopolysaccharide-induced PGE(2) and thromboxane (TxB(2)) release were increased 8 h after G-CSF treatment. This increase was abrogated by flurbiprofen. However, flurbiprofen did not affect G-CSF-mediated decrease in tumor necrosis factor-alpha or interferon-gamma release. Of the volunteers treated with G-CSF, eight reported side effects (headache and bone pain) against none in the saline group. When flurbiprofen was given before injection, one volunteer each reported side effects in the G-CSF and in the saline group. These data show that G-CSF primes for increased PGE(2) and TxB(2) release. Cyclooxygenase inhibition counteracts neither the hematopoietic nor the anti-inflammatory activity of G-CSF but reduces side effects.
 ...
PMID:Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) treatment primes for increased ex vivo inducible prostanoid release. 1461 Feb 36

Both granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and dexamethasone (DXM) are used for neutrophil (PMN) mobilization and collection. This prospective study was aimed to evaluate and compare the rate, severity and clinical significance of adverse reactions of these drugs alone and in combination in healthy donors. PMN mobilization was carried out using dexamethasone alone (8 mg orally; n=25) or glycosylated G-CSF alone (Lenograstim, 5 microg/kg subcutaneously, n=24) or in combination (n=23) prior to a standard granulocyte apheresis on the Spectra cell separator. The number of PMNs counted in the mobilized peripheral blood of the donors was 7.0 (3.6-20.4) x10(9)/L (DXM), 25.2 (15.5-49.7) x10(9)/L (G-CSF), and 31.6 (20.0-43.0) x10(9)/L (G-CSF+DXM), corresponding to PMN apheresis yields of 13 (8-43) x10(9)/U, 56 (34-118) x10(9)/U, and 83 (33-117) x10(9)/U, respectively. The three groups had comparable percentages of donors with at least one adverse effect (ranging from 75 to 80%), but the G-CSF-containing regimens were generally more toxic, as was reflected by higher percentages of donors with moderate to severe adverse reactions and higher overall severity scores of 2.28 (G-CSF) and 2.08 (G-CSF+DXM) compared with 1.33 in the DXM group ( p<or=0.001). With G-CSF alone, pain symptom complexes were more frequent, more severe, and more often triggered requests for analgesics (9/47 donors; 19%) and unwillingness to give further neutrophil donations (2/47 donors; 4%). The addition of DXM to G-CSF diminished some symptoms, particularly bone pain, headache and the frequency of requests for analgesics. The predominant symptoms in the DXM alone group were mild gastrointestinal complaints. We conclude that G-CSF stimulation improved neutrophil mobilization and apheresis yields at the expense of donor tolerability. Compared with G-CSF alone, the combination G-CSF and DXM did not increase the quantity or the severity of donor symptoms.
 ...
PMID:A comparative study of adverse reactions occurring after administration of glycosylated granulocyte colony stimulating factor and/or dexamethasone for mobilization of neutrophils in healthy donors. 1506 Jul 47


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next >>