Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0151744 (myocardial ischemia)
 31,282 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In order to study events during isovolumic relaxation, left ventricular angiograms of 120 patients with ischemic heart disease were digitized frame by frame, and compared with those of 15 normal subjects. In patients with ischemic heart disease, abnormal inward movement of endocardium occurred in areas supplied by narrowed coronary arteries. When these involved the free wall, they were due to abnormal wall thickening rather than to inward movement of epicardium. Since the volume of the ventricle was constant, they were accompanied by compensatory outward movement of endocardium elsewhere, due to premature thinning. Identical abnormalities were demonstrated in 80 patients by M-mode echocardiography, and in individual patients, agreement with angiography was good. These abnormalities were aggravated by TNT administration, and were unaffected by isometric stress. In approximately half, they were associated with abnormalities of isovolumic contraction. They appear to represent the behavior of regions of the left ventricle with partial loss of function due to previous ischemic injury.
 ...
PMID:Regional abnormalities of left ventricular wall movement during isovolumic relaxation in patients with ischemic heart disease. 66 65

The authors selected, from a general sample of 3525 cardiopathic patients treated with 2 g daily of L-carnitine during 1 year, 220 stable effort angina TNT-responder patients, presenting more than 15 anginal episodes per month; moreover, other 59 anginal patients in congestive heart failure have been taken into account. The evaluation of the results obtained in these samples has been done in parallel with the ones of cardiopathic patients studied in 2 multicentric trials carried out, according to a very similar protocol, in Switzerland (148 patients treated at the same posology for 6 months) and Germany (143 patients, 3 months of treatment). The analysis of the three trials showed net reduction of both rate of anginal episodes and therapeutic use of nitrates, substantiated by improvement of physical performance (demonstrated by ergometric test in the German trial) as well as of the quality of life (the Swiss trial). Furthermore, from the general sample of 3525 patients the authors selected 737 subjects with clearly pathological levels of plasma cholesterol, in order to evaluate the effect of L-carnitine treatment on lipidemic parameters; after 12 months of administration only 282 patients showed abnormal levels of cholesterolemia. Analysis of the results of the three trials and a review of the literature on carnitine identify the compound as a fundamental drug for the treatment of patients with myocardial ischemia.
 ...
PMID:[L-carnitine in the treatment of chronic myocardial ischemia. An analysis of 3 multicenter studies and a bibliographic review]. 153 43

The present study was performed to compare hemodynamic effect of intravenous Nitroglycerin (TNT i.v.) in 14 patients developing acute hypertension (Group I) and in 7 non hypertensives after open heart surgery (Group II). In all patients, m.a. 56.6 yrs, (10 mitral and/or aortic prosthetic valve replacements, 9 aorto-coronary bypass, 1 open mitral commissurotomy, 1 closure of atrial septal defect) TNT was infused at doses of 0.5, 1, 2 microgram X kg X min. and subsequently at 2 microgram X kg X min. after volume administration (2 + V.A.) to maintain right and left atrial pressure the same as control (P = N.S.). Mean arterial, right and left atrial pressures (MAP, RAP, LAP), cardiac frequency and index (CF, CI and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) were monitorized. TNT i.v. resulted in hypertensive patients (Group I) in reduction vs. control of: a) RAP (--20.17%) and LAP (--20.58%) at 0.5 microgram X kg X min. b) RAP (--26.13%), LAP (--27.50%), MAP (--19.94%) and CI (--12.98%) at 1 microgram X kg X X min. c) RAP (--22.47%), LAP (--26.89%), MAP (--24.68%), CI (--12.6%) and SVRI (--17.34%) at 2 microgram X kg X min. When RAP and LAP was maintained by volume administration TNT i.v. (2 microgram X kg X min.) resulted in an even greater increase in CI and a greater decrease in MAP and SVRI ((--22.04% and --24.88% respectively). No significant hemodynamic modification (P less than or equal to 0.05) were observed in non hypertensive patients (Group II) at all doses of TNT i.v. The results confirm a predominant venodilator effect of TNT at low doses and a good effect on arterial resistances at high doses in hypertensive patients. In view of previous reports of differing effects on ischemia TNT i.v. may be preferable to other vasodilator drugs for control of acute post-ECG hypertension, only on condition to maintain an adequate left ventricular filling pressure to prevent a fall of cardiac index. Moreover the absence of significant (P less than or equal to 0.05) hemodynamic modifications in non hypertensive patients may be a further advantage in the treatment of myocardial ischemia with i.v. TNT.
 ...
PMID:[Effect of intravenous nytroglicerin in hypertensive patients during and after open heart surgery (author's transl)]. 678 Apr 1

The landmark HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) studies have practical lessons for clinicans. The 4S trial established the importance of treating the hypercholesterolaemic patient with cardiovascular heart disease. Next, WOSCOPS showed the benefit of treating healthy, high-risk hypercholesterolaemic men. CARE, a secondary prevention trial, showed the benefit of treating patients with cholesterol levels within normal limits. This was confirmed by the LIPID trial, another secondary prevention study, which enrolled patients with cholesterol levels 155-271 mg/dl (4-7 mmol/l). The importance of treating patients with established ischaemic heart disease, and those at high risk of developing heart disease, regardless of cholesterol level, was being realized. In the MIRACL trial, hypocholesterolaemic therapy was useful in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome, while the AVERT study showed that aggressive statin therapy is as good as angioplasty in reducing ischaemic events in patients with stable angina. By showing the value of fluvastatin after percutaneous intervention, LIPS confirmed that benefit is a class action of the statins. The HPS randomized over 20 000 patients, and showed beyond doubt the value of statins in reducing cardiovascular events in the high-risk patient. Although PROSPER showed benefit in treating the elderly patients above 70 years, statin therapy in this trial was associated with an increase in cancer incidence. The comparative statin trials, PROVE-IT, REVERSAL, Phase Z of the A to Z, ALLIANCE and TNT, all showed that high-dose statins will better reduce cardiovascular events in the high-risk patient, although the adverse effects of therapy will also be increased. ALLHAT-LLT, ASCOT-LLA and CARDS showed that for statin therapy to demonstrate a significant benefit, hypertensive or diabetic patients must be at sufficiently high risk of cardiovascular events. The emphasis is now on the risk level for developing cardiovascular events, and treatment should target the high-risk group and not the lipid level of the patient. No therapy is free of adverse effect. Treatment of those most at risk will bring the most benefit; treatment of those not at high risk of cardiovascular disease may expose patients who would not benefit much from therapy to its adverse effects.
 ...
PMID:The statin studies: from targeting hypercholesterolaemia to targeting the high-risk patient. 1600 1

Atorvastatin has been extensively studied in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events, and may have some clinical advantages over various other statins in these respects. The principal primary prevention study of atorvastatin, ASCOT-LLA (Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid Lowering Arm), revealed that atorvastatin reduced the relative risk of primary coronary heart disease (CHD) events by 36% (p = 0.0005) compared with placebo in patients with hypertension. Much published data confirm the secondary preventive benefits of atorvastatin in various clinical settings. The IDEAL (Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering) and TNT (Treating to New Targets) trials demonstrate the preventive efficacy of atorvastatin in patients with stable CHD. Relative to simvastatin (in the IDEAL trial) and low-dosage atorvastatin (in the TNT trial), intensive atorvastatin therapy (80 mg/day) reduced the risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) by 17-22% (p < or = 0.02). Furthermore, the ALLIANCE (Aggressive Lipid-Lowering Initiation Abates New Cardiac Events) and GREACE (GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation) trials highlight the benefits of atorvastatin in the 'real world' setting in patients with stable CHD. Compared with 'usual' care, atorvastatin reduced the risk of nonfatal MI by 47-59% (p < or = 0.0002).Moreover, the MIRACL (Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering), PROVE-IT (PRavastatin Or atorVastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy) and IDEAL-ACS (Acute Coronary Syndromes) studies outline the benefits of high-dosage atorvastatin therapy started within 24-96 hours, 10 days or 2 months, respectively, of an acute coronary syndrome. Relative to placebo, pravastatin and simvastatin, atorvastatin reduced the risk of death or major cardiovascular events by 16-18% (p < or = 0.048). In patients undergoing revascularisation procedures, the AVERT (Atorvastatin VErsus Revascularisation Treatment) study revealed that 18 months' administration of atorvastatin 80 mg/day was at least as effective as angioplasty plus usual care in reducing the risk of ischaemic events in low-risk patients with stable coronary artery disease. Furthermore, the ARMYDA (Atorvastatin for Reduction in MYocardial DAmage during angioplasty) and ARMYDA-3 trials showed that 7 days' administration of atorvastatin 40 mg/day before coronary intervention significantly reduced the risks of periprocedural myocardial damage (ARMYDA), postprocedural MI (p = 0.025; ARMYDA) and atrial fibrillation (p = 0.003; ARMYDA-3) versus placebo. In addition, it has been reported that C-reactive protein levels and the combined incidence of cardiovascular events (death, MI and target segment revascularisation during the 6-month follow-up) were significantly higher in coronaropathic patients undergoing non-surgical revascularisation procedures (stent implantation) not receiving statin therapy compared with those treated with atorvastatin (80mg). Overall, therefore, the marked efficacy of atorvastatin in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events underscores the pivotal place that this statin has in general cardiovascular disease management, and suggests even greater potential clinical utility for the drug in some clinical settings.
 ...
PMID:Atorvastatin efficacy in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events. 1791 May 19

An association between hypercholesterolaemia and ischaemic stroke has not yet been clearly defined by observational studies. In clinical trials, however, cholesterol-lowering treatments appear to consistently reduce stroke risk. Data are now available from various primary prevention studies - ALLHAT-LLT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering treatment to prevent Heart Attack, Lipid-Lowering Therapy), ASCOT-LLA (Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial, Lipid-Lowering Arm), CARDS (Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study, WOSCOPS (West of Scotland COronary Prevention Study) - and secondary prevention studies - 4S (Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study), CARE (Cholesterol and Recurrent Events), GREACE (GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation), HPS (Heart Protection Study), LIPID (Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease), MIRACL (Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering), SPARCL (Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels), TNT (Treating to New Targets) - confirming the ability of statins to reduce stroke risk. Regarding primary prevention, post hoc analyses showed pravastatin reduced the relative risk of stroke by 9-11% (not statistically significant) in the ALLHAT-LLT and WOSCOPS trials, whereas atorvastatin reduced this risk by 27-48% in the ASCOT-LLA (p = 0.024) and CARDS trials. It remains to be established in prospective studies whether cholesterol-lowering is effective in the primary prevention of stroke. Regarding secondary prevention, in five placebo-controlled studies (4S, CARE, HPS, LIPID, MIRACL) involving a total of >40 000 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), statin therapy reduced the relative risk of fatal or nonfatal stroke by 19-50% (p < or = 0.048); the largest decrease was produced by atorvastatin in the MIRACL study (-50%, p = 0.045). In addition, high-dosage atorvastatin reduced stroke risk by 25% (p = 0.02) relative to lower-dosage therapy in the TNT trial, and by 47% (p = 0.034) relative to 'usual' care in the GREACE study. A post hoc analysis of data for 3280 HPS study participants who had had a previous stroke revealed that simvastatin reduced major vascular events by 20% (p = 0.001).The SPARCL study assessed the secondary preventive efficacy of atorvastatin versus placebo in 4731 patients with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), but without CHD. Atorvastatin reduced the adjusted relative risk of fatal or nonfatal stroke by 16% (p = 0.03), and that of fatal stroke alone by 43% (p = 0.03). Among secondary study endpoints, atorvastatin reduced the relative risks of stroke and TIA (-23%; p < 0.001), TIA alone (-26%; p = 0.004), and ischaemic stroke (-22%; p = 0.01). Overall, SPARCL study findings suggest that intensive atorvastatin therapy should be started immediately after a stroke or TIA. In summary, atorvastatin has developed a well defined role in the primary and secondary prevention of cerebrovascular disease, and appears to have a particularly prominent place in preventing such disease in CHD patients, and in the post-stroke and post-TIA setting in patients without CHD.
 ...
PMID:Atorvastatin: its clinical role in cerebrovascular prevention. 1791 May 21

Hypocholesterinemic drugs from the statins class are effective means of primary and secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease (IHD) in middle aged men who comprised predominant majority of patients participating in randomized controlled trials (RCT). Proofs of favorable influence of statins on origination and progression of IHD in women and elderly people are less convincing. In majority of RCTs of therapy with statins results of which were analyzed separately for men and women no lowering of rates of coronary events were found among women and people older then 65 - 70 years. Moreover in some trials increases of all cause mortality were observed in statin treated patients at the account of deaths from non-cardiovascular causes (cancer deaths in particular). In the PROSPER trial pravastatin not only turned out useless in men and women aged 70 - 82 years, but significantly increased rate of breast cancer. In ALLHAT-LLT in patients aged 65 years and older and in women pravastatin lowered neither total number of nonfatal myocardial infarctions and IHD deaths, nor total mortality. In SPARCL and TNT in which efficacy and safety of high dose statin (e.g. atorvastatin 80 mg/day) was assessed there occurred augmentation of risk of hemorrhagic stroke and mortality from noncardiovascular causes including cancer and infections. One of meta-analyses of RCTs revealed significant increase in breast cancer risk associated with treatment with statins, in another meta-analysis more close relationship was noted between statins and development of cancer in elderly patients. Thus the problem of efficacy and safety of long-term therapy with statins remains open and requires further investigation.
 ...
PMID:[Hypercholesterolemia in men and women of various age. Part II. The problem of efficacy and safety of statins]. 1826 Sep 68