Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0151744 (myocardial ischemia)
 31,282 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The authors administered lovastatin (Mevacor, MSD) to 18 patients with primary hyperlipoproteinaemia (familial and non-familial) with a lipoprotein pattern type IIa and IIb. During treatment a marked reduction of atherogenic indicators of the lipid metabolism occurred, i.e. a decline of total cholesterol (-28.6%), LDL-cholesterol -39%), apolipoprotein B (-18.6%), the index of total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol (-44.6%) and the index LDL-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol (-48.2%). At the same time a favourable effect on indicators of the lipid metabolism to which a protective action is ascribed was recorded: a rise of HDL-cholesterol (+13.6%) and apolipoprotein AI (+13%) and AII (+13%). An excellent effect was observed also in four heterozygotes with familial hypercholesterolaemia which is usually rather resistant to other types of hypolipidaemic treatment. The drug was very well tolerated and subjective side-effects of treatment were minimal. Despite the fact that a number of laboratory indicators was followed up, the authors did not observe any undesirable side-effects, only a transient and marginal rise of ALT in one patient. Lovastatin is, due to its potent hypolipidaemic effect, a new hope in the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia. Its usefulness in the prevention of ischaemic heart disease, as well as its safety during prolonged administration are tested at present in long-term investigations.
 ...
PMID:[Personal experience with lovastatin, a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (Mevacor, MSD) in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia]. 184 44

The Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Heart Disease (LIPID) trial is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the long-term effect of pravastatin on coronary mortality in patients with a previous myocardial infarction or unstable angina-ischemic heart disease (IHD). It is planned to run for at least five years with 9014 patients from 85 centers in Australia and New Zealand. The trial will monitor cause-specific mortality and major clinical events associated with each treatment. Running in parallel with the main study is a prospective economic analysis, the objectives of which are (1) to estimate the effectiveness of pravastatin compared with placebo in terms of survival, quality of life (QOL), and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY); (2) to estimate the resource usage associated with pravastatin compared with placebo-in particular, to study whether it alters resource usage through prevention of disease progression; and (3) to use this information for a cost-utility analysis with cost per quality-adjusted life-year as the unit of analysis. A novel aspect of the design is the use of a preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis, based on "best-guess" values, and a sensitivity analysis over plausible ranges to guide the choice of subsample size. Some data, such a mortality, days spent in hospital, major clinical events, and drug use, are being collected within the main LIPID trial. However, additional subsamples for the cost-effectiveness study will include information on quality of life, time off work, and resources used, such as time in hospital, procedures, and medications taken. The methods and sample sizes for these substudies have been a crucial issue in validity and feasibility.
 ...
PMID:Design of a cost-effectiveness study within a randomized trial: the LIPID Trial for Secondary Prevention of IHD. Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Heart disease. 931 28

Pravastatin, a hydrophilic inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, has been reported to beneficially affect atherogenesis, plaque stability, and transient myocardial ischemia in significant coronary artery disease by influencing lipid metabolism and by intracellular signaling via mevalonate pathway products other than cholesterol. Leukocytes are implicated to play a pathophysiological role in these events. We were interested in finding out whether pravastatin could affect transendothelial migration (TEM), chemotaxis, and respiratory burst activity of the neutrophil ex vivo. In addition, effects on monocyte and T-lymphocyte chemotaxis were tested. For TEM assays, monolayers of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were grown to confluence on polycarbonate filters bearing 5-microns pores in Transwell (Costar) culture plate inserts. Chemotaxis experiments were performed using modified Boyden chambers with cellulose nitrate micropore filters. Respiratory burst activity was measured fluorometrically. Treatment of neutrophils and monocytes with pravastatin at 2 to 200 mumol/L and 10 to 1000 mumol/L, respectively, significantly decreased chemotaxis triggered by fMet-Leu-Phe. This effect was abolished in the presence of mevalonic acid (500 mumol/L); no effect of pravastatin was seen on T-lymphocyte chemotaxis triggered by interleukin-8. Preincubation of neutrophils with pravastatin (200 mumol/L) also resulted in a significant reduction in the number of neutrophils that transmigrated a tumor necrosis factor-stimulated or lipopolysaccharide-stimulated HUVEC monolayer. At none of the concentrations tested (2 pmol/L to 200 mumol/L) did pravastatin affect neutrophil respiratory burst activity. We conclude that pravastatin may alter monocyte chemotaxis and neutrophil-endothelial interactions in migratory responses at concentrations obtained in vivo with cholesterol-lowering doses.
 ...
PMID:Mevalonate-dependent inhibition of transendothelial migration and chemotaxis of human peripheral blood neutrophils by pravastatin. 940 Mar 76

Although 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors can protect the myocardium against ischemic injury, the mechanisms of their effect have not yet been characterized at the cellular level. Therefore, we investigated the role of cardiac ATP-sensitive K+ (K(ATP)) channels induced by the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor known as pravastatin on the myocardial metabolism during ischemia by phosphorus 31-nuclear magnetic resonance (31P-NMR) in isolated rabbit hearts. Forty-five min of continuous normothermic global ischemia was carried out. Pravastatin with or without the K(ATP) channel blocker glibenclamide or the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-NAME was administered beginning 60 min prior to the global ischemia. Twenty-eight hearts were divided into 4 experimental groups consisting of 7 hearts each: the control group, the P group consisting of pravastatin treatment, the P+G group consisting of pravastatin treatment with glibenclamide, and the P+L group consisting of pravastatin treatment with L-NAME. During ischemia, the decreases in adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and intracellular pH (pHi) were significantly inhibited in the P group in comparison with Control group (at end of ischemia, respectively; both p<0.01), as was the increase in inorganic phosphate (Pi) (at end of ischemia, p<0.01). However, the decreases in ATP and pHi and the increase in Pi were not inhibited in the P+G group during ischemia. The P+L group also showed no inhibition of the aforementioned parameters during the same period. These results suggest that pravastatin has a significant beneficial effect for improving the myocardial energy metabolism, which is provided by K(ATP) channels and nitric oxide (NO), during myocardial ischemia. The cardioprotection of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor may be caused by the K(ATP) channels that are mediated by the NO.
 ...
PMID:Role of cardiac ATP-sensitive K+ channels induced by HMG CoA reductase inhibitor in ischemic rabbit hearts. 1167 53

The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are effective in both the primary and secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease. As a group, these drugs are well tolerated apart from two uncommon but potentially serious adverse effects: elevation of liver enzymes and skeletal muscle abnormalities, which range from benign myalgias to life-threatening rhabdomyolysis. Adverse effects with statins are frequently associated with drug interactions because of their long-term use in older patients who are likely to be exposed to polypharmacy. The recent withdrawal of cerivastatin as a result of deaths from rhabdomyolysis illustrates the clinical importance of such interactions. Drug interactions involving the statins may have either a pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic basis, or both. As these drugs are highly extracted by the liver, displacement interactions are of limited importance. The cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system plays an important part in the metabolism of the statins, leading to clinically relevant interactions with other agents, particularly cyclosporin, erythromycin, itraconazole, ketoconazole and HIV protease inhibitors, that are also metabolised by this enzyme system. An additional complicating feature is that individual statins are metabolised to differing degrees, in some cases producing active metabolites. The CYP3A family metabolises lovastatin, simvastatin, atorvastatin and cerivastatin, whereas CYP2C9 metabolises fluvastatin. Cerivastatin is also metabolised by CYP2C8. Pravastatin is not significantly metabolised by the CYP system. In addition, the statins are substrates for P-glycoprotein, a drug transporter present in the small intestine that may influence their oral bioavailability. In clinical practice, the risk of a serious interaction causing myopathy is enhanced when statin metabolism is markedly inhibited. Thus, rhabdomyolysis has occurred following the coadministration of cyclosporin, a potent CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitor, and lovastatin. Itraconazole has been shown to increase exposure to simvastatin and its active metabolite by at least 10-fold. Pharmacodynamically, there is an increased risk of myopathy when statins are coprescribed with fibrates or nicotinic acid. This occurs relatively infrequently, but is particularly associated with the combination of cerivastatin and gemfibrozil. Statins may also alter the concentrations of other drugs, such as warfarin or digoxin, leading to alterations in effect or a requirement for clinical monitoring. Knowledge of the pharmacokinetic properties of the statins should allow the avoidance of the majority of drug interactions. If concurrent therapy with known inhibitors of statin metabolism is necessary, the patient should be monitored for signs and symptoms of myopathy or rhabdomyolysis and the statin should be discontinued if necessary.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic drug interactions with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. 1203 92

We investigated the effects of a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, pravastatin, an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, temocaprilat, and an angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist, CV-11974, on myocardial metabolism during ischemia in isolated rabbit hearts using phosphorus 31-nuclear magnetic resonance (31P-NMR) imaging. Forty-five minutes of continuous normothermic global ischemia was carried out. Pravastatin, temocaprilat, CV-11974 or a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, L-NAME was administered from 60 min prior to the global ischemia. Japanese white rabbits were divided into the following experimental groups, a control group (n=7), a group treated with pravastatin (P group; n=7), a group treated with pravastatin and temocaprilat (P+T group; n=7), a group treated with pravastatin and CV-11974 (P+CV group; n=7), and a group treated with pravastatin and L-NAME (P+L-NAME group; n=7). During ischemia, P group, as well as either P+T group or P+CV group, showed a significant inhibition of the decreases in adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and intracellular pH (pHi) (p<0.01, respectively, at the end of ischemia compared to the control group as well as P+L-NAME group), and a significant inhibition of the increase in inorganic phosphate (Pi) (p<0.01, respectively, compared with the control group as well as P+L-NAME group). These results suggest that pravastatin significantly improved myocardial energy metabolism during myocardial ischemia. This beneficial effect was dependent on NO synthase. However, this beneficial effect was not enhanced by either temocaprilat or CV-11974.
 ...
PMID:Effects of an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor in combination with an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist on myocardial metabolism in ischemic rabbit hearts. 1204 36

The use of statin agents in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) remains an area of intense clinical interest. Statin therapy has an established secondary preventive benefit in patients with coronary artery disease, and its extension to ACS seems logical. A number of observational studies have shown an association between initiation of statin therapy early in ACS and improved clinical outcome. Additionally, 4 randomized controlled trials have examined the use of statin therapy for ACS: the Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) study, the Pravastatin Turkish Trial, the Fluvastatin on Risk Diminishing After Acute Myocardial Infarction (FLORIDA) study, and the Lipid-Coronary Artery Disease (L-CAD) study. Three of these trials showed a benefit with early initiation of statin therapy, whereas 1 trial demonstrated neither benefit nor harm. All the available trials lacked the power and design to sufficiently evaluate whether early initiation of statin therapy reduces mortality and reinfarction in patients with ACS. Four ongoing trials have been designed and sufficiently powered to determine whether statin therapy reduces the risk of death and reinfarction when initiated early in ACS treatment. A body of evidence suggests that the pleiotropic actions of statin agents might modulate benefit in ACS. This article summarizes the available data and provides a rationale for early initiation of statin therapy for patients with ACS.
 ...
PMID:Statin lipid-lowering therapy for acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina: efficacy and mechanism of benefit. 1263 May 93

The aim of this review of the landmark HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) studies is to enable the clinician to draw practical lessons from these trials. The Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) established the importance of treating the hypercholesterolemic patient with established cardiovascular heart disease. The West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study (WOSCOPS) showed the benefit of treating healthy hypercholesterolemic men who were nevertheless at high risk of developing cardiovascular heart disease in the future. The Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) study, a secondary prevention trial, proved the benefit of treating patients with myocardial ischemia and cholesterol levels within normal limits. This conclusion was confirmed by the Long-term Intervention With Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) study, another secondary prevention study that enrolled patients with a wide range of cholesterol levels (4-7 mmol/dL), into which the large majority of patients would belong. The importance of treating patients with established ischemic heart disease (IHD), and those at high risk of developing cardiovascular heart disease, regardless of cholesterol level, was being realized. The Air Force/Texas Coronary Artery Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS) then showed that treatment can reduce adverse cardiovascular events even in the primary prevention of patients with normal cholesterol levels. The Myocardial Ischemia Reduction With Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) trial showed that hypocholesterolemic therapy is useful in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome, while the Atorvastatin Versus Revascularisation Treatment (AVERT) study showed that aggressive statin therapy is as good as angioplasty in reducing ischemic cardiac events in patients with stable angina pectoris. Finally, the Heart Protection Study (HPS) randomized more than 20,000 patients, and the value of statins in reducing adverse cardiovascular events in the high-risk patient, including the elderly, women, and even in those with low cholesterol levels, is beyond doubt. The emphasis is now on the risk level for developing cardiovascular events, and treatment should target the high-risk group and not be dependent on the actual cholesterol level of the patient. It is interesting to compare the large amount of data on the value and safety of the statins with the much more limited and less convincing data on antioxidant vitamins.
 ...
PMID:Protecting the heart: a practical review of the statin studies. 1281 99

Cardiovascular disease and its clinical sequelae remain the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in many regions of the world. Dyslipidemia is a critical risk factor to intercept in both the primary and secondary prevention of acute cardiovascular events. The prospective, placebo-controlled clinical trials conducted with statins over the course of the past 15 years have conclusively demonstrated that these drugs significantly reduce risk for fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, unstable angina, and frequency of myocardial ischemia, as well as cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Of considerable interest is the fact that, even under the exquisitely controlled circumstances of a clinical trial, endpoint reductions in these trials typically occur in the range of 20% to 35%. Understandably, much attention is now being focused on deriving the pharmacologic means by which to further increase the magnitude of endpoint reduction. Epidemiologic investigation has demonstrated that the relationship between cholesterol and risk for atherosclerotic disease is a continuous one. Consequently, it is reasonable to assume that more aggressive reductions of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol might result in even greater reductions of cardiovascular event rates and atheromatous plaque progression than heretofore observed. Two recent clinical trials, Reversal of Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering (REVERSAL) and Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE IT), prospectively tested and confirmed the validity of more aggressive LDL cholesterol lowering in high-risk patients with established coronary artery disease.
 ...
PMID:Low-density lipoprotein reduction in high-risk patients: how low do you go? 1529

An association between hypercholesterolaemia and ischaemic stroke has not yet been clearly defined by observational studies. In clinical trials, however, cholesterol-lowering treatments appear to consistently reduce stroke risk. Data are now available from various primary prevention studies - ALLHAT-LLT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering treatment to prevent Heart Attack, Lipid-Lowering Therapy), ASCOT-LLA (Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial, Lipid-Lowering Arm), CARDS (Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study, WOSCOPS (West of Scotland COronary Prevention Study) - and secondary prevention studies - 4S (Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study), CARE (Cholesterol and Recurrent Events), GREACE (GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation), HPS (Heart Protection Study), LIPID (Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease), MIRACL (Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering), SPARCL (Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels), TNT (Treating to New Targets) - confirming the ability of statins to reduce stroke risk. Regarding primary prevention, post hoc analyses showed pravastatin reduced the relative risk of stroke by 9-11% (not statistically significant) in the ALLHAT-LLT and WOSCOPS trials, whereas atorvastatin reduced this risk by 27-48% in the ASCOT-LLA (p = 0.024) and CARDS trials. It remains to be established in prospective studies whether cholesterol-lowering is effective in the primary prevention of stroke. Regarding secondary prevention, in five placebo-controlled studies (4S, CARE, HPS, LIPID, MIRACL) involving a total of >40 000 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), statin therapy reduced the relative risk of fatal or nonfatal stroke by 19-50% (p < or = 0.048); the largest decrease was produced by atorvastatin in the MIRACL study (-50%, p = 0.045). In addition, high-dosage atorvastatin reduced stroke risk by 25% (p = 0.02) relative to lower-dosage therapy in the TNT trial, and by 47% (p = 0.034) relative to 'usual' care in the GREACE study. A post hoc analysis of data for 3280 HPS study participants who had had a previous stroke revealed that simvastatin reduced major vascular events by 20% (p = 0.001).The SPARCL study assessed the secondary preventive efficacy of atorvastatin versus placebo in 4731 patients with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), but without CHD. Atorvastatin reduced the adjusted relative risk of fatal or nonfatal stroke by 16% (p = 0.03), and that of fatal stroke alone by 43% (p = 0.03). Among secondary study endpoints, atorvastatin reduced the relative risks of stroke and TIA (-23%; p < 0.001), TIA alone (-26%; p = 0.004), and ischaemic stroke (-22%; p = 0.01). Overall, SPARCL study findings suggest that intensive atorvastatin therapy should be started immediately after a stroke or TIA. In summary, atorvastatin has developed a well defined role in the primary and secondary prevention of cerebrovascular disease, and appears to have a particularly prominent place in preventing such disease in CHD patients, and in the post-stroke and post-TIA setting in patients without CHD.
 ...
PMID:Atorvastatin: its clinical role in cerebrovascular prevention. 1791 May 21


1 2 Next >>