Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0149925 (small cell lung cancer)
 6,491 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The prognostic significance of serum ferritin on survival in lung cancer was evaluated. One hundred and ninety-seven patients were referred for evaluation of pulmonary lesions; 115 patients (85 men) had primary lung cancer. Their median age was 57 years. Seventy-four patients (43 men) with benign lung disease were enrolled as controls. Their median age was 53 years. Serum ferritin was measured at diagnosis. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n=90) was graded according to the TNM-system and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (n=25) in limited and extensive disease. Follow-up was median 30 months (range 23-36). Patients with lung cancer had higher median ferritin than controls (245 vs. 145 microg/l, p<0.00001): the prevalence of ferritin >300 microg/l was 37% in patients with lung cancer and 14% in controls (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in ferritin between patients with different stages either in NSCLC or in SCLC. Patients with SCLC had higher median ferritin than patients with NSCLC (344 vs. 233 microg/l, p<0.05). No significant differences in ferritin could be demonstrated among the other histological tumour types. The overall survival rate in patients with lung cancer was 52% after 1 year, 33% after 2 years, and 13% after 3 years. Survival rate was lower in patients with ferritin >300 microg/l than in those with ferritin < or =300 microg/l (p<0.0001). The probability of survival 1, 2 and 3 years after diagnosis in patients with ferritin >300 microg/l was 36, 20 and 4%, respectively, and in patients with ferritin < or =300 it was 63, 42 and 18%, respectively (p<0.0001). An elevated ferritin was a significant prognostic factor (p<0.01) even after adjustment for performance status, age, sex, TNM stage, and histological tumour type. TNM stage and performance status were likewise predictors of survival (p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively). There exists a clinically relevant relationship between serum ferritin concentration and the prognosis of survival in patients with primary lung cancer. The routine use of serum ferritin should be considered in the evaluation and follow-up of pulmonary malignancies.
 ...
PMID:The serum ferritin concentration is a significant prognostic indicator of survival in primary lung cancer. 1174 82

Radiotherapy plays an important role as a treatment for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but local failure still occurs in 70% to 80% of the patients. A retrospective analysis was carried out to evaluate the local control predictors for non-SCLC. From January 1990 to December 1996, 256 patients with stages I-IIIb NSCLC entered this analysis. All patients received definitive radiotherapy. The significance of prognostic variables on local control was evaluated using univariate analysis and Cox stepwise regression model. The prognostic index was calculated according to the value of each prognostic factor on local control. Median local progression-free survival time of the whole group was 9.7 months, and 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial local progression-free survival were 54%, 24%, and 19%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed patients with smaller tumor volume, earlier clinical staging, and treated with higher total dose in shortened overall treatment time had better local control. Tumor volume, clinical staging, and radiotherapy methods were independent prognostic factors on local control. The prognostic index model could predict the local control condition of NSCLC treated with radiation therapy more effectively than a single variable such as TNM staging.
 ...
PMID:Prognostic factors for local control in non-small-cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy. 1182 2

In a retrospective analysis of 203 patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), we examined the prognostic value of c-kit expression on survival. Expression of c-kit was examined immunohistochemically in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. c-kit was observed in 87.7% of SCLC tumors. Using the Kaplan-Meier model, we found that lack of c-kit expression was associated with significantly shorter survival time compared to the presence of c-kit expression (mean survival 151 +/- 27 vs. 358 +/- 49 days, p = 0.0084). Moreover, the proportion of c-kit(+) cells within the tumor was also related to survival time. Patients with tumors in which >75% of cells stained positive for c-kit had a mean overall survival time of 424 (+/-72) compared to 295 (+/-67) days for patients with 25-75% c-kit(+) tumor cells. Patients with tumors containing <25% c-kit(+) cells had the worst survival, with 164 (+/-24) days (p = 0.0033). Further parameters associated with short survival times were low performance status, elevated levels of lactate dehydrogenase and higher stage according to the TNM classification. Multivariate analysis using the Cox regression model showed that the proportion of c-kit(+) cells within the tumor specimen was one of 3 independent prognostic parameters (p = 0.004) for overall survival next to TNM classification (p = 0.001) and performance status (p < 0.001).
 ...
PMID:Expression of the tyrosine kinase c-kit is an independent prognostic factor in patients with small cell lung cancer. 1519 80

CMT with surgery and chemotherapy is feasible, the toxicity is manageable, and postoperative morbidity and mortality rates are acceptable. Patient selection is important, and the results of the LCSG trial indicate that surgical resection will not benefit most patients who have limited SCLC. The chances of long-term survival and cure are strongly correlated with pathologic TNM stage. Consideration of surgery for patients who have SCLC should be limited to those with stage I disease and perhaps some patients with stage II tumors. Therefore, before surgery is undertaken, patients should undergo extensive radiologic staging with CT, MRI, and perhaps even positron emission tomographic scanning and mediastinoscopy, even if the radiologic assessment of the mediastinum is negative. Surgery may be considered for patients with T1-T2 NO SCLC tumors, and whether it is offered as the initial treatment or after induction chemotherapy remains controversial [40,43]. If SCLC is identified unexpectedly at the time of thoracotomy, complete resection and mediastinal lymph node resection should be undertaken, if possible. Chemotherapy is recommended postoperatively for all patients, even those with pathologic stage I tumors. Surgery likely has very little role to play for most patients with stage II disease and virtually no role for patients with stage III tumors. Even though chemotherapy can result in dramatic shrinkage of bulky mediastinal tumors, the addition of surgical resection does not contribute significantly to long-term survival for most patients, as shown conclusively by the LCSG trial. The final group of patients who may benefit from surgical resection are those with combined small cell and non-small cell tumors. If a mixed-histology cancer is identified at diagnosis, the initial treatment should be chemotherapy to control the small cell component of the disease, and surgery should be considered for the non-small cell component. For patients who demonstrate an unexpectedly poor response to chemotherapy, and for patients who experience localized late relapse after treatment for pure small cell tumors, a repeat biopsy should be performed. Surgery may be considered if residual NSCLC is confirmed.
 ...
PMID:Should aggressive surgery ever be part of the management of small cell lung cancer? 1538 3

Aberrant methylation of several tumor suppressor genes often occurs during the pathogenesis of lung cancer. RASSF1A is one of the tumor suppressor genes, and it is frequently inactivated by hypermethylation of its promoter region in a variety of human cancers, including lung cancer. It has recently been suggested that RASSF1A methylation was frequently observed in poorly differentiated tumors, and that it was correlated with adverse survival in lung adenocarcinoma (Tomizawa Y, et al., Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:2362-8). In this study, we investigated the pathogenetic and clinicopathologic significance of RASSF1A methylation for the development and/or progression of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We examined 116 cases of NSCLC for the methylation status of RASSF1A. Methylation-specific analysis demonstrated that 40.5% (47 of 116) of the cases were methylated at the CpG sites in the promoter. Methylation of RASSF1A was associated with cellular differentiation (p = 0.0244) and it was related to survival (p = 0.0276). However, there was no association between RASSF1A methylation and the individual clinicopathologic features: TNM stage (p > 0.1), recurrence (p > 0.1), lymphatic permeation (p > 0.1) and smoking duration time (p > 0.1). Furthermore, we analyzed RASSF1A's probability as a prognostic marker by using stepwise Cox proportional hazard regression testing. As a result, the stage proved to be the most important factor (p = 0.0089), more than any other factors such as age, gender, cell type, methylation status, differentiation, smoking duration time, tumor size and lymph node permeation. There was no other significant factor other than stage and age. These results show that epigenetic inactivation of RASSF1A cannot be a prognostic marker of NSCLC.
 ...
PMID:RASSF1A is not appropriate as an early detection marker or a prognostic marker for non-small cell lung cancer. 1570 Mar 8

Although various benign and malignant tumors can occur in the bronchi and lungs, lung cancer is by far the most common tumor and the leading cause of tumor death worldwide. For therapeutic reasons lung cancer is classified currently as small cell (SCLC) or non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The main cause is smoking. There are no specific symptoms that enable early detection. Staging is according to the international TNM-system. As the results of therapy to date are disappointing and many questions remain unsolved, as many patients as possible should be included in further prospective trials. In SCLC polychemotherapy is mandatory; in local tumor stages radiotherapy should be combined early on with chemotherapy, and in cases of complete remission, prophylactic cranial irradiation is indicated. In operable stages of NSCLC adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrates a survival benefit. In locally advanced NSCLC, radiochemotherapy is now the standard of care. Advanced stages require chemotherapy usually with two drugs, second-line chemotherapy is indicated in cases of relapse.
 ...
PMID:[Lung cancer]. 1676 76

The author provides information about epidemiology as well as surgical practice for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in Hungary. It is emphasized that, based on the author's experience and on international consensus, TNM system is the basis of accurate oncological treatment. The oncological management of SCLC is summarized, which is based on surgery. SCLC, especially cases undergoing surgery, are often detected as a peripheral nodule which should be examined preoperatively by special algorithm. Despite the published favorable results, surgical treatment alone is not accepted nowadays as a correct oncological point of view. The aim of adjuvant therapy is to improve survival and to decrease local recurrence. The 5-year survival of SCLC according to stages is between 4 and 60%. After the late 80's, the complex multimodality oncotherapy has started, with neoadjuvant treatment. SCLC is chemosensitive, even at N2 stage after down-staging surgery might be available. The late results show 20-46% cumulative 5-year survival rate. However, in the case of N2 disease, only 15-30% 5-year survival is achieved. This is a critical question for surgery of SCLC, because the dominant opinion is that for N2 disease and especially residual N2 surgery does not prolong survival. SCLC often occurs in combination with NSCLC. Therefore, salvage operation is a possible choice to remove the residual chemo/radiation resistant SCLC and NSCLC components. In conclusion, surgery has an advantage for SCLC therapy especially in patients with stage I-II disease. Value of surgery for stage III/a disease is under discussion and it is not recommended in Hungarian practice. To use a complex neoadjuvant protocol is advised which provides from 20 up to 40% five-year survival rate.
 ...
PMID:[The possibility of surgery for small cell lung cancer (state of art)]. 1709 81

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is considered a systemic disease at diagnosis, because the potential for hematogenous and lymphogenic metastases is very high. For many years, the diagnosis of SCLC was considered a contraindication for surgery because radiotherapy was at least equivalent in terms of local control, and the rate of resectability in SCLC patients was poor. When chemotherapy became the mainstay of treatment for SCLC, radiotherapy was its logical complement, and surgery was progressively abandoned. However, some centers continued to support surgery because experience suggested that in selected patients it was possible to achieve a long-term survival. In the search for predictors of long-term survival it became evident that the TNM staging system was effective for SCLC. The rationale for surgery in the context of SCLC is based on 3 factors: a) Several historical series of patients operated for limited-stage SCLC reported some long-term survivors, showing that cure could be achieved. b) After chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the rate of local relapse is 20%-30%. The assumption that surgical resection might be superior for local disease control has been suggested but not yet proved. c) The surgical intervention can precisely assess pathological (p) response to chemotherapy, identify carcinoids erroneously diagnosed as SCLC, and treat the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) component of tumors with a mixed histology. Even if some controversies exist, it is accepted that surgery can be proposed as the first treatment in patients with T1 or T2 lesions with no evidence of lymph node involvement, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. In more advanced stages of disease, chemotherapy should be the first step of treatment and surgery can be proposed to responding patients, before radical radiotherapy, depending on the p-stage of disease. Such an intensive multidisciplinary approach should be always employed in the context of controlled clinical trials.
 ...
PMID:Surgery in small cell lung cancer: when and why. 1735 2

Despite medical advances lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths. Lung cancer is usually recognized late in its natural history and at presentation in 80 % unresectable. Smoking history is the most important risk factor. At present time, screening for lung cancer is not recommended. The only chance for cure is tumour resection in early stages, performed in about 20 % of all lung cancer cases. Histological subtypes are non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (80 % of lung cancers) and 20 % small cell lung cancer (SCLC). TNM-staging has important influence on prognosis and therapy. After identification the tumour should be staged using the TNM system. Currently diagnosis and staging rely predominantly on chest radiography and computed tomography (CT) scanning. Positron emission tomography (PET) identifies the tumour by its metabolic activity and helps to find malignant nodal or systemic lesions. Flexible bronchoscopy is the key investigation in the diagnosis and staging of patients with suspected lung cancer. Endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial fine needle aspiration (TBNA) may be utilized to improve the bronchoscopic results in mediastinal staging. Internistic thoracoscopy or video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) may be used in malignant pleural effusions. Mediastinoscopy staging is the gold-standard for mediastinal staging.
 ...
PMID:[Diagnosis and staging of lung cancer]. 1750 12

Surgery with chemotherapy has been the accepted procedure for treating pathological stage I small cell lung cancer. However, there is a question of whether all clinical stage I patients should undergo surgery or not because of discrepancies between clinical and pathological staging. We conducted a retrospective analysis of TNM evaluation and postoperative survival on 10 clinical stage IA (T1N0M0) and 6 stage IB (T2N0M0) patients who had undergone initial lobectomy followed by chemotherapy. Clinical stage IB showed a high incidence of hilar or mediastinal lymph node involvement than stage IA (P=0.04). The accuracy of the T-factor did not differ between both stages. The pathological mean dimension of primary tumors with lymph node metastasis (33.4 mm) was significantly larger than that without metastasis (22.1 mm) (P=0.04). The difference in survival between clinical stage IA (7 of 10) and stage IB (2 of 6) was large but not significant (P=0.07). Four patients in each clinical stage died of cancer relapses. When indicating surgery for clinical stage I small cell lung cancer, it should be taken into account that primary tumors of more than 30 mm in diameter may suggest the possibility of stages more advanced than pathological stage II because of a high incidence of lymph node metastasis.
 ...
PMID:Preoperative TNM evaluation of peripheral clinical stage I small cell lung cancer treated by initial lobectomy with adjuvant chemotherapy. 1767 Mar 70


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>