Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0149871 (deep vein thrombosis)
 12,364 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Low-dose subcutaneous Heparin-Ca injections have been used for the prevention of thrombo-embolic complications of obstetrical-gynaecological operations in 126 women exposed to risk. The blood coagulation parameters showed heparin effect of prophylactic level and thrombocytopenia or bleeding did not occur. The drug was well tolerated locally. Deep vein thrombosis or embolism did not develop. According to the opinion of the author heparin prevention is absolutely indicated--especially in case of existence of several risk factors.
 ...
PMID:Postoperative thrombosis prophylaxis with subcutaneous heparin-Ca injection. 228 23

Heparin has been used in clinical practice since 1936 as anticoagulant for: the treatment of thromboembolic disorders, the prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism and the maintenance of blood fluidity in extracorporal circuits. Its use in these indications has been complicated by an increased risk of hemorrhage such as major bleeding during the treatment of pulmonary embolism and wound hematoma after surgery. Bleeding problems associated with the use of heparin in extracorporal circuits are the following: hemorrhages after cardiopulmonary bypass, serious hemorrhagic complications in patients treated with hemodialysis during acute renal failure and in patients on chronic intermittent hemodialysis and increased occult blood loss from the gastrointestinal tract and from other sites. The precise contribution of the use of heparin to the enhanced bleeding in these conditions has not yet been established. The effects on platelets, coagulation factors and/or fibrinolytic activity by the exposure of blood to foreign surfaces together with uremia present in hemodialysis patients may also contribute to abnormalities in clinical hemostasis. Recently heparin fractions and a heparinoid of low molecular weight (LMW) have been developed because of their potential to diminish the hazard of hemorrhage while retaining their antithrombotic properties. Preliminary reports from pilot studies have confirmed the increased efficacy in preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of some of the new LMW heparin(oid)s; however, improved safety with regard to bleeding still needs to be shown. The use of LMW heparins and of a new LMW heparinoid in acute and chronic hemodialysis has also been shown to be effective.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Heparin and its biocompatibility. 243 41

Risk factors for venous thrombosis include conditions leading to venous stasis, hypercoagulable states, and trauma to veins. The most important factor is venous stasis. Both extrinsic and intrinsic coagulation pathways are intimately involved in the thrombotic process. In recent years, the importance in thrombus formation of the endothelium, platelet products, the fibrinolytic system, and inhibitors of clotting mechanisms has been discovered. Deficiencies of proteins that normally protect against venous thrombosis have been found. Heparin therapy with subsequent warfarin therapy is still the primary treatment for deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary emboli. Fibrinolytic agents lyse pulmonary emboli but are not as effective in deep venous thrombosis. The incidence of serious bleeding complications has hampered the use of fibrinolytic agents except in emergency situations. Even the newer agents, which act more specifically on thrombi instead of on plasma factors, are associated with a similar incidence of hemorrhagic events. Dextrans are a suitable alternative for treatment of deep venous thrombosis when heparin cannot be used. In the prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis, minidose heparin (5,000 U every 8 hours subcutaneously) is effective, safe, and convenient in most situations. Heparin-dihydroergotamine, dextran, or warfarin can also be used. Aspirin has been disappointing. In orthopaedic surgery, minidose heparin is not protective; large pulmonary emboli may be prevented by starting warfarin therapy at the time of surgery or by daily dextran infusions. Finally, recent studies have shown that lower doses of warfarin than previously recommended are protective against recurrent venous thrombosis and have a reduced risk of hemorrhagic complications.
 ...
PMID:Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary emboli: etiology, medical treatment, and prophylaxis. 248 50

This open, randomised multicenter trial compares the efficacy and safety of Fragmin administered subcutaneously twice daily with standard heparin administered by continuous infusion in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The initial dose of Fragmin is 100 U anti-Xa/kg/12 h and the further doses are adjusted according to the anti-Xa activity between 0.5 and 0.8 U/ml, 3 hours after the morning injection. The initial dose of standard heparin is 240 UI/kg/12 h. The dose adjustments are based on the daily results of APTT (1.5 - 3 times the control). Treatments efficacy are appreciated when comparing the venography performed before and after 10 days of treatment. The safety is evaluated on clinical parameters and iterative biological tests. Sixty-six patients have been included in this study. Efficacy of the two treatments is equivalent with a phlebographic improvement in respectively 79.3 p. 100 (Heparin Group) and 71.0 p. 100 (Fragmin Group) of the cases and an aggravation in 3.4 p. 100 and 6.4 p. 100 (NS) respectively. The frequency of dosage adjustments is lower and the stability of biological tests is better in the Fragmin group. In conclusion, the administration of Fragmin twice daily by subcutaneous route seems to be equivalent at least to standard heparin continuous infusion in the treatment of recent DVT. The better convenience and safety of Fragmin have to be verified on a larger panel of patients.
 ...
PMID:[Treatment of deep venous thrombosis. Comparative study of a low molecular weight heparin fragment (Fragmin) by the subcutaneous route and standard heparin by the continuous intravenous route. A multicenter study]. 255 52

The aim of prophylaxis in venous thromboembolism is firstly to prevent fatal pulmonary embolism and secondly to reduce the morbidity associated with deep vein thrombosis and the post-phlebitic limb. Particularly high-risk groups are identifiable and include those over 60 years of age undergoing major surgery, patients with malignancy and those undergoing hip operations. Low-dose subcutaneous heparin (5000 U s.c. commenced two hours preoperatively and continued eight to twelve hourly until the patient is fully mobile) is unequivocally effective in preventing deep vein thrombosis in medical and surgical patients and, most importantly, significantly reduces the incidence of fatal postoperative pulmonary embolism and total mortality. Furthermore, in established deep vein thrombosis, low-dose heparin limits proximal clot propagation, which is the prelude to pulmonary embolism. Despite this, surveys have demonstrated an alarming deficiency amongst clinicians in the application of measures to prevent venous thromboembolism. Heparin prophylaxis carries a small risk of increased bleeding complications, mostly evidenced by the frequency of wound haematoma rather than major haemorrhage. Low molecular heparin fragments (e.g. Fragmin, Choay, Enoxaprin) are now emerging as useful alternative agents, having the advantage of once daily administration and yet providing similar efficacy in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis. However, protection against fatal pulmonary embolism has yet to be demonstrated. Mechanical methods of prophylaxis designed to counteract venous stasis, such as graduated elastic compression stockings, are also beneficial in protection against deep vein thrombosis but by themselves do not achieve such consistently good prophylaxis as low-dose heparin. However, clinical trials with combinations of mechanical methods and low-dose heparin indicate that this may be the optimum approach to very high-risk patients. In the presence of established acute deep vein thrombosis, anticoagulant therapy is the mainstay in preventing pulmonary embolism. Vena caval interruption procedures should be reserved for patients in whom anticoagulation is contraindicated or for those who develop recurrent pulmonary embolism despite adequate anticoagulation.
 ...
PMID:Prevention of venous thromboembolism. 266 85

Adequate anticoagulation treatment in patients with deep vein thrombosis reduces the risk of thrombus extension or embolization to less than 5%. Thrombolytic treatment may possibly prevent subsequent postthrombotic syndrome. Heparin is the initial treatment of choice for most patients with deep vein thrombosis. The dose is adjusted according to the results of tests such as the whole blood clotting time, thrombin clotting time, activated partial thromboplastin time or plasma heparin concentration. The most commonly used test is the activated partial thromboplastin time which should be maintained at 1 1/2 to two times the control level. Initially the test should be performed two to three times daily and when optimal adjustment has been established, clotting studies are required only at 24-hour intervals. In general, treatment with intravenous heparin should be continued for seven to ten days. Thereafter, for secondary prophylaxis, treatment with oral anticoagulants is carried out for six to eight weeks for symptomatic lower leg thrombosis, for twelve weeks in the case of proximal venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Oral anticoagulant therapy with warfarin should be given overlapping the last few days of heparin with the dose adjusted to prolong the prothrombin time to 1.3 to 1.5 times control. Initially, the prothrombin time should be monitored weekly, thereafter at intervals of two to three weeks. If oral anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated, secondary prophylaxis with subcutaneous heparin given twice daily in doses sufficient to prolong the activated partial thromboplastin time to 1 1/2 times control is an effective and safe alternative. The major side effect of oral anticoagulant therapy, as well as that of heparin, is bleeding.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Therapy of deep vein thrombosis. 269 42

A questionnaire was sent to 283 vascular surgeons in Great Britain and Ireland regarding their use of heparin in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. The answers form the basis of this study and show that there is great variation. The majority of surgeons routinely anticoagulate their patients peroperatively. Heparin is usually given intravenously--most giving the drug 2 to 3 min prior to cross clamping the aorta. Approximately half of the respondents use the same dose in all patients, whilst the remainder vary the dose, usually on the basis of weight or "size". Most surgeons use 5000 units but the range of dose varies from 400 to 20,000 units. Just under a quarter of surgeons continue to anticoagulate their patients postoperatively, almost all of these using subcutaneous heparin for prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis. Only approximately 10% of surgeons routinely reverse the heparin with protamine.
 ...
PMID:Anticoagulation in abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: the approach of vascular surgeons in Great Britain and Ireland. 271 60

In 160 high risk patients with total hip replacement the antithrombotic efficacy and tolerance of a single daily injection of 1500 aPTT-U (aPTT = activated partial thromboplastin time) low molecular weight heparin plus 0.5 mg dihydroergotamine (HNMD; Embolex NM) was compared with a twice daily application of 5000 IU of the heparin-dihydroergotamine combination Heparin-Dihydergot in a double-blind study. Deep vein thrombosis measured by means of the radiofibrinogen uptake test occurred in 20.5% of patients in both groups. In addition, intra- and postoperative blood loss and the development of hematoma were similar in both groups. Thus, on account of the "once-daily" application HNMD offers some substantial advantages: The stress of the patient in the postoperative convalescence phase can be appreciably lowered and thereby the nursing staff are spared a great deal of work.
 ...
PMID:Prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis in high risk patients undergoing total hip replacement with low molecular weight heparin plus dihydroergotamine. 282 40

In a double-blind, randomized trial, the antithrombotic effect and haemorrhagic complications of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (Heparin fragment 2165, KabiVitrum) and unfractionated heparin (UH) were compared. LMWH (5000 anti-XaU) was injected every 24 h, UH (5000 IU) every 12 h; both drugs by subcutaneous injection. During 1984-85, 215 patients were examined clinically and by plethysmography. Venography was performed whenever DVT was suspected. None of the patients proved to have DVT. Bleeding complications were found in 54% of the cases. The LMWH group had a statistically significant predominance of bleeding complications as reflected by wound haematomas (p = 0.02) and the number of blood transfusions (p = 0.02). The heparin concentration was higher in the LMWH group (mean 0.13 IU/ml) than in the UH group (mean 0.13 IU/ml) measured 2 h after the injection. In the doses administered, LMWH and UH seem effective in the prevention of thrombosis. The increased bleeding tendency in the LMWH group probably was a consequence of the to high dosage.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of low molecular weight heparin vs. unfractionated heparin in gynecological surgery. 284 7

The risk of Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) in the immediate postoperative period varies from 0.8 to 96% of cases depending on major or minor operations and on age of patients. We have employed 8,000 I.U. AXa/daily of LMW-Heparin injected subcutaneously from one day preoperatively and prolonged for 8 days after surgical procedures in 40 patients operated upon by an aorto-femoral bypass in 25 cases, a femoro-popliteal below the knee in 8 and an extra-anatomical bypass in 7. The onset of DVP in the lower limbs was investigated by clinical examination, venous Doppler pressure evaluation, waveform analysis and echotomography and the 125I-Fibrinogen uptake test. There was no intraoperative increased bleeding and the preclotting of the prosthetic grafts was inaffected. A DVT was detected during the second postoperative day, by means of the 125I-Fibrinogen test in the calf of only one patient (1/40-2.5%), submitted to an aorto-bifemoral bypass, in whom the clinical pattern and ultrasound investigations were negative. The single daily subcutaneous administration has never caused side effects in the site of injection and it seems a real improvement in the heparin treatment. These results emphasize the advantage of the use of LMW-Heparins in patients submitted to arterial surgical reconstructions of the lower limbs for the prevention of the DVT.
 ...
PMID:Prevention of deep venous thrombosis in vascular surgical procedures by LMW-heparin. 285 Mar 23


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>