Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0149871 (deep vein thrombosis)
 12,364 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which is manifested as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), represents a significant cause of death, disability, and discomfort. They are frequent complications of various surgical procedures. The aging population and the survival of more severely injured patients may suggest an increasing risk of thromboembolism in the trauma patients. Expanded understanding of the population at risk challenges physicians to carefully examine risk factors for VTE to identify high-risk patients who can benefit from prophylaxis. An accurate knowledge of evidence-based risk factors is important in predicting and preventing postoperative DVT, and can be incorporated into a decision support system for appropriate thromboprophylaxis use. Standard use of DVT prophylaxis in a high-risk trauma population leads to a low incidence of DVT. The incidence of VTE is common in Asia. The evaluation includes laboratory tests, Doppler test and phlebography. Screening Doppler sonography should be performed for surveillance on all critically injured patients to identify DVT. D-Dimer is a useful marker to monitor prophylaxis in trauma surgery patients. The optimal time to start prophylaxis is between 2 hours before and 10 hours after surgery, but the risk of PE continues for several weeks. Thromboprophylaxis includes graduated compression stockings and anticoagulants for prophylaxis. Anticoagulants include Warfarin, which belongs to Vitamin K antagonists, unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparins, factor Xa indirect inhibitor Fondaparinux, and the oral IIa inhibitor Melagatran and ximelagatran. Recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin is a new and highly effective antithrombotic agent. Prophylactic placement of vena caval filters in selected trauma patients may decrease the incidence of PE. The indications for prophylactic inferior vena cava filter insertion include prolonged immobilization with multiple injuries, closed head injury, pelvic fracture, spine fracture, multiple long bone fracture, and attending discretion. Multiple-trauma patients are at increased risk for DVT but are also at increased risk of bleeding, and the use of heparin may be contraindicated. Serial compression devices (SCDs) are an alternative for DVT prophylaxis. Compression devices provide adequate DVT prophylaxis with a low failure rate and no device-related complications. Immobilization is one of important reasons of VTE. The ambulant patient is far less likely to develop complications of inactivity, not only venous thrombosis, but also contractures, decubitus ulcers, or osteoporosis (with its associated fatigue fractures), as well as bowel or bladder complications.
 ...
PMID:Prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in orthopedic surgery. 1684

Traditional anticoagulant drugs, including unfractionated heparin and warfarin, have several limitations. New anticoagulants have been developed that target a single coagulation factor and have predictable dose-response relationships. These include direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors. Two parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors, lepirudin and argatroban, have FDA approval for the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Bivalirudin is a parenteral direct thrombin inhibitor that is licensed for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions and for those with HIT who require percutaneous coronary interventions. Ximelagatran, an oral prodrug of the direct thrombin inhibitor melagatran, showed efficacy in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism as well as stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, due to nonhematologic safety concerns, it did not receive FDA approval in the US. Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide, which binds to antithrombin, thereby indirectly selectively inhibiting factor Xa. Fondaparinux demonstrated efficacy compared to low-molecular-weight heparin in randomized clinical trials and is FDA approved for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. The OASIS 5 trial in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes recently demonstrated that the fondaparinux dose approved for prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis is as efficacious with respect to ischemic outcomes as therapeutic doses of enoxaparin; fondaparinux, however, was associated with a substantial reduction in major bleeding at 9 days and mortality at 1 and 6 months. A number of oral direct factor Xa inhibitors as well as other oral direct thrombin inhibitors are in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis; the current status of these anticoagulants is reviewed along with the challenges faced in designing pivotal clinical trials of these agents in comparison to existing anticoagulants.
 ...
PMID:New anticoagulants. 1712 98

Although only part of the entire treatment regimen, antithrombotic therapy represents a large portion of the total costs associated with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) treatment. Unfractionated heparin (UFH), the mainstay of antithrombotic therapy, carries the risk of bleeding and associated interventions, and must be closely monitored. UFH therapy also has an increased risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and osteoporosis. These drawbacks prompted the development of newer antithrombotic agents, particularly low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) and factor Xa inhibitors. LMWH have several clinical advantages over UFH and has been demonstrated to be more effective than UFH in ACS. Because UFH is inexpensive, newer therapies need to demonstrate economic attractiveness over UFH. In addition to acquisition costs, it is important to consider the cost of all key components throughout the continuum of care. Health economic analyses show that the clinical advantages of the LMWH enoxaparin are also likely to result in net cost-saving benefits, due to reductions in diagnostic catheterization, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and intensive care unit length of stay. Fondaparinux, an indirect inhibitor of factor Xa, does not require routine monitoring or multiple daily dosing, and is unlikely to interact with HIT antibodies. Large randomized clinical trials have shown that fondaparinux is at least as safe and efficacious as enoxaparin or UFH in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and treatment of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Data from 2 recently published trials are similarly indicating noninferiority of fondaparinux in ACS patients. Health economic analysis of fondaparinux treatment is currently limited to VTE scenarios but point to a cost benefit associated with fondaparinux compared with enoxaparin.
 ...
PMID:Easing the economic burden of acute coronary syndromes: cost-effectiveness of emerging therapies. 1720 89

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), encompassing both deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism, remains a common and costly condition that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Treatment options for initial management of DVT include unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), and fondaparinux, which is the first of a new class of pentasaccharide antithrombotic agents with anti-factor Xa activity. LMWHs are an important tool in DVT management, offering advantages over UFH such as ease of dosing, lack of need for coagulation monitoring, and reduced risk for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Fondaparinux is also characterized by a simple dosing regimen, no need for coagulation monitoring, and potentially a lower risk of HIT compared with LMWH. In a recent clinical trial of DVT management, efficacy and bleeding rates with fondaparinux appeared similar to those observed with LMWH. In contrast to LMWH, fondaparinux is generally given as a fixed dose across a range of patient weights rather than calculated per individual patient weight. Given the increasing economic burden of VTE, particularly due to its increased rate among the elderly, pharmacoeconomic analyses have become a particularly useful tool to aid in selecting among similarly effective and safe agents for VTE treatment. A recent cost-effective analysis demonstrated that fondaparinux use offers an attractive economic alternative to other agents for initial DVT therapy that could yield cost savings without compromising clinical outcomes or patient safety.
 ...
PMID:The pharmacoeconomics of deep vein thrombosis treatment. 1791 58

Warfarin and heparin have formed the mainstay in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, and treatment of thromboembolic disease (TED). However, these choices are hampered by difficult administration, interactions with other medications, side effect profile, and limited indications for treatment. Anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) inhibitors have already entered the drug market with the drug Fondaparinux being the first anti-Xa inhibitor to be approved for use in the U.S. by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and other drugs such as idraparinux being currently in development. A new class of medications, known as direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI), includes the parental agents lepirudin, argatroban and bivalirudin which have been approved by the FDA and the oral agents ximelagatran, melagatran and dabigatran. The latter three drugs which are oral DTIs may soon replace warfarin and heparin as the preferred medications for DVT prophylaxis and for reducing the relative risk of stroke. These drugs do not rely on blocking serine proteases nor do they require a co-factor (antithrombin III) like unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). DTIs are rapid in onset, easy to administer, do not interact with other medications or foods, have limited side effects, and can be administered in a fixed dose. The DTI ximelagatran has already been approved in several European and Asian countries, and over a dozen randomized clinical trials have been conducted demonstrating its performance to be on par with warfarin. However, approval by the FDA in the U.S. remains pending in view of reported incidences of elevations in hepatic enzymes that are currently under evaluation. This review examines the role of DTIs in the prevention and treatment of TED and the recent patents reported in the literature.
 ...
PMID:Recent developments in antithrombotic therapy: will sodium warfarin be a drug of the past? 1822 Oct 95

Management of venous thromboembolism disease could be improved by new drugs with lower risk of bleeding and without the need of regular monitoring of anticoagulant effect. In this way, idraparinux, anti-Xa inhibitor, has been compared to conventional therapy (coumarins) for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Is it worth to treat patients more than six months? This has been evaluated in an interesting study. Prophylaxis after hip replacement surgery is indicated to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism, new drugs are under investigation. Dabigatran etexilate, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has been shown as effective as enoxaparin in reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement surgery. In 2007, new european guidelines for non-STsegment elevation acute coronary syndromes have been published. Two new antithrombotic drugs, bivalirudin and fondaparinux, are now part of the different possible choices according to specific considerations. New factor Xa and factor IIa inhibitors are under investigation and are compared to heparin in PCI for NSTE-ACS. Fondaparinux and more recently otamixaban have given interesting results. These new recommendations have not yet taken into account new data published in 2007. What will be the positioning of prasugrel, a new thienopyridine, after the results of theTRITON trial? In patients with SCA treated by PCI, prasugrel reduced the ischemic events, while increasing major bleedings. In 2007, numerous publications and meta-analyses on drug-eluting stents (DES) have been published and tempered the fear about a possible increase in mortality with the use of DES.
 ...
PMID:[What's new on antithrombotics?]. 1895 Jul 43

Many of medical patients are significant risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). VTE is the most common cause of preventable death in hospitalized patients. Prophylaxis is highly effective in reducing the risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism and should be used in most hospitalized patients. Various strategies improve adherence to evidence-based guidelines on the use of prophylaxis, including audit and feedback, and automatic reminders. The important clinical risk factors for PE (or venous thromboembolism VTE) include advanced age, general anaesthesia, prolonged immobility or paralysis, previous VTE, cancer, duration of surgery, orthopaedic surgery of lower limb leg, hip or pelvic fracture, major trauma, stroke, obesity, varicose veins, postoperative infection and heart failure. Medical patients ad bed rest or who are sick are in moderate risk of VTE and evidence based guidelines recommended thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin, or low dose of unfractionated heparin or Fondaparinux. For all situations both guidelines recommended against the use of aspirin for VTE prevention.
 ...
PMID:[Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in internal medicine]. 1937 45

Enoxaparin is the most frequently used low-molecular weight heparin in the world, given in order to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery (MOS). Fondaparinux is an effective and safe alternative. The aim of our study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin and fondaparinux in the extended thromboprophylaxis of patients undergoing MOS in Italy. A decision-tree model was developed: probabilities of symptomatic events were derived from the published trials; use of resources in Italy was evaluated by means of a questionnaire administered to a panel of experts. Only the direct costs of VTE (acute treatment of events and of complications) were considered. Cost units were derived from the current cost of drugs, and from the Italian National Healthcare tariffs in 2007. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were analysed at three time points: 30 days, 1 year and 5 years. The higher cost of fondaparinux was counterbalanced by reduced rates of early DVT, early PE and prophylaxis-related major bleeding. If compared with enoxaparin, after 30 days of extended prophylaxis, fondaparinux is associated with a savings of <euro> 48.83 per patient; at the end of the first year, the savings increased to <euro> 72.13, and after 5 years, the savings are <euro> 74.36. One-way sensitivity analysis shows that the results are robust to the variation in unit costs for VTE-related care, or in event rates for both treatments. In conclusion, our model shows that, when administered for extended prophylaxis of VTE following MOS, fondaparinux is more effective and cost saving than enoxaparin.
 ...
PMID:Extended prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism with fondaparinux in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery in Italy: a cost-effectiveness analysis. 2174 62

Anticoagulants are the mainstay of treatment of venous thromboembolic and acute coronary events. Improvements of new over established anticoagulants are targeted to achieve more favorable pharmacokinetics, minimal hemorrhagic side effects, a predictable dose response that obviates the need for coagulation monitoring, and more appropriate dose selection for the indication of interest. New parenteral anticoagulants are free of the complications of HIT, can be selected so that they are safe in patients with impaired renal or hepatic function, and can be administered once daily without the need for coagulation monitoring. Drug development has been focused on two key targets: factor Xa and factor IIa (thrombin). Fondaparinux is the first selective inhibitor of the coagulation factor Xa which is commercially available for clinical use. It has been approved for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, abdominal surgery and for the initial therapy of deep venous thrombosis and venous thromboembolism. Fondaparinux sodium injection has been accepted for priority review by the United States Food and Drug Administration based on positive results from two pivotal, Phase III trials (OASIS 5 and 6) that evaluated its role in the treatment of a broad spectrum of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). In this article, we review the available literature that provides evidence for the efficacy of fondaprinux in management of thromboembolic disease as well as acute coronary syndromes.
 ...
PMID:Update on fondaparinux: role in management of thromboembolic and acute coronary events. 2018 52

Anticoagulant therapy is a major component in the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Four anticoagulant agents are currently commercially available for ACS, namely unfractionated heparin (UFH), enoxaparin, bivalirudin and fondaparinux. We describe the advantages of fondaparinux and the reasons that have hampered its uptake into routine management of ACS. Fondaparinux was shown to be efficacious in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis vs low-molecular-weight heparins, while in the setting of venous thrombo-embolic disease, it was shown to be noninferior to enoxaparin and UFH. Two pivotal studies have demonstrated the efficacy of fondaparinux as an anticoagulant in the setting of ACS, namely OASIS-5 in non-ST elevation ACS, and OASIS-6 in ST elevation myocardial infarction (MI). In OASIS-5, fondaparinux was shown to be noninferior to enoxaparin in terms of death, MI or refractory ischemia at 9 days. Furthermore, a 50% reduction in bleeding complications was obtained with fondaparinux vs enoxaparin, leading to a risk reduction for death. In OASIS-6, fondaparinux was shown to be superior to the comparator (UFH or placebo). European and North American guidelines give fondaparinux a Grade 1A and 1B recommendation respectively, but uptake of fondaparinux in routine practice has been slow. We explore reasons for this, such as prevailing doubts about the efficacy of fondaparinux in the setting of angioplasty, the problem of catheter thrombosis, and the lack of antidote in case of bleeding complications. With the exception of primary angioplasty, fondaparinux is as effective as enoxaparin or UFH, but is also associated with a considerable reduction in bleeding complications, and thus, an undeniable net clinical benefit.
 ...
PMID:Fondaparinux and acute coronary syndromes: update on the OASIS 5-6 studies. 2040 25


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>