Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0149514 (bronchitis)
 6,902 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In a randomized, single-blind trial, ceftibuten in doses of 200 mg and 300 mg administered b.i.d., was compared with cefaclor 500 mg t.i.d. in acute lower respiratory tract infections. A total 545 patients were enrolled, of which 263 were evaluable for efficacy. All patients were adults with a diagnosis of either bacterial pneumonia or bronchitis. The infective organism was eliminated in 83% of the patients in the ceftibuten 200-mg b.i.d. treatment group and in 85% of patients in the 300-mg b.i.d. treatment group. The organisms were eliminated in 79% of cefaclor-treated patients. Satisfactory clinical responses were obtained in 91% of patients in the ceftibuten 200-mg b.i.d. treatment group and in 92% of patients in the ceftibuten 300-mg b.i.d. group. Satisfactory clinical responses were obtained in 91% of cefaclor-treated patients. Predominant pathogens isolated were Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis, and strains of Enterobacteriaceae. Adverse experiences reported were similar for the ceftibuten and cefaclor treatment groups. Gastrointestinal side effects occurred in 6% of patients treated with ceftibuten 200 mg BID, 9% in those treated with 300 mg BID, and 7% of cefaclor-treated patients. Ceftibuten 200 and 300 mg twice daily was as effective as cefaclor bacteriologically and clinically in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.
 ...
PMID:Randomized comparative study of ceftibuten versus cefaclor in the treatment of acute lower respiratory tract infections. 201 4

Two independent, investigator-blinded, multicenter, randomized clinical trials compared the clinical and bacteriologic efficacy and safety of two oral antibiotics, cefuroxime axetil and amoxicillin/clavulanate, in the treatment of patients with secondary bacterial infections of acute bronchitis (hereafter denoted acute bronchitis). Three hundred sixty patients with signs and symptoms of acute bronchitis were enrolled at 22 centers and were randomly assigned to receive 10 days of treatment with either cefuroxime axetil 250 mg twice daily (BID) (n= 177) or amoxicillin/clavulanate 500 mg three times daily (TID) (n = 183). Patients were assessed for both clinical and bacteriologic responses once during treatment (at 3 to 5 days) and twice after treatment (at 1 to 3 days and at 13 to 15 days). Bacteriologic assessments were based on sputum specimen cultures obtained before treatment and, when possible, after treatment. Organisms were isolated from the pretreatment sputum specimens of 162 (45%) of 360 patients, with the primary pathogens being Haemophilus influenzae, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Staphylococcus aureus (28%, 25%, 11%, 9%, and 8% of isolates, respectively). Thirty-four percent of the H influenzae isolates and 94% of the M catarrhalis isolates that were tested for beta-lactamase production were positive. A satisfactory clinical outcome (cure or improvement) was achieved in 86% (117 of 136) and 83% (130 of 157) of the clinically assessable patients treated with cefuroxime axetil or amoxicillin/clavulanate, respectively (P = 0.45). With respect to the eradication of bacterial pathogens, a satisfactory outcome (cure, presumed care, or cure with colonization) was obtained in 91% (53 of 58) and 86% (60 of 70) of bacteriologically assessable patients treated with cefuroxime axetil or amoxicillin/clavulanate, respectively (P = 0.32). Treatment with amoxicillin/clavulanate was associated with a significantly higher incidence of drug-related adverse events than was treatment with cefuroxime axetil (39% vs 23%; P = 0.001), primarily reflecting a higher incidence of drug-related gastrointestinal adverse events (37% vs 15%; P < 0.001), particularly diarrhea and nausea. Four patients in the cefuroxime axetil group and eight patients in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group withdrew from the study because of drug-related adverse events. These results indicate that cefuroxime axetil 250 mg BID is as effective as amoxicillin/clavulanate 500 mg TID in the treatment of patients with acute bronchitis but produces fewer gastrointestinal adverse events, particularly diarrhea and nausea.
 ...
PMID:Clinical comparison of cefuroxime axetil and amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of patients with secondary bacterial infections of acute bronchitis. 859 38

Two hundred and thirty-eight in-patients with signs and symptoms of acute purulent bronchitis or purulent exacerbation of chronic bronchitis at stage 1 and 2 of Anthonisen's classification were enrolled in 11 Centers and randomly assigned to one of the following 3 treatment groups: group A, cefodizime 1 g i.m. qD; group B, cefodizime 1 g i.m. BID; group C, ceftriaxone 1 g i.m. qD. Bacteriological results after treatment were satisfactory in 64 patients (91.4%) of group A, 64 (92.8%) of group B and 74 (94.9%) of group C. Global clinical results after treatment showed satisfactory efficacy in 57 patients (79.2%) of group A, 59 (85.5%) of group B and 63 (80.8%) of group C. There was no statistically significant difference in improvement in single symptoms, global bacteriological or clinical results between the 3 groups. Mild adverse events occurred in only 3 patients (one per group).
 ...
PMID:Open, controlled, randomized study on the efficacy and safety of cefodizime single daily dose versus two daily doses and versus ceftriaxone single daily dose in patients with acute purulent bronchitis and acute purulent exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. 866 39

In this randomized, open-label, dose-comparative study, 18 investigators enrolled 466 patients with acute bronchitis. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 600 mg of cefdinir once daily (QD) or 300 mg of cefdinir twice daily (BID) for 10 days. Both microbiologic and clinical efficacy were assessed at the test-of-cure visit, 7 to 14 days after therapy stopped. A total of 296 patients were classified as assessable at the test-of-cure visit (n = 150 QD, n = 146 BID). Eradication rates of baseline pathogens in these assessable patients were similar in both groups; the baseline pathogen eradication rate for assessable patients in the QD arm was 92%, and that in the BID arm was 93%. Clinical success (cure or improvement) in assessable patients was 91% and 93%, respectively. No difference was seen in the incidence of adverse events, in the incidence of diarrhea, or in the incidence of treatment withdrawals between the two groups. We conclude that cefdinir is effective and safe for the treatment of patients with acute bronchitis.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of cefdinir in the treatment of patients with acute bronchitis. The Cefdinir Bronchitis Study Group. 887 91

The effects of oral doxofylline (400 mg BID) on bronchial airway mucosa were investigated in 14 patients with chronic obstructive bronchitis. The eligible patients had to have forced expiratory volume in 1 second > 60% of the predicted value and oxygen partial tension > 55 mm Hg. At the onset and the end of the study, bronchial biopsies were performed via a flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope. Chronic inflammation of the airways was graded according to absence of lesions = 0, involvement of 1-10% = 1, 10-50% = 2 and > 50% = 3. After three months of treatment, 57% of patients in the doxofylline group presented absence of lesions, while the remaining 43% exhibited advanced lesions. In the control group, absence of lesions was observed in 14%, while lesions of grade 1, 2 and 3 were visible in 14%, 29% and 43%, respectively. At histological examination, a significant difference in the degree of structural changes was observed in the doxofylline group between baseline and the end of the study (p < 0.03). In conclusion, doxofylline may induce favorable effects on inflammatory changes and altered cell proliferation of the airway mucosa in patients with chronic obstructive bronchitis.
 ...
PMID:Effects of oral doxofylline on inflammatory changes and altered cell proliferation in chronic obstructive bronchitis. 1140 84

Influenza illness is an important cause of severe morbidity and mortality in the population. Oseltamivir, the first oral neuraminidase inhibitor, has proven efficacy. In children of 1 year and older (weight-dependent dosing: 30 mg, 45 mg, 60 mg or 75 mg BID for 5 days) and adults (75 mg BID for 5 days), oseltamivir reduces the duration and severity of acute influenza. Furthermore, it decreases the incidence of secondary complications such as otitis media, bronchitis, pneumonia and sinusitis. Oseltamivir has been shown to prevent influenza when given for long-term prophylaxis or for post-exposure prophylaxis. Because oseltamivir blocks the neuraminidase, an enzyme crucial to influenza virion liberation from the host cell, it is only effective during the replication phase. Clinical benefits are only seen, when oseltamivir is applied within 48 h after onset of symptoms, and clinical efficacy in acute influenza is highly dependent on the beginning of treatment. Treatment within 12 h after onset of symptoms reduces the duration of illness by an additional 74.6 h, and treatment within 24 hours an additional 53.9 h compared to the benefit seen with an intervention at 48 h. In conclusion, clinical efficacy of oseltamivir can be maximized by early start of treatment. Resistance of influenza virus against oseltamivir has rarely been observed and seems to be of no clinical relevance due to reduced transmissibility and pathogenicity of mutants. Oseltamivir is generally well tolerated. About 10% of the patients complain of transient upper gastrointestinal events, which resolved within 1-2 days, and which could be reduced when the medication was taken with a light snack.
 ...
PMID:Early therapy with the neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir maximizes its efficacy in influenza treatment. 1245 53