Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0085693 (acute appendicitis)
 3,606 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Four cases of diabetic ketoacidosis presenting with abdominal pain are reported. Case 1: a 14-year-old boy suffered from sudden onset of mid-abdominal pain, then migrating to the right lower quadrant. Nausea and vomiting occurred subsequently. Appendectomy was performed under the impression of acute appendicitis in an outside surgical clinic. The patient became comatose the next day and then was transferred to our hospital. Diabetic ketoacidosis was diagnosed after the detection of hyperglycemia, glycosuria, and ketonuria on the day of admission. Unfortunately, he expired on the same day in spite of vigorous resuscitation. Case 2: a 9-year-old boy complained of abdominal pain for 10 days. There was no specific finding in the physical examination. Diabetic ketoacidosis was confirmed four days later when conscious disturbance, dehydration, and tachypnea were noticed. Case 3: a 10-year-old girl presented with a history of intermittent abdominal pain for one month. The character of the abdominal pain was nonspecific. Glycosuria was detected in a pediatric clinic. Diabetic ketoacidosis was confirmed after her referral to our hospital. Case 4: a 5-year-old girl suffered from acute abdominal pain for four hours. She was found to have tachypnea, lethargy, and ill-looking. Diabetic ketoacidosis was diagnosed after serial examinations. The abdominal pain in diabetic ketoacidosis may lead the pediatrician into diagnostic error. Therefore, when a child presented with non-specific abdominal pain, a routine urine sugar should be checked in order not to miss the possibility of diabetic ketoacidosis.
Zhonghua Min Guo Xiao Er Ke Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi
PMID:[Abdominal pain in diabetic ketoacidosis: report of four cases]. 212 98

Forty-seven consecutive patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis were studied at this hospital from June, 1994 to March, 1995. All the patients had received a complete study protocol including: detailed history and physical examination; complete blood cell count with differential count; erythrocyte sedimentation rate; C-reactive protein and sonographic examination. The male to female ratio is 29: 18. The age range is from 4 to 14 years. Thirty patients received laparotomy and 27 were diagnosed as appendicitis by histologic findings including 6 cases of perforated appendicitis. The remaining 3 patients had no evidence of appendicitis histologically. The other 17 patients were observed clinically. In these, the abdominal pain resolved spontaneously, or it was proved due to other diseases. The sensitivity and specificity of these laboratory examinations are: leukocytosis (> 10,000/mm3): 85. 2%, 65%; leukocytosis with a shift-to-the-left (neutrophil > 75%): 81.5%, 70%; elevated ESR (> 20 mm/hr): 40.7%, 85%; elevated CRP (> 0.9 mg/dl): 70.4%, 65%; (> 5 mg/dl); 51.9%, 95%; sonography: 85.2%, 100%. There were 4 false-negative and no false-positive ultrasonographic results in our study. Five of the 6 case of perforated appendicitis had elevated CRP levels of more than 8 mg/dl. In conclusion, detailed history taking and physical examination are still the most reliable tools for diagnosis. For the doubtful cases, sonography can provide excellent specificity and good sensitivity for differential diagnosis. The classical tools of leukocytosis and shift-to-the-left can only provide a screening property but not for diagnosis. CRP was not a good predictor in our study, but it can be a useful parameter when perforated appendicitis is suspected.
Zhonghua Min Guo Xiao Er Ke Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi
PMID:Laboratory aid and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children. 859 27