Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0085693 (acute appendicitis)
 3,606 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The efficacy of imipenem-cilastatin was compared with that of tobramycin and metronidazole for the treatment of appendicitis-associated abdominal infections in children in an open, randomized trial. Two hundred eighteen patients between 2.5 and 16.8 years of age hospitalized for appendectomy because of suspected acute appendicitis were allocated to 5 treatment groups. The appendix was perforated in 54 (33.8%) of the 160 cases with appendicitis. All patients responded favorably to treatment. Infection in the wound occurred in 15 of 125 (12.0%) of those without preoperative antibiotic therapy and in 5 of 83 (6.0%) of those given imipenem preoperatively (P = 0.12; 95% confidence interval, -2.2 to 14.2%). C-reactive protein decreased significantly faster in those with perforated appendix treated with imipenem than in those treated with tobramycin and metronidazole (58.2 mg/liter vs. 89.4 mg/liter, P less than 0.05 on the third postoperative day). Imipenem-cilastatin was at least as effective and economically comparable as tobramycin and metronidazole for the treatment of appendicitis-associated infections in children.
 ...
PMID:Imipenem-cilastatin vs. tobramycin and metronidazole for appendicitis-related infections. 160 80

The clinical safety and efficacy of imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections was compared with the combination of aztreonam and clindamycin in a randomized prospective trial. The severity of illness was determined by means of the Apache II score and a fixed outcome reporting scheme was used. One hundred and four patients were entered into the study, of whom 80 were evaluable. Forty-two patients were treated with imipenem/cilastatin (500 + 500 mg qds) and 38 with aztreonam (600 tds) and clindamycin (1000 mg tds). The study groups were comparable for age and sex. The imipenem/cilastatin group differed from the aztreonam and clindamycin group in having significantly more patients with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (P < 0.01) and a significantly lower mean Apache score (P < 0.05). The predominate microorganisms isolated in both groups were Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis. Treatment with imipenem/cilastatin proved successful in 71% and failed in 24%, and initial success only was seen in 5%. The numbers in the group treated with aztreonam and clindamycin were 64%, 29% and 7% respectively. Severity of illness, as measured by Apache II score, had no influence on the study outcome. Imipenem/cilastatin as well as the combination of aztreonam and clindamycin were effective in the treatment of abdominal infections and no major adverse reactions were seen.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of imipenem/cilastatin with the combination of aztreonam and clindamycin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. 826 72