Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0085593 (chills)
 4,268 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A bispecific antibody directed to T and B cells (CD3 x CD19 bsAb) was daily infused intravenously in escalating doses from 10 micrograms up to 5 mg in three patients with chemotherapy-resistant non-Hodgkin lymphoma; in this way we aimed to activate T cells to kill the malignant B cells. Only limited toxicity was observed, consisting of moderate fever preceded by chills or shivers and mild thrombocytopenia. No human anti-(mouse Ig) antibodies were found. Pharmacokinetics showed a t1/2 of 10.5 h with peak levels of 200-300 ng/ml after infusion of 2.5 mg bsAb. bsAb in serum was functionally active in vitro. After bsAb infusion a rise in serum tumour necrosis factor alpha was observed, accompanied by an increase in soluble CD8 and to some extent in soluble interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R), but not in interferon gamma. IL-4 or soluble CD4. No evidence was found for monocyte activation (no increases in IL-6, IL-8 or IL-1 beta in serum). No gross changes in histology or number of IL-2R+, CD4+ or CD8+ cells were found in the lymph nodes after therapy, but one patient showed activated CD8+ T cells within the tumour nodules. In conclusion, after intravenously administered CD3 x CD19 bsAb only moderate toxicity was found, probably due to CD8+ T cell activation and cytokine release, without CD4+ T cell activation.
 ...
PMID:CD8 T cell activation after intravenous administration of CD3 x CD19 bispecific antibody in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. 754 21

Eighteen advanced cancer patients received weekday subcutaneous injections of recombinant interleukin-6 (rIL-6) for 4 weeks at escalating doses. Patients were evaluated for hematologic and immune system effects. Hematologic monitoring included WBC, differential, Hgb and Hct, platelet counts, and assessment of marrow and peripheral blood progenitors. Immunologic monitoring included evaluation of acute-phase reactants (APRs), immunophenotyping, serum cytokine levels, cytokine-induced proteins, and cytokine messenger RNA (mRNA). The maximal tolerated dose (MTD) was 8.0 micrograms/kg/day, with neurocortical toxicity as the major limiting factor. All patients became anemic, and most had fever and chills. APRs were increased throughout treatment. WBCs increased transiently on day 2; granulocytes and monocytes increased again through day 26, whereas lymphocytes decreased to baseline or lower levels. Platelets responded by day 12 and increased through day 26 at the MTD with no effect on colony-forming unit-megakaryocyte (CFU-Mk). Peripheral WBC and RBC progenitors were not affected but decreased in the marrow. T-cell percentages declined with little effect on absolute numbers; T-cell activation was seen. CD45RO+ T cells decreased, but there was no significant effect on CD8+ CD28+ T cells. Neither B cells nor natural killer (NK) cells were affected. However, evidence of monocyte effects included upregulation of CD71, induction of the cytokine-induced proteins 2-5A synthetase and neopterin, and increases in tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) mRNA. Serum cytokines were undetected, and mRNA for IL-1 beta, IL-2, and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) was not induced; however, mRNA for IL-4 and IL-10 did increase suggesting activation of Th2-like T cells. One mixed tumor response was seen. We conclude that IL-6 alone has systemic activity on the immune system, as well as the hematopoietic system, which at the MTD, primarily involves induction of APR, activation and expansion of monocytes, and activation of Th2-like T cells.
 ...
PMID:Hematologic and immunologic evaluation of recombinant human interleukin-6 in patients with advanced malignant disease: evidence for monocyte activation. 881 98

Interleukin (IL) 2 plays an important role in enhancing the immune response, whereas IL-4 has pluripotent activities which include affecting immune function. Preclinical data suggest that the combination might have enhanced immunomodulatory activity. In this Phase I trial in patients with advanced solid tumors, both IL-2 and IL-4 were given by separate s.c. injections simultaneously daily, 5 days in a row, Monday through Friday, for 3 consecutive weeks, followed by a 1-week break from treatment. Cycles could be repeated. The dose of IL-2 was kept constant at 9 x 10(6) IU/m2/injection while the dose of IL-4 was escalated beginning at 100 microgram/m2/injection and increasing by 100-microgram/m2 increments to a planned level of 400 microgram/m2/injection. Sixteen patients were entered in this study, with one patient being ineligible because of the presence of brain metastases. Of the 15 eligible patients, there were 14 males and 1 female, with a median age of 54 (range, 38-67) years and initial performance status of 0 in 5 patients and 1 in 10 patients. Patients were treated at levels of up to 300 microgram/m2/injection of IL-4 before the study was closed due to withdrawal of the drug by the manufacturer. The most commonly observed toxicities were fatigue, fever and chills, local reaction, nausea/vomiting and anorexia, headache and nasal stuffiness, and coughing, sometimes with the production of clear white sputum, more common in smokers. Duodenal ulcers occurred in one patient and one patient had grade 4 cardiac toxicity consisting of an asymptomatic minimal elevation of the creatinine phosphokinase MB isoenzyme (CPK-MB). Grade 3 hyponatremia occurred in two patients, and elevated liver function tests and creatinine occurred but were not dose limiting. Eosinophilia of unknown significance occurred in all patients. There were statistically significant elevations in absolute numbers of most T-cell subsets examined, without changes in circulating B cells. No antibodies to the IL-4 were found after one cycle. One patient with renal cell carcinoma showed a significant decrease in tumor burden after one cycle of treatment. Because of the IL-4 withdrawal, the maximum tolerated dose for this combination of drugs given by the route and schedule used here was not determined and will require additional testing. Subcutaneous IL-2 and IL-4 given simultaneously show important immunomodulatory and antitumor effects and should be tested further in cancer patients.
 ...
PMID:Phase I trial of simultaneous administration of interleukin 2 and interleukin 4 subcutaneously. 981 6