Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0085580 (essential hypertension)
 14,686 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The purpose of this study was to estimate the effect of hypertension on the visco-elastic properties of the brachial artery in man. Seventy-five subjects including 23 with normal blood pressure (group N, PN = 95 +/- 7 mmHg, P designates the arterial mean pressure, P = DBP + (SBP-DBP)/3) and 52 with essential hypertension (group H, PH = 122 +/- 12 mmHg) participated to this study. We measured the diameter of the brachial artery (D) by the pulsed Doppler method, the brachial-radial pulse wave velocity (PWV) by the mecanographic method, and calculated the arterial compliance (C) by the Bramwell-Hill formula. A nonlinear model was used to calculate compliance and pression at any given pressure, in particular at PN or PH. We obtained the following results: [table; see text] Passive (pressure-induced) effect was obtained by comparing D(PH) to D(PN) and C(PH) to C(PN). Isobaric effect of hypertension was estimated by comparing D(PH) and C(PN) between the N and H groups. We concluded that hypertension actually induces a decrease in compliance. However, arterial diameter is increased in hypertension. The increase in diameter appears as a compensatory effect, without which the reduction in compliance would be more nocive to the circulatory system.
 ...
PMID:[Intrinsic (isobaric) effect of essential hypertension on visco-elastic properties of the brachial artery]. 195 49

Carvedilol has been shown to be effective and safe in patients with essential hypertension when given as monotherapy. In this double-blind, randomized, group-comparative study, 2 groups of 59 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension [median supine systolic/diastolic blood pressure at baseline (SBP/DBP), 168/105 mmHg] were treated with either 25 mg carvedilol once daily (o.d.) or 50 mg atenolol o.d. for 4 weeks. Responders at 4 weeks (DBP, less than 90 mmHg) terminated the study. Nonresponders continued the study. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) was added at 25 mg o.d. for a further 6 weeks. The median blood pressure decreased under monotherapy with carvedilol (n = 59) from 167/105 at baseline to 155/94 mmHg after 4 weeks, and in the atenolol group (n = 59) it decreased from 168/105 to 162/97 mmHg. The patients who received carvedilol in combination with HCTZ and were evaluated for efficacy (n = 38) showed a decrease in SBP/DBP from 156/97 at the end of monotherapy to 145/88 mmHg after 10 weeks; the combination of atenolol with HCTZ (n = 44) reduced BP from 162/97 to 147/88. Both carvedilol and atenolol were safe when given either alone or in combination with HCTZ. In conclusion, after long-term administration, 25 mg carvedilol o.d. and 50 mg atenolol o.d. significantly reduced both SBP and DBP over 24 h. The addition of HCTZ led to a further increase in antihypertensive efficacy. Combined treatment with carvedilol or atenolol and HCTZ was very well tolerated, without hypotensive events or relevant changes in objective safety parameters.
 ...
PMID:Safety and antihypertensive efficacy of carvedilol and atenolol alone and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide. 197 5

The objective of the study was to investigate the efficacy of different dose levels of bopindolol monotherapy in hypertension. This potent nonselective beta-adrenergic receptor blocker has intrinsic sympathomimetic activity and long duration of action. Forty-four patients with essential hypertension of mild (n = 40) or moderate (n = 4) severity (90 less than DBP less than or equal to 115 mmHg at the end of the placebo period) entered and completed the single-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The study lasted 14 weeks: 2 weeks on placebo, and 12 weeks on active treatment during which the initial dose of bopindolol, 1 mg daily, was augmented up to 1.5 mg, then to 2 mg at four-week intervals until BP normalized or a maximum dose of 2 mg/day bopindolol was reached. The bopindolol was administered once a day in the morning. Patients were seen every other week in the morning before drug taking, when BP and heart rate, supine and standing, a twelve lead ECG and side-effects were recorded. Compared with placebo, supine BP was significantly reduced by bopindolol: from 169 +/- 2/103 +/- 1 mmHg to 148 +/- 3/92 +/- 1, 144 +/- 3/90 +/- 1 and 136 +/- 2/85 +/- 0.6 mmHg at the end of 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatments, respectively (P less than 0.01 for each). BP changes during standing were similar. Bopindolol lowered the supine heart rate from 84 +/- 2 to 75 +/- 1, 74 +/- 1, 72 +/- 1 beats/min (P less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Antihypertensive effect of bopindolol: a multi-centre study. 197 35

This was a randomized double-blind, multiclinic, parallel, three treatments group study to compare the safety and efficacy of a fixed-ratio combination of enalapril/hydrochlorothiazide (E/HCTZ: 20/12.5-40/25 N = 46) to enalapril (E = 20-40 mg, N = 49) and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ: 12.5-25 mg, N = 51) once daily, in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe essential hypertension (100 less than or equal to supine diastolic blood pressure less than or equal to 120 mmHg). A significant decrease of systolic and diastolic blood pressure was shown in the 3 subgroups of patients. The decrease of blood pressure was significantly greater in the E/HCTZ subgroup. After 8 weeks of treatment, the E/HCTZ group had the greatest proportion of normotensive patients (65.9 p. cent, DBP less than or equal to 90 mmHg) and of responders (81.8 p. cent, diastolic blood pressure decrease greater than 10 mmHg). The treatment groups did not differ significantly with respect to clinical adverse events. The study results document the well-known hyperuricemic effect of diuretics and also indicate that the combination of enalapril and HCTZ ameliorates this effects. In this study plasma potassium was slightly but not significantly decreased by HCTZ. The combination of enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide did not alter this parameter. The results support the conclusion that in the treatment of moderate to severe hypertension, the combination enalapril/HCTZ 20/12.5 to 40/25 mg, taken once daily, is more effective than either its components used alone. This combination is well tolerated, probably due to an adequate enalapril/HCTZ dosage ratio.
 ...
PMID:[Comparative study of enalapril, hydrochlorothiazide and their combination in the treatment of essential hypertension]. 202 11

To investigate the hypotensive and hemodynamic effects of plain and extended-release (ER) formulations of felodipine added to a diuretic in the treatment of moderate essential hypertension, we studied 18 patients in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), hemodynamics (bioimpedance), foot volume (Archimedes' principle), and symptoms were evaluated after a 1-month placebo washout, after 1-month's treatment with a fixed combination of hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg plus amiloride 5 mg (HA), and then after felodipine 5 mg twice daily (F) or felodipine ER 10 mg daily (FER) (double-blind phase), each given for 2 weeks in a randomized sequence together with the diuretic. All measurements were performed at the end of the dosing interval. At baseline, supine SBP/DBP was 175.6 +/- 12.9/113.4 +/- 8.1 mmHg; HR was 77.3 +/- 7.0 beats/min; CO was 5.3 +/- 1.4 l/min; SVR was 2166 +/- 707 dynes sec. cm5, and foot volume was 433 +/- 195 ml (FV). HA induced a reduction (p less than 0.05) in BP; one patient had a DBP = 90 mmHg and was excluded from the combination study; eight patients had a DBP reduction of greater than or equal to 10 mmHg (responders), and their blood pressure was mainly reduced by a fall in SVR. HR, CO, and FV were unchanged. The addition of felodipine to a diuretic induced a further significant (p less than 0.001) reduction in BP with respect to HA alone, with no differences between F and FER. All patients had a DBP fall greater than 10 mmHg, which had no relationship to their response to the diuretic.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Hemodynamic interactions between diuretics and calcium antagonists in the treatment of hypertensive patients. 208 95

The effect of single dose (50 mg) Captopril (C) used either alone or associated to diuretics (50 mg hydrochlorothiazide -HCTI) in the treatment of mild-moderate essential arterial hypertension was studied in a multicentric study. Eighty eight patients were chosen. After a minimum of 4 month follow-up period 53.4% responded (BDP less than 95 mm Hg) to single dose C (group 1:47 patients), 89.77% to 50 mg C in single dose together with 50 mg HTIT (group 2: 32 patients), 95.45% of two 50 mg doses of C and 50 mg HCIT (group 3: 5 patients), and 97.72% responded to 3 doses of C and 50 mg of HCTI (group 4: 2 patients). The decrease in blood pressure values was statistically significant (p, 000, Wilcoxon test) in groups 1 and 2, having a mean decrease in blood pressure (BP) of 14%. In group 1 (n = 42) the SBP which initially was 165.72 +/- 11.32, decreased to 148.28 +/- 11.5 and the DBP decreased from 101.55 +/- 5.68 to 87.28 +/- 6.59. In group 2 (n = 32) the SBP decreased from 173.50 +/- 14.08 to 152.44 +/- 20.8 and the DBP from 103.34 +/- 5.29 to 87.47 +/- 6.39. The response to monotherapy could not be statistically correlated either to early essential hypertension or to the patients age. Treatment was discontinued in three cases due to the secondary effects, cough, ageusia and nervousness, showing the remaining patients a good tolerance. No changes were observed in the analytical parameters. This study shows the usefulness and tolerance of single dose C as the initial treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension.
 ...
PMID:[Captopril in single doses in the treatment mild-moderated arterial hypertension]. 219 35

We monitored the circadian profile of cortisol, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), heart rate (HR) in 33 normotensive subjects aged 20-40 years, 20 normotensive subjects aged 40-60, 32 patients with essential hypertension and 13 patients with Cushing's syndrome (6 pituitary adenomas, 5 adrenal adenomas and 2 adrenal carcinomas). All controls and patients underwent serial blood drawings at 4-h intervals during the 24-h cycle. BP and HR were recorded every 30 min by an automatic, room-restricted instrument. Data were analyzed by conventional statistics and by chronobiological procedures (cosinor rhythmometry) to quantify rhythm parameters such as the MESOR (rhythm-adjusted average), amplitude (difference between maximum and MESOR) and acrophase (timing of the crest of the rhythm). Both the control and essential hypertensive subjects showed a BP and HR circadian profile characterized by a peak in the early afternoon and a clear nocturnal fall (rhythm detection: p less than 0.001). The chronobiological analysis did not reveal any significant difference between healthy young and aged subjects. BP rhythmicity was disrupted in patients affected by Cushing's syndrome, whereas the 24-h oscillation of HR was preserved (p less than 0.001). Patients with pituitary-dependent Cushing's syndrome had higher BP levels than adrenal-dependent subjects (p less than 0.001). Our data are compatible with the view that glucocorticoids are involved in the control of BP circadian rhythm, whereas HR is not under their control.
 ...
PMID:24-hour profiles of blood pressure and heart rate in Cushing's syndrome. Evidence for differential control of cardiovascular variables by glucocorticoids. 220 64

We monitored the circadian profiles of cortisol, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) and heart rate (HR) in 33 matched normotensive subjects, 32 patients with essential hypertension and 16 patients with Cushing's Syndrome (8 pituitary adenomas, 6 adrenal adenomas and 2 adrenal carcinomas). Each subject underwent serial blood drawings at 4-hr intervals along the 24-hr cycle. BP and HR were automatically recorded every 30 min. Data were analyzed by conventional statistics and by chronobiological procedures (cosinor rhythmometry). Both the control subjects and essential hypertensives showed a circadian profile of BP and HR characterized by a peak in the early afternoon and a clear nocturnal fall (rhythm detection: P less than 0.001). The rhythmicity of BP was disrupted in patients affected by Cushing's Syndrome, whereas the 24-hr oscillation of HR was preserved (P less than 0.001). Our data are compatible with the view that glucocorticoids are involved in the control of BP circadian rhythm, whereas HR is not under their control.
 ...
PMID:24-hour profiles of blood pressure and heart rate in Cushing's syndrome: relationship between cortisol and cardiovascular rhythmicities. 226 89

We compared the effects of sustained-release diltiazem and captopril on blood pressure control and lipid profile. Forty-eight patients with primary hypertension were included in this randomized, double-blind, crossover study and 43 completed the trial. Following a two-to four-week placebo run-in period, each patient initially received either diltiazem (60-180 mg twice daily) or captopril (25-75 mg twice daily) for 16 weeks and then crossed over to the other drug after an interim placebo washout period. Both drugs significantly reduced systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DPB) blood pressure compared to baseline. However, supine (P less than 0.01), sitting and standing (P less than 0.05) DPB was lower with diltiazem than with captopril. Moreover, BP control (sitting DBP less than 90 mmHg) was achieved in a greater proportion of patients treated with diltiazem (63 vs 44%). Heart rate was significantly reduced (P less than 0.001) with diltiazem in all positions but was unchanged with captopril. Lipid, lipoprotein and apolipoprotein concentrations were not modified with either treatment. We conclude that both diltiazem and captopril are effective antihypertensive agents without deleterious effects on lipid metabolism. However diltiazem provides a better prolonged control of BP and may offer some advantages for patients in whom a slower heart rate would be beneficial.
 ...
PMID:Comparative effects of diltiazem sustained-release and captopril on blood pressure control and plasma lipoproteins in primary hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. 228 45

Seated BP measurements were taken in 48 men with a history of essential hypertension: in a chair with back support v on an examining table with no back support, and with bell v diaphragm stethoscope head in each condition. There were no significant differences between bell and diaphragm in SBP or DBP determinations. SBP was not significantly different between table and chair, but table DBP was 6.5 mm Hg higher (P less than .0001) than chair DBP. We conclude that back support, but not bell v diaphragm stethoscope head, affects seated BP determinations.
 ...
PMID:Effect of back support and stethoscope head on seated blood pressure determinations. 232 36


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>