Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0085580 (essential hypertension)
 14,686 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The effects of placebo, propranolol, and clonidine on blood pressure and blood pressure variability were examined in 14 subjects who had moderate essential hypertension. Hydrochlorothiazide was given throughout successive 4- to 5-week periods of placebo, propranolol, and clonidine administration. During each treatment period, subjects were admitted twice to the clinical research unit for 24-hour blood pressure monitoring performed during administration of placebo, propranolol and clonidine and repeated 1 to 2 weeks later during the first 24 hours after the abrupt cessation of placebo or drug administration. Blood pressure was recorded at 15-minute intervals using an automated noninvasive recorder (Arteriosonde, Roche, New Jersey). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings were averaged and the standard deviation taken as the measure of long-term variability (LTV). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure in sequential overlapping blocks of seven readings were averaged and the standard deviation calculated. Short-term variability (STV) was estimated as the average of the standard deviations of the running means. During placebo administration and withdrawal, systolic and diastolic blood pressures as well as LTV and STV were unchanged. Systolic and diastolic pressures did not differ during propranolol administration from those during propranolol withdrawal or placebo withdrawal. Systolic and diastolic LTV and STV did not differ during propranolol administration and withdrawal from those observed during placebo administration or withdrawal. After clonidine withdrawal, both systolic and diastolic pressures increased to values significantly greater than during clonidine administration. These values were significantly greater than those observed after placebo withdrawal, thereby indicating rebound hypertension. After clonidine withdrawal, seven of fourteen subjects developed systolic pressure rebound; diastolic pressure rebound was observed in three patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Blood pressure and blood pressure variability following withdrawal of propranolol and clonidine. 270 45

The clinical efficacy, safety, and bioavailability of a generic triamterene-hydrochlorothiazide product were compared with those of Dyazide. Thirty patients who had a diagnosis of nonlabile essential hypertension and who were receiving Dyazide (triamterene 50 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg) were continued on Dyazide maintenance for 16 days to determine the stability of blood pressure control and serum chemistry values. After this baseline period, the subjects were randomized to receive either Dyazide or a generic version for 21 days. They were then crossed over to receive the opposite product for another 21 days. Blood pressures were monitored throughout the study period, and blood samples were taken for measurement of serum electrolytes and of serum triamterene and its major metabolite, hydroxytriamterene sulfate. Hydrochlorothiazide was assayed in 24-hour urine samples. There were no statistically significant differences between regimens in recumbent and standing mean diastolic blood pressures or in mean concentrations of serum potassium, chloride, glucose, creatinine, and uric acid. Area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours after drug administration, maximum concentration in serum, and time to achieve maximum concentration in serum did not differ significantly between regimens for triamterene and hydroxytriamterene sulfate. Similarly, there were no significant differences in excretion, maximum rate of excretion, and time to achieve maximum rate of excretion for urinary hydrochlorothiazide. Patients treated with a brand-name fixed-combination product containing triamterene 50 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg were given a generic formulation without loss of therapeutic efficacy or development of toxicity.
 ...
PMID:Comparative efficacy and bioequivalence of a brand-name and a generic triamterene-hydrochlorothiazide combination product. 275 98

After improvement of technical equipment continuous ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is more and more used in the diagnosis of hypertension. New fully automatic systems permit a reliable registration and evaluation of 24-h blood pressure profiles. Typical circadian rhythmics of blood pressure, independent of a variability with different grades of activity, can be demonstrated in normotensive persons and also in patients with essential hypertension. Patients with secondary forms of hypertension show a nivellation or offset of circadian blood pressure rhythmics. A study was performed to examine the antihypertensive efficacy of the calcium antagonist Nitrendipine, the beta 1-adrenoceptor-selective blocker Metoprolol, the beta-blocker with intrinsic activity Mepindolol and the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor Enalapril in patients with mild to moderate hypertension over a period of 6 month. Continuous ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed before and after 6 month of therapy. 98 of 299 included patients broke off therapy, 47 of those because of side effects. Hydrochlorothiazide was given additionally if the antihypertensive effect of monotherapy was not sufficient after a period of 4 weeks. Morning blood pressure controls at the end of the treatment period showed normotensive values in all groups without significant differences between the groups before and at the end of the treatment period. The number of prescriptions of diuretics necessary to achieve normotension differed between the four treatment groups: Nitrendipine (n = 5), Metoprolol (n = 7), Mepindolol (n = 14), Enalapril (n = 20). In contrast to the morning blood pressure values the continuous 24-h blood pressure monitoring demonstrated significant differences between the therapy groups. Metoprolol turned out as most effective in lowering blood pressure and in reducing the number of systolic blood pressure peaks above 180 mmHg, but on the other hand showed the highest incidence of relative hypotension (less than 100 mmHg systolic, less than 80 mmHg diastolic). Mepindolol demonstrated a significant lower efficacy. In the Nitrendipin group least of all prescriptions of diuretics were necessary and the lowest number of hypotensive systolic blood pressure values occurred. Enalapril showed the most significant reduction of diastolic values above 100 mmHg and the lowest number of diastolic values below 80 mmHg, but the highest number of prescription of diuretics was necessary in the Enalapril group. In none of the four therapy groups a neutralisation of circadian blood pressure rhythmics was demonstrable.
 ...
PMID:[Ambulatory continuous 24-hour blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and therapy of arterial hypertension and modification by the antihypertensive agents enalapril, metoprolol, mepindolol and nitrendipine]. 284 47

Bevantolol is a novel beta 1-selective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist. The Study Group evaluated its therapeutic utility (100-300 mg bid) compared with propranolol (80-240 mg bid) in 266 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (WHO Grades I and II, sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) greater than or equal to 95 mmHg). There was no difference in their antihypertensive efficacy over six months, 77% being controlled (DBP less than or equal to 90 mmHg) on bevantolol and 81% on propranolol. Hydrochlorothiazide 25-50 mg bid added later improved BP control in those incompletely controlled on bevantolol monotherapy. Both beta-adrenoceptor antagonists also reduced intraocular pressure. Bevantolol caused significantly fewer adverse effects than propranolol with many fewer withdrawals during long-term therapy. This unique clinical pharmacologic profile of bevantolol enhances its therapeutic usefulness and may relate to alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist activity, as well as to its beta 1-selectivity.
 ...
PMID:Bevantolol vs propranolol: a double-blind controlled trial in essential hypertension. 289 12

Twenty-seven patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were randomized to receive therapy with either hydrochlorothiazide or diltiazem. After a placebo run-in period of 2 weeks, patients received increasing doses of either drug for 14 weeks. Those in whom hypertension was effectively controlled continued for 26 weeks of total treatment. Those not controlled, i.e. blood pressure greater than 140/90 mm Hg or less than 10 mm Hg reduction of pressure, were unblinded and crossed over to therapy with both drugs. Eleven of 14 patients (79%) were effectively treated with diltiazem alone, and 8 of 13 patients (62%) were effectively treated with hydrochlorothiazide alone. Supine blood pressures fell from 152 +/- 5/97 +/- 1 to 142 +/- 4/87 +/- 3 mm Hg in the 11 patients treated with diltiazem, from 152 +/- 2/99 +/- 1 to 134 +/- 3/88 +/- 2 mm Hg in the 8 patients treated with hydrochlorothiazide, and from 151 +/- 4/104 +/- 3 to 140 +/- 5/92 +/- 1 mm Hg in the 8 patients who received both drugs (p less than 0.01 for each group). Diltiazem patients had significant increases in alkaline phosphatase and urinary magnesium. Hydrochlorothiazide patients had increases in serum uric acid, serum globulin, CO2 content, and plasma renin activity. Serum potassium, serum chloride, urinary osmolality, and urinary calcium decreased after treatment with hydrochlorothiazide. Patients receiving both drugs had increases in serum glucose, serum BUN, serum uric acid, serum globulin, and CO2 content. These patients had decreased serum chloride and urinary calcium. Diltiazem monotherapy was comparable to hydrochlorothiazide in efficacy of lowering blood pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Renal-metabolic consequences of antihypertensive therapy with diltiazem versus hydrochlorothiazide. 332 Jul 20

Forty-four patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were entered in an open study to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the two diuretic combinations, frusemide (40 mg) plus amiloride (5 mg) and hydrochlorothiazide (50 mg) plus amiloride (5 mg), as first-line treatment. After a 2-week run-in period when no antihypertensive medication was given, patients were randomized to receive one or other combination at a dose of 1 tablet daily for 2 weeks. Patients either remained on this regimen for a further 8 weeks or, if their blood pressure was not controlled, dosage was increased to 2 tablets daily. In the latter case, patients were re-assessed after 2 weeks, and those who showed a positive response remained in the study for 8 additional weeks. In the 36 patients assessed (18 in each group), both treatments were found to reduce blood pressure effectively in a high percentage of patients treated. Hydrochlorothiazide/amiloride, however, caused a significant reduction in both plasma potassium and sodium levels whereas frusemide/amiloride did not. More adverse events were reported by patients taking frusemide/amiloride, but the majority of these were trivial.
 ...
PMID:An open study to compare the efficacy and tolerability of two diuretic combinations, frusemide plus amiloride and hydrochlorothiazide plus amiloride, in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. 337 Oct 85

In this study we compared the absorption and disposition of two commonly used combination formulations of hydrochlorothiazide and triamterene (Dyazide and Maxzide) in 48 patients with essential hypertension after dosing with each formulation to steady state. Interdose AUC and urinary recovery of hydrochlorothiazide, triamterene, and the major metabolite of triamterene, hydroxytriamterene sulfate (adjusted for dose), documented marked impairment in the absorption of hydrochlorothiazide (approximately two third as bioavailable) and triamterene (about half as bioavailable) from Dyazide in comparison to Maxzide. The study also demonstrated a reduction in the clearance of triamterene, hydrochlorothiazide, and hydroxytriamterene sulfate with increasing age. Linear correlation analyses suggested that this effect was a result of the reduction in renal function that occurs with increasing age.
 ...
PMID:Absorption and disposition of two combination formulations of hydrochlorothiazide and triamterene: influence of age and renal function. 373 85

Nitrendipine is a new nifedipine-like calcium antagonist antihypertensive agent. In this study, nitrendipine 5-40 mg orally bid was administered for up to three months to 16 patients with severe essential hypertension (untreated supine diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 115 mm Hg). Hydrochlorothiazide or propranolol or both were also given to patients who did not achieve goal blood pressure with nitrendipine alone. Five patients achieved goal blood pressure (supine less than or equal to 90 mm Hg) with nitrendipine alone and six more after the addition of a second drug, and only four required triple-drug therapy. One patient was terminated from the study because of headaches, a common nitrendipine side effect. This study demonstrates that nitrendipine is an effective and well-tolerated agent in the treatment of severe hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Effectiveness of a new calcium antagonist in severe hypertension. 379 49

Fifty patients with mild or moderate essential hypertension were randomized (double-blindly) to treatment with either captopril (n = 26) or atenolol (n = 24). Their mean supine diastolic blood pressure after placebo was 100-125 mmHg. The study included an initial dose finding phase (12 weeks) during which the dosages of captopril and atenolol were increased stepwise every second week in order to obtain normotension (supine diastolic blood pressure less than 95 mmHg). Hydrochlorothiazide was added when necessary. During the second phase of the study the patients were followed on active treatment for 2 years. After the initial 12 weeks of active treatment, recumbent and standing blood pressures had fallen significantly both in the captopril group (by 31/20 and 33/19 mmHg, p less than 0.001) and in the atenolol group (by 24/18 and 30/20 mmHg, p less than 0.01 (systolic), p less than 0.001 (diastolic)). The antihypertensive effect was maintained in both groups during long-term treatment. The antihypertensive effect of both agents was potentiated to the same extent by addition of hydrochlorothiazide. Side-effects were few and mild. It can be concluded that both captopril and atenolol are safe and effective antihypertensive drugs.
 ...
PMID:Long-term effects of captopril and atenolol in essential hypertension. 388 47

Pinacidil, a new cyanoguanidine derivative, is an antihypertensive agent with arteriolar vasodilating properties, which acts on precapillary resistance vessels. A trial was carried out in 30 patients with essential hypertension WHO I-II. The treatment period was divided into three phases. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and amiloride were administered for 4 weeks in Phase 1 and supine and standing blood pressure decreased significantly. During Phase 2 pinacidil was added to HCTZ/amiloride for the following 3 months. A further significant reduction in blood pressure was obtained. In the next period of treatment (Phase 3) patients were divided into two groups. For 1 month Group A (15 patients) received pinacidil alone and Group B (15 patients) received HCTZ/amiloride. Conventional laboratory blood tests in all patients remained unchanged during treatment. Reported side effects during Phase 2 were headache (2 patients), dizziness (3 patients), palpitations (2 patients) and ankle oedema (2 patients). Plasma renin activity was slightly increased at the end both of Phases 1 and 2. Plasma catecholamines were increased but not significantly at the end of Phase 2 as compared to Phase 1. The results indicate that pinacidil is effective in lowering blood pressure in mild to moderate essential hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Effect of pinacidil on blood pressure, plasma catecholamines and plasma renin activity in essential hypertension. 389 69


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>