Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0085580 (essential hypertension)
 14,686 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

General use of ambulatory noninvasive 24-h blood pressure monitoring in many patients has shown that new criteria for arterial hypertension are useful. A classification of circadian blood pressure in "dippers" and "nondippers" (no physiologic drop of blood pressure) needs to be specified. An altered circadian blood pressure profile, like that in nondippers, was used as a diagnostic criterion for secondary hypertension. Recent epidemiologic studies in patients with essential hypertension have shown that nondippers are at higher risk for cardiovascular complications such as myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular insult. The studies also revealed that sleep-related breathing disorders (SRBD) are characterized by increased cardiovascular risk. Increases in blood pressure caused by SRBD could be documented, with the highest amount occurring during REM sleep. A study performed in a general practice showed a high incidence (40/112) of nondippers in a group of snoring middle-aged men with obesity and daytime fatigue. This indicates diagnostic and therapeutic consequences for the control of 24-h blood pressure, including nocturnal breathing pattern and daytime symptoms due to SRBD. The goal of antihypertensive drug therapy is to reduce blood pressure significantly during the day and during the night in different stages of wakefulness and sleep. A new protocol was designed to investigate blood pressure over 24 h under a standardized load, including nocturnal hypertension. The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor cilazapril was used in this test procedure and showed a significant and clinically relevant mean blood pressure reduction of 10.0 mm Hg (versus placebo 4.3 mm Hg) over 24 h.
 ...
PMID:Nocturnal hypertension and cardiovascular risk: consequences for diagnosis and treatment. 789 92

Recent studies of obstructive sleep apnea and its comorbidity with other systemic diseases have stimulated interest in the relationship of apnea to renal disease and hypertension. Polysomnographic sleep studies in patients on dialysis who complain of day-time fatigue or sleepiness reveal significant apnea in up to 73% of those studied. Abnormalities in respiratory controller mechanisms from chronic hypocarbia, metabolic acidosis, and uremic toxins have been blamed for the occurrence of apnea in this setting. Proteinuria and sometimes nephrotic syndrome have been recognized in morbidly obese patients with sleep apnea syndrome. Renal biopsies of such patients have shown glomerulomegaly and focal segmental sclerosis. It is postulated that these lesions may result from increased glomerular filtration and blood flow. Elevated urine output, sodium and chloride excretion, and atrial natriuretic peptide have been well demonstrated in obstructive apnea patients and correct to control levels with treatment of the apnea. Both acute (with each apnea) and chronic daytime blood pressure elevation are frequently observed in sleep apnea patients, and occult sleep apnea is postulated as one possible cause of "primary" hypertension in middle-aged men. In younger patients, such hypertension seems to be more reversible with the elimination of apnea. In older patients, however, the cure of systemic hypertension cannot be guaranteed with the elimination of the apnea, and asymptomatic apnea patients tend not to tolerate the bother and discomfort of apnea treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Therefore, aside from a careful history regarding sleep symptomatology, polysomnographic studies of clinic populations with primary hypertension to search for apnea as a cause cannot be recommended.
 ...
PMID:Obstructive sleep apnea and the kidney. 830 38

Torasemide is a lipophilic anilinopyridine sulphonylurea derivative that acts as a high ceiling loop diuretic and has been used for the treatment of both acute and chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) and hypertension. Torasemide is similar to other loop diuretics in terms of its mechanism of diuretic action; namely, blockade of Na+/K+/2Cl- cotransport in the thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle. It has high bioavailability (> 80%), as does bumetanide, but a longer elimination half-life (3 to 4 hours) than either bumetanide or furosemide (frusemide). In the treatment of chronic CHF, oral torasemide (5 to 20 mg/day) has been shown to be an effective diuretic. Patients treated with torasemide for up to 1 year have reduced bodyweight, improved pulmonary haemodynamics, and decreased CHF severity. Intravenous torasemide (20 to 60mg as a single dose) has been shown to be as effective as furosemide in the treatment of acute CHF, and resulted in significant diuresis, bodyweight loss, and improved pulmonary haemodynamics and exercise performance. 'Non-diuretic' dosages (2.5 to 5 mg/day) of oral torasemide have been used to treat essential hypertension, both as monotherapy and in combination with other antihypertensive agents. When used in these dosages, torasemide lowered diastolic blood pressure (DBP) to below 90mm Hg in 8 to 12 weeks in 70 to 80% of patients. With dose doubling, this level of efficacy occurred in more than 90% of hypertensive patients. Clinical trials have established that blood pressure can be maintained at this level for at least 1 year with low dose torasemide. Torasemide is well tolerated in dosages up to 20 mg/day for at least 1 year. The most commonly reported adverse effects are those associated with loop diuretics in general. These include transient hypokalaemia, hyperuricaemia, dizziness, headache, gastrointestinal disturbances, orthostatic hypotension and fatigue. Adverse effects are comparable with those of other diuretics and rarely necessitate drug withdrawal.
 ...
PMID:Benefits and risks of torasemide in congestive heart failure and essential hypertension. 885 25

Valsartan competitively and selectively inhibits the actions of angiotensin II at the AT1 receptor subtype which is responsible for most of the known effects of angiotensin II. In clinical trials in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension valsartan was as effective as losartan, lisinopril, enalapril, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide. Addition of the latter reduced blood pressure in patients who did not respond sufficiently to valsartan monotherapy. Preliminary data also suggest valsartan may be effective in patients with severe essential hypertension. The drug was as effective as lisinopril as treatment for mild to moderate essential hypertension in patients with renal insufficiency and did not worsen renal function. Headache, dizziness and fatigue were the most common adverse events in placebo-controlled studies; the incidence of these adverse events was not significantly different between placebo and valsartan recipients. Compared with ACE inhibitors, valsartan was associated with a significantly lower incidence of dry cough. Thus, valsartan is an effective treatment for mild to moderate essential hypertension and may be particularly useful in patients who experience persistent cough during ACE inhibitor therapy.
 ...
PMID:Valsartan. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in essential hypertension. 925 84

The safety and tolerability of mibefradil, a selective T-type calcium channel antagonist, were evaluated in 3,430 patients with essential hypertension and chronic stable angina pectoris treated in 15 double-blind placebo and active-controlled clinical trials and 2 open-label, long-term safety studies. Of these patients, 2,636 were treated with the recommended doses of mibefradil (50 and 100 mg) and form the basis of this report. With the 50-mg dose of mibefradil, the incidence of each adverse event was similar to, or lower than, that observed in the placebo-treated patients. Treatment with the 100-mg dose was associated with a slightly higher incidence compared to placebo of dizziness (2.1% vs 1.8%), leg edema (3.5% vs 1.4%), fatigue (2.1% vs 1.4%), and lightheadedness (2.1% vs 0.4%). The incidence of headache (4.6%) and angina pectoris (1.1%) was more frequent in patients treated with placebo. In active-controlled trials, a lower incidence of pedal edema (5.1%) was observed with mibefradil compared to amlodipine (25.7%), diltiazem SR/CD (9.4%), or nifedipine SR/GITS (17.4%). Overall, mibefradil was better tolerated than amlodipine and nifedipine SR/GITS and was as well tolerated as diltiazem SR/CD. Rates of premature discontinuation due to clinically adverse experiences with the 50- and 100-mg doses were 2.5% and 3.5%, respectively, compared with placebo (3.5%). No consistent pattern of laboratory adverse experiences were observed for mibefradil. Sinus bradycardia (heart rate <45 beats/minute) and first-degree atrioventricular block were the only relevant treatment-emergent electrocardiographic changes that occurred more frequently with mibefradil than with placebo. No evidence of first-dose effects was observed in mibefradil-treated patients, and withdrawal effects were not observed in clinical trials. There were no clinically important differences in safety profiles in the demographic subgroups for age, gender, or race. The results of this comprehensive safety analysis indicate that treatment with the recommended doses of mibefradil is well tolerated and safe.
 ...
PMID:Safety of mibefradil, a new once-a-day, selective T-type calcium channel antagonist. 928 53

Losartan is a novel orally active nonpeptidal antihypertensive agent that specifically blocks the angiotensin II type 1 receptor. This paper compares the short- and long-term safety and tolerability of losartan with those of placebo. Approximately 3800 patients with mild-to-severe essential hypertension were enrolled in 16 double-masked and 4 open clinical trials worldwide. Of these, approximately 2900 were treated with losartan either alone or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs. These trials included patients with diabetes mellitus (n = 133). An additional 5 trials enrolled hypertensive patients with compromised renal function (n = 115) or heart failure (n = 220). Losartan dosages primarily ranged from 10 to 150 mg once daily, with most patients receiving 50 to 100 mg per day. Hypertension trials generally lasted 12 weeks. The most frequently reported adverse events were headache, upper respiratory tract infection, dizziness, and asthenia/fatigue, but only dizziness occurred more frequently (> or = 1%) in the losartan-treated groups. Cough occurred in 3.1% of patients treated with losartan and 2.6% of patients treated with placebo. The overall incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse events in the losartan- and placebo-treated groups was similar among patients with hypertension and either diabetes mellitus, renal impairment, or heart failure. The data suggest that losartan can be safely administered in hypertensive patients with concomitant illnesses. It can be considered for first-line therapy and is suitable as an alternative therapy in patients already experiencing side effects with other agents.
 ...
PMID:Clinical safety and tolerability of losartan. 937 6

Enalapril combined with an extended-release formulation of diltiazem was evaluated in a 12-week multicenter trial of 112 patients with Stages 3-4 essential hypertension. Patients were randomized to once daily therapy with enalapril 5 mg plus diltiazem ER 120 mg or 180 mg. Dosages could be titrated and other antihypertensive agents added for blood pressure control. Efficacy was assessed with sitting blood pressures at trough (24 hours postdose). Overall, there was a decrease of -21.7/-18.4 mmHg. Patients responding to enalapril/diltiazem ER alone had a reduction of -15.0/-16.3 mmHg. Of all patients, 70% achieved a trough sitting diastolic blood pressure of < 95 mmHg. Common drug-related adverse experiences were headache, dizziness, rash, and asthenia/fatigue. This once daily fixed-combination of enalapril/diltiazem ER was generally well tolerated and effective when given alone or with other antihypertensives in Stage 3-4 hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of enalapril combined with diltiazem ER in patients with stage 3-4 essential hypertension. 950 87

Nebivolol is a new selective beta 1-adrenergic blocking agent, that possesses a peculiar pharmacodynamic profile and an original chemical structure, by which it differs from traditional beta 1-blockers. Nebivolol is a racemic mixture of two enantiomers in equal ratios. It is endowed with a highly selective beta 1-blocking activity, and does not show an intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. Nebivolol is endowed with peripheral vasodilating properties mediated by the modulation of the endogenous production of nitric oxide. It does not significantly decrease airway conductance compared with atenolol and propranolol. Nebivolol does not compromise the left ventricular function, but it may increase stroke volume, and does not reduce heart inotropism during exertion. Nebivolol is quite safe and is well tolerated, also when compared to traditional beta-blockers. The most common adverse effects are dizziness, headache and fatigue. Owing to its combined dual mechanism of action, nebivolol leads to a unique haemodynamic and therapeutic profile by which it may be advantageous in essential hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and congestive heart failure.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacology of nebivolol. 999 Jun 50

Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combines an angiotensin II AT1 receptor blocker with a thiazide diuretic to produce additive blood pressure reductions without major effects on heart rate. HCTZ did not significantly alter valsartan pharmacokinetics; during combination therapy, HCTZ pharmacokinetics differed from those seen with HCTZ monotherapy. In clinical trials in patients with essential hypertension, adding HCTZ 12.5 or 25 mg/day to valsartan 80 mg/day resulted in a greater blood pressure reduction than increasing the valsartan dosage from 80 to 160 mg/day. The valsartan/HCTZ combination was generally more effective than either drug given alone. Efficacy of the combination was maintained during up to 3 years of treatment. Valsartan/HCTZ was well tolerated in both short and long term trials. The most common adverse events were dizziness, headache and fatigue. The overall incidence of adverse events with the combination was similar to that with placebo. HCTZ-induced hypokalaemia was less common during combination therapy.
 ...
PMID:Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide. 1035

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of transdermal clonidine in inner-city African-American and Hispanic-American patients with essential hypertension. A multiclinic open-label, prospective trial for 12 weeks was used. Dose titration was based on office blood pressure (BP) measurements of > 140/90 mm Hg. Clinical sites were community-based primary care centers. Untreated and treated hypertensive patients whose diastolic BP exceeded 90 mm Hg were administered transdermal clonidine at 0.1 mg or 0.2 mg delivery daily. The drug was titrated after 1 month if diastolic BP was greater than 90 mm Hg. At 12 weeks of treatment, change in blood pressure from baseline as well as adverse effects and patient satisfaction were assessed. A total of 357 patients entered the treatment phase of the study, and 315 patients (244 African-Americans, 67 Hispanic-Americans) had evaluable data. Transdermal clonidine significantly (P <.001) lowered BP in all patients by 15.7/12.8 +/- 18.1/9.6 mm Hg, and heart rate was reduced by 3 +/- 9 beats/min (P <.001). There were no differences in BP reduction according to race and ethnicity, gender, or age. The most common adverse effects were pruritus or discomfort at the patch site, dizziness, dry mouth, and fatigue. Eleven percent of the patients discontinued treatment because of one of these adverse effects. A large proportion of patients (67%) reported that transdermal clonidine was more convenient to use than oral therapy. Transdermal clonidine, alone or in combination with other antihypertensive therapies, significantly lowered BP and heart rate in inner-city hypertensive patients. The drug was generally well tolerated, with 89% of the patients remaining in the trial. Patient acceptability was high with the once-weekly treatment, which is an important feature for this particular hypertensive population.
 ...
PMID:Clinical experience with transdermal clonidine in African-American and Hispanic-American patients with hypertension: evaluation from a 12-week prospective, open-label clinical trial in community-based clinics. 1042 43


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next >>