Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0085580 (essential hypertension)
 14,686 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Although early experience with tiapamil, a new calcium antagonist structurally related to verapamil, showed good antihypertensive efficacy and minimal adverse effects, recent studies have shown conflicting results. This single-blind dose-titration study was designed to determine the therapeutic efficacy, duration of action, and safety profile of tiapamil in patients with essential hypertension. After a 2-week washout period, patients received placebo for 4 weeks. Patients with a sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) of 95-114 mm Hg received tiapamil 300 mg twice daily with dose increments of 150 mg twice daily every 2 weeks to a maximum of 1,200 mg/day. Once blood pressure (BP) control was achieved or patients were receiving 600 mg twice daily, they were followed up for an additional 2 weeks. Twenty of the initial 31 patients completed the trial, and 17 patients were receiving the highest dose of tiapamil. Nine patients dropped out because of adverse effects. No significant decreases in BP and heart rate (HR) were either noted by the clinic or apparent by 24-h ambulatory BP readings. Random assays of drug supplies showed that patients received the required dosage. The incidence of adverse effects rose with increasing doses of tiapamil: 27.6% of patients at 300 mg twice daily, 48% at 450 mg twice daily, and 81.8% at 600 mg twice daily. Dizziness, headache, and palpitations were the most frequent adverse effects. These results show that tiapamil given at a daily dose of 600-1,200 mg exhibits very little effect in lowering BP in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Moreover, the incidence of adverse effects is much higher than reported in earlier studies.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and tolerability of tiapamil in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. 247 8

The antihypertensive efficacy of a combination of calcium-channel blockers and angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in severe primary hypertension is well known, but a synergistic action of this drug combination in mild to moderate primary hypertension is still not established. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of monotherapy with nitrendipine (20 mg) or captopril (100 mg), and of their combination (nitrendipine 10 mg plus captopril 50 mg), in patients suffering from mild to moderate primary hypertension, according to a single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design. After the first 4-week monotherapy period, both nitrendipine and captopril induced a significant decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) (p less than 0.001). Furthermore, nitrendipine caused a significant increase in heart rate (HR), while no change in HR was observed in patients treated with captopril. Several side effects were observed, both in the nitrendipine-treated patients (facial flushing, headache, malleolar edema) and in the captopril-treated patients (initial hypotension, dizziness, gastrointestinal disorders). However, these side effects were mild and were well tolerated. In the second combined 4-week therapy period, systolic and diastolic BP of patients treated with 10 mg nitrendipine combined with 50 mg captopril continued to decrease to a degree significantly lower (p less than 0.001) than that observed at the end of the monotherapy period. Simultaneously, no change in HR values occurred when compared to basal values. Furthermore, the incidence and intensity of some side effects observed during the combined therapy period were lower than those of the monotherapy period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Calcium-channel blockade (nitrendipine) in combination with ACE inhibition (captopril) in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. 248 3

In order to develop the tentative criteria of the differential diagnosis, 18 patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (OHCMP), 3 with nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (NOHCMP), 8 with essential hypertension (EH) with inadequate left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and 10 normal persons were subjected to clinical examination and to ultracardiosonography. The patients with OHCMP mainly complained of dizziness and syncopes. Since childhood they had systolic murmur and ECG abnormalities. Ultracardiosonography showed asymmetrical LVH, a considerable decrease of the ventricular cavity as well as abnormalities of the localization and function of the papillary muscles. NOHCMP was marked by the combination of the good well-being of the patients with gross abnormalities on the ECG. Ultracardiosonography demonstrated moderately pronounced and asymmetrical LVH. The group suffering from EH with inadequate LVH was characterized by the early development of severe circulatory failure with arterial hypertension of moderate intensity. The changes in the architectonics of the left ventricle and its subvalvular structures turned out to be similar to those in OHCMP but were less remarkable.
 ...
PMID:[The differential diagnosis of various forms of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and hypertension with inadequate left ventricular hypertrophy]. 253 35

Although calcium antagonists may impair insulin release in vitro, clinical studies have produced conflicting results. Felodipine is a highly selective dihydropyridine calcium antagonist effective in the treatment of hypertension. The efficacy of felodipine was assessed in a double-blind randomized placebo cross-over study of 21 Type 2 diabetic patients with primary hypertension, 13 men and 8 women, with an age of 61 (range 46-73) years. Thirteen were controlled on oral hypoglycaemic therapy and 8 on diet alone. Mean (SD) blood pressure (mmHg) was 176(20)/102(8) after a 2-4 week placebo run-in period, 169(21)/101(8) during the subsequent placebo period compared with 151(15)/88(9) after 4 weeks felodipine therapy (p less than 0.001). Nineteen patients required 5 mg twice daily and 2 patients 10 mg twice daily to achieve a target diastolic pressure of 95 mmHg. Side-effects seen with felodipine included ankle oedema, facial flushing, headache, and dizziness. During oral glucose tolerance tests performed after the felodipine and placebo phases, mean (SD) fasting blood glucose was 9.5(3.1) and 9.0(3.0) mmol l-1, respectively (NS), and the 90 min (peak) blood glucose was 19.1(4.8) and 18.1(4.8) mmol l-1, respectively (NS). Glycosylated haemoglobin and fructosamine concentrations likewise showed no significant changes.
 ...
PMID:A trial of the calcium antagonist felodipine in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients. 253 42

Twenty Nigerians with labile essential hypertension (LEH) were asked to record their blood pressure and pulse rate for 14-16 hours using the Remler Portable Ambulatory Blood Pressure Recorder while exposing themselves to the stress of Lagos traffic. The average blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) and pulse rate for the test day (ASBP, ADBP and APR) were determined in a cross-over randomised open design before (C), after one week on placebo bidaily (P1), after one week on bromazepam 1.5 mg bidaily (B), after one week on placebo bidaily (P2) and after one week on labetalol 100 mg bidaily (L). Allocation to the active drugs was randomised. All drugs were administered at 8.00a.m. and 8.00p.m. respectively. The maximum blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) and pulse rate MxSBP, MxDBP and MxPR were similarly determined. Both B and L significantly reduced ASBP, ADBP, APR, MxSBP, MxDBP and MxPR but L produced a much greater reduction in the above parameters than B. Side effects observed included drowsiness with B (two subjects) and postural dizziness with L (one subject). Both drugs were effective in controlling LEH but L was more effective than B in reducing stress hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Comparative effects of labetalol and bromazepam on ambulatory blood pressure of Nigerians with labile and stress hypertension. 256 2

Selective alpha 1 adrenergic receptor blocking agents lower blood pressure by reducing the increased peripheral vascular resistance that characterizes essential hypertension. Prazosin and terazosin have been shown to be well tolerated in clinical practice and seldom cause impotence or metabolic abnormalities. The most common adverse effects--dizziness, headache, and asthenia--are generally well tolerated and infrequently lead to discontinuation of therapy. First-dose syncope can usually be avoided by initiating therapy with low doses administered at bedtime. Finally, the alpha 1 receptor antagonists do not adversely affect such cardiovascular risk factors as hypokalemia, serum lipid profile, and left ventricular hypertrophy. In fact, alpha 1 antagonists reduce total cholesterol and low-density-lipoprotein plus very-low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and thus may contribute to the overall management of cardiovascular risk by blood pressure reduction and improvement of the serum lipid profile. Since the goal of treating chronic essential hypertension is to improve morbidity and mortality, the choice of therapy should be influenced by the agent's ability to modify as many risk factors as possible. Alpha 1 adrenoreceptor antagonists beneficially impact several cardiovascular risk factors and thus merit consideration as first-line antihypertensive therapy.
 ...
PMID:New perspectives on selective alpha 1 blockade. 257 43

In a multicentre open trial involving 229 investigators, cicletanine, a new antihypertensive agent, was administered orally in doses of 50 to 100 mg/day either alone (1,238 patients) or combined with another drug (430 patients). In this second group of patients with essential hypertension whose BP had not been normalized by a beta-blocker (n = 157), a calcium inhibitor (n = 67), an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (n = 134) or an alpha-blocker (n = 7), cicletanine normalized BP (less than 160/95 mmHg) in 48.8% of the patients and significantly lowered BP values which fell from 177.7 +/- 15.9/103.3 +/- 6.3 mmHg to 157.2 +/- 17.6/88.8 +/- 8.7 mmHg. The addition of cicletanine to treatments with beta-blockers, calcium inhibitors and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors normalized BP in 48%, 52% and 47% of patients respectively. A significant reduction of symptoms was noted, notably as regards headache, dizziness, palpitations, lower limb oedema, asthenia, auditory disorders and dyspnoea. The side-effects reported (headache, dizziness, gastralgia, nausea, pruritus) were minor and non-specific; they accounted for the withdrawal of only 8 patients. The only significant, though moderate, biochemical variations observed were decreases in natremia and cholesterolaemia unconfirmed by qualitative analysis. Altogether, cicletanine proved to be effective and well tolerated when administered in combination with other antihypertensive drugs belonging to three main therapeutic classes.
 ...
PMID:[Antihypertensive effectiveness and tolerance of cicletanine. Results obtained with bitherapy]. 257 67

The antihypertensive effectiveness and the clinical and biochemical safety of cicletanine were evaluated in 84 patients (28 women, 56 men) presenting with permanent essential hypertension without severe cardiovascular complications. The hypertension was insufficiently controlled by a beta-blocker, a centrally acting antihypertensive drug or nifedipine. After 3 months of treatment during which cicletanine was added to each of these three classes of drugs, there was a significant fall of systolic arterial pressure (-18 mmHg with beta-blockers, -17 mmHg with central agents and -26 mmHg with nifedipine) and diastolic arterial pressure (-22, -21 and -28 mmHg respectively), resulting in normalization of blood pressure (less than 160/95 mmHg) in 63%, 43% and 50% respectively of patients in each therapeutic group. The fall of blood pressure was accompanied by a significant decrease of functional symptoms (headache, palpitations, dizziness); in the nifedipine group, the addition of cicletanine resulted in complete regression of anginal attacks. The therapeutic combinations were well tolerated; only two patients were excluded from the study for undesirable effects unascribable to cicletanine. Otherwise, the side-effects observed were minor. The biochemical values measured did not significantly vary, and the variations noted were of small amplitude.
 ...
PMID:[Cicletanine administered with other antihypertensive agents]. 257 68

The efficacy and safety of prazosin GITS (gastro-intestinal therapeutic system), a new extended-release once-a-day formulation, were assessed both as monotherapy in mild essential hypertension and in combination with a diuretic in moderate essential hypertension in two multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Prazosin GITS (Minipress XL) given once daily in doses of either 10 or 20 mg significantly reduced sitting and standing systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared with placebo in both mild and moderate essential hypertension. There were minimal, clinically insignificant changes in heart rate following prazosin-GITS treatment (2.5, 10, and 20 mg) compared with placebo treatment. Prazosin GITS was well tolerated; the most common adverse experiences reported were headache, dizziness, and fatigue. All adverse experiences in the moderate hypertension group and the majority (91 percent) in the mild hypertension group were mild-to-moderate in severity. The results from these multicenter trials demonstrate the efficacy and safety of this new extended-release once-a-day formulation of prazosin in the treatment of patients with mild and moderate essential hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of Minipress XL, a new once-a-day formulation of prazosin. 266 73

1. The antihypertensive efficacy of a long acting formulation of the calcium channel blocking drug, nicardipine, was assessed using clinic and ambulatory (Remler M2,000) blood pressure measurements. 2. Eleven patients with essential hypertension (mean +/- s.e. mean; 173 +/- 6.6/103 +/- 1.9 mmHg) completed a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. The dose of nicardipine used was 60 mg twice daily for 4 weeks. 3. Mean ambulatory blood pressure was reduced from 164 +/- 5.3/97 +/- 2.9 to 151 +/- 5.2/88 +/- 2.4 mmHg (P less than 0.01); this effect was shown to be sustained for 8 h after the morning dose. Mean ambulatory heart rate was not significantly affected by treatment. 4. Clinic lying systolic blood pressure was reduced on treatment from 169 +/- 7.1 to 157 +/- 5.9 mmHg (P less than 0.2) and diastolic blood pressure from 99 +/- 3.6 to 89 +/- 3.9 mmHg (P less than 0.05). 5. One patient was withdrawn because of dizziness and flushing while on nicardipine; vasodilatory side effects such as headache, palpitations and flushing on nicardipine were noted by three patients. 6. We conclude that the long acting formulation of nicardipine studied in a dose of 60 mg twice daily is effective as monotherapy and is relatively well tolerated in mild hypertension. 7. This study highlights the importance of ambulatory blood pressure measurement in detecting significant changes in blood pressure, thereby permitting the study of small numbers of patients.
 ...
PMID:The effect of slow-release nicardipine on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in mild hypertension. 267 16


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>