Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0085580 (essential hypertension)
 14,686 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The efficacy of fixed dose PGE2 (prostaglandin E2) in inducing labor was studied in 40 multiparous patients. Low amniotomy was performed, and 1 tablet of 6.5 mg PGE2 was given orally in the absence of uterine activity after 30 minutes, and hourly thereafter until the patient delivered. Successful induction was defined as the establishment of effective uterine contractions and cervical dilatation within 12 hours of amniotomy. Indications for induction are postmaturity (n=15); pre-eclampsia (n=10); essential hypertension (n=6); weight loss (n=4); bad obstetric history (n=2); and others (n=3). 38 patients (95 percent) had successful labor induction, with 37 delivering vaginally within 18 hours of amniotomy and 1 delivering by Cesarian section because of fetal distress. In the remaining 2 patients, labor did not commence within 12 hours and consequently necessitated intravenous oxytocin. Mean amniotomy-delivery interval was 7.53 hours. Maternal side effects included vomiting (12.5%); diarrhea (5%); pyrexia (15%); ketonuria (22.5%); and postpartum hemorrhage (12.5%). There were no apparent fetal side effects. Advantages of oral PGE2 for labor induction include: 1) ease of administration; 2) increased patient acceptability; 3) greater convenience for medical and nursing staff; 4) absence of complications associated with intravenous infusion such as sudden changes in infusion rate, air emboli or occasional pyrogen reactions. Advantages of using a low fixed dose are: 1) excessive administration and subsequent uterine hypertonus are less likely to occur; 2) low incidence of vomiting/diarrhea; and 3) absence of uterine hypertonus and apparent fetal side effects.
 ...
PMID:Fixed dose prostaglandin E2 tablets in the induction of labour in multipara. 108 93

Dilevalol, the RR-stereoisomer of labetalol, is a non-cardioselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist with substantial partial beta 2-agonist and negligible alpha 1-blocking activity. Reduction in blood pressure during dilevalol administration is associated with peripheral vasodilatation, and heart rate remains essentially unchanged. Following oral administration, dilevalol is completely absorbed. Once-daily administration is possible, due to a long elimination half-life. Large well-controlled trials reveal that dilevalol is equivalent in antihypertensive efficacy to metoprolol, the ACE inhibitors captopril and enalapril, and the calcium antagonist nifedipine. Smaller noncomparative and comparative trials demonstrate the blood pressure-lowering effects of dilevalol and suggest an efficacy at least equivalent to that of the 'pure' beta-blockers atenolol and propranolol and the alpha 1-blockers urapidil and doxazosin. Dilevalol appears to be well tolerated, the most frequent adverse effects being dizziness, headache and diarrhoea in only about 7% of patients each. Unlike alpha 1-blockers and labetalol, dilevalol is not commonly associated with orthostatic hypotension. Thus, data suggest that dilevalol, with its distinctive pharmacological profile, is likely to be a useful addition to the options currently available for treating patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Dilevalol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in hypertension. 218 2

Recently there has been extensive development of orally active angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in addition to those already marketed, for example, captopril, enalapril, lisinopril and ramipril. It was initially thought that ACE inhibitors were likely to be most useful as antihypertensive agents in conditions in which circulating renin and angiotensin II were elevated. However, it is now clear that they can also lower arterial pressure when plasma renin is not high. In addition, they have beneficial effects in cardiac failure. Thus, captopril, enalapril, lisinopril and ramipril can be used in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension either alone or in conjunction with diuretics or calcium antagonists. Broadly speaking, efficacy appears to be similar to that of beta-blockers or diuretics. Unfortunately, however, there are no long term studies comparing one ACE inhibitor with another or with other classes of antihypertensive agents. Furthermore, there are no prognostic studies which show that use of ACE inhibitors reduces morbidity or mortality in hypertension. Many new ACE inhibitors are undergoing clinical assessment, including alacepril, cilazapril, fosenopril, perindopril, quinapril and ramipril. The drugs vary, in that some exist in the active form whereas others are prodrugs which are converted to the active agent following absorption. In addition they each possess one of several ligands, for example, carboxyl, phosphinyl or sulfhydryl groups, and so vary in their affinity for ACE. Although many of these agents are renally excreted, a small number are metabolised via the liver (e.g. quinapril and spirapril) and this may prove advantageous in the presence of renal impairment. In common with captopril and enalapril, the new ACE inhibitors inhibit the renin-angiotensin system and initial results suggest that they are effective in lowering blood pressure in essential hypertension. Furthermore, they reduce systemic vascular resistance in the absence of a reflex tachycardia. There are a number of adverse effects which are attributable to the pharmacological mechanism of the ACE inhibitors as a group; these include hypotension, particularly in patients with high renin levels, prior diuretic use, renal impairment or in the elderly. Additional adverse effects may relate to chemical structure. The high incidence of adverse effects noted in early studies related to excess dosage and to the presence of a sulfhydryl group, which the more recently developed ACE inhibitors lack. The adverse effects most commonly reported with established and new ACE inhibitors include headache and fatigue, cough, skin rashes, hypotension and diarrhoea. As a group, ACE inhibitors have an acceptable but not negligible adverse effect burden.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and moderate hypertension. 222 19

In this multicentre controlled single blind trial the effectiveness and safety of cicletanine (100 mg/day) were compared with those of enalapril (20 mg/day) and of the combination of both drugs in the same doses in 72 patients (41 men, 31 women, mean age 64.1 +/- 8.3 years) with permanent moderate essential hypertension without severe cardiovascular complications. In the course of the trial, one patient in each of the three therapeutic groups was excluded either for insufficient effectiveness in monotherapy or for photosensitization under the combined treatment. After two months of treatment, the fall in blood pressure and the number of patients with normalized BP were similar in the groups treated with cicletanine or enalapril alone. In contrast, the cicletanine-enalapril combination produced a significantly greater fall of diastolic arterial pressure than cicletanine alone. In addition, there was a greater reduction of functional symptoms associated with arterial hypertension. Apart from the lone case of photosensitization observed with the combined treatment, only minor side-effects were encountered, including an episode of diarrhoea and a case of extrasystoles with the combination, and a case or nausea with lipothymia under cicletanine alone. There were no significant variations of biochemical values.
 ...
PMID:[Evaluation of the effectiveness of a cicletanine-enalapril combination in hypertensive patients]. 255 22

The effectiveness and safety of diltiazem monotherapy was evaluated in 29 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (diastolic pressure between 95 and 115 mmHg). There were 16 men and 13 women, ages ranged from 29 to 58 years (mean 43). After a 2-week placebo period, each patient was given a 60 mg diltiazem tablet three times a day for 8 weeks. Blood pressure and heart rate were determined at weekly clinic visits. Three patients were withdrawn from the study because of a skin rash, palpitation and a frequent loose stool, respectively. In the remaining 26 patients, the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were reduced significantly in 2 weeks of therapy and thereafter. At the end of the 8-week treatment the mean supine blood pressure decreased from 158/103 at baseline to 139/94 mmHg, the mean sitting blood pressure from 156/104 to 136/93 mmHg, and the mean standing blood pressure from 151/104 to 134/96 mmHg. The heart rate did not change significantly before or during diltiazem treatment. In 16 (61.5%) of the 26 patients, diltiazem consistently reduced the diastolic blood pressure more than 5 mmHg throughout 2 to 8 weeks of treatment. The left ventricular mass and ejection fraction assessed with M-mode echocardiograms were normal before diltiazem treatment, and remained unchanged 8 weeks after the treatment. By using treadmill exercise tests, there was a significant increase in exercise duration and a significant reduction in the peak heart rate at 8 weeks after the treatment. The peak systolic blood pressure did not change significantly.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Diltiazem as monotherapy in treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. 269 94

A randomised double blind parallel group study was performed to compare the efficacy and acceptability of slow release nifedipine (maximum dose 40 mg twice a day) with those of atenolol (maximum dose 100 mg once a day) as single agents for the treatment of essential hypertension. Of 410 patients recruited almost exclusively from general practices in 22 centres in the United Kingdom 210 received nifedipine and 200 atenolol. Both drugs significantly reduced blood pressure, and control--a reduction of the diastolic pressure to less than 95 mm Hg--was obtained in about 65% of patients. Those who received nifedipine had more pronounced reductions in systolic pressure than those who received atenolol. One hundred and forty nine patients who failed to respond adequately to either atenolol or nifedipine in low doses were given both drugs once daily for eight weeks in a fixed combination capsule that contained atenolol 50 mg and nifedipine 20 mg. All patients showed further reductions in blood pressure, although those who were taking beta atenolol before the combination capsule had more pronounced reductions in systolic pressures. Twenty six patients (12%) were withdrawn because of adverse effects while taking nifedipine compared with 19 (10%) taking atenolol. Flushing and oedema were more common after the calcium antagonist, whereas diarrhoea and dyspepsia were more common after atenolol. The frequencies of headaches, dizziness, fatigue, and dyspnoea were equally distributed between the two groups. When the fixed combination capsule was taken side effects such as flushing and oedema continued. Nifedipine was more effective than atenolol in lowering systolic blood pressure, although neither drug used alone controlled the pressure of more than two thirds of the patients studied. When used in a fixed combination slightly better control of blood pressure was achieved with a lower dose of each drug.
 ...
PMID:Nifedipine and atenolol singly and combined for treatment of essential hypertension: comparative multicentre study in general practice in the United Kingdom. Nifedipine-Atenolol Study Review Committee. 289 83

Atenolol and metoprolol are the two most widely used beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonists in the treatment of essential hypertension. Differences in their physico-chemical properties have been the basis of a number of clinical studies whose primary or secondary objective has been to compare subjective well-being during treatment with these beta-selective blockers. The results are, however, contradictory, mainly due to factors such as open study design, different dose regimens and dissimilar study populations. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare subjective well-being during treatment with atenolol (50 mg o.d.) and metoprolol CR (100 mg o.d.) in a randomized double-blind, cross-over study (2 x 6 weeks) in hypertensives not previously treated with either of the drugs studied. Two self-administered questionnaires (MSE-profile and Jern quality of life questionnaire) were filled in both before randomization and before follow up visits at 1, 3 and 6 weeks in each treatment period. Furthermore, subjective symptoms, blood pressure and heart rate were monitored. At the end of the study, patients were requested to state what treatment they preferred. Atenolol and metoprolol CR were found to be equally effective in reducing blood pressure (from 159/98 to 144/87 and 144/88 mm Hg, respectively, n = 74). The MSE-profile and the Jern quality of life questionnaire could not detect any differences between the two treatments as regards general well-being. Other subjective symptoms (e.g. diarrhoea, bradycardia, cold hands and feet) were uncommon and equally distributed among atenolol and metoprolol patients. 31 of the patients preferred metoprolol CR, 23 atenolol, while 20 had no preference.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:No difference in general well-being during antihypertensive treatment with atenolol or metoprolol CR. 325 Mar 17

Seventeen unselected patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension and whose average supine blood pressure after two months' observation with no treatment was 154/100 mm Hg were entered into a double blind randomised crossover study of one month's treatment with magnesium aspartate (15 mmol magnesium/day) and treatment with placebo for a further month. This preparation of magnesium was well tolerated and did not cause diarrhoea. Despite a significant increase in plasma magnesium concentration and a significant increase in urinary excretion of magnesium while taking magnesium aspartate there was no fall in blood pressure compared with either treatment with placebo or values before treatment. The results provide no evidence for a role of dietary magnesium in the regulation of high blood pressure and are contrary to recent speculations.
 ...
PMID:Lack of effect of oral magnesium on high blood pressure: a double blind study. 392 35

Prostaglandins are naturally occurring compounds which are easily separable from other biologically active substances because of its acidic lipid nature. They are divided into 4 series, the A, B, E, and Falpha series, which differ in the structure of the characteristic 5-membered ring. Prostaglandins play a role in the following reproductive functions: 1) conception; 2) luteolysis; 3) menstruation; and 4) parturition. It has also been proposed that Prostaglandin A may be the natriuretic hormone, the circulating hormone which controls sodium reabsorption by the kidney. The experiments of Lee and Ferguson in which prostaglandins inhibited PAH uptake by rabbit renal cortex slices in vitro support this view. Prostaglandins are also implicated 1) in the fluid transfer in the gut; 2) as causative agents of diarrhea that accompanies medullary carcinoma of the thyroid or neural crest tumors; 3) in reducing blood pressure in humans with essential hypertension; 4) in fatty acid metabolism, including lipolysis; and 5) as mediators of the inflammatory response. Further research in prostaglandins will establish the validity of the proposed physiologic or pathologic functions of prostaglandins.
 ...
PMID:Functions of prostaglandins. 458 48

Alpha methyltyrosine (alpha-MPT) was administered to 52 patients from 4 days to 10 months; 22 patients were cases of pheochromocytoma and 20 had essential hypertension. Inhibition of catecholamine synthesis in the range of 50-80% was achieved with divided daily drug dosage of from 1.0 to 4.0 g. Striking clinical benefit was noted in patients with pheochromocytoma in whom the drug was used in preparation for surgery and during chronic medical management. The drug appeared to have limited usefulness when used in essential hypertension, unless added to existing therapy with conventional agents. No beneficial effects were noted in thyrotoxicosis, glaucoma, and Raynaud's phenomenon. Untoward effects in order of decreasing incidence were: sedation (with insomnia on withdrawal), anxiety, tremor, diarrhea, and galactorrhea. Drug crystalluria, which has been observed in animals and is currently restrictive of clinical trials, was not observed in these studies. Evidence is presented that the minor conversion of alpha-MPT to methyldopa probably does not contribute significantly to the central and peripheral effects of the drug.
 ...
PMID:Biochemical and pharmacologic effects of alpha-methyltyrosine in man. 563 45


1 2 3 Next >>